Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2215-1478
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1486
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes
Preview this article:


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ädel, A.
    (2008) Involvement features in writing: Do time and interaction trump register awareness?Language and Computers, 66, 35–53.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Aksu-Koç, A.
    (1998) The acquisition of aspect and modality: The case of past reference in Turkish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Thubaiti, K. A.
    (2015) L2 acquisition of English aspect by L1 Arabic speakers: The role of interpretable features at the syntax-semantics interface. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), The acquisition of the present (pp.185–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.196.07alt
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.07alt [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexopoulou, T. , Michel, M. , Murakami, A. , & Meurers, D.
    (2017) Task effects on linguistic complexity and accuracy: A large-scale learner corpus analysis employing natural language processing techniques. Language Learning, 67(1), 180–208.10.1111/lang.12232
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12232 [Google Scholar]
  5. Andersen, R. W.
    (2002) The dimensions of ‘pastness’. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp.79–105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27.06and
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27.06and [Google Scholar]
  6. Andersen, R. W. & Shirai, Y.
    (1994) Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(2), 133–156.10.1017/S0272263100012845
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100012845 [Google Scholar]
  7. Ayoun, D.
    (2015a) Conclusions and directions for future research. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), The acquisition of the present (pp.336–340). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.196.11ayo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.11ayo [Google Scholar]
  8. (Ed.) (2015b) The acquisition of the present. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.196
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bardovi-Harlig, K.
    (2000) The role of discourse: The Interlanguage Discourse Hypothesis. Language Learning, 50(1), 277–337.10.1111/0023‑8333.50.s1.7
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.50.s1.7 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2002) Analyzing aspect. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp.129–154). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27.08bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27.08bar [Google Scholar]
  11. (2012) After process, then what? A longitudinal investigation of the progressive prototype in L2 English. In I. Saddour & E. Labeau (Eds.), Tense, aspect and mood in First and Second Language Acquisition (pp.131–151). New York: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bayley, R.
    (2013) Data analysis: Qualitative approaches. In M. R. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (Eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect (pp.357–389). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781934078167.357
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078167.357 [Google Scholar]
  13. Benazzo, S. & Andorno, C.
    (2017) Is it really easier to acquire a closely-related language? A study on the expression of iteration and continuation in L2 French. In M. Howard & P. Leclercq (Eds.), Tense-aspect-modality in a second language. Contemporary perspectives (pp.105–143). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.50.05ben
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.50.05ben [Google Scholar]
  14. Binnick, R. I.
    (2006) Aspect and aspectuality. In B. Aarts & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp.244–268). Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470753002.ch11
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch11 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chan, H. L. , Finberg, J. , Costello, W. , & Shirai, Y.
    (2012) L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: Lexical aspect, morphological regularity, and transfer. In L. Filipovic & K. M. Jaszczolt (Eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures. Linguistic diversity (pp.181–204). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.36.12chan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.36.12chan [Google Scholar]
  16. Comrie, B.
    (1976) Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (1985) Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165815
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165815 [Google Scholar]
  18. Davydova, J.
    (2011) The present perfect in non-native Englishes. A corpus-based study of variation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110255027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110255027 [Google Scholar]
  19. Deshors, S. C.
    (2018) Does the passé composé influence L2 learners’ use English past tenses? A semantic exploration of the present perfect in French-English interlanguage. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 4(1), 23–53.10.1075/ijlcr.17007.des
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.17007.des [Google Scholar]
  20. Deshors, S. C. , Götz, S. , & Laporte, S.
    (Eds.) (2016) Linguistic innovations. Rethinking linguistic creativity in non-native Englishes. Special issue of theInternational Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 2(2).
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dose-Heidelmayer, S. & Götz, S.
    (2016) The progressive in spoken learner language: A corpus-based analysis of use and misuse. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(3), 229–256.10.1515/iral‑2016‑9982
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9982 [Google Scholar]
  22. Durrant, P. & Siyanova-Chanturai, A.
    (2015) Learner corpora and psycholinguistics. In S. Granger , G. Gilquin , & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp.57–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139649414.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.004 [Google Scholar]
  23. Edwards, A.
    (2014) The progressive aspect in the Netherlands and the ESL/EFL continuum. World Englishes, 33(2), 173–194.10.1111/weng.12080
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12080 [Google Scholar]
  24. Ellis, N. C.
    (2013) Frequency effects. In P. Robinson (Ed.), The Routledge encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition (pp.260–264). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2016) Cognition, corpora, and computing: Triangulating research in usage-based language learning. Language Learning, 67(1), 40–65.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ellis, N. C. , O’Donnell, M. B. , & Römer, U.
    (2013) Usage-based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition. Language Learning, 63(1), 25–51.10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00736.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00736.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Ellis, N. C. , Römer, U. , & O’Donnell, M. B.
    (Eds.) (2016) Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and processing. Cognitive and corpus investigations of construction grammar. Special issue ofLanguage Learning, 66(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Ellis, R.
    (2008) The study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Eriksson, A.
    (2008) Tense and aspect in advanced Swedish learners’ written English. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Fuchs, R. , Götz, S. , & Werner, V.
    (2016) The present perfect in learner Englishes: A corpus-​based case study on L1 German intermediate and advanced speech and writing. In V. Werner , E. Seoane , & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), Re-assessing the present perfect (pp.297–338). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110443530‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110443530-013 [Google Scholar]
  31. Gablasova, D. , Brezina, V. , & McEnery, T.
    (2017) Exploring learner language through corpora: Comparing and interpreting corpus frequency information. Language Learning, 67(1), 130–154.10.1111/lang.12226
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12226 [Google Scholar]
  32. Granger, S.
    (1999) Use of tenses by advanced EFL learners: Evidence from an error-tagged computer corpus. In H. Hasselgård & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of corpora. Studies in honour of Stig Johansson (pp.191–202). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gries, S. T. & Ellis, N. C.
    (2015) Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics. Language Learning, 65(1), 228–255.10.1111/lang.12119
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12119 [Google Scholar]
  34. Housen, A.
    (2000) Verb semantics and the acquisition of tense-aspect in L2 English. Studia Linguistica54(2), 249–259.10.1111/1467‑9582.00064
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9582.00064 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2002) The development of tense-aspect in English as a second language and the variable influence of inherent aspect. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp.155–197). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27.09hou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27.09hou [Google Scholar]
  36. Howard, M. & Leclercq, P.
    (2017a) Tense, aspect and modality in Second Language Acquisition: An overview. In M. Howard & P. Leclercq (Eds.), Tense-aspect-modality in a Second Language. Contemporary perspectives (pp.1–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.50.01how
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.50.01how [Google Scholar]
  37. (Eds.) (2017b) Tense-aspect-modality in a Second Language. Contemporary perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.50
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.50 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hundt, M. & Vogel, K.
    (2011) Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes – fact or fiction?In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes. Bridging a paradigm gap (pp.145–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.44.08vog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44.08vog [Google Scholar]
  39. Källkvist, M.
    (1999), Form-class and task-type effects in learner English: A study of advanced Swedish learners. Lund: Lund University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kellermann, E.
    (1979) Transfer and non-transfer: Where we are now. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 37–57.10.1017/S0272263100000942
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100000942 [Google Scholar]
  41. Klein, W.
    (1995) The acquisition of English. In R. Dietrich , W. Klein , & C. Noyau (Eds.), The acquisition of temporality in a second language (pp.31–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.7.04kle
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.7.04kle [Google Scholar]
  42. Labeau, E. & Saddour, I.
    (Eds.) (2012) Tense, aspect, and mood in First and Second Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Le Bruyn, B. & Paquot, M.
    Eds. (forthcoming). Second Language Acquisition and learner corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Leńko-Szymańska, A.
    (2007) Past progressive or simple past? The acquisition of progressive aspect by Polish advanced learners of English. In E. Hidalgo , L. Quereda , & J. Santana (Eds.), Corpora in the foreign language classroom (pp.253–266). Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401203906_017
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203906_017 [Google Scholar]
  45. Li, J.
    (1996) Underproduction does not necessarily mean avoidance: Investigation of underproduction using Chinese ESL learners. In L. F. Bouton (Ed.), Pragmatics and Language Learning (pp.171–188). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Division of English as an International Language.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Liszka, S. A.
    (2015) The L2 acquisition of the English present simple – present progressive distinction. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), The acquisition of the present (pp.58–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.196.03lis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.196.03lis [Google Scholar]
  47. Littré, D.
    (2015) Combining experimental data and corpus data: Intermediate French-speaking learners and the English present. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1), 89–126.10.1515/cllt‑2014‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0007 [Google Scholar]
  48. MacWhinney, B.
    (2000) The CHILDES project: The database. Abingdon: Psychology Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. McArthur, T.
    (2003) World English, Euro-English, Nordic English. English Today, 73(19/1), 54–58.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. McManus, K. , Vanek, N. , Leclercq, P. , & Roberts, L.
    (Eds.) (2017) Tense, aspect, and modality in L2 (TAML2). Special issue of theInternational Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 55(3).
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Meriläinen, L.
    (2017) The progressive form in learner Englishes: Examining variation across corpora. World Englishes, 36(4), 760–783.10.1111/weng.12244
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12244 [Google Scholar]
  52. Meriläinen, L. , Paulasto, H. , & Rautionaho, P.
    (2017) Extended uses of the progressive form in Inner, Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes. In M. Filppula , J. Klemola , A. Mauranen , & S. Vetchinnikova (Eds.), Changing English. Global and local perspectives (pp.191–216). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110429657‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429657-011 [Google Scholar]
  53. Michaelis, L.
    (2006) Time and tense. In B. Aarts & A. McMahon (Eds.), The handbook of English linguistics (pp.220–243). Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470753002.ch10
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753002.ch10 [Google Scholar]
  54. Möller, V.
    (2017) Language acquisition in CLIL and non-CLIL settings. Learner corpus and experimental evidence on passive constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.80
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.80 [Google Scholar]
  55. Mukherjee, J. & Hundt, M.
    (Eds.) (2011) Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes. Bridging a paradigm gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.44
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44 [Google Scholar]
  56. Myles, F.
    (2005) Interlanguage corpora and Second Language Acquisition research. Second Language Research, 21(4), 373–391.10.1191/0267658305sr252oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658305sr252oa [Google Scholar]
  57. Noyau, C.
    (2002) Temporal relations in learner varieties: Grammaticalization and discourse construction. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp.107–127). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27.07noy
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27.07noy [Google Scholar]
  58. Ortega, L.
    (2014) Trying out theories on interlanguage: Description and explanation over 40 years of L2 negation research. In Z. Han & E. Tarone (Eds.), Interlanguage: 40 years later (pp.173–201). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.39.10ch8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.39.10ch8 [Google Scholar]
  59. Osborne, J.
    (2015) Transfer and learner corpus research. In S. Granger , G. Gilquin , & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp.333–356). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139649414.015
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.015 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ozeki, H.
    (2016) Corpus-based Second Language Acquisition research. In M. Minami (Ed.), Handbook of Japanese applied linguistics (pp.313–334). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614511830‑016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614511830-016 [Google Scholar]
  61. Reif-Hülser, M.
    (2012) Making progress simpler? Applying cognitive grammar to tense-aspect teaching. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Rogatcheva, S.
    (2014) Aspect in learner writing. A corpus-based comparison of advanced Bulgarian and German learners’ written English. PhD thesis. Giessen: University of Giessen.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Salaberry, M. R.
    (2008) Marking past tense in Second Language Acquisition. A theoretical model. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Salaberry, M. R. & Comajoan, L.
    (Eds.) (2013) Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781934078167
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078167 [Google Scholar]
  65. Salaberry, M. R. , Comajoan, L. , & González, P.
    (2013) Integrating the analyses of tense and aspect across research and methodological frameworks. In M. R. Salaberry & L. Comajoan (Eds.), Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect (pp.423–450). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781934078167.423
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781934078167.423 [Google Scholar]
  66. Salaberry, M. R. & Shirai, Y.
    (2002a) L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. In M. R. Salaberry & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology (pp.1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27.04sal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27.04sal [Google Scholar]
  67. (Eds.) (2002b) The L2 acquisition of tense-aspect morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lald.27
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.27 [Google Scholar]
  68. Schmiedtová, B. & Sahonenko, N.
    (2008) Die Rolle des grammatischen Aspekts in der Ereignis-Enkodierung: Ein Vergleich zwischen tschechischen und russischen Lernern des Deutschen. In M. Walter & P. Grommes (Eds.), Fortgeschrittene Lernervarietäten. Korpuslinguistik und Zweitspracherwerbsforschung (pp.45–71). Tübingen: Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Shirai, Y.
    (2009) Temporality in First and Second Language Acquisition. In W. Klein & P. Li (Eds.), The expression of time (pp.167–194). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Shirai, Y. & Andersen, R. W.
    (1995) The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, 71(4), 743–762.10.2307/415743
    https://doi.org/10.2307/415743 [Google Scholar]
  71. Slabakova, R.
    (2002) Recent research on the acquisition of aspect: An embarrassment of riches?Second Language Research, 18(2), 172–188.10.1191/0267658302sr202ra
    https://doi.org/10.1191/0267658302sr202ra [Google Scholar]
  72. Tracy-Ventura, N. & Myles, F.
    (2015) The importance of task variability in the design of learner corpora for SLA research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 58–95.10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.03tra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.03tra [Google Scholar]
  73. Tono, Y. & Díez-Bedmar, M. B.
    (2014) Focus on learner writing at the beginning and intermediate stages: The ICCI corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(2), 163–177.10.1075/ijcl.19.2.01ton
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.2.01ton [Google Scholar]
  74. Vendler, Z.
    (1957) Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160.10.2307/2182371
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2182371 [Google Scholar]
  75. Vraicu, A.
    (2015) The simple present and the expression of temporality in L1 English and L2 English oral narratives: When form meets discourse. In D. Ayoun (Ed.), The acquisition of the present (pp.289–333). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Walter, M. & Grommes, P.
    (Eds.) (2008) Fortgeschrittene Lernervarietäten. Korpuslinguistik und Zweitspracherwerbsforschung. Tübingen: Niemeyer.10.1515/9783484970342
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484970342 [Google Scholar]
  77. Werner, V.
    (2014) The present perfect in world Englishes. Charting unity and diversity. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Wible, D. & Huang, P. -Y.
    (2003) Using learner corpora to examine L2 acquisition of tense-aspect markings. In D. Archer , P. Rayson , A. Wilson , & T. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics 2003 (pp.889–898). Lancaster: UCREL. Retrieved fromucrel.lancs.ac.uk/publications/CL2003/papers/wible.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Wolfram, W.
    (1985) Variability in tense marking: A case for the obvious. Language Learning, 25, 229–253.10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1985.tb01026.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01026.x [Google Scholar]
  80. Wulff, S. , Ellis, N. C. , Römer, U. , Bardovi-Harlig, K. , & LeBlanc, C.
    (2009) The acquisition of tense–aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 354–369.10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2009.00895.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00895.x [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error