1887
Linguistic Innovations
  • ISSN 2215-1478
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1486
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This paper focuses on the ‘intrusive ’-construction in complex-transitive verb complementation which was so far only attested for Indian English. Our data show that ‘intrusive ’ is a common feature in South Asian Englishes generally, albeit to different degrees. Comparing the South Asian data with data from Learner Englishes allows to test several hypotheses concerning the origin of ‘intrusive ’; the most robust correlation within the data points to redundancy as a motivating factor for both ESL and EFL contexts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.02koc
2016-10-14
2019-10-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bauer, L
    2001Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486210 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernaisch, T. , Gries, S. Th. & Mukherjee, J
    2014 “The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes”, English Word-Wide35(1), 7–31. doi: 10.1075/eww.35.1.02ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.1.02ber [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernaisch, T. , Koch, C. , Schilk, M. & Mukherjee, J
    2011Manual to the South Asian Varieties of English (save) Corpus. Giessen: Justus Liebig University, Department of English.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Biewer, C
    2011 “Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English: A learner’s perspective”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–33. doi: 10.1075/scl.44.02bie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44.02bie [Google Scholar]
  5. Buchstaller, I
    2014Quotatives. New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Malden: Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Buschfeld, S
    2011The English Language in Cyprus: An Empirical Investigation of Variety Status. PhD dissertation, University of Cologne.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 2013English in Cyprus or Cyprus English. An Empirical Investigation of Variety Status. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g46
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g46 [Google Scholar]
  8. 2014 “English in Cyprus and Namibia: A critical approach to taxonomies and models of World Englishes and Second Language Acquisition research”. In S. Buschfeld , T. Hoffmann , M. Huber & A. Kautzsch (Eds.), The Evolution of Englishes. The Dynamic Model and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 181–202. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g49
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g49 [Google Scholar]
  9. Buschfeld, S. & Kautzsch, A
    2016 “Towards an integrated approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial Englishes”, World Englishes. doi: 10.1111/weng.12203
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12203 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bybee, J
    1995Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bybee, J. & Thompson, S
    2007 “Three frequency effects in syntax”. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 269–278. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Deshors, S.C
    2014 “A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach”, English World-Wide35(3), 277–305. doi: 10.1075/eww.35.3.02des
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.3.02des [Google Scholar]
  13. Edwards, A
    2014English in the Netherlands. Functions, Forms and Attitudes. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Edwards, A. & Laporte, S
    2015 “Outer and expanding circle Englishes: The competing roles of norm orientation and proficiency levels”, English World-Wide36(2), 135–169. doi: 10.1075/eww.36.2.01edw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.2.01edw [Google Scholar]
  15. Gilquin, G
    2015 “At the interface of contact linguistics and second language acquisition research: New Englishes and Learner Englishes compared”, English World-Wide36(1), 91–124. doi: 10.1075/eww.36.1.05gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.05gil [Google Scholar]
  16. Goffin, R.C
    1934 “Some notes on Indian English”. In A.A. Goffin & R.C. Goffin (Eds.), S.P.E. Tract No. XLI. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 20–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Granger, S. , Dagneaux, E. , Meunier, F. & Paquot, M
    (Eds.) 2009International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2 (Handbook + CD-ROM). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Heaton, J.B. & Turton, N.D
    1997Longman Dictionary of Common Errors. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hock, H.H
    1982 “The Sanskrit quotative: A historical and comparative study”, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences12(2), 39–85.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hothorn, T. , Hornik, K. & Zeileis, A
    2006 “Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework”, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics15(3), 651–674. doi: 10.1198/106186006X133933
    https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933 [Google Scholar]
  21. Huddleston, R
    2002 “The verb”. In R. Huddleston & G.K. Pullum (Eds.), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (CGEL). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 213–322.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G.K
    (Eds.) 2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (CGEL). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ishikawa, S
    2011 “A new horizon in learner corpus studies: The aim of the ICNALE project”. In G. Weir , S. Ishikawa & K. Poonpon (Eds.), Corpora and Language Technologies in Teaching, Learning and Research. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Publishing, 3–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kachru, B.B
    1985 “Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle”. In R. Quirk & H.G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for The British Council, 11–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. 1991 “Liberation linguistics and the Quirk concern”, English Today25(1), 3–13. doi: 10.1017/S026607840000523X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607840000523X [Google Scholar]
  26. Kachru, Y
    1979 “The quotative in South Asian Languages”, South Asian Languages Analysis1, 63–77.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Koch, C. & Bernaisch, T
    2013 “Verb complementation in South Asian English(es): The range and frequency of ‘new’ ditransitives”. In G. Andersen & K. Bech (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Variation in Time, Space and Genre. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 69–89. doi: 10.1163/9789401209403_006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401209403_006 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kornfilt, J
    1997Turkish. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lange, C
    2014 People call it as city of garden – tracing the ‘intrusive as’ construction in South Asian varieties of English. Paper presented at the 30th South Asian Languages Analysis Roundtable (SALA 30), University of Hyderabad/India, 6-8 February 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. 2015 “The ‘intrusive as’-construction in South Asian varieties of English”, World Englishes35(1), 133–146. doi: 10.1111/weng.12173.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12173 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lohmann, A
    2013 “Is tree hugging the way to go? Classification trees and random forests in linguistic study”, Views (Vienna English Working Papers)22, 1–17. Available at: anglistik.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/dep_anglist/weitere_Uploads/Views/VIEWS_22_2013_Lohmann.pdf (accessedFebruary 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Matras, Y. & Sakel, J
    2007 “Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence”, Studies in Language31(4), 829–865. doi: 10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat [Google Scholar]
  33. Mukherjee, J
    2007 “Steady states in the evolution of New Englishes: Present-day Indian English as an equilibrium”, Journal of English Linguistics35(2), 157–187. doi: 10.1177/0075424207301888
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207301888 [Google Scholar]
  34. Nihalani, P. , Tongue, R.K. , Hosali, P. & Crowther, J
    2004Indian and British English: A Handbook of Usage and Pronunciation. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Quirk, R
    1990 “Language varieties and standard language”, English Today21, 3–10. doi: 10.1017/S0266078400004454
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400004454 [Google Scholar]
  36. Quirk, R. , Greenbaum, S. , Leech, G. & Svartvik, J
    1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. R Development Core Team
    2015The R Project for Statistical Computing. Version 3.2.2. Available at: www.r-project.org/ (accessedFebruary 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Rohdenburg, G
    1996 “Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English”, Cognitive Linguistics7(2), 149–182. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1996.7.2.149
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1996.7.2.149 [Google Scholar]
  39. Schneider, E.W
    2007Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511618901
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
  40. 2012 “Exploring the interface between World Englishes and Second Language Acquisition – and implications for English as a Lingua Franca”, Journal of English as a Lingua Franca1(1), 57–91. doi: 10.1515/jelf‑2012‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2012-0004 [Google Scholar]
  41. 2014 “New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes”, World Englishes33(1), 9–32. doi: 10.1111/weng.12069
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12069 [Google Scholar]
  42. Singh, R
    2007 “The nature, structure, and status of Indian English”. In R. Singh (Ed.), Annual Review of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2007. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 33–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Smith-Pearse, T.L.H
    1968The English Errors of Indian Students. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Sridhar, S.N
    1992 “The ecology of bilingual competence: Language interaction in indigenized varieties of English”, World Englishes11(2–3), 141–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1992.tb00058.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1992.tb00058.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Tagliamonte, S. & Baayen, H
    2012 “Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice”, Language Variation and Change24, 135–178. doi: 10.1017/S0954394512000129
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000129 [Google Scholar]
  46. Weinreich, U. , Labov, W. & Herzog, M.I
    1968 “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change”. In W.P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium. Austin and London: University of Texas Press, 97–195.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Williams, J
    1987 “Non-native varieties of English: A special case of language acquisition”, English World-Wide8(2), 161–199. doi: 10.1075/eww.8.2.02wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.8.2.02wil [Google Scholar]
  48. Yadurajan, K.S
    2001Current English. A Guide for the User of English in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.02koc
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error