Volume 7, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2214-3157
  • E-ISSN: 2214-3165
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This paper focuses on the Iranian politeness system. We report a quantitative analysis of the attitudes to held by 60 Iranians (30 women and 30 men) of two age groups (20–29 and 40–59 years old) and their use of formulaic expressions in conversations. The data come from dialogues elicited from the participants in Iran via short scripted scenarios and from their answers to a questionnaire survey about their attitudes to expressions were manually extracted from the dialogue transcripts and their overall use as well as frequencies of each expression were compared across the gender and age groups with the help of t-tests. The participants’ answers to the survey questions were compared across the groups with Kruskal-Wallis H tests. The results show statistically significant differences in the participants’ attitudes to and in its use in dialogues by gender and age group.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Babai, S. H. & Sharifian, F.
    (2013) Refusal strategies in L1 and L2. A study of Persian speaking learners of English. Multilingua, 32 (6), 801–836.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Backhaus, P.
    (2009) Politeness in institutional elderly care in Japan: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Politeness Research-language Behaviour Culture, 5, 53–71.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bagwasi, M. M.
    (2012) The effect of gender and age in Setswana greetings. Southern African Linguistics & Applied Language Studies, 30 (1), 93–100. 10.2989/16073614.2012.693717
    https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2012.693717 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bargiela-Chiappini, F. & Kádár, D. Z.
    (2011) Politeness research in and across cultures. In: F. Bargiela-Chiappini and D. Z. Kádár (Eds.). Politeness across cultures (pp1–16). New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230305939
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305939 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bella, S.
    (2009) Invitations and politeness in Greek: The age variable. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 5 (2), 243–271. 10.1515/JPLR.2009.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2009.013 [Google Scholar]
  6. Brown, P. & Levinson, S.
    (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511813085
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085 [Google Scholar]
  7. Caballero, J. A. , Vergis, N. , Jiang, X. , & Pell, M. D.
    (2018) The sound of im/politeness, Speech Communication, 102, 39–53. 10.1016/j.specom.2018.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2018.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen, R.
    (2013) Chinese requests: In comparison to American and Japanese requests and with reference to the “East-West divide.” Journal of Pragmatics55, 140–161. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.012 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Y.
    (2017) Children’s early awareness of the effect of interpersonal status on politeness. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 13 (1), 121–142. 10.1515/pr‑2014‑0016
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2014-0016 [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpeper, J.
    (2010) Conventionalised impoliteness formulae. Journal of Pragmatics, 42 (12), 3232–3245. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies, B. L.
    (2018) Evaluating evaluations: What different types of metapragmatic behaviour can tell us about participants’ understandings of the moral order. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 14 (1), 121–151. 10.1515/pr‑2017‑0037
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0037 [Google Scholar]
  12. Davis, J. E.
    (2008) Moral order. Culture, 2 (1), 17.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dogancay, S.
    (1990) “Your eye is sparkling”: Formulaic expressions and routines in Turkish. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 6 (2), 47–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S.
    (2003) Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791147 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fraser, B.
    (1990) Perspective on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 219–236. 10.1016/0378‑2166(90)90081‑N
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90081-N [Google Scholar]
  16. Fukushima, S. , and Haugh, M.
    (2014) The role of emic understandings in theorizing im/politeness: The metapragmatics of attentiveness, empathy and anticipatory inference in Japanese and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 74, 165–179. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.08.004 [Google Scholar]
  17. Garfinkel, H.
    (1964) Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems, 11 (3), 225–250. 10.2307/798722
    https://doi.org/10.2307/798722 [Google Scholar]
  18. Giles, H. , Dailey, R. M. , Sarkar, J. M. & Makoni, S.
    (2007) Intergenerational communication beliefs across the lifespan: Comparative data from India. Communication Reports, 20 (2), 75–89. 10.1080/08934210701643701
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210701643701 [Google Scholar]
  19. Giles, H. , Khajavy, G. H. & Choi, C. W.
    (2012) Intergenerational Communication Satisfaction and Age Boundaries: Comparative Middle Eastern Data. Journal of Cross Cultural Gerontology, 27, 357–371. 10.1007/s10823‑012‑9179‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-012-9179-9 [Google Scholar]
  20. Giles, H. , & Williams, A.
    (1994) Patronizing the young: forms and evaluations. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 39, 33–53. 10.2190/0LUC‑NWMA‑K5LX‑NUVW
    https://doi.org/10.2190/0LUC-NWMA-K5LX-NUVW [Google Scholar]
  21. Gnisci, A. , Graziano, E. , Sergi, I. , & Pace, A. J.
    (2018) Which criteria do naïve people use for identifying and evaluating different kinds of interruptions?Journal of Pragmatics, 138, 119–130. 12p. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.09.016 [Google Scholar]
  22. Goffman, E.
    (1955) On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry: Journal of the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18(3), 213–23I. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gohardehi, N. & Gheitury, A.
    (2014) Gender and Text Messaging in an Iranian Context. Iranian Studies, 47 (4), 535–546. 10.1080/00210862.2014.906185
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00210862.2014.906185 [Google Scholar]
  24. Haghighat, G.
    (2016) Socio-Cultural Attitudes to Ta’arof among Iranian immigrants in Canada. MA thesis. University of Saskatchewan.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Hampel, E.
    (2015) “Mama Zimbi, pls help me!” – Gender differences in (im)politeness in Ghanaian English advice-giving on Facebook. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 11, (1), 99–130. 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0005 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hassani, R. , Mardani, M. & Dastjerdi, J. V.
    (2011) A comparative study of refusals: Gender distinction and social status in focus. The Internet Journal of Language, Society and Culture, 32, 37–46.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Haugh, M.
    (2007) The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research, 3, 295–317. 10.1515/PR.2007.013
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2007.013 [Google Scholar]
  28. Haugh, Michael
    (2013) Im/politeness, social practice and the participation order. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 52–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  29. Haugh, M.
    (2015) Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110240078
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240078 [Google Scholar]
  30. Holmes, J.
    (1995) Women, Men, and Politeness, London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2013) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, 4th ed.New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315833057
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833057 [Google Scholar]
  32. Inoue, M.
    (2006) Vicarious language: Gender and linguistic modernity in Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520939066
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520939066 [Google Scholar]
  33. Izadi, A.
    (2015) Persian honorifics and im/politeness as social practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 85, 85–91. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.002 [Google Scholar]
  34. (2016) Over-politeness in Persian professional interactions. Journal of Pragmatics, 102, 13–23. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  35. Jankowiak, W. & Li, X.
    (2014) The Decline of the Chauvinistic Model of Chinese Masculinity: A Research Report. Chinese Sociological Review, 46, (4), 3–18. 10.2753/CSA2162‑0555460401
    https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA2162-0555460401 [Google Scholar]
  36. Jones, J. F. & Adrefiza, J.
    (2017) Comparing apologies in Australian English and Bahasa Indonesia: Cultural and gender perspectives. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 13 (1), 89–119. 10.1515/pr‑2016‑0033
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0033 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kádár, D. & Haugh, M.
    (2013) Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139382717
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382717 [Google Scholar]
  38. Koutlaki, S.
    (2010) Among the Iranians: A Guide to Iran’s Culture and Customs. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. (2002) Offers and expressions of thanks as face enhancing acts: tae’arof in Persian. Journal of Pragmatics, 34 (12), 1733–1756. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(01)00055‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00055-8 [Google Scholar]
  40. Labov, W.
    (1994) Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume1: Internal Factors, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lakoff, R.
    (1975) Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Leech, G.
    (1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Lin, T.
    (2013) The Concepts of “Politeness”: A Comparative Study in Chinese and Japanese Verbal Communication. Intercultural Communication Studies, 22 (2), 151–165.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Locher, M. A.
    (2004) Power and Politeness in Action: Expressing Disagreement in Oral Communication. Berlin: Mouton. 10.1515/9783110926552
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110926552 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2010) Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication, Journal of Politeness Research6, 1–5. 10.1515/jplr.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  46. Macqueen, K. M. , Mclellan-Lemal, E. , Bartholow, K. & Milstein, B.
    (2008) Team-based Codebook Development: Structure, Process, and Agreement. In: C. Guest & K. M. Macqueen (Eds.). Handbook for Team-based Qualitative Research (pp.119–134). New York: Altamira Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Masullo Chen, G. & Abedin, Z.
    (2014) Exploring differences in how men and women respond to threats to positive face on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 118–126. 10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.029
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.029 [Google Scholar]
  48. McLellan-Lemal, Eleanor & Macqueen, Kathleen & L. Neidig, Judith
    (2003) Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription. Field Methods, 15 (1), 63–84.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Mills, S.
    (2005) Gender and impoliteness. Journal of politeness research, 1, 263–280. 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.263
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.2.263 [Google Scholar]
  50. Mir-Hosseini, Z.
    (2002) The conservative-reformist conflict over women’s rights in Iran. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 16 (1), 37–53. 10.1023/A:1016530427616
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016530427616 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mitchell, N. & Haugh, M.
    (2015) Agency, accountability and evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 11 (2), 207–238. 10.1515/pr‑2015‑0009
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0009 [Google Scholar]
  52. Mohseni-Tabrizi, A. , & Homayunpoor, H.
    (2001) Barresiye vaziyate salmandan dar Iran [EAgexamining elderly people situation in Iran]. Faslnameye tamine ejtemaei [Social Security Journal], 2, 191–208.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Mullany, L.
    (2008) ‘Stop hassling me’: impoliteness, power and gender identity in the professional workplace. In: D. Bousfield and M. Locher (Eds.). Impoliteness in language (pp.231–255). Berlin: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Murphy, M. & Levy, M.
    (2006) Politeness in intercultural communication: Australian and Korean perspectives. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 12, 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Obana, Y. and Tomoda, T.
    (1994) The sociological significance of ‘politeness’ in English and Japanese languages. Report from a pilot study. Japanese Studies Bulletin, 14 (2), 37–49. 10.1080/10371399408727576
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10371399408727576 [Google Scholar]
  56. Okamoto, S.
    (1999) Situated politeness: Coordinating honorific and non-honorific expressions in Japanese conversations. Pragmatics9 (1), 51–47. 10.1075/prag.9.1.05oka
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.9.1.05oka [Google Scholar]
  57. Oxford, R. L. , & Burry-Stock, J. A.
    (1995) Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1–23. 10.1016/0346‑251X(94)00047‑A
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)00047-A [Google Scholar]
  58. Pan, Y. , Kádár, D. Z.
    (2011) Historical vs. contemporary Chinese linguistic politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (6), 1525–1539. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.018 [Google Scholar]
  59. Parvaresh, V. & Tayebi, T.
    (2018) Impoliteness, aggression and the moral order. Journal of Pragmatics, 132, 91–107. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ran, Y. & Zhao, L.
    (2019) Impoliteness revisited: Evidence from qingmian threats in Chinese interpersonal conflicts. Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behavior, Culture, 15 (2), 257–291. 10.1515/pr‑2017‑0027
    https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2017-0027 [Google Scholar]
  61. Saeli, H.
    (2016) Persian favour asking in formal and informal academic contexts: the impact of gender and academic status. Pragmatics, 26 (2), 315–344. 10.1075/prag.26.2.06sae
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.2.06sae [Google Scholar]
  62. Sharifian, F.
    (2005) The Persian cultural schema of shekasteh-nafsi: A study of compliment responses in Persian and Anglo-Australian speakers. Pragmatics & Cognition13(2), 337–361. 10.1075/pc.13.2.05sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.13.2.05sha [Google Scholar]
  63. (2008) Cultural schemas in L1 and L2 compliment responses: a study of Persian-speaking learners of English. Journal of Politeness Research, 4 (1), 55–80. 10.1515/PR.2008.003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/PR.2008.003 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sharifian, F. , & Tayebi, T.
    (2017) Perception of (im)politeness and the underlying cultural conceptualisations. A study of Persian. Pragmatics and Society, 8(2), 231–253. 10.1075/ps.8.2.04sha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.8.2.04sha [Google Scholar]
  65. Song, S.
    (2017) The Brown and Levinson theory revisited: A statistical analysis. Language Sciences, 62, 66–75. 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.03.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.03.006 [Google Scholar]
  66. Stadler, S.
    (2018) Conventionalized politeness in Singapore Colloquial English. World Englishes, 37 (2), p.307–322. 10.1111/weng.12314
    https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12314 [Google Scholar]
  67. Stevanovic, M. & Peräkylä, A.
    (2019) Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations. Language and Society, 43, 185–207. 10.1017/S0047404514000037
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000037 [Google Scholar]
  68. Sung, K.
    (2004) Elder respect among young adults: A cross-cultural study of Americans and Koreans. Journal of Aging Studies, 18, 215–230. 10.1016/j.jaging.2004.01.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2004.01.002 [Google Scholar]
  69. Sung, C. C. M.
    (2012) Exploring the interplay of gender, discourse, and (im)politeness. Journal of Gender Studies, 21 (3), 285–300. 10.1080/09589236.2012.681179
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2012.681179 [Google Scholar]
  70. Tang, C.
    (2015) The influence of the addressers’ and the addressees’ gender identities on the addressers’ linguistic politeness behavior: Some evidence from criticisms in Taiwanese media discourse. Pragmatics, 25 (3), 477–499. 10.1075/prag.25.3.07tan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.25.3.07tan [Google Scholar]
  71. Tannen, D.
    (1994) Gender and Discourse. Oxford University Press: New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Terkourafi, M.
    (2002) Politeness and formulaicity: evidence from Cypriot Greek, Journal of Greek Linguistics, 3, 179–201. 10.1075/jgl.3.08ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/jgl.3.08ter [Google Scholar]
  73. (2015) Conventionalization: A new agenda for im/politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 11–18. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.004 [Google Scholar]
  74. Thomas-Tate, S. , Daugherty, T. K. , & Bartkoski, T. J.
    (2017) Experimental study of gender effects on language use in college students’ email to faculty. College Student Journal, 51(2), 222–226.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Watts, R. J.
    (2005) Linguistic politeness research: Quo vadis?In: R. J. Watts , S. Ide , and K. Ehlich (Eds.), Politeness in Language. Studies in its History, Theory and Practice (pp.xi–xlvii). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199819.1.131
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199819.1.131 [Google Scholar]
  76. Watts, R. , Ide, S. , & Konrad, E.
    (1992) Politeness in Language: Studies in its History, Theory and Practice, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, New York. 10.1515/9783110886542
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110886542 [Google Scholar]
  77. Wetzel, P. J.
    (2004) Keigo in Modern Japan: Polite Language from Meiji to the Present. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. 10.1515/9780824846688
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780824846688 [Google Scholar]
  78. Zimmerman, D. H. and West, C.
    (1975) Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In: B. Thorne , N. Henley (Eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance (pp.105–129). Newbury: Rowley.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): age; gender; Persian (Farsi); politeness; taaroff
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error