Innovative conversions in South-East Asian Englishes

References

1. Ansaldo, U
   2004 “The evolution of Singapore English. Finding the matrix”. In L. Lim (Ed.), Singapore English. A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 127–149. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g33.08ans
   https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g33.08ans [Google Scholar]
2. Ansaldo, U
   2009 “The Asian typology of English: Theoretical and methodological considerations”, English World-Wide30(2), 133–148. doi: 10.1075/eww.30.2.02ans
   https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.30.2.02ans [Google Scholar]
3. Aronoff, M
   1976 Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Balteiro, M
   2007 The Directionality of Conversion in English. A Dia-Synchronic Study. Bern: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bao, Z
   2005 “The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation”, Journal of Linguistics41(2), 237–267. doi: 10.1017/S0022226705003269
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226705003269 [Google Scholar]
6. Bao, Z
   2009 “ One in Singapore English”, Studies in Language33(2), 338–365. doi: 10.1075/sl.33.2.05bao
   https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.33.2.05bao [Google Scholar]
7. Bao, Z
   2010a “A usage-based approach to substratum transfer: The case of four unproductive features in Singapore English”, Language86(4), 792–820.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bao, Z
   2010b “ Must in Singapore English”, Lingua120(7), 1727–1737. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.01.001
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.01.001 [Google Scholar]
9. Bates, D. , Maechler, M. , Bolker, B. & Walker, S
   2014 lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package Version 1.1–7. Available atcran.r-project.org/package=lme4 (accessedMarch 2016).
10. Bernaisch, T
    2015 The Lexis and Lexicogrammar of Sri Lankan English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g54
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g54 [Google Scholar]
11. Biermeier, T
    2008 Word-Formation in New Englishes. A Corpus-based Analysis. Münster: Lit.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Biewer, C
    2011 “Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English: A learner’s perspective”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–34. doi: 10.1075/scl.44.02bie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44.02bie [Google Scholar]
13. Bolton, K
    2000 “The sociolinguistics of Hong Kong and the space for Hong Kong English”, World Englishes19(3), 265–285. doi: 10.1111/1467‑971X.00179
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-971X.00179 [Google Scholar]
14. Bolton, K
    2003 Chinese Englishes. A Sociolinguistic History. Cambridge: CUP.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bolton, K
    2012 “Language policy and planning in Hong Kong. The historical context and current realities”. In E. Low & A. Hashim (Eds.), English in Southeast Asia. Features, Policy and Language in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 221–238. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g42.18bol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g42.18bol [Google Scholar]
16. Buschfeld, S
    2013 English in Cyprus or Cyprus English. An Empirical Investigation of Variety Status. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g46
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g46 [Google Scholar]
17. Bybee, J
    2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511750526
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526 [Google Scholar]
18. Cannon, G
    1985 “Functional shift in English”, Linguistics23, 411–431. doi: 10.1515/ling.1985.277.1.411
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1985.277.1.411 [Google Scholar]
19. Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR
    2013: online. Thematic Household Survey – Report No. 51. Use of Language in Hong Kong. Utilisation of Child Health and Family Planning Services Provided by Maternal and Child Health Centres. Available atwww.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B11302512013XXXXB0100.pdf (accessed March 2016).
20. China Labor News Translations
    . n.d. About. Available atwww.clntranslations.org/about/ (accessedFebruary 2015).
21. Chui, S
    2010 “Sensitivity to differences between speech and writing: Hong Kong students’ use of syntactic features in English”. PhD thesis, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Collins, P. & Yao, X
    2013 “Colloquial features in World Englishes”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics18(4), 479–505. doi: 10.1075/ijcl.18.4.02col
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.4.02col [Google Scholar]
23. Davies, M
    2013 Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 Billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countries. Available atcorpus2.byu.edu/glowbe/ (accessed March 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
24. Davies, M. & Fuchs, R
    2015 “Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 Billion Word Global Web-Based English Corpus (GloWbE)”, English World-Wide36(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav [Google Scholar]
25. Deshors, S
    2014 “A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach”, English World-Wide35(3), 277–305. doi: 10.1075/eww.35.3.02des
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.35.3.02des [Google Scholar]
26. Don, J. , Trommelen, M. & Zonneveld, W
    2000 “Conversion and category indeterminacy”. In G. Booij , C. Lehmann & J. Mugdan (Eds.), Morphologie. Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, Vol. 1. Berlin: De Gruyter, 943–952.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Edwards, A. & Laporte, S
    2015 “Outer and expanding circle Englishes: The competing roles of norm orientation and proficiency levels”, English World-Wide36(2), 135–169. doi: 10.1075/eww.36.2.01edw
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.2.01edw [Google Scholar]
28. Evans, S
    2010 “Business as usual: The use of English in the professional world in Hong Kong”, English for Specific Purposes29(3), 153–167. doi: 10.1016/j.esp.2009.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.11.005 [Google Scholar]
29. Evans, S
    2015 “Word-Formation in Hong Kong English: Diachronic and synchronic perspectives”, Asian Englishes17(2), 116–131. doi: 10.1080/13488678.2015.1036510
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2015.1036510 [Google Scholar]
30. Gilquin, G
    2015 “At the interface of contact linguistics and Second Language Acquisition research. New Englishes and Learner Englishes compared”, English World-Wide36(1), 91–124. doi: 10.1075/eww.36.1.05gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.05gil [Google Scholar]
31. Gilquin, G. & Granger, S
    2011 “From EFL to ESL. Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 55–78. doi: 10.1075/scl.44.04gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44.04gra [Google Scholar]
32. Gisborne, N
    2009 “Aspects of the morphosyntactic typology of Hong Kong English”, English World-Wide30(2), 149–169. doi: 10.1075/eww.30.2.03gis
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.30.2.03gis [Google Scholar]
33. Gries, S
    2015 “The most underused statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models”, Corpora10(1), 95–125. doi: 10.3366/cor.2015.0068
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2015.0068 [Google Scholar]
34. Gut, U
    2009 “Past tense marking in Singapore English verbs”, English World-Wide30(3), 262–277. doi: 10.1075/eww.30.3.02gut
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.30.3.02gut [Google Scholar]
35. Heller, B. & Röthlisberger, M.
    2015 “Big data on trial. Researching syntactic alternations in GloWbE and ICE”. Paper presented at From data to evidence. Big data, rich data, uncharted data , University of Helsinki, 19–22 October 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Horch, S
    2016 Conversion in Asian Englishes: A Usage-Based Account of the Emergence of New Local Norms. PhD thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Johnson, R
    1994 “Language policy and planning in Hong Kong”, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 1993/1994 (14), 177–199. doi: 10.1017/S0267190500002889
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002889 [Google Scholar]
38. Kachru, B
    1985 “Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the Outer Circle”. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: CUP, 11–30.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kastovsky, D
    1982 Wortbildung und Semantik. Düsseldorf: Schwann-Bagel.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kirkpatrick, A
    2012 “Theoretical issues”. In E. Low & A. Hashim (Eds.), English in Southeast Asia. Features, Policy and Language in Use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 13–31. doi: 10.1075/veaw.g42.04kir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/veaw.g42.04kir [Google Scholar]
41. Laporte, S
    2012 “Mind the gap! Bridge between World Englishes and Learner Englishes in the making”, English Text Construction5(2), 264–291. doi: 10.1075/etc.5.2.05lap
    https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.5.2.05lap [Google Scholar]
42. Leimgruber, J
    2013a Singapore English. Structure, Variation, and Usage. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139225755
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139225755 [Google Scholar]
43. Leimgruber, J
    2013b “The management of multilingualism in a city-state: Language policy in Singapore”. In P. Siemund , I. Gogolin , M. Schulz & J. Davydova (Eds.), Multilingualism and Language Diversity in Urban Areas. Acquisition, Identities, Space, Education. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 227–256. doi: 10.1075/hsld.1.12lei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hsld.1.12lei [Google Scholar]
44. Lim, L
    2010 “Migrants and ‘Mother Tongues’: Extralinguistic forces in the ecology of English in Singapore”. In L. Lim , A. Pakir & L. Wee (Eds.), English in Singapore. Modernity and Management. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 19–54. doi: 10.5790/hongkong/9789888028436.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.5790/hongkong/9789888028436.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
45. Mair, C
    2015 “Response to Davies and Fuchs”, English World-Wide36(1), 29–33. doi: 10.1075/eww.36.1.02mai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.02mai [Google Scholar]
46. Marchand, H
    1960 The Categories and Types of Present–Day English Word-Formation. A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Matthews, S. & Yip, V
    1994 Cantonese. A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mukherjee, J
    2015 “Response to Davies and Fuchs”, English World-Wide36(1), 34–37. doi: 10.1075/eww.36.1.02muk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.02muk [Google Scholar]
49. Mukherjee, J. & Gries, S
    2009 “Collostructional nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-construction associations in the International Corpus of English”, English World-Wide30(1), 27–51. doi: 10.1075/eww.30.1.03muk
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.30.1.03muk [Google Scholar]
50. Mukherjee, J. & Hundt, M
    (Eds.) 2011 Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.44
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44 [Google Scholar]
51. OED Online
    2015 Oxford: OUP. Available atwww.oed.com (accessedMarch 2016).
52. Pang, T
    2003 “Hong Kong English: A stillborn variety?”, English Today19(2), 12–18. doi: 10.1017/S0266078403002037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078403002037 [Google Scholar]
53. Pavesi, M
    1998 “‘Same word, same idea’: Conversion as a word formation process”, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching36(3), 213–231.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Peters, P
    2015 “Response to Davies and Fuchs”, English World-Wide36(1), 41–44. doi: 10.1075/eww.36.1.02pet
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.02pet [Google Scholar]
55. Plag, I
    2003 Word–Formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511841323
    https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511841323 [Google Scholar]
56. Po-Ching, Y. & Rimmington, D
    2004 Chinese. A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Quirk, R. , Greenbaum, S. , Leech, G. & Svartvik, J
    1972 A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
58. R Core Team
    2014 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 3.2.0. Wien: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available atwww.r-project.org (accessedMarch 2016).
    [Google Scholar]
59. Schneider, E.W
    2003 “The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth”, Language79(2), 233–281. doi: 10.1353/lan.2003.0136
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2003.0136 [Google Scholar]
60. Schneider, E.W
    2007 Postcolonial English. Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511618901
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618901 [Google Scholar]
61. Schneider, E.W
    2014a “Asian Englishes – into the future: A bird’s eye view”, Asian Englishes16(3), 249–256. doi: 10.1080/21639159.2014.949439
    https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2014.949439 [Google Scholar]
62. Schneider, E.W
    2014b “New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of World Englishes”, World Englishes33(1), 9–32. doi: 10.1111/weng.12069
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12069 [Google Scholar]
63. Seoane, E. & Suárez-Gómez, C
    2013 “The expression of the perfect in East and South-East Asian Englishes”, English World-Wide34(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1075/eww.34.1.01seo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.34.1.01seo [Google Scholar]
64. Setter, J. , Wong, C. & Chan, B
    2010 Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Sridhar, K. & Sridhar, S
    1986 “Bridging the paradigm gap: Second language acquisition theory and indigenized varieties of English”, World Englishes5(1), 3–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1986.tb00636.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1986.tb00636.x [Google Scholar]
66. Strang, B
    1970 A History of English. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Sun, C
    2006 Chinese. A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511755019
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755019 [Google Scholar]
68. Tan, Y
    2014 “English as a ‘Mother Tongue’ in Singapore”, World Englishes33(3), 319–339. doi: 10.1111/weng.12093
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12093 [Google Scholar]
69. The ICE Project
    2014 International Corpus of English. Available atice-corpora.net/ice/index.htm (accessedJuly 2014).
    [Google Scholar]
70. Traugott, E. & Trousdale, G
    2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
71. Van Rooy, B
    2011 “A principled distinction between error and conventionalized innovation in African Englishes”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes. Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–207. doi: 10.1075/scl.44.10roo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.44.10roo [Google Scholar]
72. Wald, B
    1993 “On the Evolution of would and other modals in the English spoken in east Los Angeles”. In N. Dittmar & A. Reich (Eds.), Modality in Language Acquisition. Berlin: De Gruyter, 59–96.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Wee, L
    2013 “Governing English in Singapore. Some challenges for Singapore’s language policy”. In L. Wee , R. Goh & L. Lim (Eds.), The Politics of English. South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Asia Pacific. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 105–124. doi: 10.1075/wlp.4.09wee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/wlp.4.09wee [Google Scholar]
74. Werner, V
    2014 The Present Perfect in World Englishes. Charting Unity and Diversity. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Williams, J
    1987 “Non-native varieties of English: A special case of language acquisition”, English World-Wide8(2), 161–199. doi: 10.1075/eww.8.2.02wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.8.2.02wil [Google Scholar]
76. Wong, W
    2011 Census of Population 2010. Statistical Release 1: Demographic Characteristics, Education, Language and Religion. Singapore: Department of Statistics, Ministry of Trade and Industry, Republic of Singapore.
    [Google Scholar]