1887
Volume 28, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Overlapping bundles, that is, shorter lexical bundles that are totally or partially embedded in longer expressions, may prove problematic in the structural and functional classification of bundles. For example, many studies in the literature focus only on four-word lexical bundles and conduct extensive structural and functional analysis of those bundles. However, most scholars have not considered the fact that some 4-word expressions may be embedded in longer expressions. These longer expressions may not only have a different structure but may also carry out a different functional role. The present study introduces the (), a software tool designed to facilitate lexical bundle research with independent observations of each lexical bundle identified. First, we describe complete overlapping, complete subsumption, and interlocking bundles in detail. We then explain how deals with these types of bundles when detected.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.21100.cor
2023-02-23
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ädel, A., & Erman, B.
    (2012) Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes, 31(2), 81–92. 10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, S.
    (1970) Frequency Dictionary of Present-Day Swedish Based on Newspaper Material, 1: Graphic Words. Almqvist & Wiksell.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Altenberg, B.
    (1993) Recurrent word combinations in spoken English. InJ. Aarts & W. Meijs (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Nordic Association for English Studies Conference (pp. 17–27). University of Iceland.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Altenberg, B., & Eeg-Olofsson, M.
    (1990) Phraseology in spoken English: Presentation of a project. InD’Arcy, J. (Ed.), Theory and Practice in Corpus Linguistics, (pp. 1–26). Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bestgen, Y.
    (2017) Getting rid of the Chi-square and Log-likelihood tests for analysing vocabulary differences between corpora. Quaderns de Filologia-Estudis Lingüístics, 221, 33–56. 10.7203/qf.22.11299
    https://doi.org/10.7203/qf.22.11299 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V.
    (2003) Lexical bundles in speech and writing: An initial taxonomy. InA. Wilson, P. Rayson, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech (pp. 71–92). Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English Harlow. Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Candarli, D., & Jones, S.
    (2019) Paradigmatic influences on lexical bundles in research articles in the discipline of education. Corpora14(2), 237–263. 10.3366/cor.2019.0170
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2019.0170 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Y. H., & Baker, P.
    (2010) Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 30–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. (2016) Investigating criterial discourse features across second language development: Lexical bundles in rated learner essays, CEFR B1, B2 and C1. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 849–880.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cortes, V.
    (2004) Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423. 10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2006) Teaching lexical bundles in the disciplines: An example from a writing intensive history class. Linguistics and Education, 17(4), 391–406. 10.1016/j.linged.2007.02.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2007.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2013) The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33–43. 10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2015) Situating lexical bundles in the formulaic language spectrum: Origins and functional analysis development. InV. Cortes & E. Csomay (Eds.), Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber (pp. 197–218). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.66.09cor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.66.09cor [Google Scholar]
  15. (2020) Lexical bundles as building blocks in discourse: The case of three-word bundles. Webinar presented at thePontifical Catholic University of São Paulo, Brazil, LAEL 50th Anniversary Webinar Series. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUpHEf2_w3I
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2022) Lexical bundles in English for Academic Purposes. InR. R. Jablonkai & E. Csomay (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Corpora in English Language Teaching (pp. 220–233). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003002901‑18
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003002901-18 [Google Scholar]
  17. Doddington, G.
    (2002) Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. InM. Marcus (Ed.), Proceedings of the ARPA Workshop on Human Language Technology (pp. 138–145). Morgan Kaufmann. 10.3115/1289189.1289273
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1289189.1289273 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gilmore, A., & Millar, N.
    (2018) The language of civil engineering research articles: A corpus-based approach. English for Specific Purposes, 511, 1–17. 10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jalali, H.
    (2014) Examining novices’ selection of lexical bundles: The case of EFL postgraduate students in applied linguistics. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 1(2), 1–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M.
    (1986) Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 422–431. 10.1037/0033‑2909.99.3.422
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.422 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lake, W.
    (2020) Seeking the Unseen Humanities Macrostructures: The Use of Corpus- and Genre-assisted Research Methodologies to Analyze Written Norms in English and Spanish Literary Criticism Articles. [Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University]. ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/alesl_diss/56/
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lake, W., & Cortes, V.
    (2020a) Using lexical bundles to reassess disciplinary norms in Spanish & English humanities and social science writing. InU. Römer, V. Cortes, & E. Friginal (Eds.), Advances in Corpus-based Research on Academic Writing (pp. 184–203). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.95.08lak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.08lak [Google Scholar]
  23. (2020b) Comparing lexical bundles in Spanish and English psychology methods sections. InE. Friginal & J. Hardy (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Corpus Approaches to Discourse Analysis (pp. 334–353). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429259982‑20
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429259982-20 [Google Scholar]
  24. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M.
    (2015) Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315750606
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750606 [Google Scholar]
  25. Oakes, M., & Farrow, M.
    (2007) Use of the Chi-Squared Test to examine vocabulary differences in English language corpora representing seven different countries. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 221, 85–99. 10.1093/llc/fql044
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fql044 [Google Scholar]
  26. Pan, F., Reppen, R., & Biber, D.
    (2016) Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in Telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 211, 60–71. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.11.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.11.003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Plonsky, L., & Ghanbar, H.
    (2018) Multiple regression in L2 research: A methodological synthesis and guide to interpreting R2 values. The Modern Language Journal, 102(4), 713–731. 10.1111/modl.12509
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12509 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ribeck, J., & Borin, L.
    (2014) Lexical bundles in Swedish secondary school textbooks. InZ. Vetulani & J. Mariani (Eds.), Human Language Technology Challenges for Computer Science and Linguistics (pp. 238–249). Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑08958‑4_20
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08958-4_20 [Google Scholar]
  29. Shin, Y., Cortes, V., & Yoo, I. W.
    (2018) Using lexical bundles as a tool to analyze definite article use in L2 academic writing: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 391, 29–41. 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  30. Shin, Y., & Kim, Y.
    (2017) Using lexical bundles to teach articles to L2 English learners of different proficiencies. System, 691, 79–91. 10.1016/j.system.2017.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.08.002 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.21100.cor
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.21100.cor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error