1887
Volume 5, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2215-1478
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1486
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Based on datasets of L1 Italian and Spanish learner language culled from the Trinity Lancaster Corpus Sample, this paper investigates how verb-argument constructions (VACs) develop in the spoken English of L2 learners across proficiency levels. In addition to proficiency and L1 effects, we focus on the potential influence of native English usage on learner VAC production. Insights into learners’ productive knowledge of five target VACs and the verbs used in those VACs are gained through (1) comparisons of normalized entropy scores for verbs in VACs; (2) correlation analyses comparing for each VAC the verbs produced by groups of learners and by native English speakers; and (3) regression analyses comparing learner verb-VAC associations against indices of VAC usage, including verb-VAC frequency, VAC-verb association strength and contingency. Results indicate that, across L1 backgrounds, more proficient learners are more productive in their VAC use and closer to patterns in L1 English usage than less proficient learners.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.17015.rom
2019-09-24
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ambridge, B. & Lieven, E.
    2015 “A constructivist account of child language acquisition”. InB. MacWhinney & O’Grady, W. (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Emergence. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 478–510.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Burnard, L.
    2007Reference Guide for the British National Corpus (XML edition). Retrieved from: www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/docs/URG
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bybee, J.
    2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
  4. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe 2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Eeg-Olofsson, M. & Altenberg, B.
    1994 “Discontinuous recurrent word combinations in the London-Lund Corpus”. InU. Fries, G. Tottie, & P. Schneider (Eds.), Creating and Using English Language Corpora: Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 63–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellis, N. C. & Ferreira-Junior, F.
    2009 “Constructions and their acquisition: Islands and the distinctiveness of their occupancy”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics7, 188–221. 10.1075/arcl.7.08ell
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.08ell [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellis, N. C. & O’Donnell, M. B.
    2014 “Construction learning as category learning: A cognitive analysis”. InT. Herbst, H. J. Schmid & S. Faulhaber (Eds.), Constructions Collocations Patterns. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 71–97.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B. & Römer, U.
    2014 “Second language processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality”. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism4(4), 405–431. 10.1075/lab.4.4.01ell
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.4.4.01ell [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellis, N. C., Römer, U. & O’Donnell, M. B.
    2016Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar. Malden MA: Wiley Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Eskildsen, S. W.
    2009 “Constructing another language: Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition”. Applied Linguistics30(3), 335–357. 10.1093/applin/amn037
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn037 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2012 “L2 negation constructions at work”. Language Learning62(2), 335–372. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2012.00698.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00698.x [Google Scholar]
  12. Eskildsen, S. W. & Cadierno, T.
    2007 “Are recurring multi-word expressions really syntactic freezes? Second language acquisition from the perspective of usage-based linguistics”. InM. Nenonen & S. Niemi (Eds.), Collocations and Idioms 1. Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press, 86–99.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., McEnery, T. & Boyd, E.
    2015 “Epistemic stance in spoken L2 English: The effect of task and speaker style”. Applied Linguistics Advanced Access. doi:  10.1093/applin/amv055
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv055 [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldberg, A. E.
    1995Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 2003 “Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language”. Trends in Cognitive Science7, 219–224. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00080‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gries, S. T. & Ellis, N. C.
    2015 “Statistical measures for usage-based linguistics”. Language Learning65(S1), 228–255. 10.1111/lang.12119
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12119 [Google Scholar]
  17. Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J. & Suchomel, V.
    2014 “The Sketch Engine: Ten years on”. Lexicography1(1), 7–36.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumar, U., Kumar, V. & Kapur, J. N.
    1986 “Normalized measures of entropy”. International Journal of General Systems12(1), 55–69. 10.1080/03081078608934927
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03081078608934927 [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, P., Eskildsen, S. W. & Cadierno, T.
    2014 “Tracing an L2 learner’s motion constructions over time: A usage-based classroom investigation”. The Modern Language Journal98, 612–628. 10.1111/modl.12091
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12091 [Google Scholar]
  20. Römer, U., O’Donnell, M. B. & Ellis, N. C.
    2014 “Second language learner knowledge of verb-argument constructions: Effects of language transfer and typology”. The Modern Language Journal98(4), 952–975. 10.1111/modl.12149
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12149 [Google Scholar]
  21. Römer, U., Roberson, A., O’Donnell, M. B. & Ellis, N. C.
    2014 “Linking learner corpus and experimental data in studying second language learners’ knowledge of verb-argument constructions”. ICAME Journal38, 59–79. 10.2478/icame‑2014‑0006
    https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2014-0006 [Google Scholar]
  22. Römer, U., Skalicky, S. & Ellis, N. C.
    2018 “Verb-argument constructions in advanced L2 English learner production: Insights from corpora and verbal fluency tasks”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Advanced online access. doi:  10.1515/cllt‑2016‑0055
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2016-0055 [Google Scholar]
  23. Tomasello, M.
    2003Constructing a Language. A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Trousdale, G. & Hoffmann, T.
    (Eds.) 2013Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.17015.rom
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.17015.rom
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error