The inverse frequency effect

References

1. Aylett, M., & Turk, A.
   (2004) The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 47(1), 31–56. 10.1177/00238309040470010201
   https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309040470010201 [Google Scholar]
2. Bock, J. K.
   (1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18(3), 355–387. 10.1016/0010‑0285(86)90004‑6
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 [Google Scholar]
3. Brewer, W. F.
   (1980) Literary theory, rhetoric, and stylistics: Implications for psychology. InR. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension (pp.221–239). Erlbaum.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chang, F., Dell, G. S., & Bock, K.
   (2006) Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review, 113(2), 234–272. 10.1037/0033‑295X.113.2.234
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.234 [Google Scholar]
5. Charniak, E., Blaheta, D., Ge, N., Hall, K., Hale, J., & Johnson, M.
   (2000) Bllip 1987–89 WSJ corpus release 1. Linguistic Data Consortium, 361.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J.
   (2003) The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 214–230. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(03)00060‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00060-3 [Google Scholar]
7. Corbett, E.
   (1971) Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student (2nd Edition). Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Davies, M.
   (2009) The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+): Design, architecture, and linguistic insights. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(2), 159–190. 10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02dav
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.14.2.02dav [Google Scholar]
9. Dubey, A., Keller, F., & Sturt, P.
   (2008) A probabilistic corpus-based model of syntactic parallelism. Cognition, 109(3), 326–344. 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.006
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.006 [Google Scholar]
10. Fenk, A., & Fenk, G.
    (1980) Konstanz im Kurzzeitgedächtnis – Konstanz im sprachlichen Informationsfluß?Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 27(3), 400–414.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ferreira, V. S.
    (2003) The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying “that” is not saying “that” at all. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(2), 379–398. 10.1016/S0749‑596X(02)00523‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00523-5 [Google Scholar]
12. Ferreira, V. S.
    (2019) A mechanistic framework for explaining audience design in language production. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 29–51. 10.1146/annurev‑psych‑122216‑011653
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011653 [Google Scholar]
13. Frank, A., & Jaeger, T. F.
    (2008) Speaking rationally: Uniform information density as an optimal strategy for language production. InB. C. Love, K. McRae, & V. M. Sloutsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.939–944). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7d08h6j4
    [Google Scholar]
14. Frazier, L., Munn, A., & Clifton, C.
    (2000) Processing coordinate structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(4), 343–370. 10.1023/A:1005156427600
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005156427600 [Google Scholar]
15. Garside, R., & Smith, N.
    (1997) A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. InR. Garside, G. Leech, & A. McEnery, A. (Eds.), Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora (pp.102–121). Longman. 10.4324/9781315841366‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315841366-13 [Google Scholar]
16. Gries, S. T.
    (2005) Syntactic priming: A corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(4), 365–399. 10.1007/s10936‑005‑6139‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-005-6139-3 [Google Scholar]
17. Hale, J.
    (2001) A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In InR. Levy & R. Reitter (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol21., pp.159–166). Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/1073336.1073357
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1073336.1073357 [Google Scholar]
18. Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. H., & Huiskamp, P.
    (1999) Priming word order in sentence production. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 52(1), 129–147. 10.1080/713755798
    https://doi.org/10.1080/713755798 [Google Scholar]
19. Heycock, C., & Zamparelli, R.
    (2003) Coordinated bare definites. Linguistic Inquiry, 34(3), 443–469. 10.1162/002438903322247551
    https://doi.org/10.1162/002438903322247551 [Google Scholar]
20. Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.
    (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
21. Jackendoff, R.
    (2008) Construction after construction and its theoretical challenges. Language, 84(1), 8–28. 10.1353/lan.2008.0058
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2008.0058 [Google Scholar]
22. Jaeger, T. F., & Snider, N. E.
    (2013) Alignment as a consequence of expectation adaptation: Syntactic priming is affected by the primes prediction error given both prior and recent experience. Cognition, 127(1), 57–83. 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.013 [Google Scholar]
23. Konopka, A. E., & Bock, K.
    (2009) Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom production. Cognitive Psychology, 58(1), 68–101. 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.05.002 [Google Scholar]
24. Levy, R.
    (2008) Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177. 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006 [Google Scholar]
25. Levy, R., & Jaeger, T. F.
    (2007) Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. InB. Schölkopf, J. Platt, & T. Hofmann (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference (pp.849–856). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0111
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0111 [Google Scholar]
26. Marcus, M. P., Kim, G., Marcinkiewicz, M. A., MacIntyre, R., Bies, A., Ferguson, M., Katz, K., & Schasberger, B.
    (1994) The Penn Treebank: Annotating predicate argument structure. InARPA Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology (pp.114–119). Morgan Kaufmann. 10.3115/1075812.1075835
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1075812.1075835 [Google Scholar]
27. McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G.
    (1996) Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 424–438. 10.1086/209459
    https://doi.org/10.1086/209459 [Google Scholar]
28. Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Knoop, C. A.
    (2017) The emotional and aesthetic powers of parallelistic diction. Poetics, 631, 47–59. 10.1016/j.poetic.2016.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.12.001 [Google Scholar]
29. Myslín, M., & Levy, R.
    (2016) Comprehension priming as rational expectation for repetition: Evidence from syntactic processing. Cognition, 1471, 29–56. 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.021 [Google Scholar]
30. Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P.
    (1998) The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(4), 633–651. 10.1006/jmla.1998.2592
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2592 [Google Scholar]
31. Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S.
    (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169–190. 10.1017/S0140525X04000056
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 [Google Scholar]
32. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartik, J.
    (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D.
    (2006) Computational Modelling of Structural Priming in Dialogue. InR. C. Moore, J. Bilmes, J. Chu-Carroll, & M. Sanderson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp.121–124). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/N06-2031. 10.3115/1614049.1614080
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1614049.1614080 [Google Scholar]
34. Reitter, D., Keller, F., & Moore, J. D.
    (2011) A computational cognitive model of syntactic priming. Cognitive Science, 35(4), 587–637. 10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2010.01165.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01165.x [Google Scholar]
35. Sanders, T.
    (1997) Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context, Discourse Processes, 24(1), 119–147. 10.1080/01638539709545009
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539709545009 [Google Scholar]
36. Scheepers, C.
    (2003) Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: Persistence of structural configuration in sentence production. Cognition, 89(3), 179–205. 10.1016/S0010‑0277(03)00119‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00119-7 [Google Scholar]
37. Szmrecsanyi, B.
    (2005) Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1), 113–150. 10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.113
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.113 [Google Scholar]
38. Temperley, D.
    (2022) Music and language. Annual Review of Linguistics, 81, 153–170. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑031220‑121126
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-121126 [Google Scholar]
39. Temperley, D., & Gildea, D.
    (2015) Information density and syntactic repetition. Cognitive Science, 39(8), 1802–1823. 10.1111/cogs.12215
    https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12215 [Google Scholar]
40. Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K.
    (1994) Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. InC. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on Sentence Processing (pp.155–179). Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Vickers, B.
    (1994) Repetition and emphasis in rhetoric: Theory and practice. InA. Fischer (Ed.), Repetition (Swiss Papers in English Language and Literature, 7) (pp.85–114). Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]