Epicene pronouns in intermediate to advanced EFL writing

References

1. Abudalbuh, M.
   2012 Ideology, Gender Roles, and Pronominal Choice: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of the Use of English Third Person Generic Pronouns by Native Speakers of Arabic. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of Kansas, Lawrence.
   [Google Scholar]
2. American Psychological Association
   American Psychological Association 2009 Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Antón-Méndez, I.
   2009 “Gender bender: Gender errors in L2 pronoun production”, Journal of Psycholinguistic Research39, 119–139. doi: 10.1007/s10936‑009‑9129‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9129-z [Google Scholar]
4. Antón-Méndez, I.
   2010 “Whose? L2-English speakers’ possessive pronoun gender errors”, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition14(3), 318–331. doi: 10.1017/S1366728910000325
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728910000325 [Google Scholar]
5. Baranowski, M.
   2002 “Current usage of the epicene pronoun in written English”, Journal of Sociolinguistics6(3), 378–397. doi: 10.1111/1467‑9481.00193
   https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00193 [Google Scholar]
6. Baron, D.
   1981 “The epicene pronoun: The word that failed”, American Speech56(2), 83–97. doi: 10.2307/455007
   https://doi.org/10.2307/455007 [Google Scholar]
7. Biber, D. , Finegan, E. , Johansson, S. , Conrad, S. & Leech, G.
   1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bodine, A.
   1975 “Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’”, Language in Society4(2), 129–146. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500004607
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004607 [Google Scholar]
9. Bußmann, H. & Hellinger, M.
   (Eds.) 2001 Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Volume1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bußmann, H. & Hellinger, M.
    (Eds.) 2002 Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Volume2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bußmann, H. & Hellinger, M.
    (Eds.) 2003 Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Volume3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Centre for English Corpus Linguistics
    Centre for English Corpus Linguistics 2016: online. The Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays (LOCNESS). Available at: https://uclouvain.be/en/research-institutes/ilc/cecl/locness.html (accessedJune 2017).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Corbett, G.
    1991 Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166119
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166119 [Google Scholar]
14. Curzan, A.
    2003 Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486913
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486913 [Google Scholar]
15. Curzan, A.
    2014 Fixing English: Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Gerner, J.
    2000 “Singular and plural anaphors of indefinite personal pronouns in spoken British English”. In Kirk, J. (Ed.), Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English. Papers from the Nineteenth International Conference of English Language Research on Computerised Corpora (ICAME 1998). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 93–114.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Granger, S. , Dagneaux, E. , Meunier, F. , & Paquot, M.
    (Eds.) 2009 The International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2 (Handbook + CD-ROM). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gygax, P. , Gabriel, U. , Sarrasin, O. , Oakhill, J. , & Garnham, A.
    2008 “Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men”, Language and Cognitive Processes23(3), 464–485. doi: 10.1080/01690960701702035
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701702035 [Google Scholar]
19. Hellinger, M. & Motschenbacher, H.
    (Eds.) 2015 Gender across Languages: The Linguistic Representation of Women and Men. Volume4. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.36
    https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.36 [Google Scholar]
20. Henley, N. & Abueg, J.
    2003 “A review and synthesis of research on comprehension of the masculine as a generic form in English”, Estudios de Sociolinguistica: Linguas, Sociedades e Culturas4(2), 427–454.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K.
    2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530 [Google Scholar]
22. Laitinen, M.
    2007 Agreement Patterns in English: Diachronic Corpus Studies on Common-Number Pronouns. Helsinki, Finland: Société Néophilologique.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lee, J.
    2007 “Acceptability of sexist language among young people in Hong Kong”, Sex Roles56, 285–195. doi: 10.1007/s11199‑006‑9170‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9170-4 [Google Scholar]
24. Meyers, M.
    1990 “Current generic pronoun usage: An empirical study”, American Speech65(3), 228–237. doi: 10.2307/455911
    https://doi.org/10.2307/455911 [Google Scholar]
25. Mitchell, F.
    1994 “Student writing and pronoun reference: A study of inclusive language in practice”, Women and Language17(2), 2–6.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Newman, M.
    1992 “Pronominal disagreements: The stubborn problem of singular epicene antecedents”, Language in Society21(3), 447–475. doi: 10.1017/S0047404500015529
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015529 [Google Scholar]
27. Newman, M.
    1998 “What can pronouns tell us? A case study of English epicenes”, Studies in Language22(2), 353–389. doi: 10.1075/sl.22.2.04new
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.22.2.04new [Google Scholar]
28. Paterson, L.
    2011 “Epicene pronouns in UK national newspapers: A diachronic study”, ICAME Journal35, 171–184.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Paterson, L.
    2014 British Pronoun Use, Prescription, and Processing. Linguistic and Social Influences Affecting ‘They’ and ‘He’. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pauwels, A.
    2001 “Non-sexist language reform and generic pronouns in Australian English”, English World-Wide22(1), 105–119. doi: 10.1075/eww.22.1.06pau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.22.1.06pau [Google Scholar]
31. Quirk, R. Greenbaum, S. , Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Svenska Akademiens ordlista över svenska språket (SAOL) 2015 14th edition. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Scott, M.
    2008 WordSmith Tools. Version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Zuber, S. & Reed, A.
    1993 “The politics of grammar handbooks”, College English55(5), 515–530. doi: 10.2307/378587
    https://doi.org/10.2307/378587 [Google Scholar]