1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. International Journal of Language and Culture
  4. Volume 12, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 12, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2214-3157
  • E-ISSN: 2214-3165
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Solitude speech has been viewed as dialogic, especially by Western scholars (Bakhtin [1929] 1984; Vygotsky [1934] 1986). This study investigates the prevailing belief by focusing on a ‘self-regulatory’ type of Japanese solitude speech, based on data collected in a sequential multiple-task experiment. It was revealed that Japanese self-regulatory solitude speech shows dialogic traits in terms of lexico-grammatical features and sequential structures. The results contrasted with those of our earlier research on an ‘expressive’ type of solitude speech (Izutsu et al. 2022), which were found to be monologic for Japanese response cries but comparatively more dialogic in the case of their American English counterparts. This shows that expressive solitude speech is conceived as either monologic or dialogic, depending on cultural beliefs of the speakers, while self-regulatory solitude speech prefers a dialogic conception with less cultural diversity. It is also suggested that such a dialogic perspective is likely to arise from “the demands of thinking” (Nishida [1911] 1990).

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00068.izu
2026-02-05
2026-02-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00068.izu
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alderson-Day, B., & Fernyhough, C.
    (2015) Inner speech: Development, cognitive functions, phenomenology, and neurobiology. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 931–65. 10.1037/bul0000021
     https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000021 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ameka, F. K.
    (1992) Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 181, 101–118. 10.1016/0378‑2166(92)90048‑G
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90048-G [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin, M.
    ([1929] 1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. ed. & trans. byC. Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Berk, L. E.
    (1986) Relationship of elementary school children’s private speech to behavioral accompaniment to task, attention, and task performance. Developmental Psychology, 22(5), 671–680. 10.1037/0012‑1649.22.5.671
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.22.5.671 [Google Scholar]
  5. Berk, L. E., & Garvin, R. A.
    (1984) Development of private speech among low-income Appalachian children. Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 271–286. 10.1037/0012‑1649.20.2.271
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.20.2.271 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bunnin, N., & Yu, J.
    (2004) The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cary, P.
    (2023) The Nicene creed: An introduction. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng, C.
    (1987) Shuujoshi: Hanashite-to kikite-no ninshiki-no gyappu-o umeru-tameno bunsetsuji. Nihongogaku, 6(10), 93–109.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Diaz, R. M.
    (1992) Methodological concerns in the study of private speech. InR. M. Diaz & L. E. Berk (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 181–198). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Dingemanse, M.
    (2023) Beyond single-mindedness: A figure-ground reversal for the cognitive sciences. Cognitive Science, 471, online. Retrieved from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.13230 (accessedMay 17, 2024).
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Du Bois, J. W., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Cumming, S., & Paolino, D.
    (1993) Outline of discourse transcription. InJ. A. Edwards & M. D. Lampert (Eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research (pp. 45–89). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Du Bois, J. W.
    (2009) Interior dialogues: The co-voicing of ritual in solitude. InG. Senft & E. B. Basso (Eds.), Ritual communication (pp. 317–372). Oxford: Berg.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Feigenbaum, P.
    (1992) Development of the syntactic and discourse features in private speech. InR. M. Diaz & L. E. Berk (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 55–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fernyhough, C.
    (2009) Dialogic thinking. InA. Winsler, C. Fernyhough & I. Montero (Eds.), Private speech: Executive functioning, and the development of verbal self-regulation (pp. 42–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511581533.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511581533.004 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2016) The voices within: The history and science of how we talk to ourselves. London: Welcome Collection.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Frauenglass, M. H., & Diaz, R. M.
    (1985) Self-regulatory functions of children’s private speech: A critical analysis of recent challenges to Vygotsky’s theory. Developmental Psychology, 21(2), 357–364. 10.1037/0012‑1649.21.2.357
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.2.357 [Google Scholar]
  17. Goffman, E.
    (1978) Response cries. Language, 54(4), 787–815. 10.2307/413235
     https://doi.org/10.2307/413235 [Google Scholar]
  18. Haiman, J.
    (1995) Grammatical signs of the divided self: A study of language and culture. InW. Abraham, T. Givón & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse grammar and typology: Papers in honor of John W.M. Verhaar (pp. 213–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.27.17hai
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.27.17hai [Google Scholar]
  19. Hasegawa, Y.
    (2010) Soliloquy in Japanese and English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.202
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.202 [Google Scholar]
  20. (2015) Japanese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Heine, B.
    (2023) The grammar of interactives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780192871497.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192871497.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hidaka, A.
    (2014) Shiryofunbetsu-wa naze junsuikeiken-dewa-nai-noka. Studies in Japanese Philosophy111: 126–155.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Horiuchi, K.
    (1978) Batoogo-no hikakubunka. Gengo Seikatsu, 3211, 50–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hoshino, A.
    (1971) Akutaimokutai koo: Akutai-no shosoo-to kinoo. Kikan Jinruigaku, 2(3), 29–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Iori, I., Takanashi, S., Nakanishi, K., & Yamada, T.
    (2001) Chuujookyuu-o oshieru hito-notameno nihongo bunpoo handobukku. Tokyo: 3A Corporation.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Izutsu, M. N., & Izutsu, K.
    (2019) Why is Twitter so popular in Japan?: Linguistic devices for monologization. Internet Pragmatics, 2(2), 260–289. 10.1075/ip.00030.izu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00030.izu [Google Scholar]
  27. (2021) On and off the common ground: Japanese final particles as (un)grounding devices. Lingua Posnaniensis, 63(2), 7–32. 10.14746/linpo.2021.63.2.1
     https://doi.org/10.14746/linpo.2021.63.2.1 [Google Scholar]
  28. Izutsu, M. N., Kim, Y.-T., & Izutsu, K.
    (2022) Response cries or response statements?: A cross-linguistic analysis of interjectional expressions in Japanese and English. Contrastive Pragmatics, 3(2), 194–221. 10.1163/26660393‑bja10038
     https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10038 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2023) “Naked” or “dressed up”?: A contrastive analysis of response cries between Korean and Japanese. InS. Williamson (Eds), Japanese/Korean linguistics, vol. 30 (pp. 441–451). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kamio, A.
    (1997) Territory of information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.48
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.48 [Google Scholar]
  31. Katagiri, Y.
    (2007) Dialogue functions of Japanese sentence-final particles ‘Yo’ and ‘Ne.’ Journal of Pragmatics, 39(7), 1313–1323. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.013 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ki, H.
    (2005) Nihon/Kankoku-no aidentitii keisei-niokeru ‘shuudansei’-no sooi. Rinshoo Shinrigaku (Graduate School of Fukuoka Jo Gakuin University), 21, 1–6.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, S. S. H. C.
    (2017) Korean han and the postcolonial afterlives of “the beauty of sorrow.” Korean Studies, 411, 253–279. 10.1353/ks.2017.0026
     https://doi.org/10.1353/ks.2017.0026 [Google Scholar]
  34. Koguma, T., & Izutsu, K.
    (2022) What’s my name in absolute solitude?: The essence of monologic selves in Japanese. Gengo Bunka Ronso, 261, 19–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kohlberg, L., Yaeger, J., & Hjertholm, E.
    (1968) Private speech: Four studies and a review of theories. Child Development, 39(3), 691–736. 10.2307/1126979
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1126979 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kojien, 6th edition
    Kojien, 6th edition (2008) Tokyo: Iwanami.
  37. Kosaka, K.
    (2002) Nishida Kitaro-no shisoo. Tokyo: Kodansha.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Labov, W.
    (1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, D.-Y.
    (2007) Involvement and the Japanese interactive particles ne and yo. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(2), 363–388. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.06.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ljung, M.
    (2011) Swearing: A cross-cultural linguistic study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Mackenzie, J. L.
    (2019) The syntax of an emotional expletive in English. InJ. L. Mackenzie & L. Alba-Juez (Eds.), Emotion in discourse (pp. 44–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.302.03mac
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.302.03mac [Google Scholar]
  42. Masuoka, T.
    (1991) Modaritii-no bunpoo. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Maynard, S. K.
    (1993) Discourse modality: Subjectivity, emotion, and voice in the Japanese language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.24
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.24 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2022) Exploring the self, subjectivity, and character across Japanese and translation texts. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004505865
     https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004505865 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mead, G. H.
    (1934) Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Mercier, H., & Sperber, D.
    (2011) Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 341, 57–111. 10.1017/S0140525X10000968
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000968 [Google Scholar]
  47. Mitsuhashi, T.
    (2007) Shintoo-no jooshiki-ga wakaru shoojiten. Tokyo/Kyoto: PHP Kenkyusho.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Miyazaki, K.
    (2002) Shuujoji ne-to na. Handai Nihongo Kenkyu, 141, 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Moriyama, T.
    (1997) Hitorigoto-o megutte. InY. Kawabata & Y. Nitta (Eds.), Nihongo bunpoo: Taikei-to hoohoo (pp. 173–188). Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Narrog, H.
    (2014) Beyond intersubjectification: Textual uses of modality and mood in subordinate clauses as part of speech-act orientation. InL. Brems, L. Ghesquière & F. Van de Velde (Eds.), Intersubjectivity and intersubjectification in grammar and discourse (pp. 29–51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.65.03nar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.65.03nar [Google Scholar]
  51. Nishida, K.
    ([1911] 1990) An inquiry into the good. trans. byM. Abe & I. Cristopher. New Haven: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. ([1926] 2012) Place and dialectic: Two essays by Kitaro Nishida. trans. byJ. W. M. Kummel & S. Nagamoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Nomura, S.
    (1987) Tonchinkan-to toomonseitoo. Gengoseikatsu, 4281, 64–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. (1992) Nichijoogo-kara mita choosen bunka: Josetsu. The Geibun-Kenkyu: Journal of Arts and Letters, 601, 430–446.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Ohso, M.
    (1986) Goyoo bunseki 1: ‘Kyoo-wa ii tenki-desu-ne’ — ‘Hai, soo-desu.’ Nihongogaku, 5(9), 91–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Peirce, C. S.
    (1935) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Vol. VI: Scientific Metaphysics. ed. byC. Hartshorne & P. Weiss. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J.
    (1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H.
    (1973) Opening up closings. Semiotica, 81, 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
     https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  59. Searle, J. R.
    (1979) Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511609213
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213 [Google Scholar]
  60. Suzuki, T.
    (1978) Words in context: A Japanese perspective on language and culture. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Takahashi, H.
    (2012) A cognitive linguistic analysis of the English imperative: With special reference to Japanese imperatives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.35
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.35 [Google Scholar]
  62. Taniguchi, S.
    (2021) Shoshuukyoo-no ayumi: Jijitsu-to honshitsu-no aida-de. Kyoto: Koyoshobo.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. The God Issue
    The God Issue (2012, March12). New Scientist: Special Edition, Issue 2856.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Tsui, A. B. M.
    (1989) Beyond the adjacency pair. Language in Society, 18(4), 545–564. 10.1017/S0047404500013907
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500013907 [Google Scholar]
  65. Tsurumi, S.
    (1954) Taishuu geijutsu. Tokyo: Kawadeshobo.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Tsutsui, Y.
    (1967) Akkoo zoogon barizanboo shiron. Kotobano Uchuu, 2(8), 23–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Turner, R. H.
    (1976) The real self: From institution to impulse. American Journal of Sociology, 81(5), 989–1016. 10.1086/226183
     https://doi.org/10.1086/226183 [Google Scholar]
  68. Ueda, S.
    (2007) Keiken-to basho. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Usami, M.
    (2019) Kihontekina mojika-no gensoku, 2019-nen kaiteiban. Retrieved from: https://isplad.jp/lab/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/BTSJ2019.pdf (accessedJanuary 4, 2023).
  70. Uyeno, T.
    (1971) A study of Japanese modality: A performative analysis of sentence particles. Ph. D. Dissertation. The University of Michigan, Michigan.
  71. Vygotsky, L.
    ([1934] 1986) Thought and language. trans. byE. Hanfmann & G. Vakar, rev. & ed. byA. Kozulin. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Washi, R.
    (1997) Shuujoshi-to hatsuwa ruikei: Tookyoogo shuujoshi ‘wa’- to ‘na’-no danwa-niokeru hataraki. Nihongo Nihonbunka Kenkyu, 71, 65–79.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00068.izu
Loading
Speaking while thinking
International Journal of Language and Culture 12, 20 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.00068.izu
/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00068.izu
/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.00068.izu
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): dialogicity/monologicity; expressive solitude speech; Japanese; self-regulatory solitude speech; thinking

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error