1887
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1478
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1486
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Findings from corpus-based and psycholinguistic research have highlighted the importance of acquiring productive knowledge of English phraseology for L2 learners. Many studies exploring this facet of language learning have investigated the use of predominantly fixed multi-word sequences by advanced learners in academic settings and compared their use against that of native-speaking writers. More recent studies have attempted to explore the differences between learners’ use of multi-word sequences across proficiency levels. The current study aims to add to this growing body of literature. It examines the use of phrase-frames by L1 German learners of English as a Foreign Language at five different proficiency levels represented in the (EFCAMDAT). The most frequent phrase-frames in each level are analyzed according to both quantitative and qualitative characteristics. The results revealed that, at higher proficiency levels, p-frames in learner texts are more variable, less predictable, and more functionally complex.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.2.1.02gar
2016-07-08
2019-10-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ädel, A. & Erman, B
    2012 “Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of english: A lexical bundles approach”, English for Specific Purposes31, 81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexopoulou, T. , Geertzen, J. , Korhonen, A. & Meurers, D
    2015 “Exploring big educational learner corpora for SLA research: Perspectives on relative clauses”, International Journal of Learner Corpus Research1(1), 96–129. doi: 10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.04ale
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.04ale [Google Scholar]
  3. Altenberg, B
    1998 “On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations”. In A.P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 101–122.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, D. , Conrad, S. & Cortes, V
    2004 “If you look at...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks”, Applied Linguistics25(3), 371–405. doi: 10.1093/applin/25.3.371
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371 [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, D. , Johansson, S. , Leech, G. , Conrad, S. & Finegan, E
    1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bybee, J
    2008 “Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition”. In P. Robinson & N.C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, 216–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, Y.H. & Baker, P
    2010 “Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing”, Language Learning and Technology14(2), 30–49.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. 2013 “Investigating criterial discourse features across second language development: Lexical bundles in rated learner essays, CEFR B1, B2, and C1”, Applied Linguistics Advance Access published December 5, 2014. doi: 10.1093/applin/amu065
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu065 [Google Scholar]
  9. Council of Europe
    2001Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Davies, M
    2008The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990-present. Available atcorpus.byu.edu/coca/
    [Google Scholar]
  11. DeCock, S
    2000 “Repetitive phrasal chunkiness and advanced EFL speech and writing”. In C. Mair & M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 51–68.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. DeCock, S. , Granger, S. , Leech, G. & McEnery, T
    1998 “An automated approach to the phrasicon of EFL learners”. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer. London: Longman, 67–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ellis, N.C
    2002 “Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition”, Studies in Second Language Acquisition24, 143–188.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2012 “Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics32, 17–44. doi: 10.1017/S0267190512000025
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000025 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellis, N.C. , Simpson-Vlach, R. & Maynard, C
    2008 “Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL”, TESOL Quarterly42(3), 375–396. doi: 10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00137.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00137.x [Google Scholar]
  16. Erman, B. & Warren, B
    2000 “The idiom principle and the open choice principle”, Text20, 29–62.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Eskildsen, S.W
    2009 “Constructing another language - Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition”, Applied Linguistics30(3), 335–357. doi: 10.1093/applin/amn037
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn037 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2015 “What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions”, Language Learning65(1), 33–62. doi: 10.1111/lang.12090
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12090 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fletcher, W.H
    2002-2007KfNgram. Annapolis, MD: USNA.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Geertzen, J. , Alexopoulou, T. & Korhonen, A
    2013 “Automatic linguistic annotation of large scale L2 databases: The EF-Cambridge Open Language Database (EFCamDat)”. Proceedings of the 31st Second Language Research Forum (SLRF) .
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Granger, S
    1998 “Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: collocations and formulae”. In A.P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 145–160.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gray, B. & Biber, D
    2013 “Lexical frames in academic prose and conversation”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18(1), 109–135. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.18.1.08gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.1.08gra [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiang, N. & Nekrasova, T
    2007 “The processing of formulaic sequences by second language speakers”, The Modern Language Journal91(3), 433–445. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2007.00589.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00589.x [Google Scholar]
  24. Jukneviciene, R
    2009 “Lexical bundles in learner language: Lithuanian learners vs. native speakers”, KALBOTYRA61(3), 61–72. doi: 10.15388/Klbt.2009.7638
    https://doi.org/10.15388/Klbt.2009.7638 [Google Scholar]
  25. Leńko-Szymańska, A
    2014 “The acquisition of formulaic language by EFL learners: A cross-sectional and cross-linguistic perspective”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics19(2), 225–251. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.19.2.04len
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19.2.04len [Google Scholar]
  26. Li, P. , Cadierno, T. & Eskildsen, S.W
    2014 “Tracing an L2 learner’s motion constructions over time: A usage-based classroom investigation”, The Modern Language Journal98(2), 612–628. doi: 10.1111/modl.12091
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12091 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mellow, J.D
    2006 “The emergence of second language syntax: A case study of the acquisition of relative clauses”, Applied Linguistics27(4), 645–670. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml031
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml031 [Google Scholar]
  28. Myles, F. , Hooper, J. & Mitchell, R
    1998 “Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning”, Language Learning48(3), 323–363. doi: 10.1111/0023‑8333.00045
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00045 [Google Scholar]
  29. Nekrasova, T.M
    2009 “English L1 and L2 speakers’ knowledge of lexical bundles”, Language Learning59(3), 647–686. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00520.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00520.x [Google Scholar]
  30. Paquot, M. & Granger, S
    2012 “Formulaic language in learner corpora”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics32, 130–149. doi: 10.1017/S0267190512000098
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000098 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pawley, A. & Syder, F.H
    1983 “Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency”. In J.C. Richards & R.W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication. London: Longman, 191–225.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Renouf, A. & Sinclair, J
    1991 “Collocational frameworks in English”. In B. Altenberg & K. Aijmer (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics. Studies in Honor of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, 128–143.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Römer, U
    2009 “The inseparability of lexis and grammar: Corpus linguistic perspectives”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics7, 140–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. 2010 “Establishing the phraseological profile of a text type: The construction of meaning in academic book reviews”, English Text Constructions3(1), 95–119. doi: 10.1075/etc.3.1.06rom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.3.1.06rom [Google Scholar]
  35. Siyanova-Chantura, A. & Martinez, R
    2015 “The idiom principle revisited”, Applied Linguistics36(5), 549–569.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Staples, S. , Egbert, J. , Biber, D. & McClair, A
    2013 “Formulaic sequences and EAP writing development: Lexical bundles in the TOEFL iBT writing section”, Journal of English for Academic Purposes12, 214–225. doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  37. Stubbs, M
    2007 “An example of frequent english phraseology: Distributions, structures, and functions”. In R. Facchinetti (Ed.), Corpus Linguistics 25 Years on. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 89–105.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Svartvik, J
    1990The London Corpus of Spoken English. Lund: Lund University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Vidakovic, I. & Barker, F
    2010 “Use of words and multi-word units in skills for life writing examinations”, Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes41, 7–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Yuldashev, A. , Fernandez, J. & Thorne, S.L
    2013 “Second language learners’ contiguous and discontiguous multi-word unit use over time”, The Modern Language Journal97(S1), 31–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2012.01420.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01420.x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.2.1.02gar
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): German EFL learners , L2 phraseology , phrase-frames and usage-based SLA
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error