oa “…animated by a number of fundamental principles”

References

1. Anthony, L.
   (2024) AntConc (Version 4.3.0) [Computer software]. Waseda University. www.laurenceanthony.net/
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baker, P., Hardie, A., & McEnery, T.
   (2006) A glossary of corpus linguistics. Edinburgh University Press. 10.1515/9780748626908
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748626908 [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, P., & McEnery, T.
   (2015) Introduction. InP. Baker, & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora (pp.–). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137431738_1
   https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137431738_1 [Google Scholar]
4. Biel, L.
   (2018) Lexical bundles in EU law: The impact of translation process on the patterning of legal language. InS. Goźdź-Roszkowski, & G. Pontrandolfo (Eds.), Phraseology in legal and institutional settings: A corpus-based interdisciplinary perspective (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315445724
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445724 [Google Scholar]
5. Byrne, R., McCutcheon, P., Bruton, C., & Coffey, G.
   (2014) The Irish legal system. Bloomsbury.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bunreacht na hÉireann — Constitution of Ireland
   Bunreacht na hÉireann — Constitution of Ireland (2018/1937) The Stationery Office.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Carolan, E.
   (Ed.) (2018) Judicial power in Ireland. Institute of Public Administration.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cheng, W.
   (2012) Exploring corpus linguistics: Language in action. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203802632
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203802632 [Google Scholar]
9. Dickson, B.
   (2019) How does today’s Supreme Court conceptualise human rights?Irish Supreme Court Review, , –.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Doyle, O.
    (2018) Interpretation: The unrealisable ideal of judicial constraint. InE. Carolan (Ed.), Judicial power in Ireland (pp.–). Institute of Public Administration.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Ferriter, D.
    (2024) The Revelation of Ireland: 1995–2020. Profile Books.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Feteris, E. T.
    (2002) A pragma-dialectical approach of the analysis and evaluation of pragmatic argumentation in a legal context. Argumentation, , –. 10.1023/A:1019999606665
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019999606665 [Google Scholar]
13. Feteris, E. T.
    (2005) A survey of 25 years of research on legal argumentation. Argumentation, , –. 10.1023/A:1007794830151
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007794830151 [Google Scholar]
14. Feteris, E. T.
    (2016) Prototypical argumentative patterns in a legal context: The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions. Argumentation, , –. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9376‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9376-0 [Google Scholar]
15. Feteris, E. T.
    (2017) Fundamentals of legal argumentation. Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑024‑1129‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1129-4 [Google Scholar]
16. Foley, R.
    (2002) Legislative language in the EU: The crucible. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, , –. 10.1023/A:1021203529151
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021203529151 [Google Scholar]
17. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S.
    (2018a) Between corpus-based and corpus-driven approaches to textual recurrence. Exploring semantic sequences in judicial discourse. InJ. Kopaczyk, & T. Jukka (Eds.), Patterns in text: Corpus-driven methods and applications (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.82.06goz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.82.06goz [Google Scholar]
18. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S.
    (2018b) Facts in law: A comparative study of fact that and its phraseologies in American and Polish judicial discourse. InS. Goźdź-Roszkowski, & G. Pontrandolfo (Eds.), Phraseology in legal and institutional settings: A corpus-based interdisciplinary perspective (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315445724
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445724 [Google Scholar]
19. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S.
    (2020) Communicating dissent in judicial opinions: A comparative, genre-based analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, , –. 10.1007/s11196‑020‑09711‑y
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09711-y [Google Scholar]
20. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S.
    (2021) Corpus linguistics and legal discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, , –. 10.1007/s11196‑021‑09860‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09860-8 [Google Scholar]
21. MacCormick, N.
    (2005) Rhetoric and the rule of law. A theory of legal reasoning. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571246.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571246.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
22. Manning, M.
    (2010) The Seanad. InM. MacCarthaigh, & M. Manning (Eds.), The Houses of the Oireachtas (pp.–). Institute of Public Administration.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Mazzi, D.
    (2014) “Our reading would lead to…”: Corpus perspectives on pragmatic argumentation in US Supreme Court judgments. Journal of Argumentation in Context, (), –. 10.1075/jaic.3.2.01maz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.3.2.01maz [Google Scholar]
24. Mazzi, D.
    (2016) The Theoretical background and practical implications of argumentation in Ireland. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Mazzi, D.
    (2020) A Discourse perspective on Bunreacht na hÉireann: A sound Constitution?Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mazzi, D.
    (2022) “…without proof of negligence or a causative connection…”: On causal argumentation in the discourse of the Supreme Court of Ireland’s judgments on data protection. InS. Goźdź-Roszkowski, & G. Pontrandolfo (Eds.), Law, language and the Courtroom: Legal linguistics and the discourse of judges (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003153771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003153771 [Google Scholar]
27. Mazzi, D.
    (Forthcoming). “The analogy…is imperfect”: On criticisms of argumentation by comparison in Supreme Court of Ireland’s judgments on human rights. InS. Goźdź-Roszkowski, & G. Pontrandolfo Eds. In the minds of judges: Argumentative discourse at the intersection of law and language. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783111569628‑002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111569628-002 [Google Scholar]
28. Morgan, D. G.
    (2001) A Judgment too far? Judicial activism and the Constitution. Cork University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ó Dónaill, N.
    (1977) Foclóir Gaeilge-Béarla. An Gúm.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pontrandolfo, G., & Goźdź-Roszkowski, S.
    (2014) Exploring the local grammar of evaluation: The case of adjectival patterns in American and Italian judicial discourse. Research in Language, (), –. 10.2478/rela‑2014‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2014-0014 [Google Scholar]
31. Smyth, G.
    (2012) Irish national identity after the Celtic Tiger. Estudios Irlandeses, , –. https://www.estudiosirlandeses.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Gerry_Smyth_7.pdf. 10.24162/EI2012‑1973
    https://doi.org/10.24162/EI2012-1973 [Google Scholar]
32. Solan, L. M.
    (2020) Corpus linguistics as a method of legal interpretation: Some progress, some questions. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, , –. 10.1007/s11196‑020‑09707‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09707-8 [Google Scholar]
33. Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
    (1996) Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory. A Handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Lawrence Erlbaum. 10.4324/9780203811306
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203811306 [Google Scholar]
34. Van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F.
    (2007) Argumentative indicators in discourse: A pragma-dialectical approach. Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4020‑6244‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5 [Google Scholar]
35. Van Eemeren, F. H.
    (2016) Identifying argumentative patterns: A vital step in the development of pragma-dialectics. Argumentation, , –. 10.1007/s10503‑015‑9377‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9377-z [Google Scholar]
36. Van Poppel, L.
    (2012) Pragmatic argumentation in health brochures. Journal of Argumentation in Context, , –. 10.1075/jaic.1.1.08pop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.1.1.08pop [Google Scholar]
37. Vogel, F., Hamann, H., & Gauer, I.
    (2018) Computer-assisted legal linguistics: Corpus analysis as a new tool for legal studies. Law & Social Inquiry, (), –. 10.1111/lsi.12305
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12305 [Google Scholar]
38. Williams, C.
    (2008) The end of the ‘masculine rule’? Gender-neutral legislative drafting in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Statute Law Review, (), –. 10.1093/slr/hmn015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hmn015 [Google Scholar]
39. Yu, W.
    (2021) Reporting verbs in court judgments of the common law system: A corpus-based study. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, , –. 10.1007/s11196‑020‑09740‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09740-7 [Google Scholar]