1887
image of The relative influence of language backgrounds, communicative text types, and disciplines in undergraduate student
writing
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Previous studies of undergraduate writing investigated linguistic variation across (i) assignment types, (ii) disciplines, and (iii) language backgrounds. The combined findings of these studies allowed us to formulate eight hypotheses as to how undergraduate writing is likely to vary across these three variables. Three of the hypotheses are as follows: (a) writing in humanities will have more features of ‘academic involvement’, while writing in sciences will have more features of ‘information density’; (b) assignments such as proposals and procedural recounts will have more features of ‘expression of possibility’; and (c) L1 students will use more features of ‘information density’ than L2 students. In the current study, we test these hypotheses, examining whether the language of undergraduate writing varies in accordance with the expectations from previous research. We use the dimensions identified in Goulart (2024) to examine these hypotheses in a corpus of undergraduate student writing. The results provide support for hypotheses related to disciplines and communicative purposes, but not for those related to language backgrounds.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.23028.gou
2024-10-25
2024-11-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Biber, D.
    (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  2. (2006) University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.23
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.23 [Google Scholar]
  3. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G. N., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (2021) Grammar of spoken and written English. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.232
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.232 [Google Scholar]
  4. Conrad, S. M.
    (1996) Academic discourse in two disciplines: Professional writing and student development in biology and history (Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University).
  5. Cohen, J.
    (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Egbert, J., & Staples, S.
    (2019) Doing multi-dimensional analysis in SPSS, SAS, and R. Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues, –. 10.5040/9781350023857.0015
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0015 [Google Scholar]
  7. Gardner, S., Nesi, H., & Biber, D.
    (2019) Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amy005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005 [Google Scholar]
  8. Goulart, L.
    (2017) Compilation of a Brazilian academic written English corpus. Revista e-scrita: Revista do Curso de Letras da UNIABEU, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. (2021) Register variation in L1 and L2 student writing: A multidimensional analysis. Register Studies, (), –. 10.1075/rs.20012.gou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20012.gou [Google Scholar]
  10. Goulart, L., Biber, D., & Reppen, R.
    (2022) In this essay, I will…: Examining variation of communicative purpose in student written genres. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101159
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101159 [Google Scholar]
  11. Goulart, L., & Staples, S.
    (2023) Multidimensional analysis. InConducting genre-based research in applied linguistics (pp.–). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003300847‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003300847-9 [Google Scholar]
  12. Goulart, L.
    (2024) Variation in university student writing. John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.117
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.117 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hardy, J. A., & Römer, U.
    (2013) Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, (), –. 10.3366/cor.2013.0040
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0040 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hardy, J. A., & Friginal, E.
    (2016) Genre variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2016.03.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  15. Kellogg, R. T., & Raulerson, B. A.
    (2007) Improving the writing skills of college students. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, (), –. 10.3758/BF03194058
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194058 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lan, G., Zhang, Q., Lucas, K., Sun, Y., & Gao, J.
    (2022) A corpus-based investigation on noun phrase complexity in L1 and L2 English writing. English for Specific Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.esp.2022.02.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.02.002 [Google Scholar]
  17. Larsson, T., Paquot, M., & Biber, D.
    (2021) On the importance of register in learner writing. InE. Seoane & D. Biber (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to register variation (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.103.09lar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.09lar [Google Scholar]
  18. Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L.
    (2016) An A-Z of applied linguistics research methods. Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑40322‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40322-3 [Google Scholar]
  19. Moran, K. E.
    (2013) Exploring undergraduate disciplinary writing: Expectations and evidence in psychology and chemistry. Georgia State University.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Nesi, H., Gardner, S., Thompson, P., & Wickens, P.
    (2004–2007) The British Academic Written English (BAWE) corpus. www.coventry.ac.uk/bawe
  21. Nesi, H., & Gardner, S.
    (2012) Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009030199
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030199 [Google Scholar]
  22. R Core Team
    R Core Team (2024) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. https://www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. B.
    (2011) From student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, (), –. 10.3366/cor.2011.0011
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2011.0011 [Google Scholar]
  24. Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B.
    (2016) Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication, (), –. 10.1177/0741088316631527
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527 [Google Scholar]
  25. Staples, S., Biber, D., & Reppen, R.
    (2018) Using corpus-based register analysis to explore the authenticity of high-stakes language exams: A register comparison of TOEFL iBT and disciplinary writing tasks. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/modl.12465
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12465 [Google Scholar]
  26. Staples, S., Gray, B., Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
    (2023) Writing trajectories of grammatical complexity at the university: Comparing L1 and L2 English writers in BAWE. Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1093/applin/amac047
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac047 [Google Scholar]
  27. Weigle, S. C., & Friginal, E.
    (2015) Linguistic dimensions of impromptu test essays compared with successful student disciplinary writing: Effects of language background, topic, and L2 proficiency. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, , –. 10.1016/j.jeap.2015.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.03.006 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.23028.gou
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.23028.gou
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error