1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Framing the path to net zero
EPUB
PDF

Abstract

Abstract

Big corporations are a leading contributor to global carbon emissions and their investment decisions have a significant impact on the world’s ability to tackle climate change. This study combines corpus and discourse approaches to examine how major corporate emitters have responded to the Paris Agreement, how they legitimize their practices amid mounting public pressure, and how companies operating in high- and middle-income countries differ in their framing of climate change. The results show that carbon majors place increasing focus on climate issues, widely support the goals of the Paris Agreement, and are increasingly making net-zero pledges. However, close inspection of linguistic patterns reveals a troubling disconnect between proclaimed goals, the solutions advocated for, and the radical steps needed to address the escalating climate crisis. Companies from middle-income countries devote comparatively less attention to climate change, which points to the need for better coordinated global efforts to address this problem.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.22123.fuo
2023-12-07
2024-10-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.22123.fuo
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/ijcl.22123.fuo/ijcl.22123.fuo.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.22123.fuo&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ali, W., Frynas, J. G., & Mahmood, Z.
    (2017) Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, (), –. 10.1002/csr.1410
     https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1410 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, P., & McEnery, T.
    (2015) Corpora and Discourse Studies: Integrating Discourse and Corpora. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137431738
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bednarek, M., Ross, A. S., Boichak, O., Doran, Y. J., Carr, G., Altmann, E. G., & Alexander, T. J.
    (2022) Winning the discursive struggle? The impact of a significant environmental crisis event on dominant climate discourses on Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media, . . 10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100564
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100564 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatia, A., & Makkar, B.
    (2019) CSR disclosure in developing and developed countries: a comparative study. Journal of Global Responsibility, (), –. 10.1108/JGR‑04‑2019‑0043
     https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-04-2019-0043 [Google Scholar]
  5. Breeze, R.
    (2012) Legitimation in corporate discourse: Oil corporations after Deepwater Horizon. Discourse & Society, (), –. 10.1177/0957926511431511
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431511 [Google Scholar]
  6. CDP
    CDP (2017) New report shows just 100 companies are source of over 70% of emissions. https://www.cdp.net/en/articles/media/new-report-shows-just-100-companies-are-source-of-over-70-of-emissions
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, J. C., & Roberts, R. W.
    (2010) Toward a More Coherent Understanding of the Organization–Society Relationship: A Theoretical Consideration for Social and Environmental Accounting Research. Journal of Business Ethics, (), –. 10.1007/s10551‑010‑0531‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0531-0 [Google Scholar]
  8. Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O.
    (2013) CSR as aspirational talk. Organization(), –. 10.1177/1350508413478310
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413478310 [Google Scholar]
  9. Climate Accountability Institute
    Climate Accountability Institute (2020) Carbon majors 2018 data set released December 2020. https://climateaccountability.org/carbon-majors-dataset-2020/
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Comyns, B.
    (2018) Climate change reporting and multinational companies: Insights from institutional theory and international business. Accounting Forum, (), –. 10.1016/j.accfor.2017.07.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2017.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cordova, C., Zorio-Grima, A., & Merello, Paloma
    (2021) Contextual and corporate governance effects on carbon accounting and carbon performance in emerging economies. Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society, (), –. 10.1108/CG‑10‑2020‑0473
     https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-2020-0473 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dahl, T., & Fløttum, K.
    (2019) Climate change as a corporate strategy issue: A discourse analysis of three climate reports from the energy sector. Corporate Communications. An International Journal, (), –. 10.1108/CCIJ‑08‑2018‑0088
     https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-08-2018-0088 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dietz, S., Fruitiere, C., Garcia-Manas, C., Irwin, W., Rauis, B., & Sullivan, R.
    (2018) An assessment of climate action by high-carbon global corporations. Nature Climate Change, (), –. 10.1038/s41558‑018‑0343‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0343-2 [Google Scholar]
  14. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W.
    (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, (), –. 10.2307/2095101
     https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fairclough, N.
    (2013) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315834368
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ferguson, J., Sales de Aguiar, T. R., & Fearfull, A.
    (2016) Corporate response to climate change: language, power and symbolic construction. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal(), –. 10.1108/AAAJ‑09‑2013‑1465
     https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2013-1465 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fuoli, M.
    (2012) Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of Appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse & Communication. SAGE Publications, (), –. 10.1177/1750481311427788
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311427788 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2018) Building a trustworthy corporate identity: A corpus-based analysis of stance in annual and corporate social responsibility reports. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amw058
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw058 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gillings, M., & Dayrell, C.
    (2023) Climate change in the UK press: Examining discourse fluctuation over time. Applied Linguistics, amad007. 10.1093/applin/amad007
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad007 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hrasky, S.
    (2012) Carbon footprints and legitimation strategies: symbolism or action?Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, (), –. 10.1108/09513571211191798
     https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571211191798 [Google Scholar]
  21. IEA
    IEA (2021) Net zero by 2050. A roadmap for the global energy sector. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Ihlen, Ø.
    (2009) Business and climate change: The climate response of the world’s 30 largest corporations. Environmental Communication, (), –. 10.1080/17524030902916632
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030902916632 [Google Scholar]
  23. IPCC
    IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ipcc_wg3_ar5_annex-iii.pdf#page=7
     [Google Scholar]
  24. IPCC
    IPCC (2022) Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Jaworska, S.
    (2018) Change but no climate change: Discourses of climate change in corporate social responsibility reporting in the oil industry. International Journal of Business Communication, (), –. 10.1177/2329488417753951
     https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417753951 [Google Scholar]
  26. Jaworska, S., & Nanda, A.
    (2018) Doing well by talking good: A topic modelling-assisted discourse study of corporate social responsibility. Applied Linguistics, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kenner, D., & Heede, R.
    (2021) White knights, or horsemen of the apocalypse? Prospects for Big Oil to align emissions with a 1.5 °C pathway. Energy Research & Social Science, , . 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102049
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102049 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V.
    (2014) The Sketch Engine: ten years on. Lexicography, (), –. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  29. Klaus, J. P., Nishi, H., Peabody, S. D., & Reichert, C.
    (2023) CSR activity in response to the Paris Agreement exit. European Financial Management, (), –. 10.1111/eufm.12368
     https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12368 [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, M., Trencher, G., & Asuka, J.
    (2022) The clean energy claims of BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil and Shell: A mismatch between discourse, actions and investments. PLOS ONE(), –. 10.1371/journal.pone.0263596
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263596 [Google Scholar]
  31. Liesen, A., Hoepner, A. G., Patten, D. M., & Figge, F.
    (2015) Does stakeholder pressure influence corporate GHG emissions reporting? Empirical evidence from Europe. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, (), –. 10.1108/AAAJ‑12‑2013‑1547
     https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2013-1547 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lischinsky, A.
    (2015) What is the environment doing in my report? Analyzing the environment-as-stakeholder thesis through corpus linguistics. Environmental Communication, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Livesey, S. M.
    (2002) The discourse of the middle ground: Citizen shell commits to sustainable development. Management Communication Quarterly, (), –. 10.1177/0893318902153001
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318902153001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Luo, L., Tang, Q., & Yi-Chen, L.
    (2013) Comparison of propensity for carbon disclosure between developing and developed countries: A resource constraint perspective. Accounting Research Journal, (), –. 10.1108/ARJ‑04‑2012‑0024
     https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-04-2012-0024 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mahlberg, M.
    (2005) English General Nouns: A Corpus Theoretical Approach. John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/scl.20
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.20 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2007) Lexical items in discourse: Identifying local textual functions of sustainable development. InM. Hoey, M. Mahlberg, M. Stubbs, & W. Teubert (Eds.), Text, Discourse and Corpora: Theory and Analysis. With an introduction by John Sinclair (pp.–). Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. (2014) Corpus linguistics and discourse analysis. InK. P. Schneider & A. Barron, (Eds.), Pragmatics of Discourse, (pp.–). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214406‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214406-009 [Google Scholar]
  38. Martin-Roberts, E., Scott, V., Flude, S., Johnson, G., Stuart Haszeldine, R., & Gilfillan, S.
    (2021) Carbon capture and storage at the end of a lost decade. One Earth, (), –. 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  39. Megura, M., & Gunderson, R.
    (2022) Better poison is the cure? Critically examining fossil fuel companies, climate change framing, and corporate sustainability reports. Energy Research & Social Science, , . 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102388
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102388 [Google Scholar]
  40. Milne, M. J., Kearins, K., & Walton, S.
    (2006) Creating adventures in Wonderland: The journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, (), –. 10.1177/1350508406068506
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406068506 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pitrakkos, P., & Maroun, W.
    (2019) Evaluating the quality of carbon disclosures. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, (), –. 10.1108/SAMPJ‑03‑2018‑0081
     https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2018-0081 [Google Scholar]
  42. Pollach, I.
    (2018) Issue cycles in corporate sustainability reporting: A longitudinal study. Environmental Communication, (), –. 10.1080/17524032.2016.1205645
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1205645 [Google Scholar]
  43. Van Leeuwen, T.
    (2007) Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, (), –. 10.1177/1750481307071986
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [Google Scholar]
  44. Vormedal, I., Gulbrandsen, L. H., & Skjærseth, J. B.
    (2020) Big oil and climate regulation: Business as usual or a changing business?Global Environmental Politics, (), –. 10.1162/glep_a_00565
     https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00565 [Google Scholar]
  45. Watt, R.
    (2021) The fantasy of carbon offsetting. Environmental Politics, (), –. 10.1080/09644016.2021.1877063
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1877063 [Google Scholar]
  46. Zappettini, F., & Unerman, J.
    (2016) ‘Mixing’ and ‘Bending’: The recontextualisation of discourses of sustainability in integrated reporting. Discourse & Communication, (), –. 10.1177/1750481316659175
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481316659175 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.22123.fuo
Loading
Framing the path to net zero
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22123.fuo
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.22123.fuo
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.22123.fuo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: carbon neutrality ; corporate social responsibility ; carbon reporting ; discursive legitimation ; climate change

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error