Bringing the toys to life

References

1. Ariel, M.
   (1990) Accessing NP antecedents. London: Routledge, Croom Helm.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ariel, M.
   (1991) The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics, 16(5), 443-463.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Atran, S. , Medin, D. , Lynch, E. , Vapnarsky, V. , Ek’ Ucan, E. & Sousa, P.
   (2001) Folkbiology doesn’t come from folkpsychology: Evidence from Yukatek Maya in cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 1(1), 3–42.10.1163/156853701300063561
   https://doi.org/10.1163/156853701300063561 [Google Scholar]
4. Biro, S. , Csibra, G. , & Gergely, G.
   (2007) The role of behavioral cues in understanding goal-directed actions in infancy. Progress in brain research, 164, 303–322.10.1016/S0079‑6123(07)64017‑5
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(07)64017-5 [Google Scholar]
5. Carey, S.
   (1985) Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chen, M.
   (2012) Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822395447
   https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395447 [Google Scholar]
7. Cherry, J.
   (1992) Animism in Thought and Language. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of California at Berkeley.
8. Comrie, B.
   (1989) Language Universals and Linguistic Typology (2nd ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dahl, Ö.
   (2008) Animacy and egophoricity: Grammar, ontology and phylogeny. Lingua, 118, 141–150.10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.008
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.008 [Google Scholar]
10. Dahl, Ö. & Fraurud, K.
    (1996) Animacy in grammar and discourse. In T. Fretheim & J. K. Gundel (Eds.), Reference and referent accessibility (pp.47–64). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.38.04dah
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.38.04dah [Google Scholar]
11. DeLancey, S.
    (1981) An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language, 57, 626–657.10.2307/414343
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414343 [Google Scholar]
12. Foley, W. A. & Van Valin, R. D., Jr.
    (1984) Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gelman, S. A. & Opfer, J. E.
    (2002) Development of the animate-inanimate distinction. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (pp.151–166). Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470996652.ch7
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996652.ch7 [Google Scholar]
14. Gundel, J. K. , Hedberg, N. & Zacharski, R.
    (1993) Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69(2), 274–307.10.2307/416535
    https://doi.org/10.2307/416535 [Google Scholar]
15. Hurford, J. R.
    (2007) The Origins of Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Johnson, M. H. & Morton, J.
    (1991) Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Klaiman, M. H.
    (1991) Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Leopold, D. & Rhodes, G.
    (2010) A Comparative View of Face Perception. Journal of Comparative Psycholology, 124(3), 233–251.10.1037/a0019460
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019460 [Google Scholar]
20. Lockwood, H. T. & McCaulay, M.
    (2012) Prominence hierarchies. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6/7, 431–446.10.1002/lnc3.345
    https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.345 [Google Scholar]
21. Lyons, J.
    (1977) Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Matthews, D.
    (Ed.) (2014) Pragmatic Development in First Language Acquisition (Trends in Language Acquisition Research, vol. 10). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Milne, C.
    (1974/2016) The Enchanted Places: A Childhood Memoir. London: Pan Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Piper, W.
    (1930) The Little Engine that Could. New York: Platt & Munk.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Rakison, D. H. & Poulin-Dubois, D.
    (2001) Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 209–228.10.1037/0033‑2909.127.2.209
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.209 [Google Scholar]
26. Searle, J. R.
    (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438 [Google Scholar]
27. Siewierska, A.
    (1991) Functional Grammar. London and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Siewierska, A.
    (1993) Subject and object order in written Polish: Some statistical data. Folia Linguistica, 27(1/2), 147–169.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Trompenaars, T. , Hogeweg, L. , Stoop, W. & de Hoop, H.
    (in review). The language of an inanimate narrator. (submitted to Open Linguistics, special issue, ‘Effects of animacy in grammar and cognition’, D. Nelson & V. -A. Vihman (Eds.) to appear 2018).
    [Google Scholar]
30. Tsutsumi, S. , Ushitani, T. , Tomonaga, M. & Fujita, K.
    (2012) Infant monkeys’ concept of animacy: the role of eyes and fluffiness. Primates, 53, 113–119.10.1007/s10329‑011‑0289‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-011-0289-8 [Google Scholar]
31. Whedon, J. , Stanton, A. , Cohen, J. and Sokolow, A.
    (1995) Toy Story. Original screenplay (unpublished).
    [Google Scholar]
32. Williams, M.
    (1922) The Velveteen Rabbit (or How Toys Become Real)New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Yamamoto, M.
    (1999) Animacy and Reference: A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.46
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.46 [Google Scholar]