References

1. Bauer, L
   2001 Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486210
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486210 [Google Scholar]
2. Bernaisch, T. , Gries, S. Th. & Mukherjee, J
   2014 “The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes”, English Word-Wide35(1), 7–31. doi: 10.1075/eww.35.1.02ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.1.02ber [Google Scholar]
3. Bernaisch, T. , Koch, C. , Schilk, M. & Mukherjee, J
   2011 Manual to the South Asian Varieties of English (save) Corpus. Giessen: Justus Liebig University, Department of English.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biewer, C
   2011 “Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English: A learner’s perspective”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–33. doi: 10.1075/scl.44.02bie
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44.02bie [Google Scholar]
5. Buchstaller, I
   2014 Quotatives. New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Malden: Wiley.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Buschfeld, S
   2011 The English Language in Cyprus: An Empirical Investigation of Variety Status. PhD dissertation, University of Cologne.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Buschfeld, S
   2013 English in Cyprus or Cyprus English. An Empirical Investigation of Variety Status. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g46
   https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g46 [Google Scholar]
8. Buschfeld, S
   2014 “English in Cyprus and Namibia: A critical approach to taxonomies and models of World Englishes and Second Language Acquisition research”. In S. Buschfeld , T. Hoffmann , M. Huber & A. Kautzsch (Eds.), The Evolution of Englishes. The Dynamic Model and beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 181–202. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g49
   https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g49 [Google Scholar]
9. Buschfeld, S. & Kautzsch, A
   2016 “Towards an integrated approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial Englishes”, World Englishes. doi: 10.1111/weng.12203
   https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12203 [Google Scholar]
10. Bybee, J
    1995 Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
11. Bybee, J. & Thompson, S
    2007 “Three frequency effects in syntax”. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 269–278. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
12. Deshors, S.C
    2014 “A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach”, English World-Wide35(3), 277–305. doi: 10.1075/eww.35.3.02des
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.3.02des [Google Scholar]
13. Edwards, A
    2014 English in the Netherlands. Functions, Forms and Attitudes. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Edwards, A. & Laporte, S
    2015 “Outer and expanding circle Englishes: The competing roles of norm orientation and proficiency levels”, English World-Wide36(2), 135–169. doi: 10.1075/eww.36.2.01edw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.2.01edw [Google Scholar]
15. Gilquin, G
    2015 “At the interface of contact linguistics and second language acquisition research: New Englishes and Learner Englishes compared”, English World-Wide36(1), 91–124. doi: 10.1075/eww.36.1.05gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.05gil [Google Scholar]
16. Goffin, R.C
    1934 “Some notes on Indian English”. In A.A. Goffin & R.C. Goffin (Eds.), S.P.E. Tract No. XLI. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 20–32.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Granger, S. , Dagneaux, E. , Meunier, F. & Paquot, M
    (Eds.) 2009 International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2 (Handbook + CD-ROM). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Heaton, J.B. & Turton, N.D
    1997 Longman Dictionary of Common Errors. Harlow: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hock, H.H
    1982 “The Sanskrit quotative: A historical and comparative study”, Studies in the Linguistic Sciences12(2), 39–85.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hothorn, T. , Hornik, K. & Zeileis, A
    2006 “Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework”, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics15(3), 651–674. doi: 10.1198/106186006X133933
    https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933 [Google Scholar]
21. Huddleston, R
    2002 “The verb”. In R. Huddleston & G.K. Pullum (Eds.), The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (CGEL). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 213–322.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G.K
    (Eds.) 2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (CGEL). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ishikawa, S
    2011 “A new horizon in learner corpus studies: The aim of the ICNALE project”. In G. Weir , S. Ishikawa & K. Poonpon (Eds.), Corpora and Language Technologies in Teaching, Learning and Research. Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Publishing, 3–11.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Kachru, B.B
    1985 “Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle”. In R. Quirk & H.G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for The British Council, 11–30.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Kachru, B.B
    1991 “Liberation linguistics and the Quirk concern”, English Today25(1), 3–13. doi: 10.1017/S026607840000523X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S026607840000523X [Google Scholar]
26. Kachru, Y
    1979 “The quotative in South Asian Languages”, South Asian Languages Analysis1, 63–77.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Koch, C. & Bernaisch, T
    2013 “Verb complementation in South Asian English(es): The range and frequency of ‘new’ ditransitives”. In G. Andersen & K. Bech (Eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Variation in Time, Space and Genre. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 69–89. doi: 10.1163/9789401209403_006
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401209403_006 [Google Scholar]
28. Kornfilt, J
    1997 Turkish. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lange, C
    2014 People call it as city of garden – tracing the ‘intrusive as’ construction in South Asian varieties of English. Paper presented at the 30th South Asian Languages Analysis Roundtable (SALA 30), University of Hyderabad/India, 6-8 February 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lange, C
    2015 “The ‘intrusive as’-construction in South Asian varieties of English”, World Englishes35(1), 133–146. doi: 10.1111/weng.12173.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12173 [Google Scholar]
31. Lohmann, A
    2013 “Is tree hugging the way to go? Classification trees and random forests in linguistic study”, Views (Vienna English Working Papers)22, 1–17. Available at: anglistik.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/dep_anglist/weitere_Uploads/Views/VIEWS_22_2013_Lohmann.pdf (accessedFebruary 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
32. Matras, Y. & Sakel, J
    2007 “Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence”, Studies in Language31(4), 829–865. doi: 10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.4.05mat [Google Scholar]
33. Mukherjee, J
    2007 “Steady states in the evolution of New Englishes: Present-day Indian English as an equilibrium”, Journal of English Linguistics35(2), 157–187. doi: 10.1177/0075424207301888
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207301888 [Google Scholar]
34. Nihalani, P. , Tongue, R.K. , Hosali, P. & Crowther, J
    2004 Indian and British English: A Handbook of Usage and Pronunciation. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Quirk, R
    1990 “Language varieties and standard language”, English Today21, 3–10. doi: 10.1017/S0266078400004454
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400004454 [Google Scholar]
36. Quirk, R. , Greenbaum, S. , Leech, G. & Svartvik, J
    1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
37. R Development Core Team
    2015 The R Project for Statistical Computing. Version 3.2.2. Available at: www.r-project.org/ (accessedFebruary 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rohdenburg, G
    1996 “Cognitive complexity and increased grammatical explicitness in English”, Cognitive Linguistics7(2), 149–182. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1996.7.2.149
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1996.7.2.149 [Google Scholar]
39. Schneider, E.W
    2007 Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511618901
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
40. Schneider, E.W
    2012 “Exploring the interface between World Englishes and Second Language Acquisition – and implications for English as a Lingua Franca”, Journal of English as a Lingua Franca1(1), 57–91. doi: 10.1515/jelf‑2012‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2012-0004 [Google Scholar]
41. Schneider, E.W
    2014 “New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes”, World Englishes33(1), 9–32. doi: 10.1111/weng.12069
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12069 [Google Scholar]
42. Singh, R
    2007 “The nature, structure, and status of Indian English”. In R. Singh (Ed.), Annual Review of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2007. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 33–46.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Smith-Pearse, T.L.H
    1968 The English Errors of Indian Students. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sridhar, S.N
    1992 “The ecology of bilingual competence: Language interaction in indigenized varieties of English”, World Englishes11(2–3), 141–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1992.tb00058.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1992.tb00058.x [Google Scholar]
45. Tagliamonte, S. & Baayen, H
    2012 “Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice”, Language Variation and Change24, 135–178. doi: 10.1017/S0954394512000129
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000129 [Google Scholar]
46. Weinreich, U. , Labov, W. & Herzog, M.I
    1968 “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change”. In W.P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium. Austin and London: University of Texas Press, 97–195.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Williams, J
    1987 “Non-native varieties of English: A special case of language acquisition”, English World-Wide8(2), 161–199. doi: 10.1075/eww.8.2.02wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.8.2.02wil [Google Scholar]
48. Yadurajan, K.S
    2001 Current English. A Guide for the User of English in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]