Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2214-3157
  • E-ISSN: 2214-3165
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


While the newly arriving Millennial generation of cultural linguists was maturing, Boomers and Generation Xer’s were developing a theory of cognitive linguistics in an environment hostile to both induction and science. Two decades of mechanical deductive models from the intellectual (not political) right were followed by two more decades of linguistic subversion of science from the postmodernist left. In spite of these astringent intellectual currents, inductive linguistic science thrived in the last two decades of the 20th Century and attracted attention from other disciplines, including anthropology, philosophy, psychology, and ESL. The branch that we call cognitive linguistics did so largely by investigating imagery, usage, symbolic networks, and systems of metaphor. Some researchers from the social and linguistic sciences found it useful to shift the focus away from the universal imagistic attentional processes employed by cognitive linguists and over to culturally defined sources of imagery. This resulted in the retooling of linguistic relativism under the rubric of just as the first Millennials were entering grad schools at the advent of the 21st century. In addition to motivating cross-linguistic and cross-cultural studies of metaphors and cultural models, the shift has been productive in revealing links between culture, ideology, and grammar. It is argued that the single most pregnant and distinguishing concept in cultural linguistics is that of the , and it is hoped that the Millennial generation will continue to develop and employ it in cross-linguistic studies. In this paper we demonstrate its application to cultural grammar.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Aarsleff, H.
    (1988) Introduction. In W. von Humboldt , P. Heath (trans) On language: The diversity of human language structure and its influence on the mental development of mankind (pp.vii–lxv). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Agar, M.
    (1973) Ripping and running: A formal ethnography of urban heroin addicts. New York: Seminar Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bagemihl, B.
    (1991) Syllable structure in Bella Coola. Linguistic Inquiry, 22(4), 589–646.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Basso, K.
    (1984) “Stalking with stories”: Names, places and moral narratives among the Western Apache. In E. M. Bruner (Eds.) Text, play and story, (pp.19–55).Washington, D.C.: AES.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bateson, G.
    (1935) Culture contact and schismogenesis. Man, 35, 178–183. doi: 10.2307/2789408
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2789408 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernardo de Sahagún, F.
    (1969)  C. E. Dibble & A. J. O. Anderson (trans). Book 6. Rhetoric and moral philosophy: Florentine codex, general history of things of new Spain. Santa Fe, N. M.: School of American Research.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bernárdez, E.
    (2017) Evidentiality—A Cultural Interpretation. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), pp.433–459.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Biesele, M.
    (1986) How hunter-gatherers stories “make sense”: Semantics and adaptation. Cultural Anthropology, 1(2), 157–170. doi: 10.1525/can.1986.1.2.02a00030
    https://doi.org/10.1525/can.1986.1.2.02a00030 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bloomfield, L.
    (1933) Language. New York: Henry Holt.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brugman, C.
    (1988) The Story of over: Polysemy, semantics, and the structure of the lexicon. New York: Garland Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bybee, J. L.
    (1985) Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/tsl.9
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chlebda, W.
    (2013) Can Polish ethnolinguistics become a philological keystone of the humanities?In A. Głaz , D. S. Danaher & P. Łozowski (Eds.) The linguistic worldview: ethnolinguistics, cognition, and culture (pp.25–40). London: Versita. [Open access: www.degruyter.com/view/product/246955]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cook, H. M.
    (1991) The Japanese particle yo as a non-referential indexical. Paper presented at the2nd International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, University of California at Santa Cruz, July 29-August 2, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Croft, W. A.
    (2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198299554.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  15. Denny, J. P. & Creider, C. A.
    (1986) The semantics of noun classes in Proto-Bantu. In Co. Craig (Eds.), Noun classes and categorization (pp.217–240). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tsl.7.15den
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.7.15den [Google Scholar]
  16. Dirven, R. , Wolf, H. -G. & Polzenhagen, F.
    (2007) Cognitive linguistics and cultural studies. In D. Geeraerts & S. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1203–1221). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fauconnier, G.
    (1997) Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139174220
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fillmore, C. J.
    (1975) Topics in lexical semantics. In R. W. Cole (Eds.), Current issues in linguistics (pp.76–138). Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Friedrich, P.
    (1979) Language, context, and the imagination: Essays by Paul Friedrich. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Geeraerts, D. & Grondelaers, S.
    (1995) Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. R. Taylor & R. E. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the World (pp.153–179). Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110809305.153
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809305.153 [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldberg, A.
    (1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Heine, B.
    (1997) Cognitive foundations of grammar. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Heine, B. & Kuteva, T.
    (2002) World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511613463
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613463 [Google Scholar]
  24. Hoijer, H.
    (1953) The relation of language to culture. In A. L. Kroeber Anthropology Today (pp.554–473). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  25. Keesing, R. M.
    (1979) Linguistic knowledge and cultural knowledge. American Anthropologist, 81(1), 14–36. doi: 10.1525/aa.1979.81.1.02a00020
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1979.81.1.02a00020 [Google Scholar]
  26. (1992) Anthropology and linguistics. In M. Putz (Eds.), Thirty years of linguistic evolution: Studies in honor of rené dirven on the occasion of his sixtieth birthday (pp. 593–609). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/z.61.45kee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.61.45kee [Google Scholar]
  27. Kövecses, Z.
    (1988) The language of love: The semantics of passion in conversational English. Lewisberg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (1990) Emotion concepts. New York: Springer-Verlag. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑3312‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3312-1 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  30. Kuhn, T. S.
    (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. VolumeI. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. (1991) Concept, image, and symbol. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110857733
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110857733 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2000) Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2001) Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 143–188. doi: 10.1515/cogl.12.2.143
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.12.2.143 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2014) Culture and cognition, lexicon and grammar. In M. Yamaguchi , D. Tay & B. Blount , (Eds). Approaches to language, culture, and cognition: The intersection of cognitive linguistics and linguistic anthropology (pp.27–49). New York/Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Malcolm, I. G.
    (1994) Aboriginal English inside and outside the classroom. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 147–180.10.1075/aral.17.2.08mal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.17.2.08mal [Google Scholar]
  39. Malcolm, I. G. & Sharifian, F.
    (2002) Aspects of Aboriginal English oral discourse: An application of cultural schema theory. Discourse Studies, 4(2), 169–181. doi: 10.1177/14614456020040020301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040020301 [Google Scholar]
  40. Meier, T.
    (2015) Theory change and structural realism. Saarbrücken, Germany: Südwestdeutscher Verlag für Hochschulschriften.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Musolff, A.
    (2000) Political imagery of Europe: A house without exit doors?Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21(3), 216–229. doi: 10.1080/01434630008666402
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01434630008666402 [Google Scholar]
  42. Nerlich, B. & Clarke, D. D.
    (2007) Cognitive linguistics and the history of linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens , (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 589–607). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Nunberg, G.
    (2015) So, what’s the big deal with starting a sentence with ‘so’?Retrieved fromwww.npr.org/2015/09/03/432732859/so-whats-the-big-deal-with-starting-a-sentence-with-soonMarch21 2016.
  44. Occhi, D. J.
    (2009) Tiny buds whispering: Ideologies of flowers in contemporary Japanese. Social Semiotics, 19(2), 213–229. doi: 10.1080/10350330902816475
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330902816475 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2010) Consuming Kyara ‘characters:’ Anthropomorphization and marketing in contemporary Japan. Comparative Culture, 15, 77–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. (2012) Wobbly aesthetics, performance, and message: Comparing Japanese Kyara with their anthropomorphic forebears. Asian Ethnology, 71(1), 109–132.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (2014) Sloppy selfhood: metaphor, embodiment, animism, and anthropomorphization in Japanese language and culture. In M. Yamaguchi , B. Blount & D. Tay (Eds.), Language, culture and cognition in the 21st century: Intersection of cognitive linguistics and linguistic anthropology (pp.124–144). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (2015) U900: A cute Japanese ‘character’ band with real people inside. Retrieved frompopanth.com/article/u900-a-cute-japanese-character-band-with-real-people-insideviewed onAugust 29, 2016.
  49. (2016)  Kyaraben (character bento): The cutesification of Japanese food in and beyond the lunchbox. East Asian Journal of Popular Culture, 2(1), 63–77.10.1386/eapc.2.1.63_1
    https://doi.org/10.1386/eapc.2.1.63_1 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2017) Where Japanese and Occidental Cultural Conceptualisations Meet: Reading Manga Which Anthropomorphise Nations as Kyara ‘Characters’Through the Lens of Cultural Linguistics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), pp.561–572.10.1007/978‑981‑10‑4056‑6_25
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4056-6_25 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2018). Kumamon: Japan’s surprisingly cheeky Yuru Kyara mascot. In A. Freedman & T. Slade Eds. Introducing Japanese popular culture. (pp.13–23). London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Palmer, G. B.
    (1980) Persecution, alliance, and revenge in Shuswap Indian war legends: A formal analysis. In Lucille B. Harten , Claude N. Warren , and Donald J. Touhy Anthropological Papers in Memory of Earl H. Swanson (pp.1–7). Pocatello: Idaho Museum of Natural History.
  53. (1996) Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. (2003) Talking about thinking in Tagalog. Journal of Cognitive Linguistics, 14(2–3), Special Issue, 251–280.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Palmer, G. B.
    (2006) When does cognitive linguistics become cultural?In J. Luchjenbroers (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics Investigations (pp.36). fig. 9. https://benjamins.com/#catalog/books/hcp.15/main10.1075/hcp.15.05pal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.15.05pal [Google Scholar]
  56. Palmer, G. B.
    (2007) Cognitive linguistics and anthropological linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens , (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.1045–1073). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. (2014) Emotional, evaluative, and ideological subjectification in Tagalog and Shona. International Journal of Language and Culture, 1(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1075/ijolc.1.1.01pal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.1.1.01pal [Google Scholar]
  58. (2015) Ethnography: A neglected method of inductive linguistics. Etnolingwistyka, 27(1), 21–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Palmer, G. B. , Thompson, J. , Parkin, J. & Harmon, E.
    (2014) The ceremonial origins of language. In M. Yamaguchi , D. Tay & B. Blount (Eds.) Towards an integration of language, culture and cognition (pp.145–177). New York/Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Palmer, G. B. & Woodman, C.
    (1999) Ontological classifiers as polycentric categories, as seen in Shona class 3 nouns. In M. Puetz & M. Verspoor (Eds.), Explorations in linguistic relativity (pp.225–49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Peeters, B.
    (2017) Applied ethnolinguistics Is Cultural Linguistics, but Is It cultural linguistics?In F. Sharifian (Ed.), pp.507–527.10.1007/978‑981‑10‑4056‑6_23
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4056-6_23 [Google Scholar]
  62. Quinn, N.
    (1985) “Commitment” in American marriage: A cultural analysis. In J. W. Dougherty (Eds.), Directions in cognitive anthropology (pp.291–320). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Sapir, E.
    (1921) Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. (1949) Language. In D. G. Mandelbaum (Eds.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture, and personality (pp.7–32). Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press. (Original work printed in 1933).
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Senft, G.
    (1991) Network models to describe the Kilivila classifier system. Oceanic Linguistics, 30(2), 151–155. doi: 10.2307/3623085
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3623085 [Google Scholar]
  66. (2007) Nominal classification. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens , (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.677–696). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Sharifian, F.
    (2014) Advances in cultural linguistics. In M. Yamaguchi , D. Tay & B. Blount (Eds.), Approaches to language and culture, and cognition: The intersection of cognitive linguistics and linguistic anthropology, (pp.99–123). New York/Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. (Ed.) (2017) Advances in Cultural Linguistics. NewYork/London/Singapore: Springer Nature 2017.10.1007/978‑981‑10‑4056‑6
  69. Talmy, L.
    (1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science12: 49–100.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Taylor, J. R.
    (2007) Cognitive linguistics and autonomous linguistics. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens , (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp.566–588). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Thompson, S.
    (1966) Tales of the North American Indians. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press. (Original work published in 1929).
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Tomasello, M.
    (1999) The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Traugott, E.
    (1989) On the rise of epistemic meaning in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65(1), 31–55. doi: 10.2307/414841
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414841 [Google Scholar]
  74. (2010) (Inter) subjectivity and (inter) subjectification. In K. Davidse , L. Vandelanotte , & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification, and grammaticalization (pp.29–74). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Tuggy, D.
    (2003) Reduplication in Nahuatl: Iconicities and paradoxes. In E. Casad & G. B. Palmer CognitivelLinguistics and non-Indo-European languages (pp.91–133). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197150.2.91
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197150.2.91 [Google Scholar]
  76. Tylor, S. E. B.
    (1871) Primitive culture, Vol.1. London: John Murray. Retrieved fromhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Burnett_Tyloron7 February, 2016.
  77. Walker, D.
    (1968) Conflict and schism in Nez Perce Acculturation. Pullman: Washington State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Wallace, A.
    (1972) Driving to work. In M. K. Spiro (Eds.), Context and meaning in cultural anthropology (pp.277–292). New York: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Wierzbicka, A.
    (1994a) ‘Cultural scripts’: A new approach to the study of cross-cultural communication. In M. Putz (Eds.), Language contact and language conflict (pp.69–87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.71.04wei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.71.04wei [Google Scholar]
  80. (1994b) Emotion, language, and ‘cultural scripts’. In S. Kitayama & H. Markus Emotion and culture: Empirical studies of mutual influence (pp.130–198). Washington: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10152‑004
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10152-004 [Google Scholar]
  81. (2015) A whole cloud of culture condensed into a drop of semantics: The meaning of the German word Herr as a term of address. International Journal of Language and Culture, 2(1), 1–37. doi: 10.1075/ijolc.2.1.01wie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.2.1.01wie [Google Scholar]
  82. Woolard, K. A.
    (1998) Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In B. B. Schieffelin , K. A. Woolard , & P. V. Kroskrity (Eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory (pp.3–47). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Yu, N.
    (2009) The Chinese heart in a cognitive perspective: Culture, body, and language. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110213348
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213348 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cultural grammar; cultural linguistics; discourse; ideology; Scenario; subjectivity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error