Segmental, prosodic and fluency features in phonetic learner corpora

References

1. Ballier, N. , & Martin, Ph
   2015 “Speech annotation of learner corpora”. In S. Granger , G. Gilquin , & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 107–134. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139649414.006
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414.006 [Google Scholar]
2. Belz, M. , Sauer, S. , Lüdeling, A. , & Mooshammer, C.
   this volume. “Fluently disfluent? Pauses and repairs of advanced learners and native speakers of German”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research4(2).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Best, C. T.
   1995 A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. York: Timonium, MD, 167–200.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Carranza, M. , Cucchiarini, C. , Burgos, P. , & Strik, H.
   2014 “Non-native speech corpora for the development of computer assisted pronunciation training systems”. In L. Gómez Chova , A. López Martínez , & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies Edulearn 2014. Barcelona: IATED Academy, 3624–3633.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Council of Europe
   Council of Europe 2001 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Delais-Roussarie, E. , Avanzi, M. , & Herment, S.
   (Eds.) 2015 Prosody and Language in Contact. L2 Acquisition, Attrition and Languages in Multilingual Situations. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Derwing, T. M. , & Munro, M. J.
   2015 Pronunciation Fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lllt.42
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.42 [Google Scholar]
8. Detey, S. , & Racine, I.
   this volume. “Towards a perceptually assessed corpus of non-native French: the InterPhonology of Contemporary French (IPFC) project illustrated with a longitudinal study of Japanese learners’ /b-v/ productions”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research4(2).
   [Google Scholar]
9. Díaz-Negrillo, A. , Ballier, N. , & Thompson, P.
   (Eds.) 2013 Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/scl.59
   https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.59 [Google Scholar]
10. Draxler, C.
    2008 Korpusbasierte Sprachverarbeitung. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Durand, J. , Gut, U. , & Kristoffersen, G.
    (Eds.) 2014 Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology. (Oxford Handbook of Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571932.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571932.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
12. Flege, J. E.
    1995 “Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems”. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. York: Timonium, MD, 233–272.
    [Google Scholar]
13. García Lecumberri, M. L. , Cooke, M. , & Wester, M.
    this volume. “A bi-directional task-based corpus of learners’ conversational speech”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research4(2).
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gósy, M. , Gyarmathy, D. , & Beke, A.
    this volume. “Phonetic analysis of filled pauses based on a Hungarian-English learner corpus”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research4(2).
    [Google Scholar]
15. Granger, S. , Gilquin, G. , & Meunier, F.
    (Eds.) 2015 The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139649414
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649414 [Google Scholar]
16. Gut, U.
    2012 “The LeaP corpus. A multilingual corpus of spoken learner German and learner English”. In T. Schmidt , & K. Wörner (Eds.), Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 3–23. doi: 10.1075/hsm.14.03gut
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.14.03gut [Google Scholar]
17. Gut, U.
    Gut, U. this volume. “Phonological development in different learning contexts – a corpus-based study”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research4(2).
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kuhl, P. , & Iverson, P.
    1995 “Linguistic experience and the ‘perceptual magnet effect’”. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. York: Timonium, MD, 91–120.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Niebuhr, O. , Alm, M. , Schümchen, N. , & Fischer, K.
    this volume. “Comparing visualization techniques for learning second language prosody – first results”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research4(2).
    [Google Scholar]
20. Quené, H. , & Orr, R.
    2014 Long-term convergence of speech rhythm in L1 and L2 English. In N. Campbell , D. Gibbon , & D. Hirst (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dublin, 342–346. fastnet.netsoc.ie/sp7/sp7book.pdf (last accessed11 July 2017)
    [Google Scholar]
21. Raab, M. , Gruhn, R. , & Noeth, E.
    2007 Non-native speech databases. In S. Furui , & T. Kawahara (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU), Kyoto/Japan. 413–418. doi: 10.1109/ASRU.2007.4430148
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ASRU.2007.4430148 [Google Scholar]
22. Schmidt, T. , & Wörner, K.
    (Eds.) 2012 Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hsm.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hsm.14 [Google Scholar]
23. Tono, Y. , Kawaguchi, Y. , & Minegishi, M.
    (Eds.) 2012 Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tufs.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tufs.4 [Google Scholar]
24. Trouvain, J. , Bonneau, A. , Colotte, V. , Fauth, C. , Fohr, D. , Jouvet, D. , Jügler, J. , Laprie, Y. , Mella, O. , Möbius, B. , & Zimmerer, F.
    2016 The IFCASL corpus of French and German non-native and native read speech. In N. Calzolari , K. Choukri , T. Declerck , S. Goggi , M. Grobelnik , B. Maegaard , J. Mariani , H. Mazo , A. Moreno , J. Odijk , & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Portorož, 1333–1338. www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2016/index.html (last accessed11 July 2017)
    [Google Scholar]
25. Trouvain, J. , & Zimmerer, F.
    2016 “Phonetische Lernerkorpora und ihr Nutzen im DaF-Bereich”. Deutsch als Fremdsprache53(4), 204–212.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Van Engen, K. J. , Baese-Berk, M. , Baker, R. E. , Choi, A. , Kim, M. , & Bradlow, A. R.
    2010 “The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles”. Language and Speech53(4), 510–540. doi: 10.1177/0023830910372495
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910372495 [Google Scholar]
27. Wagner, P. Trouvain, J. , & Zimmerer, F.
    2015 “In defense of stylistic diversity in speech research”. Journal of Phonetics48, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2014.11.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.11.001 [Google Scholar]
28. Zimmerer, F. , & Trouvain, J.
    2015 Productions of /h/ in German: French vs. German speakers. In Möller, S. , Ney, H. , Möbius, B. , Nöth, E. , & Steidl, S. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech), Dresden 1922–1926 www.isca-speech.org/archive/interspeech_2015/papers/i15_1922.pdf
    [Google Scholar]