Exploring the ‘language of intimacy’ in English and French romance novels by means of a corpus-driven approach

References

1. Abouwarda, R., & Kraif, O.
   (2024) Utilisation de requêtes syntaxiques pour la terminologie: Une étude de cas dans les domaines de la psychologie et de la psychiatrie. [Using syntactic queries for terminology: a case study in the areas of psychology and psychiatry]. SHS Web of Conferences, 191: 9e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française. 10.1051/shsconf/202419111005
   https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202419111005 [Google Scholar]
2. Adam, J.-M.
   (2011 [1992]) Les textes: Types et prototypes [Texts: Types and prototypes]. Armand Colin.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aït-Mokhtar, S., Chanod, J.-P., & Roux, C.
   (2002) Robustness beyond shallowness: Incremental deep parsing. Natural Language Engineering, , –. 10.1017/S1351324902002887
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324902002887 [Google Scholar]
4. Augustinus, L., Vandeghinste, V., & Vanallemeersch, T.
   (2016) Poly-GrETEL: Cross-lingual example-based querying of syntactic constructions. InN. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. Grobelnik, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation — LREC 2016 (pp.–). https://aclanthology.org/L16-1564.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bartsch, S., & Evert, S.
   (2014) Towards a Firthian notion of collocation. InA. Abel & L. Lemnitzer (Eds.), Vernetzungsstrategien, Zugriffsstrukturen und automatisch ermittelte Angaben in Internetwörterbüchern [Networking strategies, access structures and automatically determined information in Internet dictionaries] (pp.–). Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim. https://pub.ids-mannheim.de/laufend/opal/pdf/opal2014-2.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
6. Béja, A.
   (2019) La new romance et ses nuances: Marché littéraire, sexualité imaginaire et condition féminine. [The new romance and its nuances: The literary market, imagined sexuality, and the female condition.] Revue du Crieur, –. 10.3917/crieu.012.0106
   https://doi.org/10.3917/crieu.012.0106 [Google Scholar]
7. Bertels, A., & Speelman, D.
   (2013) ‘Keywords method’ versus ‘Calcul des spécificités’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.18.4.04ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.4.04ber [Google Scholar]
8. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
   (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Duff, D.
   (2000) Modern genre theory. Longman. 10.4324/9781315839257
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315839257 [Google Scholar]
10. Dunning, T.
    (1993) Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence: Computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics, (), –. https://aclanthology.org/J93-1003/
    [Google Scholar]
11. Elliott, J.
    (2017) Whole genre sequencing. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities(), –. 10.1093/llc/fqv034
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv034 [Google Scholar]
12. Evert, S.
    (2008) Corpora and collocations. InA. Lüdeling and M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp.–). Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Fischer-Starcke, B.
    (2010) Corpus linguistics in literary analysis: Jane Austen and her contemporaries. Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Frow, J.
    (2005) Genre. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203962619
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962619 [Google Scholar]
15. Goldberg, A.
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument constructions. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Goșa, C.
    (2012) Sex and the genre: The role of sex in popular romance. InD. Percec (Ed.), Romance: The history of a genre (pp.–). Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Gries, S.
    (2019) 15 years of collostructions: Some long overdue additions/corrections (to/of actually all sorts of corpus-linguistics measures). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.00011.gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.00011.gri [Google Scholar]
18. Gymnich, M., & Dyka, S.
    (2020) Falling in love with vs. sich verlieben in: A corpus-based analysis of English and German romance novels. InL. Fesenmeier & I. Novakova (Eds.), Phraséologie et stylistique de la langue littéraire: Approches interdisciplinaires [Phraseology and stylistics of literary language: Interdisciplinary approaches] (pp.–). Peter Lang. 10.3726/b17628
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b17628 [Google Scholar]
19. Hardie, A.
    (2012) CQPweb — combining power, flexibility and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics(), –. 10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.17.3.04har [Google Scholar]
20. Hoey, M.
    (2005) Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203327630
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203327630 [Google Scholar]
21. Jacquot, C., Goossens, V. & Novakova, I.
    (2020) Étude contrastive des motifs spécifiques aux romans sentimentaux et aux romans Harlequin. [Contrastive study of motifs that are specific in romance novels and in Harlequin novels] InL. Fesenmeier & I. Novakova (Eds.), Phraséologie et stylistique de la langue littéraire: Approches interdisciplinaires [Phraseology and stylistics of literary language: Interdisciplinary approaches] (pp.–). Peter Lang. 10.3726/b17628
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b17628 [Google Scholar]
22. Katsma, H.
    (2014) Loudness in the novel. Literary Lab Pamphlet. https://litlab.stanford.edu/LiteraryLabPamphlet7.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kilgarriff, A., Rychly, P., Smrz, P. & Tugwell, D.
    (2004) The Sketch Engine. InG. Williams & S. Vessier (Eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh EURALEX international congress (pp.–). European Association for Lexicography. https://euralex.org/publications/the-sketch-engine/.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kolmes, S. & Hoffman, M. A.
    (2021) Harlequin resistance? Romance novels as a model for resisting objectification. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, –. 10.1093/jaac/kpaa004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpaa004 [Google Scholar]
25. König, E., & Lezius, W.
    (2003) The TIGER language — A description language for syntax graphs, formal definition. Technical report IMS, Universität Stuttgart, Germany. www.wolfganglezius.de/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=cl:tigerlangform.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
26. Lebart, L., & Salem, A.
    (1994) Statistique textuelle [Textual statistics]. Dunod.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Legallois, D.
    (2012) La colligation: Autre nom de la collocation grammaticale ou autre logique de la relation mutuelle entre syntaxe et sémantique? [Colligation: Another name for grammatical collocation or another logic for the mutual relationship between syntax and semantics?] Corpus, . corpus.revues.org/2202
    [Google Scholar]
28. Legallois, D., & Koch, S.
    (2020) The notion of motif where disciplines intersect: Folkloristics, narrativity, bioinformatics, automatic text processing and linguistics. InI. Novakova & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Phraseology and style in subgenres of the novel: A synthesis of corpus and literary perspectives (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑23744‑8_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23744-8_2 [Google Scholar]
29. Legallois, D., & Tutin, A.
    (2013) Présentation: Vers une extension du domaine de la phraséologie [Presentation: Towards an extension of the field of phraseology]. Langages, , –. 10.3917/lang.189.0003
    https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.189.0003 [Google Scholar]
30. Longrée, D., & Mellet, S.
    (2013) Le motif: Une unité phraséologique englobante? Étendre le champ de la phraséologie de la langue aux discours [The motif: An encompassing phraseological unit? Extending the scope of phraseology from language to discourse]. Langages, , –. 10.3917/lang.189.0065
    https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.189.0065 [Google Scholar]
31. Mahlberg, M.
    (2013) Corpus stylistics and Dickens’s fiction. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203076088
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203076088 [Google Scholar]
32. Mahlberg, M., Wiegand, V. & Hennessey, A.
    (2020) Eye language — body part collocations and textual contexts in the nineteenth-century novel. InL. Fesenmeier & I. Novakova (Eds.), Phraséologie et stylistique de la langue littéraire: Approches interdisciplinaires [Phraseology and stylistics of literary language: Interdisciplinary approaches] (pp.–). Peter Lang. 10.3726/b17628
    https://doi.org/10.3726/b17628 [Google Scholar]
33. Martin, R.
    (1983) Pour une logique du sens [For a logic of meaning]. Presses universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
34. McIntyre, D. & Walker, B.
    (2019) Corpus stylistics: Theory and practice. Edinburgh University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3366/j.ctvggx49p. 10.1515/9781474413220
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474413220 [Google Scholar]
35. Monte, M., & Philippe, G.
    (Eds.) (2014) Genres et textes: Déterminations, évolutions, confrontations [Genres and texts: Determinations, developments, confrontations]. Presses universitaires de Lyon. 10.4000/books.pul.2988
    https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pul.2988 [Google Scholar]
36. Moody, S.
    (2015) Identification, affect, and escape: Theorizing popular romance reading. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, (), –. 10.1215/15314200‑3158669
    https://doi.org/10.1215/15314200-3158669 [Google Scholar]
37. Novakova, I. & Gymnich, M.
    (2021) Extended phraseological units and literary genres: a contrastive analysis of French and English lexico-syntactic constructions. Lexique, , –. https://hal.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/hal-03208828v1
    [Google Scholar]
38. Novakova, I., & Siepmann, D.
    (2020a) Literary style, corpus stylistic, and lexico-grammatical narrative patterns: Toward the concept of literary motifs. InI. Novakova & D. Siepmann (Eds.), Phraseology and style in subgenres of the novel: A synthesis of corpus and literary persepctives (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑23744‑8_1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23744-8_1 [Google Scholar]
39. Novakova, I., & Siepmann, D.
    (Eds.) (2020b) Phraseology and style in subgenres of the novel: A synthesis of corpus and literary perspectives. Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑23744‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23744-8 [Google Scholar]
40. Parnell, C.
    (2018) Models of publishing and opportunities for change: Representations in Harlequin, Montlake and self-published romance novels. Australian Literary Studies(), –. 10.20314/als.1cd73e2f68
    https://doi.org/10.20314/als.1cd73e2f68 [Google Scholar]
41. Percec, D.
    (2012) Introduction: why romance?InD. Percec (Ed.), Romance: The history of a genre (pp.–). Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Perrier, G., & Guillaume, B.
    (2019) GREW, un outil au service de l’annotation de corpus et de l’exploitation de corpus annotés. [GREW, a tool for annotating corpora and making use of annotated corpora] Journées scientifiques “Linguistique informatique, formelle de terrain”, . https://inria.hal.science/hal-02388693v1
    [Google Scholar]
43. Philippe, G.
    (2016) French style: L’accent français de la prose anglaise [The French Accent of English Prose.] Les Impressions Nouvelles.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Philippe, G.
    (2021) Pourquoi le style change-t-il? [Why does style change?] Les Impressions Nouvelles. 10.14375/NP.9782874498671
    https://doi.org/10.14375/NP.9782874498671 [Google Scholar]
45. Roach, C.
    (2016) Happily ever after: The romance story in popular culture. Indiana University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt19zbzq4
    [Google Scholar]
46. Semino, E., & Short, M.
    (2004) Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203494073
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203494073 [Google Scholar]
47. Siepmann, D.
    (2015) A corpus-based investigation into key words and key patterns in post-war fiction. Functions of Language, (), –. 10.1075/fol.22.3.03sie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.3.03sie [Google Scholar]
48. Siepmann, D.
    (2016) Lexicologie et phraséologie du roman contemporain: Quelques pistes pour le français et l’anglais [Lexicology and phraseology of the contemporary novel: Some paths for French and English]. Cahiers de lexicologie, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Sinclair, J.
    (2004) Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203594070
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203594070 [Google Scholar]
50. Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. Th.
    (2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.03ste [Google Scholar]
51. Stubbs, M., & Barth, I.
    (2003) Using recurrent phrases as text-type discriminators: A quantitative method and some findings. Functions of Language, (), –. 10.1075/fol.10.1.04stu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.10.1.04stu [Google Scholar]
52. Stubbs, M.
    (2005) Conrad in the computer: Examples of quantitative stylistic methods. Language and Literature, (), –. 10.1177/0963947005048873
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947005048873 [Google Scholar]
53. Tognini-Bonelli, E.
    (2001) Corpus linguistics at work. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6 [Google Scholar]
54. Thierauf, D.
    (2016) Forever after: desire in the 21st-century romance blockbuster. The Journal of Popular Culture(), –. 10.1111/jpcu.12423
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jpcu.12423 [Google Scholar]
55. Wherry, M.
    (2015) More than a love story: The complexities of the popular romance. InCh. Berberich (Ed.), The Bloomsbury introduction to popular fiction (pp.–). Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Zymner, R.
    (2003) Gattungstheorie: Probleme und Positionen der Literaturwissenschaft [Genre theory: Problems and positions of literary studies]. Mentis.
    [Google Scholar]