1887
Volume 22, Issue 2
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Multi-Dimensional Analysis (MDA) has been widely used to explore register variation. This paper reports on a project using MDA to explore the features of an interdisciplinary academic domain. Six dimensions of variation are identified in a corpus of 11,000 journal articles in environmental studies. We then focus on articles in one interdisciplinary journal, (GEC). It is expected that these articles will diverge sufficiently to produce differences that are analogous to register differences. Instead of identifying these “registers” on external criteria, we use the dimensional profiles of individual texts to identify ‘constellations’ of texts sharing combinations of features. Six such constellations are derived, consisting of texts with commonalities in their approaches to research: the development of predictive models; quantitative research; discussions of theory and policy; and human-environment studies focusing on individual voices. The identification of these constellations could not have been achieved through an a priori categorisation of texts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.22.2.01tho
2017-09-22
2018-12-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackermann, K. , & Chen, Y-H.
    (2013) Developing the Academic Collocation List (ACL): A corpus-driven and expert-judged approach. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 235–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alsop, S. , & Nesi, H.
    (2009) Issues in the development of the British Academic Written English (BAWE) corpus. Corpora, 4(1), 71–83. doi: 10.3366/E1749503209000227
    https://doi.org/10.3366/E1749503209000227 [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, D.
    (1985) Investigating macroscopic textual variation through multifeature/multidimensional analyses. Linguistics, 23(2), 337–360. doi: 10.1515/ling.1985.23.2.337
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1985.23.2.337 [Google Scholar]
  4. (1988) Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  5. (1989) A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27(1), 3–43. doi: 10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3 [Google Scholar]
  6. (1990) Methodological issues regarding corpus-based analysis of linguistic variation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 5(4), 257–269. doi: 10.1093/llc/5.4.257
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/5.4.257 [Google Scholar]
  7. (1995) Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2006) University Language: A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
  9. Biber, D. , Conrad, S. , & Reppen, R.
    (1998) Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511804489
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489 [Google Scholar]
  10. Biber, D. , Egbert, J. , & Davies, M.
    (2015) Exploring the composition of the searchable web: A corpus-based taxonomy of web registers. Corpora, 10(1), 11–45. doi: 10.3366/cor.2015.0065
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2015.0065 [Google Scholar]
  11. Biglan, A.
    (1973) The characteristics of subject matter in academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. doi: 10.1037/h0034701
    https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701 [Google Scholar]
  12. Breiman, L. E. O.
    (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324 [Google Scholar]
  13. Charles, M.
    (2006) The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 492–518. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml021
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml021 [Google Scholar]
  14. Conrad, S. , & Biber, D.
    (2001) Multi-dimensional methodology and the dimensions of register variation in English. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional Studies (pp.13–42). Essex: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Csomay, E.
    (2002) Variation in academic lectures: Interactivity and level of instruction. In R. Reppen , S. Fitzmaurice & D. Biber (Eds.) Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation (pp.203–224). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.9.14cso
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.9.14cso [Google Scholar]
  16. Durrant, P.
    (2015) Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 165–193. doi: 10.1093/applin/amv011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv011 [Google Scholar]
  17. (2017) Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 165–193. doi: 10.1093/applin/amv011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv011 [Google Scholar]
  18. Egbert, J. , Biber, D. , & Davies, M.
    (2015) Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1817–1831. doi: 10.1002/asi.23308
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23308 [Google Scholar]
  19. Friginal, E. , & Weigle, S.
    (2014) Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multidimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 80–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gardner, S. , Biber, D. , & Nesi, H.
    (2015) MDA perspectives on discipline and level in the BAWE corpus. Paper presented at theCorpus Linguistics 7th Conference, Lancaster, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Giannoni, D.
    (2010) Mapping Academic Values in the Disciplines: A Corpus-based Approach. Bern: Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑0351‑0020‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0020-4 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gray, B.
    (2013) More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora, 8(2), 153–181. doi: 10.3366/cor.2013.0039
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0039 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2015) Linguistic Variation in Research Articles: When Discipline Tells Only Part of the Story. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.71
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.71 [Google Scholar]
  24. Grieve, J. , Biber, D. , Friginal, E. , & Nekrasova, T.
    (2010) Variation among blogs: A multidimensional analysis. In A. Mehler , S. Sharoff & M. Santini (Eds.), Genres on the Web: Corpus Studies and Computational Models (pp.45–71). New York: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978‑90‑481‑9178‑9_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9178-9_14 [Google Scholar]
  25. Groom, N.
    (2005) Pattern and meaning across genres and disciplines: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(3), 257–277. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  26. Halliday, M. A. K. , & Hasan, R.
    (1990) Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Halliday, M. A. K. , & Martin, J.
    (1993) Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hardy, J. , & Friginal, E.
    (2016) Genre variation in student writing: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hardy, J. , & Römer, U.
    (2013) Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 8(2), 183–207. doi: 10.3366/cor.2013.0040
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0040 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hu, G. , & Wang, G.
    (2014) Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 14–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001 [Google Scholar]
  31. Huckin, T. , Leslie, A. , & Olsen, L.
    (1984) The need for professionally oriented ESL instruction in the United States. TESOL Quarterly, 18(2), 273–294.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hyland, K.
    (2000) Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2001a) Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic writing. Written Communication, 18(4), 549–574. doi: 10.1177/0741088301018004005
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018004005 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2001b) Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207–226. doi: 10.1016/S0889‑4906(00)00012‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2008) As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kanoksilapatham, B.
    (2007) Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. In D. Biber , U. Connor & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the Move: Using Corpus Analysis to Describe Discourse Structure (pp.73–119). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.28.06kan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28.06kan [Google Scholar]
  37. Kilgarriff, A. , Baisa, V. , Bušta, J. , Jakubíček, M. , Kovář, V. , Michelfeit, J. , Rychlý, P. , & Suchomel, V.
    (2014) The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography ASIALEX, 1(1), 7–36. doi: 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kuhn, M. , & Johnson, K.
    (2013) Applied Predictive Modeling. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑6849‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mauranen, A.
    (2006) Speaking the discipline: Discourse and socialisation in ELF and L1 English. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.) Academic Discourse across Disciplines (pp.271–294). Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. McGrath, L.
    (2016) Self-mentions in anthropology and history research articles: Variation between and within disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21, 86–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  41. Poos, D. , & Simpson, R.
    (2002) Cross-disciplinary comparisons of hedging: Some findings from the Michigan Corpus of Spoken Academic English. In R. Reppen , S. Fitzmaurice & D. Biber (Eds.) Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation (pp.3–24). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.9.03poo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.9.03poo [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.22.2.01tho
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.22.2.01tho
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error