1887
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1478
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1486
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Second language (L2) speech fluency has been found to develop especially in study-abroad contexts, while few studies have examined fluency development in formal instruction. Furthermore, the instructional approaches have rarely targeted fluency specifically. The present study examines the effects of a teaching experiment utilizing learner-corpus-based awareness-raising activities on L2 fluency development in formal instruction. Eighteen Finnish university students of English, divided into control and experimental groups, provided speech samples at the beginning and end of an L2 English pronunciation course. The samples were analyzed with a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative analyses demonstrated mostly minor differences in fluency development across the groups. Qualitative analyses demonstrated individual learning trajectories regarding stalling mechanisms. The findings suggest that while corpus-based awareness-raising activities can be beneficial for supporting L2 fluency development, a more extensive teaching approach is needed for full effects. The study has implications for L2 fluency research and pedagogy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.00040.pel
2024-06-28
2024-07-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Borràs, J., & Llanes, À.
    (2021) Re-examining the impact of study abroad on L2 development: A critical overview. The Language Learning Journal, 491, 527–540. 10.1080/09571736.2019.1642941
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1642941 [Google Scholar]
  2. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L.
    (2002) Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1111, 2862–2873. 10.1121/1.1471894
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1471894 [Google Scholar]
  4. De Jong, N. H.
    (2016) Fluency in second language assessment. InD. Tsagari, & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment (pp. 203–218). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614513827‑015
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513827-015 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2018) Fluency in second language testing: Insights from different disciplines. Language Assessment Quarterly, 151, 237–254. 10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780 [Google Scholar]
  6. De Jong, N. H., & Wempe, T.
    (2009) Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 411, 385–390. 10.3758/BRM.41.2.385
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.385 [Google Scholar]
  7. De Jong, N., & Perfetti, C. A.
    (2011) Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 611, 533–568. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2010.00620.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00620.x [Google Scholar]
  8. Degand, L., Gilquin, G., Meurant, L., & Simon, A. C.
    (2019) Introduction. InL. Degand, G. Gilquin, L. Meurant, & A. C. Simon (Eds.), Fluency and disfluency across languages and language varieties (pp. 9–14). Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Derwing, T. M.
    (2017) L2 fluency development. InS. Loewen, & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed Second Language Acquisition (pp. 246–259). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676968‑14
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-14 [Google Scholar]
  10. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2008) A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 291, 359–380. 10.1093/applin/amm041
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm041 [Google Scholar]
  11. Doe, T.
    (2021) Fluency development in an EFL setting: A one-semester study. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. 10.1177/13621688211058520
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211058520 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dörnyei, Z.
    (1995) On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly, 291, 55–85. 10.2307/3587805
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3587805 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J.
    (1998) Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication: A psycholinguistic perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 201, 349–385. 10.1017/S0272263198003039
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198003039 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dumont, A.
    (2018) Fluency and disfluency: A corpus study of non-native and native speaker (dis)fluency profiles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université catholique de Louvain. hdl.handle.net/2078.1/198393
  15. Finnish National Agency for Education
    Finnish National Agency for Education (2019) Lukion opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2019 [National core curriculum for upper secondary schools 2019]. https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/lukion_opetussuunnitelman_perusteet_2019.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Götz, S.
    (2013) Fluency in native and nonnative English speech. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.53
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.53 [Google Scholar]
  17. Guillot, M.-N.
    (1999) Fluency and its teaching. Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hanzawa, K.
    (2024) Development of second language speech fluency in foreign language classrooms: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research, 281, 816–838. 10.1177/13621688211008693
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211008693 [Google Scholar]
  19. Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
    (Eds.) (2012) Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.32
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32 [Google Scholar]
  20. Huensch, A., & Tracy-Ventura, N.
    (2017) L2 utterance fluency development before, during, and after residence abroad: A multidimensional investigation. The Modern Language Journal, 1011, 275–293. 10.1111/modl.12395
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12395 [Google Scholar]
  21. Kormos, J.
    (2006) Speech production and Second Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kormos, J., & Dénes, M.
    (2004) Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 321, 145–164. 10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Larson-Hall, J.
    (2010) A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Lennes, M. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lennon, P.
    (1990) Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 401, 387–417. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1990.tb00669.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Lintunen, P., & Eirola, V.
    (2023) Organizing an in-service teacher training module – societal interaction at its best. EnglanTY blog. https://blogit.utu.fi/englishturku/2023/06/05/organizing-an-in-service-teacher-training-module-societal-interaction-at-its-best/
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lintunen, P., & Mäkilähde, A.
    (2018) Short- and long-term effects of pronunciation teaching: EFL learners’ views. InJ. Volín, & R. Skarnitzl (Eds.), Pronunciation of English by Speakers of Other Languages (pp. 46–72). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lintunen, P., Mutta, M., & Peltonen, P.
    (2020) Synthesising approaches to second language fluency: Implications and future directions. InP. Lintunen, M. Mutta, & P. Peltonen (Eds.), Fluency in L2 learning and use (pp. 186–201). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mitrunen, M.
    (2023) Sallivuutta suulliseen ilmaisuun syntyperäisten puhetta havainnoimalla [More tolerance towards spoken expression by observing native speech]. InP. Lintunen, S. Mäkinen, & V. Eirola (Eds.), Sujuvuutta suulliseen kielitaitoon: Näkökulmia kielten opetukseen [Fluent oral proficiency: Perspectives on language teaching] (pp. 82–86). University of Turku. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-29-9474-8
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mora, J. C., & Valls-Ferrer, M.
    (2012) Oral fluency, accuracy, and complexity in formal instruction and study abroad learning contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 461, 610–641. 10.1002/tesq.34
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.34 [Google Scholar]
  31. Peltonen, P.
    (2020) Individual and interactional speech fluency in L2 English from a problem-solving perspective: A mixed-methods approach. University of Turku.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2021, July). Development of individual and interactional L2 fluency. Paper presented at the30th EuroSLA conference 2021, University of Barcelona, Spain (online). https://eurosla30.dryfta.com/program-schedule
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Peltonen, P., & Lehtilä, E.
    (2023) Sujuvuus oppimisen ja arvioinnin kohteena [Fluency as the target of learning and assessment]. InP. Lintunen, S. Mäkinen, & V. Eirola (Eds.), Sujuvuutta suulliseen kielitaitoon: Näkökulmia kielten opetukseen [Fluent oral proficiency: Perspectives on language teaching] (pp. 8–15). University of Turku. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-29-9474-8
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Peltonen, P., & Lintunen, P.
    (2016) Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in L2 fluency analysis: A study of Finnish-speaking and Swedish-speaking learners of English at two school levels. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 41, 209–238. 10.1515/eujal‑2014‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2014-0018 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2019, August). Short-term development of L2 fluency in formal instruction: A mixed methods study. Paper presented at the29th EuroSLA conference 2019, Lund University, Sweden. https://www.humlab.lu.se/fileadmin/user_upload/humlab/EuroSLA_Book_of_Abstracts.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rossiter, M. J., Derwing, T. M., Manimtim, L. G., & Thomson, R. I.
    (2010) Oral fluency: The neglected component in the communicative language classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 661, 583–606. 10.3138/cmlr.66.4.583
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.4.583 [Google Scholar]
  37. Segalowitz, N.
    (2010) The cognitive bases of second language fluency. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203851357
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851357 [Google Scholar]
  38. Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B.
    (2004) Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 261, 173–199. 10.1017/S0272263104262027
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104262027 [Google Scholar]
  39. Skehan, P.
    (2009) Modelling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 301, 510–532. 10.1093/applin/amp047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp047 [Google Scholar]
  40. Tavakoli, P.
    (2018) L2 development in an intensive study abroad EAP context. System, 721, 62–74. 10.1016/j.system.2017.10.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.10.009 [Google Scholar]
  41. Tavakoli, P., Campbell, C., & McCormack, J.
    (2016) Development of speech fluency over a short period of time: Effects of pedagogic intervention. TESOL Quarterly, 501, 447–471. 10.1002/tesq.244
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.244 [Google Scholar]
  42. Tavakoli, P., & Hunter, A.-M.
    (2018) Is fluency being ‘neglected’ in the classroom? Teacher understanding of fluency and related classroom practices. Language Teaching Research, 221, 330–349. 10.1177/1362168817708462
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817708462 [Google Scholar]
  43. Tavakoli, P., Nakatsuhara, F., & Hunter, A.-M.
    (2020) Aspects of fluency across assessed levels of speaking proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 1041, 169–191. 10.1111/modl.12620
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12620 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tavakoli, P., & Wright, C.
    (2020) Second language speech fluency: From research to practice. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108589109
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108589109 [Google Scholar]
  45. Tonkyn, A.
    (2012) Measuring and perceiving changes in oral complexity, accuracy and fluency: Examining instructed learners’ short-term gains. InA. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 221–246). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.32.10ton
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.10ton [Google Scholar]
  46. Towell, R.
    (2002) Relative degrees of fluency: A comparative case study of advanced learners of French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 401, 117–150. 10.1515/iral.2002.005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2002.005 [Google Scholar]
  47. Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N.
    (1996) The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 171, 84–119. 10.1093/applin/17.1.84
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/17.1.84 [Google Scholar]
  48. Wolk, C., Götz, S., & Jäschke, K.
    (2020) Possibilities and drawbacks of using an online application for semi-automatic corpus analysis to investigate discourse markers and alternative fluency variables. Corpus Pragmatics, 51, 7–36. 10.1007/s41701‑019‑00072‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00072-x [Google Scholar]
  49. Wood, D.
    (2006) Uses and functions of formulaic sequences in second language speech: An exploration of the foundations of fluency. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 631, 13–33.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.00040.pel
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.00040.pel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): fluency; intervention; mixed-methods; pedagogy; second language speech
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error