Women have no honour of their own

References

1. Baker, P.
   (2010) Sociolinguistics and corpus linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Baroni, M., & Barnardini, S.
   (2004) BootCaT: Bootstrapping corpora and terms from the web. InM. T. Lino, M. Xavier, F. Ferreira, R. Costa, R. Silva, C. Pereira, F. Carvalho, M. Lopes, M. Catarino & S. Barros (Eds.), Proceedings of LREC 2004 (pp.1313–1316). Lisbon: Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bates, L.
   (2017) Honour-based abuse in England and Wales. Who does what to whom?PhD-dissertation: University of Bristol.
4. Begagić, M.
   (2013) Semantic preference and semantic prosody of the collocation make sense. Jezikoslovlje, 14(2–3), 403–416.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R.
   (1998) Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511804489
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804489 [Google Scholar]
6. Bybee, J., & Hopper, P.
   (2001) Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. InJ. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp.1–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.45.01byb
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.01byb [Google Scholar]
7. Chakravarti, U.
   (2005) From fathers to husbands: Of love death and marriage in North India. InL. Welchman & S. Hossain (Eds.), ‘Honour’: Crimes, paradigms and violence against women, (pp.308–331). London: Zed Books. 10.5040/9781350220621.ch‑015
   https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350220621.ch-015 [Google Scholar]
8. Churchill, P.
   (2018) Women in the crossfire: Understanding and endling honor killing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780190468569.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190468569.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
9. Croft, W., Taoka, C., & Wood, E.
   (2001) Argument linking and the commercial transaction frame in English, Russian and Japanese. Language Sciences, 231, 579–602. 10.1016/S0388‑0001(00)00037‑1
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00037-1 [Google Scholar]
10. D’Andrade, R.
    (1987) A folk model of the mind. InD. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp.112–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607660.006
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660.006 [Google Scholar]
11. Das, P.
    (2020) Euphemism, rhetoric and prosody. London: New Central Book Agency.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Davies, M.
    (2022) Corpus of contemporary American English. URL: https://www.english-corpora.org/coca
    [Google Scholar]
13. D’Lima, T., Solotaroff, J., & Pande, R.
    (2020) For the sake of family and tradition: Honour killings in India and Pakistan. Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 5(1), 22–39. 10.1177/2455632719880852
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2455632719880852 [Google Scholar]
14. Dousset, L.
    (2011) Australian aboriginal kinship. Marseille: Manuels du Credo. 10.4000/books.pacific.556
    https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pacific.556 [Google Scholar]
15. Ermers, R.
    (2018) Honor related violence. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315180175
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180175 [Google Scholar]
16. Evison, J.
    (2010) What are the basics of analysing a corpus. InA. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. (pp.112–135). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203856949‑10
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949-10 [Google Scholar]
17. Finzel, A.
    (2021) Innate or acquired? Homosexuality and cultural models of gender in Indian and Nigerian English. InH.-G. Wolf, D. Lati, & A. Finzel (Eds.), Cultural-Linguistic Explorations into Spirituality, Emotionality, and Society (pp.186–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clscc.14.09fin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.14.09fin [Google Scholar]
18. Flowerdew, L.
    (2004) The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional language. InU. Connor & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics (pp.11–33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.16.02flo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.16.02flo [Google Scholar]
19. Frank, R.
    (2015) A future agenda for research on language and culture. InF. Sharifian (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp.593–612). New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gegeo, D., & Watwon-Gegeo, K.
    (1999) Adult education, language change, and issues of identity and authenticity in Kwara’ae (Solomon Islands). Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 30(1), 22–36. 10.1525/aeq.1999.30.1.22
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1999.30.1.22 [Google Scholar]
21. Gill, A. K., & A. Brah
    (2014) Interrogating cultural narratives about ‘honour’-based violence. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 21(1), 72–86. 10.1177/1350506813510424
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506813510424 [Google Scholar]
22. Glushko, R., Maglio, D., Matlock, T., & Barsalou, L.
    (2008) Categorization in the wild. Trends in cognitive science, 12(4), 129–135. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.01.007 [Google Scholar]
23. Goossens, L.
    (1990) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), 323–340. 10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.3.323 [Google Scholar]
24. Hunjan, S., & Towson, S.
    (2007) “Virginity is everything”: Sexuality in the context of intimate partner violence in the South Asian community. InS. Dasgupta (Ed.), Body evidence: Intimate violence against South Asian women in America (pp.53–67). Chicago, IL: Rutgers University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hunston, S.
    (2002) Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524773
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524773 [Google Scholar]
26. Kamir, O.
    (2019) Betraying Dignity: The Toxic Seduction of Social Media, Shaming, and Radicalization. Oxford: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kachru, B.
    (1990) World Englishes and applied linguistics. World Englishes, 9(1), 3–20. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1990.tb00683.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1990.tb00683.x [Google Scholar]
28. Kaushal, K.
    (2020) No honour in honour killing. Comparative analysis of Indian traditional social structure vis-á-vis gender violence. Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 5(1), 52–69. 10.1177/2455632719880870
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2455632719880870 [Google Scholar]
29. Kemmer, S., & Barlow, M.
    (2000) Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. InM. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp.vii–xxvii). Chicago, IL: CSLI.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Lakoff, G.
    (1987) Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
31. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
    (1989) More than cool reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
33. Mandelbaum, D.
    (1988) Women’s seclusion and men’s honor: Sex roles in North India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. Tuscon, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Martsa, S.
    (2013) Conversation in English: A cognitive semantic approach. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Nishida, H.
    (1999) A cognitive approach to intercultural communication based on schema theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(5), 753–777. 10.1016/S0147‑1767(99)00019‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(99)00019-X [Google Scholar]
36. Polzenhagen, F., & Wolf, H.-G.
    (2021) Culture-specific conceptualisations of corruption in African English: Linguistic analyses and pragmatic applications. InM. Sadeghpour & F. Sharifian (Eds.), Cultural linguistics and world Englishes (pp.361–399). Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑15‑4696‑9_17
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4696-9_17 [Google Scholar]
37. Polzenhagen, F., Finzel, A., & Wolf, H.-G.
    (2021) Colonial cultural conceptualizations and World Englishes. InA. Onysko (Ed.), Research Developments in World Englishes (pp.199–230). London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350167087.ch‑010
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350167087.ch-010 [Google Scholar]
38. Quinn, N.
    (1987) Convergent evidence for a cultural model of American marriage. InD. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp.173–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607660.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660.008 [Google Scholar]
39. Quinn, N., & Holland, D.
    (1987) Culture and cognition. InD. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp.3–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511607660.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660.002 [Google Scholar]
40. Radden, G. & Kövesces, Z.
    (1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. InK.-U. Panther & G. RaddenEds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp.17–59). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad [Google Scholar]
41. Rosch, E.
    (1973) Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 328–350. 10.1016/0010‑0285(73)90017‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 [Google Scholar]
42. Sharifian, F.
    (2011) Cultural conceptualisations and language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clscc.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.1 [Google Scholar]
43. Sharifian, F.
    (2014) Advances in Cultural Linguistics. InM. Yamaguchi, D. Tay & B. Blount (Eds.), Approaches to language, culture, and cognition: The intersection of cognitive linguistics and linguistic anthropology (pp.99–123). New York: MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Sharifian, F.
    (2017) Cultural Linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/clscc.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.8 [Google Scholar]
45. Strauss, C.
    (2015) Language and culture in cognitive anthropology. InF. Sharifian (ed.), Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp.593–612). London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Tonsing, J., & Barn, R.
    (2016) Intimate partner violence in South Asian communities: Exploring the notion of ‘shame’ to promote understandings of migrant women’s experiences. International Social Work, 60(3), 628–639. 10.1177/0020872816655868
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872816655868 [Google Scholar]
47. Walker, L., Augoustinos, M., & Donahie, N.
    (1995) Social cognition: An integrated introduction. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Walsh, M.
    (1993) Classifying the world in an aboriginal language. InM. Walsh & C. Yallop (Eds.), Language and culture in aboriginal Australia (pp.107–122). Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Wikan, U.
    (1984) Shame and honour: A contestable pair. Man, 19(4), 635–652. 10.2307/2802330
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2802330 [Google Scholar]
50. Wolf, H.-G., & Polzenhagen, F.
    (2009) World Englishes: A cognitive sociolinguistic approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199222
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199222 [Google Scholar]