1887
image of From theory to data
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper presents a corpus-based study that evaluates variables identified introspectively by Berthonneau (2002) in relation to the alternation between two French synonymous: (‘next’ or ‘upcoming’) and (‘following’ or ‘next’). Employing a multifactorial and behavioural profiles approach, we explore the asymmetry in their temporal and spatial applications. Our findings highlight distinct uses with temporal nouns, whereas uses with material nouns overlap. Binomial logistic regression and multiple correspondence analysis reveal a general divide between the deictic use of and the anaphoric use of , corroborating Berthonneau’s descriptions. Additionally, event predictability, which Berthonneau addressed only fleetingly, significantly influences form choice, with often associated with general, eventual contexts and with specific, predictable events. This study contributes to the understanding of how corpus-based methods can refine existing linguistic hypotheses by illuminating the intersections and divergences between empirical and introspective research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.24085.loo
2025-10-31
2025-11-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barnier, J.
    (2023) explor: Interactive interfaces for results exploration. R package version 0.3.10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=explor
  2. Dogucu, M., Johnson, A., & Ott, M.
    (2021) bayesrules: Datasets and supplemental functions from Bayes Rules! Book. R package 0.0.2.9000. https://github.com/bayes-rules/bayesrules
  3. Gabry, J., & Mahr, T.
    (2022) bayesplot: Plotting for Bayesian models. R package version 1.10.0. https://mc-stan.org/bayesplot/
  4. Goodrich, B., Gabry, J., Ali, I., & Brilleman, S.
    (2022) rstanarm: Bayesian applied regression modelling via Stan. R package version 2.21.3. https://mc-stan.org/rstanarm
  5. Hartig, F.
    (2022) DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R package version 0.4.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa
  6. Le, S., Josse, J., & Husson, F.
    (2008) FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v025.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01 [Google Scholar]
  7. Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., & Makowski, D.
    (2021) performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software, (), . 10.21105/joss.03139
    https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139 [Google Scholar]
  8. Nenadic, O., & Greenacre, M.
    (2007) Correspondence Analysis in R, with two- and three-dimensional graphics: The ca package. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. 10.18637/jss.v020.i03
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v020.i03 [Google Scholar]
  9. Vehtari, A., Gabry, J., Magnusson, M., Yao, Y., Bürkner, P., Paananen, T., & Gelman, A.
    (2022) loo: Efficient leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC for Bayesian models. R package version 2.5.1. https://mc-stan.org/loo
  10. Wickham, H.
    (2011) The Split-Apply-Combine strategy for data analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, (), –. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v40/i01/. 10.18637/jss.v040.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i01 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2016) ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑24277‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 [Google Scholar]
  12. Aarts, J.
    (1991) Intuition-based and observation-based grammars. InK. Aijmer & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics, (pp.–). Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Benzitoun, C., Bresson, S., Budzinski, L., Debaisieux, J. M., & Holzheimer, K.
    (2010) Quand un corpus rencontre un adjectif du troisième type. Étude distributionnelle de prochain. Corpus, , –. 10.4000/corpus.1927
    https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.1927 [Google Scholar]
  14. Berthonneau, A.-M.
    (2002) Prochain/dernier et compagnie. Les adjectifs « déictiques » à l’épreuve de l’espace ou comment circuler dans le temps, l’espace, le texte. Langue Française, , –. 10.3406/lfr.2002.6475
    https://doi.org/10.3406/lfr.2002.6475 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chomsky, N.
    (1979) Language and responsibility: Based on conversations with Mitsou Ronat. Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Debaisieux, J. M., Benzitoun, C., & Deulofeu, J.
    (2016) Le projet ORFÉO: Un corpus d’études pour le français contemporain. Corpus: Actes du colloque Corpus de Français Parlés et Français Parlés des Corpus, , –. 10.4000/corpus.2936
    https://doi.org/10.4000/corpus.2936 [Google Scholar]
  17. Fornacon-Wood, I., Mistry, H., Johnson-Hart, C., Faivre-Finn, C., O’Connor, J. P. B., & Price, G. J.
    (2021) Understanding the differences between Bayesian and frequentist statistics. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, (), –. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.12.011 [Google Scholar]
  18. Feuillet, J.
    (1991) Adjectifs et adverbes, essai de classification. InC. Guimier & P. Larcher (Eds.), Travaux linguistique du Cerlico 3: Les états de l’adverbe, (pp.–). Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1992) “Corpus linguistics” vs. “computer-aided armchair linguistics”. InJ. Svartvik (Ed.), Directions in corpus linguistics: Proceedings from a 1991 Nobel symposium on corpus linguistics, (pp.–), Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110867275.35
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110867275.35 [Google Scholar]
  20. Forsgren, M.
    (1978) La place de l’adjectif épithète en français contemporain: Étude quantitative et sémantique [The Placement of attributive adjective in contemporary French: A quantitative and semantic study]. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Gabry, J., Simpson, D., Vehtari, A., Betancourt, M. & Gelman, A.
    (2019) Visualization in Bayesian workflow. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, (), –. 10.1111/rssa.12378
    https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12378 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gelman, A., Hill, J., & Vehtari, A.
    (2020) Regression and other stories. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139161879
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139161879 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
    (2006) Introspection and cognitive linguistics. Should we trust our own intuitions?Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, , –. 10.1075/arcl.4.06gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.06gib [Google Scholar]
  24. Goes, J.
    (2021) L’adjectif: Une partie du discours éminemment syncatégorématique. Kalbotyra, , –. 10.15388/Kalbotyra.2021.74.4
    https://doi.org/10.15388/Kalbotyra.2021.74.4 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2022) Grand et petit, de simples antonymes?Éla. Études de linguistique appliquée, , –. 10.3917/ela.206.0015
    https://doi.org/10.3917/ela.206.0015 [Google Scholar]
  26. Greenacre, M.
    (2017) Correspondence analysis in practice (3rd ed.). Chapman and Hall. 10.1201/9781315369983
    https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315369983 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gries, S. T., & Deshors, S. C.
    (2014) Using regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: two suggestions. Corpora, (), –. 10.3366/cor.2014.0053
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2014.0053 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gries, S. T., & Divjak, D.
    (2009) Behavioral profiles: a corpus-based approach to cognitive semantic analysis. InV. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, (pp.–). Johns Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.24.07gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.24.07gri [Google Scholar]
  29. Hanks, P.
    (2013) Lexical analysis: Norms and exploitations. The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262018579.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262018579.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Heiden, S.
    (2010) The TXM platform: Building open-source textual analysis software compatible with the TEI encoding scheme. InR. Otoguro, K. Ishikawa, H. Umemoto, K. Yoshimoto, & Y. Harada (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Pacific Asia conference on language, information and computation, (pp.–). Institute of Digital Enhancement of Cognitive Processing, Waseda University.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Levshina, N.
    (2015) How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu, M., & Dou, J.
    (2024) Metaphorical polysemy of the Chinese color term hēi 黑 “black”: A corpus-based cognitive semantic analysis with behavioral profiles. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.21067.liu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21067.liu [Google Scholar]
  33. McEnery, T., & Hardie, A.
    (2012) Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511981395
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511981395 [Google Scholar]
  34. Noailly, M.
    (1999) L’adjectif en français [Adjective in French]. Ophrys.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Riegel, M., Pellat, J.-C., & Rioul, R.
    (2004) Grammaire méthodique du Français [Methodical grammar of French] (3rd ed.). Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2009) Grammaire méthodique du Français [Methodical grammar of French] (4th ed.). Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Schindler, S., Drożdżowicz, A., & Brøcker, K.
    (Eds.) (2020) Linguistics intuitions: Evidence and method. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780198840558.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840558.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  38. Schnedecker, C.
    (Ed.) (2002a) L’adjectifs sans qualité(s). Langue Française, . https://www.persee.fr/issue/lfr_0023-8368_2002_num_136_1
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2002b) Présentation: les adjectifs « inclassables », des adjectifs du troisième type?Langue française, , –. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41559054
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Scontras, G.
    (2023) Adjective ordering across languages. Annual Review of Linguistics, , –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑030521‑041835
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-030521-041835 [Google Scholar]
  41. Sinclair, J. M. H.
    (1998) The lexical item. InE. Weigand (Ed.), Contrastive lexical semantics, (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.171.02sin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.171.02sin [Google Scholar]
  42. (2000) Lexical grammar. Naujoji Metodologija, , –. 10.7220/2335‑8769.24.13
    https://doi.org/10.7220/2335-8769.24.13 [Google Scholar]
  43. Teubert, W.
    (2010) Our brave new world?International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.15.3.04teu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.3.04teu [Google Scholar]
  44. Wasserstein, R. L., Schirm, A. L., & Lazar, N. A.
    (2019) Moving to a world beyond “p < 0.05”. The American Statistician, (), –. 10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913 [Google Scholar]
  45. Worlock Pope, C.
    (Ed.) (2010) The bootcamp discourse and beyond. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (). https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/15699811/15/3
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wulff, S.
    (2003) A multifactorial corpus analysis of adjective order in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.8.2.04wul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.04wul [Google Scholar]
  47. Xu, M., Li, F., & Szmrecsanyi, B.
    (2024) Modeling the locative alternation in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/ijcl.22072.xu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22072.xu [Google Scholar]
  48. Yamamoto, D.
    (2020) L’adjectivité des épithètes antéposées sale et foutu. Travaux de Lingustique, , –. 10.3917/tl.080.0049
    https://doi.org/10.3917/tl.080.0049 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.24085.loo
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.24085.loo
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error