1887
Volume 6, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2214-3157
  • E-ISSN: 2214-3165
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Among Northern Kampas, the linguistically creative production of by non-kin and affines intends – apart from having fun – to initiate an intimate relationship or affirm the intimacy of the existing interpersonal relationship. Northern Kampa participants of ‘joking’ often resort to gender-switching strategies for jocular effects. Creatively playing with linguistic gender marking is characteristic of -joking conduct. The study’s findings revealed that there are variable lexicogrammatical means for accomplishing the man > woman gender switch. Two basic gender-switching strategies are deployed: manipulation of person marking indexes and deployment of derivational morphology. The verbal person marking strategy is the most basic and most common means of indicating gender switches, whereas derivational morphology functions as a supplementary technique. In gender reversals, participation structure (production and reception roles) is predominantly coded by third person (other-role) markers on the verb. The woman > man direction of gender reversals is uncommon in joking sequences.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00019.mih
2019-02-01
2019-09-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
    2016How gender shapes the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723752.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198723752.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Ronald Jaime
    2002Historias de cambio de los ashéninka (Comunidades y Culturas Peruanas 29). Lima: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Carter, Ronald
    2004Language and creativity. The art of common talk. London: Rutledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Descola, Philippe
    1992 Societies of nature and the nature of society. InAdam Kuper (Ed.). Conceptualizing Society (pp.107‒126). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Enfield, Nick J.
    2013Relationship thinking. Agency, enchrony and human sociality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199338733.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199338733.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Garfinkel, Harold
    1967Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Goffman, Erving
    1981Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, & Emanuel A. Schegloff
    1987 Notes on laughter in the pursuit of intimacy. InG. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.). Talk and social organization (pp.152–205). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson, Allen
    2003Families of the forest. The Matsigenka Indians of the Peruvian Amazon. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/california/9780520232419.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520232419.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Killick, Evan
    2009 Ashéninka amity: a study of social relations in an Amazonian society. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 15, 701–718. 10.1111/j.1467‑9655.2009.01580.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2009.01580.x [Google Scholar]
  11. Levinson, Stephen C.
    1988 Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. InPaul Drew & Anthony Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction (pp.161–227). Boston: Northeastern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Michael, Lev D.
    2008Nanti evidential practice: Language, knowledge and social action in an Amazonian society. Austin: University of Texas dissertation.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Mihas, Elena
    . Forthcoming. Genders and classifiers in Kampa (Arawak) languages of Peru. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Elena Mihas eds. Genders and classifiers: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2014Upper Perené narratives of history, landscape and ritual. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1d9njkk
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1d9njkk [Google Scholar]
  15. 2015aA grammar of Alto Perené (Arawak). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1124.7840 [Google Scholar]
  17. 2017a The Kampa languages of the Arawak language family. InAlexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R. W. M. Dixon (Eds.). The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology, (pp.782–814) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316135716.025
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316135716.025 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2017bConversational structures of Alto Perené (Arawak) of Peru. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.181
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.181 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ñaco Rosas, Guillermo
    2010Mesozonificación ecológica y económica para el desarrollo sostenible de la Provincia de Satipo. Caracterización social y antropológica. Iquitos: Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonía Peruana.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rojas Zolezzi, Enrique
    1994Los ashaninka: El pueblo tras el bosque. Contribución a la etnología de los campa de la selva central Peruana. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Peru.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosengren, Dan
    2010 Seriously laughing: On paradoxes of absurdity among Matsigenka people. Ethnos, 75(1), 102–121. 10.1080/00141840903402468
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840903402468 [Google Scholar]
  22. Santos-Granero, Fernando
    2007 Of fear and friendship: Amazonian sociality beyond kinship and affinity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13, 1–18. 10.1111/j.1467‑9655.2007.00410.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2007.00410.x [Google Scholar]
  23. Sarmiento Barletti, Juan Pablo
    2011 Kametsa asaiki: The pursuit of the ‘good life’ in an Ashaninka village (Peruvian Amazonia). St. Andrews: University of St. Andrews dissertation.
  24. Sidnell, Jack, & Tanya Stivers
    (eds.) 2013The handbook of conversation analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Shepard, Glenn, Jr.
    1997 Noun classification and ethnozoological classification in Machiguenga, an Arawakan language of the Peruvian Amazon. Journal of Amazonian Languages, 1, 29–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza, Mondada, & Jacob Steensig
    2011 Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction. InTanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, & Jacob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, (pp.3–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Veber, Hanne
    1997 Pájaros pintados: Complementariedad entre hombres y mujeres en la visión de los Ashéninka del Gran Pajonal. InMichel Perrin & Marie Perruchon (Eds.), Complementariedad entre hombre y mujer: Relaciones de género desde la perspectiva amerindia, (pp.125–140). Quito: Abya-Yala.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 2009Historias para nuestro futuro. Yotantsi ashi otsipaniki: Narraciones autobiográficas de líderes Asháninkas y Ashéninkas. Copenhagen: Grupo Internacional de Trabajo Sobre Asuntos Indígenas.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Vilchez Jímenez, Elsa
    2002 El rol de la mujer en algunas comunidades amazónicas. Escritura y Pensamiento, 5(9), 9–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Weiss, Gerald
    1975 The world of a forest tribe in South America. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, 52(5), 219‒588.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00019.mih
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00019.mih
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error