1887
image of Encouraging cumulative knowledge building as normal practice in (learner) corpus research
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

There is no abstract available.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.24022.lar
2025-01-10
2025-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andersson, E., McPhearson, T., & Pickett, S. T.
    (2024) From urban ecology to urban enquiry: How to build cumulative and context-sensitive understandings. Ambio, (), –. 10.1007/s13280‑023‑01959‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01959-5 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bazerman, C.
    1988Shaping written knowledge: the genre and activity of the experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Borenstein, M., & Hedges, L. V.
    (2019) Effect sizes for meta-analysis. InH. Cooper, L. Hedges & J. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, (Vol., pp.–). Russell Sage Foundation. 10.7758/9781610448864.14
    https://doi.org/10.7758/9781610448864.14 [Google Scholar]
  4. Chong, S. W., & Plonsky, L.
    (2024) A typology of secondary research in Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, (), –. 10.1515/applirev‑2022‑0189
    https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0189 [Google Scholar]
  5. De Bruin, A., Brush, C. G., & Welter, F.
    (2006) Introduction to the special issue: Towards building cumulative knowledge on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑6520.2006.00137.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00137.x [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellemers, N.
    (2021) Science as collaborative knowledge generation. British Journal of Social Psychology, (), –. 10.1111/bjso.12430
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12430 [Google Scholar]
  7. Glass, G. V.
    (1976) Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, (), –. 10.3102/0013189X005010003
    https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003 [Google Scholar]
  8. Isager, P. M., Van Aert, R. C. M., Bahník, Š., Brandt, M. J., DeSoto, K. A., Giner-Sorolla, R., Krueger, J. I., Perugini, M., Ropovik, I., van ’T Veer, A. E., Vranka, M., & Lakens, D.
    (2023) Deciding what to replicate: A decision model for replication study selection under resource and knowledge constraints. Psychological Methods, (), –. 10.1037/met0000438
    https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000438 [Google Scholar]
  9. Larsson, T., Biber, D., & Hancock, G. R.
    (2024) On the role of cumulative knowledge building and specific hypotheses: The case of grammatical complexity. Corpora, (). –. 10.3366/cor.2024.0314
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2024.0314 [Google Scholar]
  10. Liu, Y., & Lu, X.
    (2024) Development of verb argument constructions in L2 English learners: A close replication of research question 3 in Römer and Berger (2019). Studies in Second Language Acquisition, –. 10.1017/S027226312400024X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226312400024X [Google Scholar]
  11. McEnery, T., and Brezina, V.
    (2022) Fundamental principles of corpus linguistics. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781107110625
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107110625 [Google Scholar]
  12. McManus, K.
    (forthcoming). Replication studies in Second Language Acquisition research: Definitions, issues, resources, and future directions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mizumoto, A., Plonsky, L., & Egbert, J.
    (2021) Meta-analyzing corpus linguistic research. InM. Paquot & S. Th. Gries (Eds), A practical handbook of corpus linguistics (pp.–). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑46216‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1 [Google Scholar]
  14. Mouton, M.
    (2020) A case for project based learning to enact semantic waves: towards cumulative knowledge building. Journal of Biological Education, (), –. 10.1080/00219266.2019.1585379
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1585379 [Google Scholar]
  15. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, (), –. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  16. Norris, J. M. & L. Ortega
    (Eds.) (2006) Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.13
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.13 [Google Scholar]
  17. O’Rourke, K.
    (2007) An historical perspective on meta-analysis: Dealing quantitatively with varying study results. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, (), –. 10.1177/0141076807100012020
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076807100012020 [Google Scholar]
  18. Paquot, M.
    (2018) Phraseological competence: A missing component in university entrance language tests? Insights from a study of EFL learners’ use of statistical collocations. Language Assessment Quarterly, (), –. 10.1080/15434303.2017.1405421
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1405421 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2019) The phraseological dimension in interlanguage complexity research. Second Language Research, (), –. 10.1177/0267658317694221
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317694221 [Google Scholar]
  20. Paquot, M., & Plonsky, L.
    (2017) Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, (), –. 10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.03paq
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.1.03paq [Google Scholar]
  21. Plonsky, L.
    (2014) Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990–2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform. The Modern Language Journal, (), –. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2014.12058.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12058.x [Google Scholar]
  22. Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L.
    (2012) How to do a meta-analysis. InA. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp.–). Basil Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Porte, G., & McManus, K.
    (2019) Doing replication research in applied linguistics. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rubin, R., Housen, A., & Paquot, M.
    (2021) Phraseological complexity as an index of L2 Dutch writing proficiency: A partial replication study. InS. Granger (Ed.), Perspectives on L2 phrasican: The view from learner corpora (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781788924863‑006
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788924863-006 [Google Scholar]
  25. Ross, S.
    (1998) Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, (), –. 10.1177/026553229801500101
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500101 [Google Scholar]
  26. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E.
    (1977) Development of a general solution to the problem of validity generalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, (), –. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.529. 10.1037/0021‑9010.62.5.529
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.529 [Google Scholar]
  27. Snyder, H.
    (2019) Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, , –. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 [Google Scholar]
  28. Stengers, H., Boers, F., Housen, A., & Eyckmans, J.
    (2011) Formulaic sequences and L2 oral proficiency : Does the type of target language influence the association?International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1515/iral.2011.017
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2011.017 [Google Scholar]
  29. Trikalinos, T. A., Salanti, G., Zintzaras, E., & Ioannidis, J. P.
    (2008) Meta-analysis methods. Advances in Genetics, , –. 10.1016/S0065‑2660(07)00413‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2660(07)00413-0 [Google Scholar]
  30. Uman, L. S.
    (2011) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Journal de l’Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l’enfant et de l’adolescent, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Vanderweerd, N., Housen, A., & Paquot, M.
    (2021) Applying phraseological complexity measures to L2 French: A partial replication study. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, (), –. 10.1075/ijlcr.20015.van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20015.van [Google Scholar]
  32. Zeigler, D.
    (2012) Evolution and the cumulative nature of science. Evo Edu Outreach, , –. 10.1007/s12052‑012‑0454‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0454-6 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijlcr.24022.lar
Loading
  • Article Type: Introduction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error