1887
Volume 29, Issue 3
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811

Abstract

Abstract

We examine a corpus of integrated reports endorsed as best practice to explore how the concept of ‘capital’ and its novel extension into six types of capitals — including ‘human’, ‘social and relationship’, and ‘natural’ — are discursively constructed and legitimised in the corporate field. Our findings show that the new capitals are mentioned frequently, but in a bullet point-like way without elaboration on their significance — a response strategy that we call ‘management by keywords’. Our analysis suggests that the collective business mindset remains centred on financial value creation, with the new capitals acting as servants to financial objectives. This questions the transformative power of the six capitals, hailed as a business innovation, to move corporate practices towards more social and environmental sustainability via enhanced corporate accountability. At the conceptual and methodological level, the study showcases the potential of corpus linguistics for fostering interdisciplinary research involving linguists and scholars in business and accounting.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.24069.jaw
2024-10-04
2025-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijcl.24069.jaw.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.24069.jaw&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adams, C. A.
    (2015) The international integrated reporting council: A call to action. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 271, 23–28. 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker, P.
    (2006) Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum. 10.5040/9781350933996
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933996 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., & McEnery, T.
    (2013) Discourse analysis and media attitudes. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511920103
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920103 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beattie, V.
    (2014) Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework. The British Accounting Review, 46(2), 111–134. 10.1016/j.bar.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Beck, C., Dumay, J., & Frost, G.
    (2017) In pursuit of a ‘single source of truth’: From threatened legitimacy to integrated reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(1), 191–205. 10.1007/s10551‑014‑2423‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2423-1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bondi, M.
    (2016) The future in reports: Prediction, commitment and legitimization in corporate social responsibility (CSR). Pragmatics and Society, 7(1), 57–81. 10.1075/ps.7.1.03bon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.7.1.03bon [Google Scholar]
  8. Breeze, R.
    (2012) Legitimation in corporate discourse: Oil corporations after Deepwater Horizon. Discourse & Society, 23(1), 3–18. 10.1177/0957926511431511
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511431511 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, J., & Dillard, J.
    (2014) Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and opening up. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1120–1156. 10.1108/AAAJ‑04‑2013‑1313
    https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1313 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brown, J., & Tregidga, H.
    (2017) Re-politicizing social and environmental accounting through Rancière: On the value of dissensus. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 611, 1–21. 10.1016/j.aos.2017.08.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  11. Buhr, N., & Reiter, S.
    (2006) Ideology, the environment and one world view: A discourse analysis of Noranda’s environmental and sustainable development reports. InM. Freedman & B. Jaggi (Eds.), Environmental accounting (pp.1–48). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 10.1016/S1479‑3598(06)03001‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3598(06)03001-9 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cannan, E.
    (1921) Early history of the term capital. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 35(3), 469–481. 10.2307/1884097
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1884097 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chelli, M., & Gendron, Y.
    (2013) Sustainability ratings and the disciplinary power of the ideology of numbers. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(2), 187–203. 10.1007/s10551‑012‑1252‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1252-3 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M.
    (2007) The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 639–647. 10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M.
    (2010) The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 431–443. 10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  16. D’Adderio, L.
    (2008) The performativity of routines: Theorising the influence of artefacts and distributed agencies on routines dynamics. Research Policy, 37(5), 769–789. 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.012 [Google Scholar]
  17. de Villiers, C., & Dimes, R.
    (2023) Will the formation of the International Sustainability Standards Board result in the death of integrated reporting?Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 19(2), 279–295. 10.1108/JAOC‑05‑2022‑0084
    https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-05-2022-0084 [Google Scholar]
  18. de Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J.
    (2014) Integrated Reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1042–1067. 10.1108/AAAJ‑06‑2014‑1736
    https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2014-1736 [Google Scholar]
  19. Douglas, M.
    (1986) How institutions think. Syracuse University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Egbert, J., Larsson, T., & Biber, D.
    (2020) Doing linguistics with a corpus: Methodological considerations for the everyday user. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108888790
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108888790 [Google Scholar]
  21. Firth, J. R.
    (1957) Papers in linguistics 1934–1951. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Flower, J.
    (2015) The international integrated reporting council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 271, 1–17. 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Freeman, R. E., Martin, K., & Parmar, B.
    (2007) Stakeholder capitalism. Journal of Business Ethics, 741, 303–314. 10.1007/s10551‑007‑9517‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9517-y [Google Scholar]
  24. Friedman, M.
    (1970, September13). A Friedman doctrine — The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine. https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Fuoli, M.
    (2012) Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of Appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse & Communication, 6(1), 55–81. 10.1177/1750481311427788
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481311427788 [Google Scholar]
  26. Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
    (2017) Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: Identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence. Language Learning, 67(S1), 155–179. 10.1111/lang.12225
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12225 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gendron, Y., & Rodrigue, M.
    (2021) On the centrality of peripheral research and the dangers of tight boundary gatekeeping. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 761, Article 102076. 10.1016/j.cpa.2019.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.02.003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gibassier, D., Rodrigue, M., & Arjaliès, D. L.
    (2018) Integrated reporting is like God: No one has met Him, but everybody talks about Him: The power of myths in the adoption of management innovations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(5), 1349–1380. 10.1108/AAAJ‑07‑2016‑2631
    https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2016-2631 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gillings, M., & Dayrell, C.
    (2024) Climate change in the UK press: Examining discourse fluctuation over time. Applied Linguistics, 45(1), 111–133. 10.1093/applin/amad007
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad007 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gillings, M., & Mautner, G.
    (2024) Concordancing for CADS: Practical challenges and theoretical implications. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 29(1), 34–58. 10.1075/ijcl.21168.gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21168.gil [Google Scholar]
  31. Gleeson-White, J.
    (2015) Six capitals, or can accountants save the planet? Rethinking capitalism for the twenty-first century. W. W. Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Higgins, C., Stubbs, W., & Love, T.
    (2014) Walking the talk(s): Organisational narratives of integrated reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1090–1119. 10.1108/AAAJ‑04‑2013‑1303
    https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1303 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hodgson, G. M.
    (2014) What is capital? Economists and sociologists have changed its meaning: Should it be changed back?Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(5), 1063–1086. 10.1093/cje/beu013
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beu013 [Google Scholar]
  34. IIRC [Google Scholar]
  35. IIRC
    IIRC (2019) Integrated Reporting examples database. https://examples.integratedreporting.org/home
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Jaworska, S.
    (2018) Change but no climate change: Discourses of climate change in corporate social responsibility reporting in the oil industry. International Journal of Business Communication, 55(2), 194–219. 10.1177/2329488417753951
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417753951 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jaworska, S., & Nanda, A.
    (2018) Doing well by talking good: A topic modelling-assisted discourse study of corporate social responsibility. Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 373–399.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Jonsen, K., Point, S., Kelan, E., & Grieble, A.
    (2021) Diversity and inclusion branding: A five-country comparison of corporate websites. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(3), 616–649. 10.1080/09585192.2018.1496125
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1496125 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V.
    (2014) The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1(1), 7–36. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lischinsky, A.
    (2015) What is the environment doing in my report? Analyzing the environment-as-stakeholder thesis through corpus linguistics. Environmental Communication, 9(4), 539–559. 10.1080/17524032.2014.967705
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.967705 [Google Scholar]
  41. Malsch, B.
    (2013) Politicizing the expertise of the accounting industry in the realm of corporate social responsibility. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(2), 149–168. 10.1016/j.aos.2012.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  42. McNally, M. A., & Maroun, W.
    (2018) It is not always bad news: Illustrating the potential of integrated reporting using a case study in the eco-tourism industry. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(5), 1319–1348. 10.1108/AAAJ‑05‑2016‑2577
    https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2016-2577 [Google Scholar]
  43. Milne, M. J., & Gray, R.
    (2013) W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29. 10.1007/s10551‑012‑1543‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8 [Google Scholar]
  44. O’Dwyer, B., Humphrey, C., & Rowbottom, N.
    (2024) From institutional integration to institutional demise: The disintegration of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 991, Article 102699. 10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102699
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102699 [Google Scholar]
  45. Oswick, C., & Noon, M.
    (2014) Discourses of diversity, equality and inclusion: Trenchant formulations or transient fashions?British Journal of Management, 25(1), 23–39. 10.1111/j.1467‑8551.2012.00830.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00830.x [Google Scholar]
  46. OED
    OED. (n.d.). Growth. InOED | Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. RetrievedAugust 6, 2024, fromhttps://www.oed.com/dictionary/growth_n1?tab=factsheet
    [Google Scholar]
  47. OED
    OED. (n.d.). Organic. InOED | Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. RetrievedAugust 6, 2024, fromhttps://www.oed.com/dictionary/organic_adj?tab=factsheet#33325143
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Pollach, I.
    (2012) Taming textual data: The contribution of corpus linguistics to computer-aided text analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 15(2), 263–287. 10.1177/1094428111417451
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428111417451 [Google Scholar]
  49. Power, M.
    (2021) The financial reporting system — what is it?Accounting and Business Research, 51(5), 459–480. 10.1080/00014788.2021.1932253
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2021.1932253 [Google Scholar]
  50. Reinecke, J., & Ansari, S.
    (2016) Taming wicked problems: The role of framing in the construction of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 299–329. 10.1111/joms.12137
    https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12137 [Google Scholar]
  51. Robson, K., & Ezzamel, M.
    (2023) The cultural fields of accounting practices: Institutionalization and accounting changes beyond the organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1041, Article 101379. 10.1016/j.aos.2022.101379
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101379 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rowbottom, N., & Locke, J.
    (2016) The emergence of <IR>. Accounting and Business Research, 46(1), 83–115. 10.1080/00014788.2015.1029867
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1029867 [Google Scholar]
  53. Solomon, J.
    (2013) Corporate governance and accountability (4th ed.). Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Stenka, R.
    (2022) Beyond intentionality in accounting regulation: Habitual strategizing by the IASB. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 881, Article 102294. 10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102294
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102294 [Google Scholar]
  55. Stenka, R., & Jaworska, S.
    (2019) The use of made-up users. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 781, Article 101055. 10.1016/j.aos.2019.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  56. Tregidga, H., Milne, M., & Kearins, K.
    (2014) (Re)presenting ‘sustainable organizations’. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 477–494. 10.1016/j.aos.2013.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2013.10.006 [Google Scholar]
  57. (2018) Ramping up resistance: Corporate sustainable development and academic research. Business & Society, 57(2), 292–334. 10.1177/0007650315611459
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315611459 [Google Scholar]
  58. Tregidga, H., Milne, M., & Lehman, G.
    (2012) Analyzing the quality, meaning and accountability of organizational reporting and communication: Directions for future research. Accounting Forum, 36(3), 223–230. 10.1016/j.accfor.2012.07.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2012.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  59. van Bommel, K., Rasche, A., & Spicer, A.
    (2023) From values to value: The commensuration of sustainability reporting and the crowding out of morality. Organization & Environment, 36(1), 179–206. 10.1177/10860266221086617
    https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266221086617 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.24069.jaw
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.24069.jaw
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): collocations; integrated reporting; keywords; six capitals; sustainability
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error