1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of A corpus-based study into new combining forms in American English
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study examines 10 new combining forms (CFs) in American English from both diachronic and synchronic perspectives, based on data from the Corpus of Historical American English, the Corpus of Contemporary American English, and the News on the Web, as well as seven dictionaries. Through the lens of corpus and dictionary data alongside the construction­alisation approach, it is found that all the CFs are partially schematised and partly inherit their meanings from their source words. The constructional changes and constructionalisation of the CFs are accompanied by varying degrees of schematic extensions. The distinctions between their schemas are reflected in the semantic categories of the preceding elements, the differences in the appearance dates of these categories, and the word classes to which the preceding elements belong. This study further confirms that the formation of contemporary CFs may involve analogy and other word-formation schemas in addition to compounding and blending.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.23039.hua
2025-10-09
2025-11-13

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.23039.hua
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, V.
    (1973) An introduction to modern English word-formation. Longman. 10.4324/9781315504254
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315504254 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arndt-Lappe, S.
    (2014) Analogy in suffix rivalry: The case of English -ity and -ness. English Language & Linguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S136067431400015X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S136067431400015X [Google Scholar]
  3. Baayen, R. H.
    (1992) Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. InG. Booij & J. V. Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1991 (pp. –). Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑2516‑1_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2516-1_8 [Google Scholar]
  4. (1993) On frequency, transparency and productivity. InG. Booij & J. V. Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1992 (pp. –). Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3710‑4_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3710-4_7 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2009) Corpus linguistics in morphology: morphological productivity. InA. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp. –). Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213881.2.899
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213881.2.899 [Google Scholar]
  6. Baayen, R. H., & Lieber, R.
    (1991) Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baldi, P., & Dawar, C.
    (2000) Creative processes. InG. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, W. Kesselheim, & S. Skopeteas (Eds.), Morphology: An international handbook of inflection and word-formation (Vol.) (pp. –). De Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bauer, L.
    (2001) Morphological productivity. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511486210
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486210 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2017) Compounds and compounding. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108235679
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235679 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bauer, L., & Huddleston, R.
    (2016) Lexical word-formation. InR. Huddleston & G. K. Pullum (Eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language (pp.–). Elsevier. 10.1017/9781316423530.020
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530.020 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bejan, C.
    (2017) English words: Structure, origin and meaning. Addleton Academic Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Beliaeva, N.
    (2019) Blending creativity and productivity: on the issue of delimiting the boundaries of blends as a type of word formation. Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology, , –. 10.4000/lexis.4004
     https://doi.org/10.4000/lexis.4004 [Google Scholar]
  13. Biermeier, T.
    (2008) Word-formation in New Englishes: A corpus-based analysis. LIT Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Booij, G.
    (2005) The Grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. (2010) Construction morphology. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown, E. K., & Miller, J. E.
    (2013) The Cambridge dictionary of linguistics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139049412
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139049412 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bybee, J.
    (1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.9
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  18. Callies, M.
    (2016a) Towards a process-oriented approach to comparing EFL and ESL varieties: A corpus-study of lexical innovations. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, (), –. 10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.05cal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.05cal [Google Scholar]
  19. (2016b) Of soundscapes, talkathons and shopaholics: On the status of a new type of formative in English (and beyond). STUF-Language Typology and Universals, (), –. 10.1515/stuf‑2016‑0021
     https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2016-0021 [Google Scholar]
  20. Cambridge University Press
    Cambridge University Press. (n.d.). Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (CALD). RetrievedDecember 31, 2023, fromhttps://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cannon, G.
    (1986) Blends in English word formation. Linguistics, , –. 10.1515/ling.1986.24.4.725
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1986.24.4.725 [Google Scholar]
  22. Collins
    Collins. (n.d.). Collins English Dictionary (CED). RetrievedDecember 31, 2023, fromhttps://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Crystal, D.
    (2008) A Dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Blackwell Publishing. 10.1002/9781444302776
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444302776 [Google Scholar]
  24. Davies, M.
    (2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). RetrievedDecember 31, 2023, fromhttps://www.english-corpora.org/coca/
     [Google Scholar]
  25. (2010) The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). RetrievedDecember 31, 2023, fromhttps://www.english-corpora.org/coha/
     [Google Scholar]
  26. (2016) The News on the Web (NOW). RetrievedDecember 31, 2023, fromhttps://www.english-corpora.org/now/
     [Google Scholar]
  27. (2019) Corpus-based studies of lexical and semantic variation: The importance of both corpus size and corpus design. InSuhr (Eds.), From data to evidence in English language research (pp. –). Brill. 10.1163/9789004390652_004
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390652_004 [Google Scholar]
  28. Fischer, R.
    (1998) Lexical change in present-day English: A corpus-based study of the motivation, institutionalisation, and productivity of creative neologisms. Gunter Narr Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Fradin, B.
    (2000) Combining forms, blends and related phenomena. InU. Doleschal & A. M. Thornton (Eds.), Extragrammatical and marginal morphology (pp. –). Lincom.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Gaeta, L., & Ricca, D.
    (2006) Productivity in Italian word formation: A variable-corpus approach. Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/LING.2006.003
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2006.003 [Google Scholar]
  31. Goldberg, A. E.
    (2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hilpert, M.
    (2013) Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation, and syntax. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139004206
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004206 [Google Scholar]
  33. Iacobini, C., & Giuliani, A.
    (2010) A multidimensional approach to the classification of combining forms. Italian Journal of Linguistics, (), –. https://www.italian-journal-linguistics.com/app/uploads/2021/05/3_Iacobini__Giuliani.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jackendoff, R.
    (2017) In defense of theory. Cognitive Science, , –. 10.1111/cogs.12324
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12324 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kastovsky, D.
    (2009) Astronaut, astrology, astrophysics: about combining forms, classical compounds and affixoids. InR. McConchie, J. Tyrkkö, & A. Honkapohja (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 symposium on new approaches in English historical lexis (HEL-LEX 2) (Vol.) (p.). Somerville. https://www.lingref.com/cpp/hel-lex/2008/paper2161.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lalić-Krstin, G., Silaški, N., & Đurović, T.
    (2022) Meanings of -nomics in English: From Nixonomics to coronanomics. How -nomics has extended its original meaning to additional senses. English Today, –. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/FC5EE61047D00E8C1E5A88C4D8514CA7/S0266078422000013a.pdf/meanings-of-nomics-in-english-from-nixonomics-to-coronanomics-how-nomics-has-extended-its-original-meaning-to-additional-senses.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Langemets, M., Kallas, J., Norak, K., & Hein, I.
    (2020) New Estonian words and senses: Detection and description. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America, (), –. 10.1353/dic.2020.0005
     https://doi.org/10.1353/dic.2020.0005 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lehrer, A.
    (1998) Scapes, holics, and thons: The semantics of English combining forms. American Speech, (), –. 10.2307/455924
     https://doi.org/10.2307/455924 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2007) Blendalicious. InMunat, J. (Ed.), Lexical creativity, texts and contexts (pp. –). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sfsl.58.16leh
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.58.16leh [Google Scholar]
  40. Lüdeling, A.
    (2006) Neoclassical word-formation. InK. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (pp. –). Elsevier. 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00121‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00121-8 [Google Scholar]
  41. Marchand, H.
    (1969) The Categories and types of present-day English word formation (2nd ed.). Beck Original Edition.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Mattiello, E.
    (2013) Extra-grammatical morphology in English: Abbreviations, blends, reduplicatives, and related phenomena. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110295399
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295399 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2017) Analogy in word-formation: A study of English neologisms and occasionalisms. De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110551419
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110551419 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2022) Derivational paradigms: The case of English combining forms. InA. E. Ruz, C. Fernández-Alcaina, & C. Lara-Clares (Eds.), Paradigms in word formation: Theory and applications (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.225.06mat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.225.06mat [Google Scholar]
  45. (2023) Transitional morphology: Combining forms in Modern English. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009168274
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009168274 [Google Scholar]
  46. McCauley, J.
    (2006) Technical combining forms in the third edition of the OED: Word-formation in a historical dictionary. InR. W. McConchie, O. Timofeeva, H. Tissari, & T. Säily (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2005 symposium on new approaches in English historical lexis (HEL-LEX) (pp. –). Somerville. https://www.lingref.com/cpp/hel-lex/2005/paper1350.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Merriam-Webster
    Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (MWCD). RetrievedDecember 31, 2023, fromhttps://www.merriam-webster.com
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Miller, D. G.
    (2014) English lexicogenesis. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689880.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689880.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  49. Mithun, M.
    (1995) Affixation and morphological longevity. InG. Booij & J. V. Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1994 (pp. –). Kluwer Academic Publishers. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑3714‑2_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3714-2_3 [Google Scholar]
  50. Montero Fleta, M. B., & Pérez-Sabater, C.
    (2016) Initial combining forms across registers: the case of aero-, hydro- and cyber-. English for Specific Purposes World, (), –. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/82839
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Norde, M., & Sippach, S.
    (2019) Nerdalicious scientainment: A network analysis of English libfixes. Word Structure, (), –. 10.3366/word.2019.0153
     https://doi.org/10.3366/word.2019.0153 [Google Scholar]
  52. Oxford University Press
    Oxford University Press (2000–) Oxford English Dictionary (OED, 3rd ed.). RetrievedDecember 31, 2023, fromhttps://www.oed.com/?tl=true
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Oxford University Press
    Oxford University Press (2023–) Oxford Dictionaries of English (ODE). RetrievedDecember 31, 2023, fromhttps://premium.oxforddictionaries.com/english/
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Oxford University Press
    Oxford University Press. (n.d.). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary Online (OALD). RetrievedDecember 31, 2023, fromhttps://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Plag, I.
    (2018) Word-formation in English (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316771402
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771402 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2021) Productivity. InB. Aarts, A. McMahon, & L. Hinrichs (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp. –). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119540618.ch24
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119540618.ch24 [Google Scholar]
  57. Prćić, T.
    (2005) Prefixes vs initial combining forms in English: A lexicographic perspective. International Journal of Lexicography, (), –. 10.1093/ijl/eci026
     https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/eci026 [Google Scholar]
  58. (2007) Headhood of suffixes and final combining forms in English word formation. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, (), –. 10.1556/ALing.54.2007.4.2
     https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.54.2007.4.2 [Google Scholar]
  59. Rita-Kasari, E.
    (2013) The Morphological productivity of selected combining forms in English [Unpublished master dissertation]. University of Helsinki. hdl.handle.net/10138/42284
  60. Rodríguez-Puente, P., Säily, T., & Suomela, J.
    (2022) New methods for analysing diachronic suffix competition across registers: How-ity gained ground on -ness in Early Modern English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.22014.rod
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22014.rod [Google Scholar]
  61. Schaefer, S.
    (2017) A fresh look at English “combining forms”: Structure, identification and pronunciation. InA. Bloch-Rozmej & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Constraints on structure and derivation in syntax, phonology and morphology (pp. –). Peter Lang. 10.3726/b10705
     https://doi.org/10.3726/b10705 [Google Scholar]
  62. Shao, B., Cai, Y., & Trousdale, G.
    (2019) A multivariate analysis of diachronic variation in a bunch of NOUN: A construction grammar account. Journal of English Linguistics, (), –. 10.1177/0075424219838611
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424219838611 [Google Scholar]
  63. Stein, G.
    (1979) The best of British and American lexicography. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America, (), –. 10.1353/dic.1979.0004
     https://doi.org/10.1353/dic.1979.0004 [Google Scholar]
  64. Stevenson, A.
    (2010) Oxford Dictionary of English (3rd ed). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acref/9780199571123.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199571123.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  65. Szudarski, P.
    (2018) Corpus linguistics for vocabulary: A guide for research. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315107769
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107769 [Google Scholar]
  66. Taylor, J. R.
    (Ed.) (2015) The Oxford handbook of the word. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641604.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199641604.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  67. Tokar, A.
    (2020) Disyllabic combining forms and their stressed vowels. Studia Neophilologica, (), –. 10.1080/00393274.2019.1695224
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2019.1695224 [Google Scholar]
  68. Tomaszewicz, E.
    (2008) Novel words with final combining forms in English. A case for blends in word formation. Poznań studies in contemporary linguistics, (), –. 10.2478/v10010‑008‑0018‑7
     https://doi.org/10.2478/v10010-008-0018-7 [Google Scholar]
  69. Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G.
    (2013) Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  70. (2014) Contentful constructionalization. Journal of Historical Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/jhl.4.2.04tra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jhl.4.2.04tra [Google Scholar]
  71. Warren, B.
    (1990) The importance of combining forms. InW. U. Dressler, H. C. Luschützky, O. E. Pfeiffer, & J. R. Rennison (Eds.), Contemporary morphology (pp. –). Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110874082.111
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110874082.111 [Google Scholar]
  72. Wiemeyer, L.
    (2019) The diachronic productivity of native combining forms in American English. InV. Wiegand & M. Mahlberg (Eds.), Corpus linguistics, context and culture (pp. –). Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110489071‑009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110489071-009 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wikimedia Foundation
    Wikimedia Foundation (2002) Wiktionary. RetrievedDecember 31, 2023, fromhttps://en.wiktionary.org/
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Zwicky, A.
    (2010, 23January). Libfixes. Arnold Zwicky’s Blog. https://arnoldzwicky.org/2010/01/23/libfixes/
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.23039.hua
Loading
A corpus-based study into new combining forms in American English
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.23039.hua
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.23039.hua
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.23039.hua
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: English combining forms ; constructionalisation ; productivity and stability ; formation ; corpus-based approach

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error