1887
Volume 22, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Since the late twentieth century, the usage of intensifiers, such as , or , has been investigated in relation to gender. Whereas previous literature has widely agreed that women and men do indeed use intensifiers differently, there has been some disagreement as to which gender uses them more frequently. Taking up this discussion, this study explores authentic data provided in the Spoken BNC2014S by investigating 39 intensifiers. After establishing the ten most frequently used intensifiers by women and men, these are subcategorized and investigated for gender and age effects. The results generally support earlier findings, however, they also illustrate that there is much interindividual variation and variation regarding individual intensifiers and that there are fascinating interactions with other variables such as age.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.05hes
2017-11-23
2019-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bäcklund, U.
    (1970) The Collocation of Adverbs of Degree in English. Uppsala: University of Uppsala.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey, G.
    (2002) Real and apparent time. InJ. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (pp.312–332). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnfield, K., & Buchstaller, I.
    (2010), Intensifiers on Tyneside: Longitudinal developments and new trends. English World-Wide, 31(2), 252–87. doi:  10.1075/eww.31.3.02bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.31.3.02bar [Google Scholar]
  4. Borst, E.
    (1902) Die Gradadverbien im Englischen. Heidelberg: C. Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Leech, G.
    (2002) Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bing, J., & Bergvall, V.
    (1998) The question of questions: Beyond binary thinking. InJ. Coates (Ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader (pp.495–510). Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bolinger, D.
    (1972) Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. doi:  10.1515/9783110877786
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877786 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bradac, J., Mulac, A., & Thompson, S.
    (1995) Men’s and women’s use of intensifiers and hedges in problem-solving interaction: Molar and molecular analyses. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(2), 93–116. doi:  10.1207/s15327973rlsi2802_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2802_1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cameron, D.
    (2009) The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Coates, J.
    (1996) Women Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2004) Women, Men, and Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Drescher, N.
    (2003 July). The relationships among gender, power, and register in the American academic community. Paper presented at theinternational conference of Perception and Realization in Language and Gender Research, East Lansing, MI.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fahy, P. J.
    (2002) Use of linguistic qualifiers and intensifiers in a computer conference. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 5–22. doi:  10.1207/S15389286AJDE1601_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1601_2 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hardie, A.
    (2012) CQPweb – Combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409. doi:  10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har [Google Scholar]
  16. Holmes, J.
    (1995) Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ito, R., & Tagliamonte, S.
    (2003)  Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society, 32(2), 257–279. doi:  10.1017/S0047404503322055
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404503322055 [Google Scholar]
  18. Jespersen, O.
    (1922) Language: Its Nature, Development and Origins. London: Allen and Unwin.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kortmann, B.
    (2005) English Linguistics: Essentials. Berlin: Cornelsen.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Labov, W.
    (1966) The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (1972a) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lakoff, R. T.
    (1975) Language and Woman’s Place. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
    (this issue) The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344 doi:  10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov [Google Scholar]
  24. McEnery, T., Xiao, R., & Tono, Y.
    (2006) Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Macaulay, R.
    (2002) Extremely interesting. Very interesting, or only quite interesting? Adverbs and social class. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(3), 398–417. doi:  10.1111/1467‑9481.00194
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00194 [Google Scholar]
  26. Murphy, B.
    (2010) Corpus and Sociolinguistics: Investigating Age and Gender in Female Talk. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/scl.38
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.38 [Google Scholar]
  27. Méndez-Naya, B.
    (2008) Special issue on English intensifiers. English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 213–219. doi:  10.1017/S1360674308002591
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674308002591 [Google Scholar]
  28. Nevalainen, T.
    (2008) Social variation in intensifiers use: Constraint on -ly adverbialization in the past?English Language and Linguistics, 12(2), 289–315. doi:  10.1017/S1360674308002633
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674308002633 [Google Scholar]
  29. Oakley, A.
    (1972) Sex, Gender and Society. London: Temple Smith.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Perkuhn, R., Keibel, H., & Kupietz, M.
    (2012) Korpuslinguistik. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
    (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Rayson, P.
    (2014) CLAWS part-of-speech tagger. Retrieved fromucrel.lancs.ac.uk/claws (last accessedSeptember 2016).
  33. Romaine, S.
    (1994) Language in Society: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Stenström, A.
    (1999) He was really gormless – She’s bloody crap. Girls, boys and intensifiers. InH. Hasselgård & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson (pp.69–78). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Stoffel, C.
    (1901) Intensives and Down-toners: A Study in English Adverbs. Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tagliamonte, S., & Roberts, C.
    (2005) So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech, 80(3), 280–300. doi:  10.1215/00031283‑80‑3‑280
    https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-80-3-280 [Google Scholar]
  37. Talbot, M.
    (2010) Language and Gender (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Trudgill, P.
    (1972) Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, (1)2, 179–195. doi:  10.1017/S0047404500000488
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000488 [Google Scholar]
  39. Vasilieva, I.
    (2004 September). Gender-specific use of boosting and hedging adverbs in English computer-related texts – A corpus-based study. Paper presented at theInternational Conference on Language, Politeness and Gender, Helsinki, Finland.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Weatherall, A.
    (2002) Gender, Language and Discourse. New York, NY: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Xiao, R., & Tao, H.
    (2007) A corpus-based sociolinguistic study of amplifiers in British English. Sociolinguistic Studies, 1(2), 241–273. doi:  10.1558/sols.v1i2.241
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v1i2.241 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.05hes
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.05hes
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): amplifier , downtoner , gender and language , intensifier and sociolinguistics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error