1887
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1478
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1486
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

English as a foreign language (EFL) textbooks typically present a prescriptive typology of three or four conditional types. We examine the extent to which this long-established English Language Teaching (ELT) typology is reflected in four varieties of English by comparing the forms and functions of four samples of 620 conditionals from French school EFL textbooks (TEC-Fr), French L1 Learner English (OpenCLC-Fr), Web English (EnTenTen15-S) and British English (BNC-S). The ELT typology accounts for considerably less than half of sentences in the reference data. Even in the EFL textbooks, only 57% of conditionals match the typology explicitly taught in their grammar sections. For many formal and functional features, the learner data sits halfway between the distributions of the textbook and reference data. We conclude that the ELT typology needs to be adapted to provide a more representative account of conditionals that focuses on L1 and L2 usage and meaning over form.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win
2022-03-08
2022-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andri et mult. al., S.
    (2021) DescTools. Tools for Descriptive Statistics (Version R Package Version 0.99.40). https://cran.r-project.org/package=DescTools
  2. Athanasiadou, A., & Dirven, R.
    (1996) Typology of if-clauses. InE. H. Casad (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the redwoods (pp.609–654). De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (1997) Conditionality, hypotheticality, counterfactuality. InA. Athanasiadou & R. Dirven (Eds.), On conditionals again (pp.61–96). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.143.05ath
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143.05ath [Google Scholar]
  4. (2000) Pragmatic conditionals. InA. Foolen & F. van der Leek (Eds.), Constructions in cognitive linguistics (pp.1–26). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.178.03ath
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.178.03ath [Google Scholar]
  5. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (1999) Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Burnard, L.
    (2007) Reference guide for the British National Corpus (XML edition). www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/docs/URG/
  7. Cambridge University Press
    Cambridge University Press (2017) Open Cambridge Learner Corpus (Version 1). Distributed byLexical Computing Limited on behalf of Cambridge University Press and Cambridge English Language Assessment. https://www.sketchengine.eu/cambridge-learner-corpus/
  8. Comrie, B.
    (1986) Conditionals: A typology. InE. C. Traugott, A. Ter Meulen, J. S. Reilly, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), On conditionals (pp.77–100). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511753466.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753466.005 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dancygier, B.
    (1988) Conditionals and concessives. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, 24, 111–121.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Declerck, R., & Reed, S.
    (2001) Conditionals. A comprehensive empirical analysis. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110851748
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851748 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dirven, R., & Putseys, Y.
    (Eds.) (1989) A user’s grammar of English. Word, sentence, text, interaction. Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dolgova Jacobsen, N.
    (2018) The best of both worlds: Combining cognitive linguistics and pedagogic tasks to teach English conditionals. Applied Linguistics, 39(5), 668–693.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fenn, P.
    (2010) A student’s advanced grammar of English (SAGE). Francke. 10.36198/9783838584324
    https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838584324 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferguson, G.
    (2001) If you pop over there: A corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 20(1), 61–82. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(99)00027‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00027-7 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1990) Epistemic stance and grammatical form in English conditional sentences. Papers from the 26th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 137–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ford, C. E.
    (1997) Speaking conditionally: Some contexts for if-clauses in conversation. InA. Athanasiadou, & R. Dirven (Eds.), On Conditionals Again (pp.387–413). John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.143.21for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143.21for [Google Scholar]
  17. Franke, M.
    (2007) The pragmatics of biscuit conditionals. InM. Aloni, P. Dekker, & F. Roelofsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp.91–96).
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fulcher, G.
    (1991) Conditionals revisited. ELT Journal, 45(2), 164–168. 10.1093/elt/45.2.164
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/45.2.164 [Google Scholar]
  19. Funk, W.-P.
    (1985) On a semantic typology of conditional sentences. Folia Linguistica, 19(3–4), 365–414. 10.1515/flin.1985.19.3‑4.365
    https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.1985.19.3-4.365 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
    (2019) The Trinity Lancaster Corpus: Development, description and application. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 5(2), 126–158. 10.1075/ijlcr.19001.gab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.19001.gab [Google Scholar]
  21. Gabrielatos, C.
    (2003) Conditional sentences: ELT typology and corpus evidence. Paper presented at theAnnual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, University of Leeds, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2006) Corpus-based evaluation of pedagogical materials: If-conditionals in ELT coursebooks and the BNC. Paper presented at the7th Teaching and Language Corpora Conference (TaLC 2006), University of Paris, France.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (2010) A corpus-based examination of if-conditionals through the lens of modality. Nature and types (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Lancaster University.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (2013) If-conditionals in ICLE and the BNC: A success story for teaching or learning?InS. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), Twenty years of learner corpus research. Looking back, moving ahead (pp.155–166). Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (2019) If-conditionals and modality: Description and pedagogy. Paper presented at theTESOL Research Seminar, University of Central Lancashire, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2021) If-conditionals: Corpus-based classification and frequency distribution. ICAME Journal, 45, 87–124. 10.2478/icame‑2021‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.2478/icame-2021-0003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gilquin, G.
    (2008) Combining contrastive and interlanguage analysis to apprehend transfer: Detection, explanation, evaluation. InG. Gilquin, S. Papp, & M. B. Díez-Bedmar (Eds.), Linking up contrastive and learner corpus research (pp.3–33). Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401206204_002
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401206204_002 [Google Scholar]
  28. Granger, S.
    (2009) The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: A critical evaluation. InK. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp.13–32). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.33.04gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.33.04gra [Google Scholar]
  29. Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., & Meunier, F.
    (2002) The International Corpus of Learner English (Version 1.1) [Handbook + CD-ROM]. Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Iatridou, S.
    (1991) Topics in conditionals (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. hdl.handle.net/1721.1/13521
  31. Jakubíček, M., Kilgarriff, A., Rychlý, P., Suchomel, V., & Kovář, V.
    (2013) The TenTen corpus family. 7th International Corpus Linguistics ConferenceCL, 125–127.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Keck, C., & Kim, Y.
    (2014) Pedagogical grammar. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.190
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.190 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychlý, P., & Suchomel, V.
    (2014) The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1, 7–36. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kilgarriff, A., Reddy, S., Pomikálek, J., & Pvs, A.
    (2010) A corpus factory for many languages. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), 904–910.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Kormos, J., & Gabrielatos, C.
    (2014) A corpus-based analysis of if-conditionals in spoken second language data. Paper presented at theBAAL Language Learning and Teaching SIG Annual Conference, University of Leeds.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Le Foll, E.
    (2020) Exploring the registers of school EFL textbooks using multi-dimensional analysis. Paper presented atICAME 41, Heidelberg University.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2021) Register variation in school EFL textbooks. Register Studies, 3(2). 10.1075/rs.20009.lef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20009.lef [Google Scholar]
  38. Leech, G.
    (2011) Frequency, corpora and language teaching. InF. Meunier, S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & M. Paquot (Eds.), A taste for corpora: In honour of Sylviane Granger (pp.9–31). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.45.05lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.45.05lee [Google Scholar]
  39. Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N.
    (2009) Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511642210
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511642210 [Google Scholar]
  40. Leroy, M.
    (2012) Les manuels scolaires. Situation et perspectives (No. 36). Retrieved fromhttps://www.education.gouv.fr/les-manuels-scolaires-situation-et-perspectives-6017 (25 April 2021).
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T.
    (2017) The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344. 10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.3.02lov [Google Scholar]
  42. Maule, D.
    (1988) ‘Sorry, but if he comes, I go’: Teaching conditionals. ELT Journal, 42(2), 117–123. 10.1093/elt/42.2.117
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.2.117 [Google Scholar]
  43. Ministère de l’éducation nationale, de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche
    Ministère de l’éducation nationale, de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche (2015) Bulletin officiel spécial n°11 du 26 novembre 2015. Retrieved on29 December 2019fromcache.media.education.gouv.fr/file/MEN_SPE_11/35/1/BO_SPE_11_26-11-2015_504351.pdf
  44. Ministère de l’éducation nationale, de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche
    Ministère de l’éducation nationale, de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche (2016) Communication langagière. Repères de progressivité linguistique Anglais. Retrieved on29 December 2019fromhttps://cache.media.eduscol.education.fr/file/Anglais/21/5/RA16_C4_LV_anglais_declination_linguistique_578215.pdf (29 December 2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Möller, V.
    (2020) From pedagogical input to learner output: Conditionals in EFL and CLIL teaching materials and learner language. Pedagogical Linguistics, 1(2), 95–124. 10.1075/pl.00001.mol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pl.00001.mol [Google Scholar]
  46. Paquot, M.
    (2007) EAP vocabulary in native and learner writing. From extraction to analysis: A phraseology-oriented approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve.
  47. Paquot, M., & Plonsky, L.
    (2017) Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3(1), 61–94. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.03paq
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.03paq [Google Scholar]
  48. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Riegel, M., Pellat, J.-C., & Rioul, R.
    (2009) Grammaire méthodique du français. Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Römer, U.
    (2004) Comparing real and ideal language learner input: The use of an EFL textbook corpus in corpus linguistics and language teaching. InG. Aston, S. Bernardini, & D. Stewart (Eds.), Corpora and language learners (pp.151–168). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.17.12rom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.17.12rom [Google Scholar]
  51. (2007) Learner language and the norms in native corpora and EFL teaching materials: A case study of English conditionals. InS. Volk-Birke, & J. Lippert (Eds.), Anglistentag 2006 Hall:. Proceedings (pp.355–363). Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2011) Corpus research applications in second language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 205–225. 10.1017/S0267190511000055
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000055 [Google Scholar]
  53. Sweetser, E.
    (1990) From etymology to pragmatics. Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wallis, S.
    (2013) Binomial confidence intervals and contingency tests: Mathematical fundamentals and the evaluation of alternative methods. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 20(3), 178–208. 10.1080/09296174.2013.799918
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2013.799918 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.20021.win
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error