1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 11, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2215-1478
  • E-ISSN: 2215-1486
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The present study tests the empirical adequacy of competing models of grammatical complexity in university student writing, based on analysis of disciplinary texts from L1-English and L2-English students. The results show that grammatical complexity in student writing must be treated as a multi-dimensional linguistic construct, distinguishing among both structural types and syntactic functions. We compare the results here to previous research (Biber et al., 2024a, b), showing a similar patterning of complexity features in student writing and the broader domain of general writing. Two of these groupings – dependent phrases functioning as noun modifiers, and finite dependent clauses functioning as clause-level constituents – are especially interesting. These two groupings represent the strongest co-occurrence patterns in general writing, but only the dependent clause grouping is represented in student writing. This discrepancy is interpreted relative to the development of advanced proficiency in the use of complexity features by university students.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.23036.bib
2024-07-01
2025-04-21

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.23036.bib
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahn, H.
    (2019) From interlanguage grammar to target grammar in L2 processing of definiteness as uniqueness. Second Language Research, 371, 91–119. 10.1177/0267658319868003
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319868003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Beers, S. F., & Nagy, W. E.
    (2011) Writing development in four genres from grades three to seven: syntactic complexity and genre differentiation. Reading and Writing, 241, 183–202. 10.1007/s11145‑010‑9264‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9264-9 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bi, P., & Jiang, J.
    (2020) Syntactic complexity in assessing young adolescent EFL learners’ writings: Syntactic elaboration and diversity. System, 911. 10.1016/j.system.2020.102248
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102248 [Google Scholar]
  4. Biber, D.
    (1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2014) Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast, 141, 7–34. 10.1075/lic.14.1.02bib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.14.1.02bib [Google Scholar]
  6. Biber, D., & Gray, B.
    (2016) Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K.
    (2011) Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. 10.5054/tq.2011.244483
     https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483 [Google Scholar]
  8. Biber, D., Gray, B., Staples, S., & Egbert, J.
    (2020) Investigating grammatical complexity in L2 English writing research: Linguistic description versus predictive measurement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 461, 1–14. 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100869
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100869 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2022) The Register-Functional approach to grammatical complexity. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
    (2021) Grammar of spoken and written English. John Benjamins. [Previously published in 1999 by Longman] 10.1075/z.232
     https://doi.org/10.1075/z.232 [Google Scholar]
  11. Biber, D., Larsson, T., & Hancock, G. R.
    (2024a) The linguistic organization of text complexity: Comparing the empirical adequacy of theory-based models. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 20(2), 347–373. 10.1515/cllt‑2023‑0016
     https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2023-0016 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2024b) Dimensions of text complexity in the spoken and written modes: A comparison of theory-based models. Journal of English Linguistics. 52(1), 65–94. 10.1177/00754242231222296
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00754242231222296 [Google Scholar]
  13. Biber, D., Reppen, R., Staples, S., & Egbert, J.
    (2020) Exploring the longitudinal development of grammatical complexity in the disciplinary writing of L2-English university students. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 6(1), 38–71. 10.1075/ijlcr.18007.bib
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.18007.bib [Google Scholar]
  14. Bulté, B., & Housen, A.
    (2012) Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. InA. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp.21–46). Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.32.02bul
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.02bul [Google Scholar]
  15. (2014) Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 261, 42–65. 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2018) Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 281, 147–164. 10.1111/ijal.12196
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12196 [Google Scholar]
  17. Carter, R., & McCarthy, M.
    (2006) Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Casal, J. E., & Lee, J. J.
    (2019) Syntactic complexity and writing quality in assessed first-year L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 441, 51–62. 10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellis, R., & Yuan, F.
    (2004) The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 261, 59–84. 10.1017/S0272263104261034
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104261034 [Google Scholar]
  20. Frear, M. W., & Bitchener, J.
    (2015) The effects of cognitive task complexity on writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 301, 45–57. 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.009 [Google Scholar]
  21. Huddleston, R.
    (1984) Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139165785
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139165785 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiang, J., Bi, P., & Liu, H.
    (2019) Syntactic complexity development in the writings of EFL learners: Insights from a dependency syntactically-annotated corpus. Journal of Second Language Writing, 461, 100666. 10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100666
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100666 [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson, M.
    (2017) Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 371, 13–38. 10.1016/j.jslw.2017.06.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kormos, J.
    (2011) Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 201, 148–161. 10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kreyer, R., & Schaub, S.
    (2018) The development of phrasal complexity in German intermediate learners of English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 41, 82–111. 10.1075/ijlcr.16011.kre
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.16011.kre [Google Scholar]
  26. Kushik, G. A., & Huhta, A.
    (2020) Investigating syntactic complexity in EFL learners’ writing across common European framework of reference levels A1, A2, and B1. Applied Linguistics, 411, 506–532. 10.1093/applin/amy064
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy064 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kyle, K.
    (2016) Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine grained indices of syntactic complexity and usage-based indices of syntactic sophistication. [Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia State University].
  28. Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. A.
    (2018) Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine-grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal, 1021, 333–349. 10.1111/modl.12468
     https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12468 [Google Scholar]
  29. Kyle, K., Crossley, S. A., & Verspoor, M.
    (2021) Measuring longitudinal writing development using indices of syntactic complexity and sophistication. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 43(4), 781–812. 10.1017/S0272263120000546
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263120000546 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lan, G., Lucas, K., & Sun, Y.
    (2019) Does L2 writing proficiency influence noun phrase complexity? A case analysis of argumentative essays written by Chinese students in a first-year composition course. System, 851, 1–13. 10.1016/j.system.2019.102116
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102116 [Google Scholar]
  31. Lan, G., & Sun, Y.
    (2019) A corpus-based investigation of noun phrase complexity in the L2 writings of a first-year composition course. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 381, 14–24. 10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  32. Larsson, T., Biber, D., & Hancock, G. R.
    (forthcoming). On the role of cumulative knowledge building and specific hypotheses: The case of grammatical complexity. Corpora, 19(3).
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Lei, L., Wen, J., & Yang, X.
    (2023) A large-scale longitudinal study of syntactic complexity development in EFL writing: A mixed-effects model approach. Journal of Second Language Writing, 591. 10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100962
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100962 [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, Y., Lin, S., Liu, Y., & Lu, X.
    (2023) The predictive powers of fine-grained syntactic complexity indices for letter writing proficiency and their relationship to pragmatic appropriateness. Assessing Writing, 561. 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100707
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100707 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lu, X.
    (2010) Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474–496. 10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu [Google Scholar]
  36. (2017) Automated measurement of syntactic complexity in corpus-based L2 writing research and implications for writing assessment. Language Testing, 341, 493–511. 10.1177/0265532217710675
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217710675 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lu, X., & Ai, H.
    (2015) Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing, 291, 16–27. 10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003 [Google Scholar]
  38. Lu, X., Casal, E., & Liu, Y.
    (2020) The rhetorical functions of syntactically complex sentences in social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 441. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100832
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100832 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mancilla, R. L., Polat, N., & Akcay, A. O.
    (2017) An investigation of native and nonnative English speakers’ levels of written syntactic complexity in asynchronous online discussions. Applied Linguistics, 381, 112–134. 10.1093/applin/amv012
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv012 [Google Scholar]
  40. Martínez, A. C. L.
    (2018) Analysis of syntactic complexity in secondary education EFL writers at different proficiency levels. Assessing Writing, 351, 1–11. 10.1016/j.asw.2017.11.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  41. Nasseri, M.
    (2021) Is postgraduate English academic writing more clausal or phrasal? Syntactic complexification at the crossroads of genre, proficiency, and statistical modeling. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 491. 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100940
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100940 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nesi, H., & Gardner, S.
    (2012) Genres across the disciplines. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009030199
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030199 [Google Scholar]
  43. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
    (2009) Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 301, 555–578. 10.1093/applin/amp044
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ortega, L.
    (2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 241, 492–518. 10.1093/applin/24.4.492
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492 [Google Scholar]
  45. Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J.
    (2014) Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 141, 48–59. 10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Polat, N., Mahalingappa, L., & Mancilla, R. L.
    (2020) Longitudinal growth trajectories of written syntactic complexity: The case of Turkish learners in an intensive English program. Applied Linguistics, 411, 688–711. 10.1093/applin/amz034
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz034 [Google Scholar]
  47. Polio, C., & Yoon, H-J.
    (2018) The reliability and validity of automated tools for examining variation in syntactic complexity across genres. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 281, 165–188. 10.1111/ijal.12200
     https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12200 [Google Scholar]
  48. Purpura, J. E.
    (2004) Assessing grammar. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511733086
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733086 [Google Scholar]
  49. Qian, L., Yang, Y., & Zhao, Y.
    (2021) Syntactic complexity revisited: sensitivity of China’s AES-generated scores to syntactic measures, effects of discourse-mode and topic. Reading and Writing, 341, 681–704. 10.1007/s11145‑020‑10087‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10087-5 [Google Scholar]
  50. Qin, W., & Uccelli, P.
    (2020) Beyond linguistic complexity: Assessing register flexibility in EFL writing across contexts. Assessing Writing, 451. 10.1016/j.asw.2020.100465
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100465 [Google Scholar]
  51. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Rankin, T.
    (2022) Input and competing grammars in L2 syntax. Second Language Research, 391, 581–596. 10.1177/02676583221091389
     https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583221091389 [Google Scholar]
  53. Seo, N., & Oh, S.-Y.
    (2024) Development of clausal and phrasal complexity in L2 writing: A case of argumentative essays of Korean college students. English for Specific Purposes, 731. 46–60. 10.1016/j.esp.2023.09.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2023.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  54. Shao, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., & Xu, X.
    (2022) Phrasal complexity in English argumentative writing: Variations across Chinese STEM versus English majors– production and EFL textbook essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 551. 10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101070
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101070 [Google Scholar]
  55. Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B.
    (2016) Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication, 331, 149–183. 10.1177/0741088316631527
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527 [Google Scholar]
  56. Staples, S., Gray, B., Biber, D., & Egbert, J.
    (2023) Writing trajectories of grammatical complexity at the university: Comparing L1 and L2 English writers in BAWE. Applied Linguistics, 441, 46–71. 10.1093/applin/amac047
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac047 [Google Scholar]
  57. Willis, D.
    (2003) Rules, patterns and words: Grammar and lexis in English language teaching. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511733000
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733000 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H-Y.
    (1998) Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity [Technical Report No. 17]. University of Hawaii.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Wu, X., Mauranen, A., & Lei, L.
    (2020) Syntactic complexity in English as a lingua franca academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 431. 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100798
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100798 [Google Scholar]
  60. Yoon, H.-J.
    (2017) Linguistic complexity in L2 writing revisited: Issues of topic, proficiency, and construct multidimensionality. System, 661, 130–141. 10.1016/j.system.2017.03.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.03.007 [Google Scholar]
  61. (2021) Challenging the connection between task perceptions and language use in L2 writing: Genre, cognitive task complexity, and linguistic complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 541. 10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100857
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100857 [Google Scholar]
  62. Yoon, H.-J., & Polio, C.
    (2017) The linguistic development of students of English as a second language in two written genres. TESOL Quarterly, 511, 275–301. 10.1002/tesq.296
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.296 [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhang, X., & Lu, X.
    (2022) Revisiting the predictive power of traditional vs. fine-grained syntactic complexity indices for L2 writing quality: The case of two genres. Assessing Writing, 511. 10.1016/j.asw.2021.100597
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100597 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.23036.bib
Loading
Comparing theory-based models of grammatical complexity in student writing
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 11, 145 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.23036.bib
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.23036.bib
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.23036.bib
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): dependent clauses; dependent phrases; grammatical complexity; syntactic functions; university student writing; written register variation

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error