Face and cultural conceptualizations in German-Brazilian business exchanges

References

1. Arundale, R.
   (2006) Face as relational and interactional: a communication framework for research on face, facework, and politeness. Journal of Politeness Research2(2), 193–216. 10.1515/PR.2006.011
   https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2006.011 [Google Scholar]
2. Arundale, R.
   (2010) Constituting face in conversation: Face, facework, and interactional achievement. Journal of Pragmatics42(8), 2078–2105. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.021 [Google Scholar]
3. Arundale, R. B.
   (2013) Face as a research focus in interpersonal pragmatics: Relational and emic perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics58, 108–120. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.013
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.013 [Google Scholar]
4. Baxter, L., & Montgomery, B.
   (1996) Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. Guilford, New York.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bhatia, V. K.
   (1993) Analysing genre–language use in professional settings. London: Longmann.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bhatia, V. K.
   (2001) Analyzing genre: Some conceptual issues. InM. Hewings (Ed.), Academic writing in context: Implications and applications (pp.79–92). Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bou-Franch, P.
   (2006) Solidarity and deference in Spanish computer-mediated communication: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of students’ emails to lecturers. InP. Bou Franch (Ed.), Ways into discourse (pp.61–79). Granada: Comares.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brown, P., & Levinson, S.
   (1987 [1978]) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
9. Chang, W., & Haugh, M.
   (2011) Strategic embarrassment and face threatening in business interaction. Journal of Pragmatics43(12), 2948–2963. 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.009
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.009 [Google Scholar]
10. Chang, W.
    (2013) Face and face practices in talk-in-interaction: An empirical analysis of Taiwanese business interactions, PhD thesis, Griffith University.
11. Dillon, R.
    (2015) Respect. InE. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), available atplato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/respect/date of accessApril 2nd, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dörnyei, Z.
    (2007) Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Goffman, E.
    (1955) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry18(3), 213–231. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
14. Goffman, E.
    (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Grainger, K., Mills, S., & Sibanda, M.
    (2010) “Just tell us what to do”: Southern African face and its relevance to intercultural communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(8), 2158–2171. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.017 [Google Scholar]
16. Gumperz, J.
    (1999) On interactional sociolinguistic method. In: S. Sarangi; & C. Robert (Eds.), Talk, work and institutional order (pp.453–472). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110208375.4.453
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375.4.453 [Google Scholar]
17. Haugh, M.
    (2013) Disentangling face, facework and im/politeness. Sociocultural Pragmatics, 1(1), 46–73.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Johnson, M.
    (1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
19. Kecskés, I.
    (2008) Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), 385–406. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.004 [Google Scholar]
20. Kecskés, I.
    (2014) Intercultural pragmatics. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kövecses, Z.
    (2002) Metaphor: a practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Kövecses, Z.
    (2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
23. Matsumoto, Y.
    (1988) Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(4), 403–426. 10.1016/0378‑2166(88)90003‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(88)90003-3 [Google Scholar]
24. Mendes de Oliveira, M.
    (2017) Conceptualizations of respect in business negotiations: A research note. International Journal of Language and Culture4(2), 254–272. 10.1075/ijolc.4.2.07oli
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.4.2.07oli [Google Scholar]
25. Mendes de Oliveira
    (2020) Business negotiations in ELF from a cultural linguistic perspective. [Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 43]. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110630466
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110630466
26. Palmer, G.
    (1996) Toward a theory of Cultural Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pearson, V., & Stephan, W.
    (1998) Preferences for styles of negotiation: A comparison of Brazil and the US. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(1), 67–83. 10.1016/S0147‑1767(97)00036‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(97)00036-9 [Google Scholar]
28. Polzenhagen, F., & Wolf, H-G.
    (2007) Culture-specific conceptualisations of corruption in African English: Linguistic analyses and pragmatic applications. InF. Sharifian, & G. Palmer (Eds.), Applied cultural linguistics (pp.125–168). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.7.09pol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.7.09pol [Google Scholar]
29. Polzenhagen, F., & Wolf, H. G.
    (2010) Investigating culture from a linguistic perspective: An exemplification with Hong Kong English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 58(3), 281–303. 10.1515/zaa.2010.58.3.281
    https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa.2010.58.3.281 [Google Scholar]
30. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1999) Discourse, pragmatics, conversation, analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(4), 405–435. 10.1177/1461445699001004002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445699001004002 [Google Scholar]
31. Schröder, U.
    (2014) The interplay of (im)politeness, conflict styles, rapport management, and metacommunication in Brazilian–German interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics, 11(1), 57–82. 10.1515/ip‑2014‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2014-0003 [Google Scholar]
32. Schröder, U.; Mendes de Oliveira, M.; Nascimento, T.
    (manuscript). The ‘Olympic spirit’ from a cross-cultural perspective: a cognitive-pragmatic analysis.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sharifian, F.
    (2011) Cultural conceptualisations and language: Theoretical framework and applications (Vol.1). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/clscc.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.1 [Google Scholar]
34. Sharifian, F.
    (2017) (Ed.). Cultural Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clscc.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.8 [Google Scholar]
35. Sørensen, H. E.
    (2012) Business development. InD. Teece & M. Augier (Eds.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management (pp.1–2). London: Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Swales, J.
    (2004) Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524827
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827 [Google Scholar]
37. Swales, J., & Feak, C.
    (2003) English in today’s research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wenger, E.
    (1998) Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems thinker, 9(5), 2–3.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wierzbicka, A.
    (2003) The semantics of human interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Wolf, H.-G.
    (2015) Language and culture in intercultural communication. InF. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp.445–459). Oxford, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]