Volume 8, Issue 1
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The paper studies the semantics of four Russian key terms of aesthetic evaluation: ‘beautiful’, ‘beautiful/fine’, ’ugly/plain’ and ‘ugly/frightful’. It demonstrates different patterns of polysemy of the words and the nuances of meaning. Following the framework of folk aesthetics and cultural semantics, the meanings of the terms in question are represented using the Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) and are shown to relate to Russian cultural themes. The analysis demonstrates cultural significance of aesthetic value in Russian and its intrinsic link with ethics, morality and politeness.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00036.gla
2021-06-07
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Apresjan, J.
    (2004) Ljubovat’sja, zagljadet’sja. InApresjan, J. (Ed.), Novyj ob’’jasnitel’nyj slovar’ sinonimov russkogo jazyka [The New Explanatory Dictionary of Russian Synonyms] (pp.526–529). Moskva-Wien: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury-Wiener Slawistischer Almanach.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Evgen’eva, A.
    (Ed.) (1981–1984) Slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Russian Dictionary]. 4Vols.2nd ed.Moscow: Russkij Jazyk.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fasmer, M.
    (2004) Ėtymologičeskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Russian Etymological Dictionary]. 4Vols.4th ed.Moscow: Asterl-ACT.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gladkova, A.
    (2010) Russkaja kul’turnaja semantika: ėmocii, cennosti, žiznennye ustanovki. [Russian cultural semantics: emotions, values and attitudes.] Moscow: Languages of Slavonic Cultures.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. (2011) Cultural variation in language use. InAijmer, K. & G. Andersen (Eds.), Pragmatics of society (pp.567–588). Vol.5 of series Handbooks of Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110214420.571
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214420.571 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2013a) “Is he one of ours?” The cultural semantics and ethnopragmatics of social categories in Russian. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 180–194. [doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.010]
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.06.010 [Google Scholar]
  7. (2013b) ‘Intimate’ talk in Russian: human relationships and folk psychotherapy. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 33(3), 322–343. [doi:  10.1080/07268602.2013.846453]
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2013.846453 [Google Scholar]
  8. (2017) Communication Modes, Russian. InKim, Y. Y. (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. [doi:  10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0147].
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0147 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2020) The semantics of verbs of visual aesthetic appreciation in Russian. InBromhead, H. and Z. Ye (Eds), Meaning, Life and Culture: In Conversation with Anna Wierzbicka. ANU Press: Canberra.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gladkova, A. & Larina, T.
    (2018a) Anna Wierzbicka, words and the world. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22(3), 499–520. [doi:  10.22363/2312‑9182‑2018‑22‑3‑499‑520]
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-3-499-520 [Google Scholar]
  11. (2018b) Anna Wierzbicka, culture and text. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 22(4), 717–748. [doi:  10.22363/2312‑9182‑2018‑22‑4‑717‑748]
    https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2018-22-4-717-748 [Google Scholar]
  12. Gladkova, A. & Romero-Trillo, J.
    (2014) Ain’t it beautiful? The conceptualization of beauty from an ethnopragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 140–159. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.005 [Google Scholar]
  13. (this issue a). The linguistic conceptualization in folk aesthetics.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. (this issue b). Is ugliness in the mind of the beholder?: The conceptualization of ‘ugly’ in English.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goddard, C.
    (2009) Polysemy. A problem of definition. InRavil, Y. & C. Leacock (Eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches, (pp.129–151). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Goddard, C. & Wierzbicka, A.
    (Eds.) 2002Meaning and universal grammar: Theory and empirical findings. 2Vols.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2014) Words and Meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages and cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Haugh, M. & Schneider, K.
    (Eds.) (2012) Special issue on “Im/politeness across Englishes”. Journal of Pragmatics44(9), 1017–1133. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  19. Larina, T.
    (2009) Kategorija vežlivosti i stil’ kommunikacii. [The category of politeness and style of communication.] Moscow: Jazyki Slavjanskix kul’tur.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Levisen, C.
    (this issue). Pæn, Flot, Dejlig, and Lækker: A Lexical Anthropology of Danish Folk Aesthetics.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Levontina, I.
    (2004) Ostorožno, pošlost’! [Beware of vulgarity]. InArutjunova, N. D. (Ed.), Logičeskij analiz jazyka. Jazyki ėstetiki. Konceptual’nye polja prekrasnogo i bezobraznogo [Logical analysis of language. Languages of aesthetics. Conceptual fields of beautiful and ugly] (pp.231–250). Moscow: Indrik.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Levontina, I. & Šmelev, A.
    (2005) Rodnye prostory. [Dear vast space.] InZalizniak, Anna A., Levontina, I., Šmelev, A., Ključevye idei russkoj jazykovoj kartiny mira. [Key ideas of the Russian linguistic worldview.] (pp.64–75). Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lišaev, S.
    (2015) Ėstetika prostranstva [The Aesthetics of Space.] St. Petersburg: Aleteya.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Pasternak, B. L.
    (1990) Stixotvorenija i poėmy. [Poems.] 2Vols.3rd ed.Leningrad: Sovetskij pisatel’.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Romero-Trillo, J. & Fuentes, V.
    (2017) What is pretty cannot be beautiful? A corpus-based analysis of the aesthetics of nature. InJ. Blochowiak, C. Grisot, S. Durrleman-Tame, & C. Laenzlinger (Eds.), Formal Models in the Study of Language (pp.415–430). Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑48832‑5_22
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48832-5_22 [Google Scholar]
  26. Russian National Corpus [RNC]
    Russian National Corpus [RNC]www.ruscorpora.ru
  27. Sharifian, F. & Tayebi, T.
    (2017) Perception of (im)politeness and the underlying cultural conceptualisations: A study of Persian. Pragmatics and Society, 8(2), 231–253. 10.1075/ps.8.2.04sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.2.04sha [Google Scholar]
  28. Šmelev, A.
    (2004) Vidy aestetičeskoj ocenki v predstavlenii russkogo jazyka. [Types of aesthetic evaluation in Russian.] InArutjunova, N. D. (Ed.) Logičeskij analiz jazyka. Jazyki ėstetiki. Konceptual’nye polja prekrasnogo i bezobraznogo. [Logical analysis of language. Languages of aesthetics. Conceptual fields of beautiful and ugly] (pp.303–311). Moscow: Indrik.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (2005) Širota russkoj duši. [Breadth of the Russian soul.] InZalizniak, Anna A., Levontina, I., Šmelev, A., Ključevye idei russkoj jazykovoj kartiny mira. [Key ideas of the Russian linguistic worldview.] (pp.51–63). Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Šmeleva, E.
    (2004) Ot nekrasivogo, urodlivogo, bezobraznogo – k prekrasnomu. [From unbeautiful, crippled and ugly to beautiful]. InArutjunova, N. D. (Ed.) Logičeskij analiz jazyka. Jazyki ėstetiki. Konceptual’nye polja prekrasnogo i bezobraznogo [Logical analysis of language. Languages of aesthetics. Conceptual fields of beautiful and ugly] (pp.597–602). Moscow: Indrik.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Tayebi, T.
    (this issue). Conceptualisations of ugly and beautiful: An analysis of im/politeness metapragmatic markers in Persian.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Uryson, E.
    (2004) Aestetičeskaja ocenka tela čeloveka v russkom jazyke. [Aesthetic evaluation of human body in Russian.] InArutjunova, N. D. (Ed.) Logičeskij analiz jazyka. Jazyki ėstetiki. Konceptual’nye polja prekrasnogo i bezobraznogo [Logical analysis of language. Languages of aesthetics. Conceptual fields of beautiful and ugly] (pp.471–486). Moscow: Indrik.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Ušakov, D. N.
    (1994) Tolkovyj slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Russian Explanatory Dictionary]. 4Vols.Moscow: Russkie slovari.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Watts, R.
    2003Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511615184
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184 [Google Scholar]
  35. Wierzbicka, A.
    (1997) Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, Japanese. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. (2002) Russian cultural scripts: The theory of cultural scripts and its applications. Ethos, 30(4), 401–432. 10.1525/eth.2002.30.4.401
    https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.2002.30.4.401 [Google Scholar]
  37. Wong, J. & Or, M.
    (this issue). “Is beauty only skin deep?” The conceptualization of ‘beauty’ in Mandarin Chinese.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Zabolotsky, N. A.
    (2004) Stixotvorenija. [Poems]. Moscow: Progress-Plejada.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Zalizniak, Anna A., & Šmelev, A. D.
    (2004) Ėstetičeskoe izmerenie v russkoj jazykovoj kartine mira: byt, pošlost’, vran’e. [Aesthetic dimension in the Russian linguistic worldview: byt, pošlost’, vran’e.] InArutjunova, N. D. (Ed.), Logičeskij analiz jazyka. Jazyki ėstetiki. Konceptual’nye polja prekrasnogo i bezobraznogo [Logical analysis of language. Languages of aesthetics. Conceptual fields of beautiful and ugly] (pp.209–230). Moscow: Indrik.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00036.gla
Loading
Keyword(s): beautiful; cultural semantics; folk aesthetics; natural semantic metalanguage (NSM); politeness; polysemy; Russian; ugly

Most Cited