1887
Volume 4, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2215-1478
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1486
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Present-day English manifests ongoing changes in the frequency and semantic range of the progressive form, which presents a challenge for foreign language learners. This study examines the frequencies and semantic functions of the progressive in the with the aim of finding out to what extent learners are adopting the ongoing changes. This study analyses the effects of an exposure-rich learning environment by comparing learners from countries where English is used in varying degrees outside formal educational contexts and by examining intra-corpus variation between learners who have vs. have not spent time in English-speaking countries. The results reveal that exposure to English in the home country explains some of the variation in the progressive frequencies, but most of all it shows in the extent to which the learners have adopted its new semantic uses. By contrast, stay in English-speaking countries was not found to be an influential variable for all learner groups.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.17002.mer
2018-08-27
2019-08-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersen, R. W. & Shirai, Y.
    (1996) The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp.527–570). San Diego: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berns, M. , Claes, M. -T. , de Bot, K. , Evers, R. , Hasebrink, U. , Huibregtse, I. , Truchot, C. , & van der Wijst, P.
    (2006) English in Europe. In M. Berns , K. de Bot , & U. Hasebrink (Eds.), In the presence of English: Media and European youth (pp.15–42). New York: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolton, K. & Graddol, D.
    (2012) English in China today. English Today, 28(3), 3–9.10.1017/S0266078412000223
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078412000223 [Google Scholar]
  4. Collins, P.
    (2008) The progressive aspect in World Englishes: A corpus-based study. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 28(2), 225–249.10.1080/07268600802308782
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268600802308782 [Google Scholar]
  5. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De Cock, S.
    (2003) Recurrent sequences of words in native speaker and advanced learner spoken and written English. PhD thesis. Louvain-la-Neuve: Université Catholique de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Deshors, S. C.
    (2014) A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach. English World-Wide, 35(3), 277–305.10.1075/eww.35.3.02des
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.3.02des [Google Scholar]
  8. De Wit, A. & Patard, A.
    (2013) Modality, aspect and the progressive: The semantics of the present progressive in French in comparison with English. Languages in Contrast, 13(1), 113–132.10.1075/lic.13.1.06wit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.13.1.06wit [Google Scholar]
  9. De Wit, A. , Patard, A. , & Brisard, F.
    (2013) A contrastive analysis of the present progressive in French and English. Studies in Language, 37(4), 846–879.10.1075/sl.37.4.05wit
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.4.05wit [Google Scholar]
  10. Dose-Heidelmayer, S. & Götz, S.
    (2016) The progressive in spoken learner language: A corpus-based analysis of use and misuse. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 54(3), 229–256.10.1515/iral‑2016‑9982
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2016-9982 [Google Scholar]
  11. Edwards, A.
    (2016) English in the Netherlands. Functions, forms and attitudes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Edwards, A. & Laporte, S.
    (2015) Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes: The competing roles of norm orientation and proficiency levels. English World-Wide, 36(2), 135–169.10.1075/eww.36.2.01edw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.2.01edw [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, R.
    (2008) The study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fuchs, R. , Götz, S. , & Werner, V.
    (2016) The present perfect in learner Englishes: A corpus-based case study on L1 German intermediate and advanced speech and writing. In V. Werner , E. Seoane , & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), Re-assessing the present perfect (pp.297–338). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110443530‑013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110443530-013 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gilquin, G.
    (2016) Discourse markers in L2 English: From classroom to naturalistic input. In O. Timofeeva , A. Gardner , A. Honkapohja , & S. Chevalier (Eds.), New approaches to English linguistics: Building bridges (pp.213–249). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.177.09gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.177.09gil [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilquin, G. , De Cock, S. , & Granger, S.
    (Eds.) (2010) Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage [Handbook + CD-ROM]. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
  17. Gilquin, G. & Granger, S.
    (2011) From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap (pp.55–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.44.04gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44.04gra [Google Scholar]
  18. Granger, S. , Dagneaux, E. , Meunier, F. , & Paquot, M.
    (Eds.) (2009) International Corpus of Learner English (Version 2) [Handbook + CD-ROM]. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
  19. Gut, U. & Fuchs, R.
    (2013) Progressive aspect in Nigerian English. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(3), 243–267.10.1177/0075424213492799
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424213492799 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hakulinen, A. , Vilkuna, M. , Korhonen, R. , Koivisto, V. , Heinonen, T. R. , & Alho, I.
    (2005) Iso suomen kielioppi [The comprehensive grammar of Finnish]. Hämeenlinna: Karisto.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Holmes, P. & Hinchliffe, I.
    (2008) Swedish. A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hundt, M.
    (2004) Animacy, agentivity, and the spread of the progressive in Modern English. English Language and Linguistics, 8(1), 47–69.10.1017/S1360674304001248
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674304001248 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hundt, M. & Vogel, K.
    (2011) Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes: Fact or fiction?In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap (pp.145–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.44.08vog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44.08vog [Google Scholar]
  24. Iwasaki, S.
    (2013) Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.17
    https://doi.org/10.1075/loall.17 [Google Scholar]
  25. Jarvis, S. & Pavlenko, A.
    (2008) Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kasztalska, A.
    (2014) English in contemporary Poland. World Englishes, 33(2), 242–262.10.1111/weng.12083
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12083 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kortmann, B. & Lunkenheimer, K.
    (Eds.) (2013) The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Retrieved fromewave-atlas.org
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kranich, S.
    (2010) The progressive in Modern English. A corpus-based study of grammaticalization and related changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Krashen, S.
    (1989) We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440–464.10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1989.tb05325.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Laitinen, M. & Levin, M.
    (2016) On the globalization of English: Observations of subjective progressives in present-day Englishes. In E. Seoane & C. Suárez-Gómez (Eds.), World Englishes: New theoretical and methodological considerations (pp.229–252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Leech, G. , Hundt, M. , Mair, C. , & Smith, N.
    (2009) Change in contemporary English. A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
  32. Leńko-Szymańska, A.
    (2007) Past progressive or simple past? The acquisition of the progressive aspect by Polish advanced learners of English. In E. Hidalgo , L. Quereda , & J. Santana (Eds.), Corpora in the foreign language classroom (pp.253–266). Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401203906_017
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203906_017 [Google Scholar]
  33. Leppänen, S. , Nikula, T. , & Kääntä, L.
    (Eds.) (2008) Kolmas kotimainen. Lähikuvia englannin käytöstä Suomessa [The third domestic language: Case studies on the use of English in Finland]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Meriläinen, L.
    (2010) Language transfer in the written English of Finnish students. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland. Retrieved fromepublications.uef.fi/pub/urn_isbn_978-952-61-0230-6/index_en.html
    [Google Scholar]
  35. (2017) The progressive form in learner Englishes: Examining variation across corpora. World Englishes, 36(4), 760–783.10.1111/weng.12244
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12244 [Google Scholar]
  36. Meriläinen, L. , Paulasto, H. , & Rautionaho, P.
    (2017) Extended uses of the progressive form in Inner, Outer and Expanding Circle Englishes. In M. Filppula , J. Klemola , A. Mauranen , & S. Vetchinnikova (Eds.), Changing English: Global and local perspectives (pp.191–216). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110429657‑011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110429657-011 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mesthrie, R. & Bhatt, R.
    (2008) World Englishes. The study of new linguistic varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791321
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791321 [Google Scholar]
  38. Meunier, F. & Littré, D.
    (2013) Tracking learners’ progress: Adopting a dual ‘corpus cum experimental data’ approach. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 61–76.10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01424.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01424.x [Google Scholar]
  39. Mukherjee, J. & Hundt, M.
    (Eds.) (2011) Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes. Bridging a paradigm gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.44
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44 [Google Scholar]
  40. Nesselhauf, N.
    (2007) The spread of the progressive and its ‘future’ use. English Language and Linguistics, 11(1), 191–207.10.1017/S1360674306002152
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674306002152 [Google Scholar]
  41. Pahta, P. & Taavitsainen, I.
    (2011) English in intranational public discourse. In B. Kortmann & J. van der Auwera (Eds.), The languages and linguistics of Europe: A comprehensive guide (pp.605–619). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110220261.605
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110220261.605 [Google Scholar]
  42. Paulasto, H.
    (2006) Welsh English syntax. Contact and variation. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. (2014) Extended uses of the progressive form in L1 and L2 Englishes. English World-Wide, 35(3), 247–276.10.1075/eww.35.3.01pau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.3.01pau [Google Scholar]
  44. Quirk, R. , Greenbaum, S. , Leech, G. , & Svartvik, J.
    (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved fromhttps://www.R-project.org/
  46. Rautionaho, P.
    (2014) Variation in the progressive. A corpus-based study into World Englishes. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Rogatcheva, S.
    (2014) Aspect in learner writing: A corpus-based comparison of advanced Bulgarian and German learners’ written English. PhD thesis. Giessen: University of Giessen.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rohde, A.
    (2009) Input frequency and the acquisition of the progressive. In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input matters in SLA (pp.29–46). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Römer, U.
    (2005) Progressives, patterns, pedagogy. A corpus-driven approach to English progressive forms, functions, contexts and didactics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.18
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.18 [Google Scholar]
  50. Schneider, E.
    (2014) New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of world Englishes. World Englishes, 33(1), 9–32.10.1111/weng.12069
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12069 [Google Scholar]
  51. Scott, M.
    (2008) WordSmith Tools (Version 5) [Computer software]. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.
  52. Seargeant, P.
    (2009) The idea of English in Japan. Ideology and the evolution of a global language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sharma, D.
    (2009) Typological diversity in New Englishes. English World-Wide, 30(2), 170–195.10.1075/eww.30.2.04sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.30.2.04sha [Google Scholar]
  54. Smitterberg, E.
    (2005) The progressive in 19th-century English. A process of integration. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004333086
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004333086 [Google Scholar]
  55. van Rooy, B.
    (2014) Progressive aspect and stative verbs in Outer Circle varieties. World Englishes, 33(2), 157–172.10.1111/weng.12079
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12079 [Google Scholar]
  56. Westergren Axelsson, M. & Hahn, A.
    (2001) The use of the progressive in Swedish and German advanced learner English: A corpus-based study. ICAME Journal, 25, 5–30.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.17002.mer
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.17002.mer
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error