Volume 27, Issue 4
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The ways in which politicians have discussed who, what, and where was considered “uncivilized’” across the past two centuries gives an insight into how speakers in a position of authority classified and constructed the world around them, and how those in power in Britain see the country and themselves. This article uses the Hansard Corpus 1803–2003 of speeches in the UK Parliament alongside data from the to analyse diachronic variation in usage of words for persons, places and practices considered uncivil. It proposes new methods and offers quantitative data to describe the period’s shift in political attitudes towards not just the so-called “uncivil” but also the country as a whole.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Abercrombie, G., & Batista-Navarro, R.
    (2018a) A sentiment-labelled corpus of Hansard parliamentary debate speeches. InProceedings of ParlaCLARIN. Common Language Resources and Technology Infrastructure (pp.43–47). CLARIN. lrec-conf.org/workshops/lrec2018/W2/pdf/book_of_proceedings.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2018b) HanDeSeT: Hansard Debates with Sentiment Tags [Data set]. Mendeley. 10.17632/XSVP45CBT4.2
    https://doi.org/10.17632/XSVP45CBT4.2 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander, M.
    (forthcoming). Speech in the British Hansard. InM. Korhonen, H. Kotze, & J. Tyrkkö Eds. Exploring Language and Society with Big Data: Parliamentary Discourse across Time and Space. John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexander, M., Dallachy, F., Piao, S., Baron, A., & Rayson, P.
    (2015) Metaphor, popular science, and semantic tagging: Distant reading with the Historical Thesaurus of English. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 30(s1), i16–i27. 10.1093/llc/fqv045
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv045 [Google Scholar]
  5. Alexander, M., & Davies, M.
    (2015) The Hansard Corpus 1803–2005. https://www.english-corpora.org/hansard/
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Alexander, M., & Struan, A.
    (2013) “In countries so unciviliz’d as those?” The language of incivlity and the British experience of the world. InM. Farr & X. Guégan (Eds.), Experiencing Imperialism: Interdisciplinary and Transnational Perspectives on the Colonial and Post-Colonial British (pp.232–249). Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Archer, D.
    (2017) Mapping Hansard impression management strategies through time and space. Studia Neophilologica, 89(s1), 5–20. 10.1080/00393274.2017.1370981
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2017.1370981 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barkawi, T., & Brighton, S.
    (2013) Brown Britain: Post-colonial politics and grand strategy. International Affairs, 89(5), 1109–1123. 10.1111/1468‑2346.12062
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12062 [Google Scholar]
  9. Baron, A., & Rayson, P.
    (2008) VARD 2: A tool for dealing with spelling variation in historical corpora. InProceedings of the Postgraduate Conference in Corpus Linguistics. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/41666/1/BaronRaysonAston2008.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bell, D.
    (2010) John Stuart Mill on colonies. Political Theory, 38(1), 34–64. 10.1177/0090591709348186
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591709348186 [Google Scholar]
  11. BNC Consortium
    BNC Consortium (2007) British National Corpus (version 3, BNC XML ed.). www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/
  12. Bourne, H. R. F.
    (1900) The Claims of Uncivilized Races: A paper submitted to the International Congress on Colonial Sociology, held in Paris in August, 1900. InForeign and Commonwealth Office Collection, King’s College London.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Colley, L.
    (2014) Empires of writing: Britain, America and constitutions, 1776–1848. Law and History Review, 32(2), 237–266. 10.1017/S0738248013000801
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0738248013000801 [Google Scholar]
  14. Edgerton, D.
    (2018) The Rise and Fall of the British Nation: A Twentieth Century History. Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fitzmaurice, A.
    (2012) Liberalism and empire in nineteenth-century international law. The American Historical Review, 117(1), 122–140. 10.1086/ahr.117.1.122
    https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr.117.1.122 [Google Scholar]
  16. Foreign and Commonwealth Office
    Foreign and Commonwealth Office (2006) Active Diplomacy for a Changing World: The UK’s International Priorities. TSO.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hansard at Huddersfield Project
    Hansard at Huddersfield Project (2022) Hansard at Huddersfield. University of Huddersfield. https://hansard.hud.ac.uk
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hiltunen, T., Räikkönen, J., & Tyrkkö, J.
    (2020) Investigating colloquialization in the British parliamentary record in the late 19th and early 20th century. Language Sciences, 79, 1–16. 10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101270
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101270 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jeffries, L., & Sanjurjo-González, H.
    (2019, May15–17). Making corpus-based searching accessible for non-expert users: The case of Hansard [Paper presentation]. XI International Conference on Corpus Linguistics (CILC 2019) conference. Valencia, Spain.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kay, C., Alexander, M., Dallachy, F., Roberts, J., Samuels, M., & Wotherspoon, I.
    (Eds.) (2022) The Historical Thesaurus of English (Version 5.0). https://ht.ac.uk/
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumar, K.
    (2012) Greece and Rome in the British Empire: Contrasting role models. Journal of British Studies, 51(1), 76–101. 10.1086/662545
    https://doi.org/10.1086/662545 [Google Scholar]
  22. Leech, G., Garside, R., & Bryant, M.
    (1994) CLAWS4: The tagging of the British National Corpus. InProceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 94) (pp.622–628). https://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/papers/coling1994paper.pdf. 10.3115/991886.991996
    https://doi.org/10.3115/991886.991996 [Google Scholar]
  23. McEnery, T., & Baker, H.
    (2016) Corpus Linguistics and 17th-Century Prostitution: Computational Linguistics and History. Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mollin, S.
    (2007) The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora, 2(2), 187–210. 10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.187
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.187 [Google Scholar]
  25. Morris, J.
    (2011) How great is Britain? Power, responsibility and Britain’s future global role. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 13(3), 326–347. 10.1111/j.1467‑856X.2011.00450.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00450.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Piao, S., Dallachy, F., Baron, A., Demmen, J., Wattam, S., Durkin, P., McCracken, J., Rayson, P., & Alexander, M.
    (2017) A time-sensitive historical thesaurus-based semantic tagger for deep semantic annotation. Computer Speech and Language, 46, 113–35. 10.1016/j.csl.2017.04.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2017.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  27. Pietsch, T.
    (2013) Rethinking the British world. Journal of British Studies, 52(2), 441–463. 10.1017/jbr.2013.53
    https://doi.org/10.1017/jbr.2013.53 [Google Scholar]
  28. Rayson, P., Archer, D., Piao, S., & McEnery, T.
    (2004) The UCREL semantic analysis system. InProceedings of the Workshop on Beyond Named Entity Recognition Semantic Labelling for NLP Tasks in Association with 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (pp.7–12) LREC 2004. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/1783/1/usas_lrec04ws.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Seely, B., & Rogers, J.
    (2019) Global Britain – A Twenty-first Century Vision. Henry Jackson Society. https://henryjacksonsociety.org/publications/global-britain-a-twenty-first-century-vision/
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Select Committee on Aboriginal Tribes
    Select Committee on Aboriginal Tribes (1837) Report of the Parliamentary Select Committee on Aboriginal Tribes (British Settlements). Ball, Chambers, Row and Hatchard.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Skinner, Q.
    (1969) Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), 3–53. 10.2307/2504188
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2504188 [Google Scholar]
  32. Slembrouck, S.
    (1992) The parliamentary Hansard ‘verbatim’ report: The written construction of spoken discourse. Language and Literature, 1(2), 101–19. 10.1177/096394709200100202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709200100202 [Google Scholar]
  33. Thompson, G., & Hunston, S.
    (2000) Evaluation: An introduction. InS. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp.1–27). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Toye, R.
    (2014) The rhetorical culture of the House of Commons after 1918. History, 99(335), 270–298. 10.1111/1468‑229X.12051
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-229X.12051 [Google Scholar]
  35. Tyrkkö, J.
    (2019) Kinship references in the British parliament, 1800–2005. InU. Lutzky & M. Nevala (Eds.), Reference and Identity in Public Discourses (pp.97–124). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.306.04tyr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.306.04tyr [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): barbaric; Hansard; Historical Thesaurus of English; Parliamentary discourse; uncivil
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error