1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
  4. Volume 9, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2215-1478
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1486
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to explore the potential of oral reading tasks to establish learners’ proficiency when compiling learner corpora. Informed by research on oral reading fluency, we selected a text containing a variety of linguistic features and submitted it to 68 English learners in Taiwan, who were interviewed for the construction of a large spoken corpus of L2 English across proficiency levels. Their proficiency was rated by trained (CEFR; Council of Europe, 2001, 2018, 2020) raters and ranged from A1 to B2. The performances in the reading passage were analyzed for reading rate and reading disfluencies. The relationship between reading measures and language scores was analyzed using spine plots, revealing a strong association between reading rate and language level. The number of disfluencies did not show a significant association with language level when all disfluencies were counted together. However, when different types of disfluencies were treated separately, false starts were found to be associated with language level (even though the relationship was less clear than the one reported between reading rate and language level). The study demonstrates that including a carefully selected reading passage among the tasks when compiling spoken learner corpora may be an efficient way of collecting data relating to learner performance in speech.

© 2023 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.22013.gra
2024-02-08
2024-12-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.22013.gra
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anderson, J. R.
    (2000) Learning and memory: An integrated approach. John Wiley.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashby, J.
    (2016) Why does prosody accompany fluency? Re-conceptualizing the role of phonology in reading. InA. Khateb & I. Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency (pp.65–90). Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkins, A.
    (2014) Improving reading fluency: An investigation into timed reading. InT. Muller, J. Adamson, P. S. Brown, & S. Herder (Eds.), Exploring EFL fluency in Asia (pp.244–260). Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137449405_15
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137449405_15 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernhardt, E. B., & Kamil, M. L.
    (1995) Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 15–34. 10.1093/applin/16.1.15
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.1.15 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bulté, B., & Roothooft, H.
    (2020) Investigating the interrelationship between rated L2 proficiency and linguistic complexity in L2 speech. System, 911, 1–16. 10.1016/j.system.2020.102246
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102246 [Google Scholar]
  6. Callies, M.
    (2013) Agentivity as a determinant of lexico-grammatical variation in L2 academic writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(3), 357–390. 10.1075/ijcl.18.3.05cal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.18.3.05cal [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlsen, C.
    (2012) Proficiency level – A fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora. Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 161–183. 10.1093/applin/amr047
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr047 [Google Scholar]
  8. Carver, R. P.
    (1990) Reading rate: A review of research and theory. Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chung, M., & Nation, P.
    (2006) The effect of a speed reading course. English Teaching, 61(4), 181–204.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cilibrasi, L., Adani, F., & Tsimpli, I.
    (2019) Reading as a predictor of complex syntax – The case of relative clauses. Frontiers in Psychology, 10 (Art. 1450), 1–12. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01450
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01450 [Google Scholar]
  11. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2018) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment companion volume with new descriptors. Council of Europe Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2020) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. De Clercq, B.
    (2015) The development of lexical complexity in second language acquisition. A cross-linguistic study of L2 French and English. EUROSLA Yearbook, 15(1), 69–94. 10.1075/eurosla.15.03dec
     https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.15.03dec [Google Scholar]
  15. DeKeyser, R. M.
    (2001) Automaticity and automatization. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.125–151). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.007
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.007 [Google Scholar]
  16. Eguchi, M., & Kyle, K.
    (2020) Continuing to explore the multidimensional nature of lexical sophistication: The case of oral proficiency interviews. The Modern Language Journal, 104(2), 381–400. 10.1111/modl.12637
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12637 [Google Scholar]
  17. Favier, S., Meyer, A. S., & Huettig, F.
    (2021) Literacy can enhance syntactic prediction in spoken language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(10), 2167–2174. 10.1037/xge0001042
     https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001042 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R.
    (2001) Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 239–256. 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L.
    (1988) The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20–28. 10.1177/074193258800900206
     https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258800900206 [Google Scholar]
  20. Gass, S., Behney, J., & Plonsky, L.
    (2013) Second language acquisition. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203137093
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203137093 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gibson, S.
    (2008) Reading aloud: a useful learning tool?ELT journal, 62(1), 29–36. 10.1093/elt/ccm075
     https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm075 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gilquin, G.
    (2015) From design to collection of learner corpora. InS. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier, The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp.9–34). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139649414.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.002 [Google Scholar]
  23. Grabe, W.
    (2009) Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Gráf, T.
    (2017) Repeats in advanced spoken English of learners with Czech as L1. AUC PHILOLOGICA, 2017(3), 65–78. 10.14712/24646830.2017.34
     https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2017.34 [Google Scholar]
  25. Granger, S., Dupont, M., Meunier, F., Naets, H., & Paquot, M.
    (Eds.) (2020) The International Corpus of Learner English (Version 3). Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hawkins, J. A., & Buttery, P.
    (2010) Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal, 1(1/e5), 1–23. 10.1017/S2041536210000036
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S2041536210000036 [Google Scholar]
  27. Helliwell, M.
    (2015) Business Plus 3. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Huang, L., & Gráf, T.
    (2021) Expanding LINDSEI to spoken learner English from several L1s across CEFR levels. Corpora, 16(2), 271–285. 10.3366/cor.2021.0220
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2021.0220 [Google Scholar]
  29. Huang, L., Kubelec, S., Keng, N., & Hsu, L.
    (2018) Evaluating CEFR rater performance through the analysis of spoken learner corpora. Language Testing in Asia, 8(14), 1–17. 10.1186/s40468‑018‑0069‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0069-0 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hudson, R. F., Paige, C. P., Holly, B. L., & Torgesen, J. K.
    (2009) The complex nature of reading fluency: A multidimensional view. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25(1), 4–32. 10.1080/10573560802491208
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802491208 [Google Scholar]
  31. Huettig, F., & Pickering, M. J.
    (2019) Literacy advantages beyond reading: Prediction of spoken language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(6), 464–475. 10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ishikawa, S.
    (2015) Lexical development in L2 English learners’ speeches and writings. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1981, 202–210. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.437
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.437 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jasińska, K. K., Frost, S., Molfese, P., Landi, N., Mencl, W. E., Rueckl, J., & Pugh, K.
    (2016) Neuroimaging perspectives on skilled and impaired reading and the bilingual experience. InA. Khateb & I. Bar-Kochva (Eds.), Reading fluency (pp.25–49). Springer International Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Jendryczka-Wierszycka, J.
    (2009) Collecting spoken learner data: Challenges and benefits. A Polish L1 perspective. InM. Mahlberg, V. González-Díaz, & C. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 Corpus Linguistics Conference, University of Liverpool, UK, 20–23 July 2009, Article 230.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Jeon, E.
    (2012) Oral reading fluency in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 241, 186–208.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Jiang, X., Sawaki, Y., & Sabatini, J.
    (2012) Word reading efficiency, text reading fluency, and reading comprehension among Chinese learners of English. Reading Psychology, 33(4), 323–349. 10.1080/02702711.2010.526051
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2010.526051 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kallio, H., Šimko, J., Huhta, A., Karhila, R., Vainio, M., Lindroos, E., Hildén, R., & Kurimo, M.
    (2018) Towards the phonetic basis of spoken second language assessment: Temporal features as indicators of perceived proficiency level. AFinLA-Sovelt. Kielitieteen Tutkimuksia, 101, 193–213. 10.30660/afinla.73137
     https://doi.org/10.30660/afinla.73137 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kang, O., & Yan, X.
    (2018) Linguistic features distinguishing examinees’ speaking performances at different proficiency levels. Journal of Language Testing & Assessment, 11, 24–39. 10.23977/langta.2018.11003
     https://doi.org/10.23977/langta.2018.11003 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kato, S., & Tanaka, K.
    (2015) Reading aloud performance and listening ability in an L2: The case of college-level Japanese EFL users. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 5(2), 187–206. 10.4236/ojml.2015.52015
     https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2015.52015 [Google Scholar]
  40. Khateb, A., & Bar-Kochva, I.
    (Eds.) (2016) Reading fluency. Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Koda, K.
    (1996) L2 word recognition research: A critical review. The Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 450–460. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.1996.tb05465.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05465.x [Google Scholar]
  42. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A.
    (2004) Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. InR. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp.412–453). International Reading Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J.
    (1974) Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. 10.1016/0010‑0285(74)90015‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2 [Google Scholar]
  44. Lems, K.
    (2003) Adult ESL oral reading fluency and silent reading comprehension. National Louis University.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Mukherjee, J.
    (2009) The grammar of conversation in advanced spoken learner English: Learner corpus data and language-pedagogical implications. InK. Aijmer (Ed.), Corpora and language teaching (pp.203–230). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.33.17muk
     https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.33.17muk [Google Scholar]
  46. Osborne, J.
    (2008) Adverb placement in post-intermediate learner English: A contrastive study of learner corpora. InG. Gilquin, S. Papp, & M. Díez-Bedmar (Eds.), Linking up contrastive and learner corpus research (pp.127–146). Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401206204_006
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401206204_006 [Google Scholar]
  47. Park, H. I., Solon, M., Dehghan-Chaleshtori, M., & Ghanbar, H.
    (2022) Proficiency reporting practices in research on second language acquisition: Have we made any progress?Language Learning, 72(1), 198–236. 10.1111/lang.12475
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12475 [Google Scholar]
  48. Perfetti, C. A.
    (1985) Reading ability. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Ramig, L. A.
    (1983) Effects of physiological aging on speaking and reading rates. Journal of Communication Disorders, 16(3), 217–226. 10.1016/0021‑9924(83)90035‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(83)90035-7 [Google Scholar]
  50. Segalowitz, N., & Hulstijn, J.
    (2005) Automaticity in bilingualism and second language learning. InJ. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp.371–388). Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Taguchi, E., Gorsuch, G., & Sasamoto, E.
    (2006) Developing second and foreign language reading fluency and its effect on comprehension: A missing link. The Reading Matrix, 61, 1–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Waring, R.
    (2014) Building fluency with extensive reading. InT. Muller, J. Adamson, P. S. Brown, & S. Herder (Eds.), Exploring EFL fluency in Asia (pp.213–230). Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T.
    (2001) Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 211–239. 10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_2
     https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_2 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.22013.gra
Loading
Oral reading tasks as proficiency indicators
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 9, 155 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.22013.gra
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.22013.gra
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.22013.gra
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): L2 proficiency; proficiency in learner corpora; reading disfluencies; reading fluency; reading rate

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error