1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
  4. Volume 31, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 31, Issue 1
  • ISSN 1384-6655
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9811
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This editorial introduces a special issue of the International Journal of Corpus Linguistics on corpus perspectives on legal discourse. It first situates corpus-based research within the broader empirical tradition of language and law studies, tracing the emergence of a ‘corpus turn’ from the mid-1990s onwards and its contribution to the analysis of legal texts. It then identifies established and emerging trends exemplified by the five studies in the issue, which span jurisdictions in Europe, North America and Asia and draw on both common law and civil law traditions. Four trends are discussed: the continued dominance of written legal discourse as the core object of corpus analysis; comparison as a foundational methodological design principle; the role of intertextuality, interdiscursivity and genre networks in situating legal texts within broader institutional and societal contexts; and the spectrum from impersonal, informational legal language to more involved, evaluative discourse in judicial settings.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.26065.wri
2026-04-02
2026-04-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.26065.wri
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archer, D.
    (2005) Questions and answers in the English courtroom (1640–1760): A Sociopragmatic analysis. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.135
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.135 [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P.
    (1979) Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑04057‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-04057-5 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhatia, V. K.
    (1987) Language of the law. Language Teaching, 20(4), 227–234. 10.1017/S026144480000464X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480000464X [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatia, V. K., Langton, N. M., & Lung, J.
    (2004) Legal discourse: Opportunities and threats for corpus linguistics. InU. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp.203–231). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.16.09bha
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.09bha [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, D.
    (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  6. Charrow, R. P., & Charrow, V. R.
    (1979) Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instructions. Columbia Law Review, 79(7), 1306–1374. 10.2307/1121842
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1121842 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cotterill, J.
    (2001) Domestic discord, rocky relationships: Semantic prosodies in representations of marital violence in the O.J. Simpson trial. Discourse & Society, 12(3), 291–312. 10.1177/0957926501012003002
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003002 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2003) Language and power in court: A linguistic analysis of the O. J. Simpson trial. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230006010
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230006010 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2012) Corpus analysis in forensic linguistics. InC. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0238
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0238 [Google Scholar]
  10. Coulthard, M.
    (1994) On the use of corpora in the analysis of forensic texts. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 1(1), 27–43. 10.1558/ijsll.v1i1.27
     https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v1i1.27 [Google Scholar]
  11. Crystal, D., & Davy, D.
    (1969) Investigating English style. Longman. 10.4324/9781315538419
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315538419 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fanego, T., & Rodríguez-Puente, P.
    (2019) “Why may not that be the skull of a lawyer?” English legal discourse past and present. InT. Fanego & P. Rodríguez-Puente (Eds.), Corpus-based research on variation in English legal discourse (pp.1–22). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.91.01fan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.91.01fan [Google Scholar]
  13. Finegan, E., & Lee, B. T.
    (2021) Legal writing: attitude and emphasis. InM. Coulthard, A. May & R. Sousa-Silva (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of forensic linguistics (pp.48–63). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429030581
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429030581 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gibbons, J.
    (2003) Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S.
    (2021) Corpus linguistics in legal discourse. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 34(5), 1515–1540. 10.1007/s11196‑021‑09860‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09860-8 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S., & Pontrandolfo, G.
    (2018) Cross-linguistic approaches and applications to phraseology in legal and institutional discourse. InS. Goźdź-Roszkowski & G. Pontrandolfo (Eds.), Phraseology in legal and institutional settings: A corpus-based interdisciplinary perspective (pp.1–8). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315445724
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315445724 [Google Scholar]
  17. Grieshofer, T.
    (2024) Legal-lay discourse and procedural justice in family and county courts. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009378031
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009378031 [Google Scholar]
  18. Harris, S.
    (1984) Questions as a mode of control in magistrates’ courts. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 491, 5–27. 10.1515/ijsl.1984.49.5
     https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1984.49.5 [Google Scholar]
  19. Haworth, K.
    (2016) Linguistics and the law. InK. Allen (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistics (pp.532–545). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315718453
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315718453 [Google Scholar]
  20. Heffer, C.
    (2005) The Language of jury trial: A Corpus-aided analysis of legal-lay discourse. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230502888
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230502888 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2008) Judgement in court: Evaluating participants in courtroom discourse. InK. Kredens and S. Goźdź-Roszkowski (Eds.), Language and the law: International outlooks (pp.145–179). Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kit, C., Webster, J. J., Sin, K. K., Pan, H., & Li, H.
    (2004) Clause alignment for Hong Kong legal texts: A lexical-based approach. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 29–51. 10.1075/ijcl.9.1.02kit
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.02kit [Google Scholar]
  23. Maley, Y.
    (1994) The language of the law. InJ. Gibbons (Ed.), Language and the law (pp.3–50). Longman. 10.4324/9781315844329
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315844329 [Google Scholar]
  24. Matoesian, G. M.
    (1993) Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C.
    (2013) Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.55
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.55 [Google Scholar]
  26. O’Barr, W. M.
    (1982) Linguistic evidence: Language, power, and strategy in the courtroom. Academic Press. 10.1016/C2009‑0‑21138‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-21138-X [Google Scholar]
  27. Rock, F., Heffer, C., & Conley, J.
    (2013) Textual travel in legal–lay communication. InC. Heffer, F. Rock, & J. Conley (Eds.), Legal-lay communication: Textual travels in the law (pp.3–32). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746842.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199746842.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  28. Shuy, R. W.
    (1998) The language of confession, interrogation and deception. Sage. 10.4135/9781452229133
     https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452229133 [Google Scholar]
  29. Stubbs, M.
    (2001) Texts, corpora and problems of interpretation. Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 149–172. 10.1093/applin/22.2.149
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.2.149 [Google Scholar]
  30. Stygall, G.
    (1994) Trial language: Differential discourse processing and discursive formation. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.26
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.26 [Google Scholar]
  31. Swales, J. M.
    (2004) Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
  32. Tiersma, P. M.
    (1999) Legal language. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226854809.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226854809.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2008) The nature of legal language. InJ. Gibbons & M. T. Turell (Eds.), Dimensions of forensic linguistics (pp.7–25). John Benjamins. 10.1075/aals.5.03tie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.5.03tie [Google Scholar]
  34. Vogel, F., Hamann, H., & Gauer, I.
    (2018) Computer-assisted legal linguistics: Corpus analysis as a new tool for legal studies. Law & Social Inquiry, 43(4), 1340–1363. 10.1111/lsi.12305
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12305 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wright, D.
    (2025) Corpus approaches to discourse in forensic and legal contexts. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003017301
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003017301 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijcl.26065.wri
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
Keyword(s): corpus-assisted discourse study; forensic linguistics; language and law; Legal discourse; legal genres

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error