1887
image of Vocabulary sophistication in children’s L2 school writing
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper tests three hypotheses about written vocabulary in child L2 English. Specifically, as children mature, (1) the mean frequency values of the nouns they use increase; (2) the mean frequencies of other parts-of-speech decrease; (3) the use of academic vocabulary increases only in certain types of writing. Using a corpus of writing by children in Norway, hypothesis 1 was confirmed up to the mid-teenage years. The mean frequency values of nouns then decreased. Analysis showed that the early increase is due to decreased repetition of low-frequency topic words. After age 15, frequencies drop as the main source of vocabulary moves from a region around the 150th most frequent lemma to one around the 550th. Hypotheses 2 and 3 were partially confirmed. Mean frequencies of non-nouns decreased in non-stories after Year 9. Non-stories became more academic across school years. Stories had much lower scores overall but also showed an increase at Year 10.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.23025.dur
2024-10-25
2024-11-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Banerjee, J., Franceschina, F., & Smith, A. M.
    (2007) Documenting features of written language production typical at different IELTS band score levels. IELTS Research Reports, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bulté, B., Housen, A., Pierrard, M., & Van Daele, S.
    (2008) Investigating lexical proficiency development over time — the case of Dutch-speaking learners of French in Brussels. Journal of French Language Studies, , –. 10.1017/S0959269508003451
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959269508003451 [Google Scholar]
  3. Crossley, S. A.
    (2020) Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview. Journal of Writing Research, (), –. 10.17239/jowr‑2020.11.03.01
    https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.01 [Google Scholar]
  4. Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D.
    (2012) Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication. Journal of Research in Reading, (), –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9817.2010.01449.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01449.x [Google Scholar]
  5. Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D.
    (2011) Predicting the proficiency level of language learners using lexical indices. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532211419331
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211419331 [Google Scholar]
  6. Daller, H., Turlik, J., & Weir, I.
    (2013) Vocabulary acquisition and the learning curve. InS. Jarvis & H. Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary knowledge: Human ratings and automated measures (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.47.09ch7
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.47.09ch7 [Google Scholar]
  7. Davies, M.
    (2008–) The Corpus of Contemporary American: 450 million words, 1990-present. Retrieved fromcorpus.byu.edu/coca/on1 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2018) Word frequency data. Retrieved fromwww.wordfrequency.infoonNovember 2012.
  9. Dirdal, H., Hasund, I. K., Drange, E.-M. D., Vold, E. T., & Berg, E. M.
    (2022) Design and construction of the Tracking Written Learner Language (TRAWL) Corpus: A longitudinal and multilingual young learner corpus. Nordic Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, (), –. 10.46364/njltl.v10i2.1005
    https://doi.org/10.46364/njltl.v10i2.1005 [Google Scholar]
  10. Douglas, S. R.
    (2015) The relationship between lexical frequency profiling measures and rater judgements of spoken and written general English language proficiency on the CELPIP-General Test. TESL Canada Journal (), –. 10.18806/tesl.v32i0.1217
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v32i0.1217 [Google Scholar]
  11. Durrant, P.
    (2023) Corpus linguistics for writing development. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Durrant, P., & Brenchley, M.
    (2019) Development of vocabulary sophistication across genres in English children’s writing. Reading and Writing, (), –. 10.1007/s11145‑018‑9932‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9932-8 [Google Scholar]
  13. Durrant, P., Brenchley, M., & McCallum, L.
    (2021) Understanding development and proficiency in writing: quantitative corpus linguistic approaches. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108770101
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108770101 [Google Scholar]
  14. Durrant, P., & Durrant, A.
    (2022) Appropriateness as an aspect of lexical richness: what do quantitative measures tell us about children’s writing?Assessing Writing, . 10.1016/j.asw.2021.100596
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100596 [Google Scholar]
  15. Eguchi, M., & Kyle, K.
    (2023) L2 collocation profiles and their relationship with vocabulary proficiency: A learner corpus approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, . 10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100975
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.100975 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gardner, D., & Davies, M.
    (2014) A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amt015
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt015 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gregori-Signes, C., & Clavel-Arroiti, B.
    (2015) Analysing lexical density and lexical diversity in university students’ written discourse. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, , –. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.477
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.477 [Google Scholar]
  18. Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D.
    (2013) Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study. Assessing Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hammou, B. A., Larouz, M., & Fagroud, M.
    (2021) Word frequency, Range and Lexical diversity: Picking out Changes in Lexical Proficiency among University Learners in an EFL Context. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, (), –. 10.36892/ijlts.v2i2.131
    https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v2i2.131 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hasund, I. K.
    (2022) Genres in young learner L2 English writing: A genre typology for the TRAWL (Tracking Written Learner Language) corpus. Nordic Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, (), –. 10.46364/njltl.v10i2.939
    https://doi.org/10.46364/njltl.v10i2.939 [Google Scholar]
  21. Horst, M., & Collins, L.
    (2006) From Faible to Strong: How Does their Vocabulary Grow?The Canadian Modern Language Review, (), –. 10.3138/cmlr.63.1.83
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.83 [Google Scholar]
  22. Juanggo, W.
    (2018) Investigating lexical diversity and lexical sophistication of productive vocabulary in the written discourse of Indonesian EFL learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11462
    https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11462 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim, M., & Crossley, S. A.
    (2018) Modelling second language writing quality: A structural equation investigation of lexical, syntactic, and cohesive features in source-based and independent writing. Assessing Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kolsvik, S. G.
    (2019) Moving toward(s) Americanization: A study of the use of and attitudes toward American spelling, vocabulary and pronunciation among Norwegian students and teachers (Unpublished Master’s thesis). University of Louvain and University of Oslo.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kyle, K.
    (2020) Measuring Lexical Richness. InS. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Vocabulary Studies (pp.–). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2021) Lexis. InN. Tracy-Ventura & M. Paquot (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Corpora (pp.–). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A.
    (2016) The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Larsson, T., Sardinha, T. B., Gray, B., & Biber, D.
    (2023) Exploring early L2 writing development through the lens of grammatical complexity. Applied Corpus Linguitics, . 10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100077
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100077 [Google Scholar]
  29. Laufer, B.
    (1994) The lexical profile of second language writing: does it change over time?RELC Journal, (), –. 10.1177/003368829402500202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829402500202 [Google Scholar]
  30. (1998) The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/19.2.255
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.2.255 [Google Scholar]
  31. Laufer, B., & Nation, P.
    (1995) Vocabulary Size and Use: Lexical Richness in L2 Written Production. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/16.3.307
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee, C., Ge, H., & Chung, E.
    (2021) What linguistic features distinguish and predict L2 writing quality? A study of examination scripts written by adolescent Chinese learners of English in Hong Kong. System, . 10.1016/j.system.2021.102461
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102461 [Google Scholar]
  33. Leńko-Szymanska, A.
    (2002) How to trace the growth in learners’ active vocabulary. A corpus-based study. InB. Kettermann & G. Marko (Eds.), Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis: proceedings of the fourth international conference on teaching and language corpora, Graz 19–24 July, 2000 (pp.–). Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004334236_019
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334236_019 [Google Scholar]
  34. Leńko-Szymańska, A.
    (2020) Defining and assessing lexical proficiency. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Levitzky-Aviad, T., & Laufer, B.
    (2013) Lexical properties in the writing of foreign language learners over 8 years of study: Single words and collocations. InC. Bardel, C. Lindquist, & B. Laufer (Eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use: New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis. (pp.–): European Second Language Association.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lin, Y.-M., & Chen, M. Y.
    (2020) Understanding writing quality change: A longitudinal study of repeaters of a high-stakes standardized English proficiency test. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/0265532220925448
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532220925448 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lines, H.
    (2014) “It’s a matter of individual taste, I guess”: Secondary school English teachers’ and students’ conceptualisations of quality in writing. (PhD dissertation). University of Exeter.
  38. Maamuujav, U.
    (2021) Examining lexical features and academic vocabulary use in adolescent L2 students’ text-based analytical essays. Assessing Writing, . 10.1016/j.asw.2021.100540
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100540 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mazgutova, D., & Kormos, J.
    (2015) Syntactic and lexical development in an intensive English for Academic Purposes programme. Journal of Second Language Writing, , –. 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ministry of Education and Research
    Ministry of Education and Research (2013) English subject curriculum (ENG1–03). Retrieved fromwww.udir.no/kl06/ENG1-03?lplang=data.udir.no/kl06/engon23 March 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ministry of Education and Research
    Ministry of Education and Research (2022) Information for newly arrived parents and guardians: The education system in Norway. Retrieved fromwww.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/minoritetsspraklige-og-flyktninger/minoritetsspraklige/informasjon-til-nyankomne/information-for-newly-arrived/on23 March 2024.
  42. Monteiro, K. R., Crossley, S. A., & Kyle, K.
    (2020) In Search of New Benchmarks: Using L2 Lexical Frequency and Contextual Diversity Indices to Assess Second Language Writing. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amy056
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy056 [Google Scholar]
  43. Moreno Espinosa, S.
    (2005) Can P_Lex accurately measure lexical richness in the written production of young learners of EFL?Porta Linguarum, , –. 10.30827/Digibug.29863
    https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.29863 [Google Scholar]
  44. Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education
    Norwegian Agency for Quality Assurance in Education. (n.d.). General information about education in Norway. Retrieved fromhttps://www.nokut.no/en/norwegian-education/general-information-about-education-in-norway/on23 March 2024.
  45. Nøklestad, A., Hagen, K., Johannessen, J. B., Kosek, M., & Priestley, J.
    (2017) A modernised version of the Glossa corpus search system. InJ. Tiedemann & N. Tahmasebi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics (NoDaLiDa) (pp.–). Association for Computational Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Olsson, E.
    (2021) A comparative study of CLIL implementation in upper secondary school in Sweden and students’ development of L2 English academic vocabulary. Language teaching research, (), –. 10.1177/13621688211045000
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211045000 [Google Scholar]
  47. R. Core Team
    R. Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. URLwww.R-project.org: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rindal, U., & Piercy, C.
    (2013) Being ‘neutral’? English pronunciation among Norwegian learners. World Englishes, (), –. 10.1111/weng.12020
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12020 [Google Scholar]
  49. Schmid, H.
    (1994) Probabilistic part-of-speech tagging using decision trees. Proceedings of International Conference on New Methods in Language Processing. Manchester, UK.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (1995) Improvements in part-of-speech tagging with an application to German. Proceedings of the ACL SIGDAT-Workshop. Dublin, Ireland.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Staples, S., Gray, B., Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
    (2023) Writing trajectories of grammatical complexity at the university: comparing L1 and L2 English writers in BAWE. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amac047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac047 [Google Scholar]
  52. Storch, N., & Tapper, J.
    (2009) The impact of an EAP course on postgraduate writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2009.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  53. Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., Chan, H. P., & Vahtrick, L.
    (2017) Linguistic complexity in second language development: variability and variation at advanced stages. Recherches en Didactique des Langues et des Cultures, (), –. 10.4000/rdlc.1450
    https://doi.org/10.4000/rdlc.1450 [Google Scholar]
  54. Vidakovic, I., & Barker, F.
    (2010) Use of words and multi-word units in Skills for Life Writing examinations. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations Research Notes, ().
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Yoon, H.-J., & Polio, C.
    (2016) The linguistic development of students of English as a second language in two written genres. TESOL Quarterly, (), –. 10.1002/tesq.296
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.296 [Google Scholar]
  56. Yousofi, N., & Bahramlou, K.
    (2014) Assessing writing quality: vocabulary profiles in place of holistic measures. Iranian EFL Journal, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.23025.dur
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.23025.dur
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error