Tracing facework over time using semi-automated methods

References

1. Archer, D.
   (2014) Exploring verbal aggression in English historical texts using USAS: The possibilities, the problems and potential solutions. In I. Taavitsainen , A. H. Jucker & J. Tuominen (Eds.), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, (pp.277–301). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.243.17arc
   https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.243.17arc [Google Scholar]
2. Archer, D.
   (2015) Slurs, insults, (backhanded) compliments and other strategic facework moves. Language Sciences52, 82–97. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2015.03.008
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.03.008 [Google Scholar]
3. Baron, A. , & Rayson, P.
   (2008, May). VARD 2: A tool for dealing with spelling variation in historical corpora. Paper presented at thePostgraduate Conference in Corpus Linguistics, Birmingham, UK.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baumeister, R. F.
   (1987) How the self became a problem: A psychological review of historical research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 163–76. doi: 10.1037/0022‑3514.52.1.163
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.163 [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, P. , & Levinson, S. C.
   (1987) Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chilton, P.
   (2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London/New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cockcroft, R. , & Cockcroft, S.
   (2005) Persuading People: An Introduction to Rhetoric (2nd. ed.). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Crewe, E.
   (2005) Lords of Parliament: Manners, Rituals and Politics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Culpeper, J.
   (2011) Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511975752
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752 [Google Scholar]
10. Culpeper, J. , & Demmen, J.
    (2011) Nineteenth-century English politeness: Negative politeness, conventional indirect requests and the rise of the individual self. In M. Bax & D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), Understanding Historical (Im)politeness (pp.49–80). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0025‑9
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0025-9 [Google Scholar]
11. Dunning, T.
    (1993) Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics, 19(1), 61–74.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eelen, G.
    (2001) A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome’s Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Farrelly, M. , & Seoane, E.
    (2012) Democratization. In T. Nevalainen & E. C. Traugott (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of The History of English (pp.392–401). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fetzer, A. , & Bull, P.
    (2012) Doing leadership in political speech: Semantic processes and pragmatic inferences. Discourse & Society, 23(2), 127–144. doi: 10.1177/0957926511431510
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431510 [Google Scholar]
15. Finch, E. , & Fafinski, S.
    (2015) Legal Skills. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/he/9780198718840.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198718840.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
16. Goffman, E.
    (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Goffman, E.
    (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Harris, S.
    (2001) Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse & Society, 12(4), 451–472. doi: 10.1177/0957926501012004003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012004003 [Google Scholar]
19. Johnson, A. , & Clifford, R.
    (2011) Polite incivility in defensive attack: Strategic politeness and impoliteness in cross-examination in the David Irving vs. Penguin Books Ltd and Deborah Lipstadt trial. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture, 7(1), 43–71. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2011.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2011.003 [Google Scholar]
20. Jones, E. E. , & Pittman, T. S.
    (1982) Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. M. Suls (Eds.), Psychological Perspectives of the Self (pp.231–62). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Jucker, A. H.
    (2012) Changes in politeness cultures. In T. Nevalainen & E. C. Traugott (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of The History of English (pp.422–433). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Jucker, A. & Taavitsainen, I.
    (2000) Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 1(1), 67–95. doi: 10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc [Google Scholar]
23. Kopytko, R.
    (1995) Against rationalistic pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 475–91. doi: 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00004‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00004-X [Google Scholar]
24. Leech, G. N. , Hundt, M. , Mair, C. , & Smith, N.
    (2009) Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
25. Levinson, S. C.
    (1992) Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp.66–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Locher, M. , & Watts, R.
    (2008) Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In D. Bousfield & M. Locher (Eds.), Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice (pp.77–100). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110208344
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208344 [Google Scholar]
27. May, E. , & Sweetman, J. F.
    (Eds.) (1989) Erskine May’s Treatise on the Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament (21st ed.) London: Butterworths.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Penman, R.
    (1990) Facework & politeness: Multiple goals in courtroom discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 9(1/2), 15–38. doi: 10.1177/0261927X9091002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X9091002 [Google Scholar]
29. Rayson, P.
    (2008) Wmatrix: A Web-based Corpus Processing Environment [Computer software]. Lancaster: Lancaster University. Available atucrel.lancs.ac.uk/wmatrix/(last accessedMay 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Reid, C.
    (2012) Imprison’d Wranglers: The Rhetorical Culture of the House of Commons 1760–1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581092.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581092.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
31. Smiles, S.
    (1859) Self-Help; with Illustrations of Character and Conduct. London: John Murray.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Trilling, L.
    (1967) Beyond Culture: Essays on Literature and Learning. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ward, J.
    (1980) The Hansard Chronicles. Toronto: Deneau and Greenberg.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Watts, R. J.
    (2003) Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
35. Wenger, E.
    (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803932
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932 [Google Scholar]
36. Wierzbicka, A.
    (2006) Anglo scripts against “putting pressure” on other people and their linguistic manifestations. In C. Goddard (Ed.), Ethnopragmatics. Understanding Discourse in Cultural Context (pp.31–63). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110911114.31
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110911114.31 [Google Scholar]