1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2214-3157
  • E-ISSN: 2214-3165
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Play language practices are common around the globe and have been described for several parts of the world. While some contributions on play language focus on the structure, manipulative strategies, and rules, this paper ties in with approaches that seek to view play language practices in their respective sociolinguistic contexts (e.g. Sherzer 2002Storch 2011). Chibende, the play language practice under study in this paper, is analyzed in its Zimbabwean context. By looking at Zimbabwean examples and by broadening the perspective on these creative linguistic phenomena, it becomes evident that play languages are not performed in isolation but are deeply entangled with other language practices, such as youth language, as part of complex repertoires and social practices as well as acts of identity. By focusing on creativity and also taking the aspect of fun into account, the agency of the speakers becomes a central feature which is also reflected by the metalinguistic knowledge of the practitioners of Zimbabwean play language. In this regard, the discussion in this paper centers on the speakers’ ideologies of play language.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00014.hol
2019-02-01
2019-10-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bagemihl, Bruce
    1988Alternative Phonologies and Morphologies. PhD Thesis, University of British Columbia.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. 1989 The crossing constraint and ‘backwards languages’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory7,4, 481–549. 10.1007/BF00205156
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00205156 [Google Scholar]
  3. 1995 Language games and related areas. InGoldsmith, John (Ed.). The Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 697–712). Cambridge, Mass. and Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blake, Barry J.
    2010 Secret Language. Codes, Tricks, Spies, Thieves, and Symbols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Botne, Robert and Stuart Davis
    2000 Language games, segment imposition and the syllable. Studies in Language, 24. 2, 319–344. 10.1075/sl.24.2.04bot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.24.2.04bot [Google Scholar]
  6. Eckert, Penelope & Sally McConnell-Ginet
    1992 Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–490. 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333 [Google Scholar]
  7. Galliker, Esther
    2014Bricolage. Ein kommunikatives Genre im Sprachgebrauch Jugendlicher aus der Deutschschweiz. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑03994‑8
    https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03994-8 [Google Scholar]
  8. García, Ofelia and Li Wei
    2014Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137385765
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765 [Google Scholar]
  9. Hollington, Andrea
    2018 Transatlantic translanguaging in Zimdancehall: Reassessing linguistic creativity in youth language practices. The Mouth, 3 (special issue: Critical Youth Language Studies – Rethinking Concepts), 105–123.
  10. Hollington, Andrea & Tafadzwa Makwabarara
    2015 Youth language practices in Zimbabwe. InNassenstein, Nico & Andrea Hollington (Eds.). Youth Language Practices in Africa and Beyond (pp. 257–269). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9781614518525‑014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614518525-014 [Google Scholar]
  11. Lave, Jean & Etienne Wenger
    1991Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355 [Google Scholar]
  12. Makoni, Sinfree, Janina Brutt-Griffler & Pedzisai Mashiri
    2007 The use of “indigenous” and urban vernaculars in Zimbabwe. Language in Society, 36, 25–49. 10.1017/S0047404507070029
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070029 [Google Scholar]
  13. Mashiri, Pedzisai
    2009 Shona-English code-mixing in the speech of students at the University of Zimbabwe. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 20,4, 245–261. 10.2989/16073610209486314
    https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610209486314 [Google Scholar]
  14. Mawadza, Aquilina
    2000 Harare Shona Slang: A linguistic study. Zambezia, XXVII(i), 93–101.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ndlovu, Sambulo
    2017 A Comparative Analysis of Metaphorical Expressions Used by Rural and Urban Ndebele speakers: The Contribution of S’ncamtho. PhD Thesis, Cape Town, University of Cape Town.
  16. Nyota, Shumirai & Rugare Mareva
    2012 What’s new in Shona street lingo? Semantic change in lingo adoptives from mainstream Shona. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2, 6, 112–119. 10.5539/ijel.v2n6p112
    https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n6p112 [Google Scholar]
  17. Sherzer, Joel
    1970 Talking Backwards in Cuna: The Sociological Reality of Phonological Descriptions. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 26,4, 343–353. 10.1086/soutjanth.26.4.3629365
    https://doi.org/10.1086/soutjanth.26.4.3629365 [Google Scholar]
  18. 1976 Play languages: Implications for (socio) linguistics. InKirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara (Ed.). Speech Play (pp. 19–36). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 10.9783/9781512803150‑003
    https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512803150-003 [Google Scholar]
  19. 2002Speech Play and Verbal Art. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Storch, Anne
    2011 Secret Manipulations. Language and Context in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199768974.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199768974.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2017 Typology of secret languages and linguistic taboos. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology (pp.187–322). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316135716.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316135716.010 [Google Scholar]
  22. Tusting, Karin
    2005 Language and power in communities of practice. InBarton, David & Karin Tusting (eds). Beyond Communities of Practice. Language, Power and Social Context (pp. 36–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511610554.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610554.004 [Google Scholar]
  23. Veit-Wild, F.
    2009 ‘Zimbolicious’ The Creative Potential of Linguistic Innovation: The Case of Shona-English in Zimbabwe. Journal of Southern African Studies, 35, 3, 683–697. 10.1080/03057070903101896
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03057070903101896 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00014.hol
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00014.hol
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): creativity , manipulation , metalinguistic knowledge , secret language , youth language practice and Zimbabwe
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error