oa Using machine learning to automate data annotation in corpus linguistics

References

1. Brandsen, A., Verberne, S., Lambers, K., & Wansleeben, M.
   (2022) Can BERT dig it? Named entity recognition for information retrieval in the Archaeology domain. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(3), Article 51. 10.1145/3497842
   https://doi.org/10.1145/3497842 [Google Scholar]
2. Davies, M.
   (2010) The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). Available online athttps://www.english-corpora.org/coha/
   [Google Scholar]
3. De Smet, H., & Vancayzeele, E.
   (2015) Like a rolling stone: The changing use of English premodifying present participles. English Language and Linguistics, 19(1), 131–156. 10.1017/S136067431400029X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067431400029X [Google Scholar]
4. De Smet, H., Flach, S., Tyrkkö, J., & Diller, H.-J.
   (2015) The Corpus of Late Modern English (CLMET) (version 3.1: Improved tokenization and linguistic annotation). KU Leuven, FU Berlin, U Tampere, RU Bochum. https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0044428/clmet3_0.htm
   [Google Scholar]
5. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K.
   (2019) BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. InProceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), 4171–4186. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/N19-1423.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
6. Fanego, T.
   (2004) On reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change: The rise and development of English verbal gerund. Diachronica, 21(1), 5–55. 10.1075/dia.21.1.03fan
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.21.1.03fan [Google Scholar]
7. Fonteyn, L.
   (2019) Categoriality in language change: The case of the English gerund. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190917579.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190917579.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
8. Fonteyn, L., & Hartmann, S.
   (2016) Usage-based perspectives on diachronic morphology: A mixed-methods approach towards English ing-nominals. Linguistics Vanguard, 2(1), 20160057. 10.1515/lingvan‑2016‑0057
   https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0057 [Google Scholar]
9. Fonteyn, L., & Petré, P.
   (2022) On the probability and direction of morphosyntactic lifespan change. Language Variation and Change, 34(1), 79–105. 10.1017/S0954394522000011
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394522000011 [Google Scholar]
10. Fonteyn, L., & Van de Pol, N.
    (2016) Divide and conquer: The formation and functional dynamics of the Modern English ing-clause network. English Language and Linguistics, 20(2), 185–219. 10.1017/S1360674315000258
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674315000258 [Google Scholar]
11. Hosseini, K., Beelen, K., Colavizza, G., & Coll Ardanuy, M.
    (2021) Neural language models for nineteenth-century English. Journal of Open Humanities Data, 71, 22. 10.5334/johd.48
    https://doi.org/10.5334/johd.48 [Google Scholar]
12. Hundt, M., Röthlisberger, M., Schneider, G., & Zehentner, E.
    (2019) (Semi-)automatic retrieval of data from historical corpora: Chances and challenges. [Conference presentation]. 52nd Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE). Leipzig, Germany. https://www.prepcomp.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:0b6447fb-d466-4015-85f2-4311e372abfc/SLE_Workshop_Introduction.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
13. James, G. M., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R.
    (2013) An introduction to statistical learning. Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4614‑7138‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 [Google Scholar]
14. Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H.
    (2025) Speech and language processing: An introduction to speech recognition, computational linguistics, and speech recognition with language models. Third edition. Online manuscript releasedJanuary 12, 2025. https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/slp3/
    [Google Scholar]
15. Killie, K., & Swan, T.
    (2009) The grammaticalization and subjectification of adverbial -ing clauses (converb clauses) in English. English Language and Linguistics, 13(3), 337–363. 10.1017/S1360674309990141
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674309990141 [Google Scholar]
16. Kortmann, B.
    (1991) Free adjuncts and absolutes in English: Problems of control and interpretation. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315002880
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315002880 [Google Scholar]
17. Kroch, A., Santorini, B., & Delfs, L.
    (2004) The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME) (First edition, release 3). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. www.ling.upenn.edu/ppche/ppche-release-2016/PPCEME-RELEASE-3
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kroch, A., Santorini, B., & Diertani, A.
    (2016) The Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English (PPCMBE2) (Second edition, release 1). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. www.ling.upenn.edu/ppche/ppche-release-2016/PPCMBE2-RELEASE-1
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lass, R.
    (1992) Phonology and morphology. InN. Blake (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. II: 1066–1476 (pp.23–155). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264754.003 [Google Scholar]
20. Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N.
    (2009) Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
21. Manjavacas, E., & Fonteyn, L.
    (2021) MacBERTh: Development and evaluation of a historically pre-trained language model for English (1450–1950). Proceedings of the Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Digital Humanities (NLP4DH) (pp.23–36). Association for Computational Linguistics. icon2021.nits.ac.in/resources/nlp4dh.pdf#page=35
    [Google Scholar]
22. Manjavacas, E., & Fonteyn, L.
    (2022) Adapting vs. pre-training language models for historical languages. Journal of Data Mining & Digital Humanities, 91521. 10.46298/jdmdh.9152
    https://doi.org/10.46298/jdmdh.9152 [Google Scholar]
23. Manning, C. D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H.
    (2008) Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511809071
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809071 [Google Scholar]
24. Manning, C. D.
    (2011) Part-of-Speech tagging from 97% to 100%: Is it time for some linguistics?. InA. F. Gelbukh (Ed.) Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing. CICLing 2011. Lecture notes in computer science, vol.66081. (pp.171–189). Springer. nlp.stanford.edu/~manning/papers/CICLing2011-manning-tagging.pdf. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑19400‑9_14
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19400-9_14 [Google Scholar]
25. Petré, P., Anthonissen, L., Budts, S., Manjavacas, E., Silva, E.-L., Standing, W., & Strik, A. O.
    (2019) Early Modern Multiloquent Authors (EMMA): Designing a large-scale corpus of individuals’ languages. ICAME Journal, 431, 83–122. 10.2478/icame‑2019‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2019-0004 [Google Scholar]
26. Rastas, I., Ryan, Y., Tiihonen, I., Qaraei, M., Repo, L., Babbar, R., Mäkelä, E., Tolonen, M. & Ginter, F.
    (2022) Explainable publication year prediction of eighteenth century texts with the BERT model. Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Historical Language Change (pp.68–77). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/2022.lchange-1.7.pdf. 10.18653/v1/2022.lchange‑1.7
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.lchange-1.7 [Google Scholar]
27. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I.
    (2017) Attention is all you need. InI. Guyon, U. Von Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, & R. Garnett (Eds.) Advances in neural information processing systems: 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA. Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc.https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Paper.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
28. Zhang, J., Ryan, Y. C., Rastas, I., Ginter, F., Tolonen, M., & Babbar, R.
    (2022) Detecting sequential genre change in eighteenth-century texts. InF. Karsdorp, A. Lassche, & K. Nielbo (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computational Humanities Research Conference 2022. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 3290 (pp.243–255). Computational Humanities Research Conference, Antwerp, Belgium. hdl.handle.net/10138/351519
    [Google Scholar]