1887
Volume 9, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2214-3157
  • E-ISSN: 2214-3165
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This case study explores how Spanish YouTubers construct affective narratives in terms of self-disclosure in the context of sensitive topics. In addition, it sheds light on how YouTubers take up a stance within the stories, and the components of this stance-taking. Stories and stance-taking will be evaluated through multimodal analysis, observing both the verbal and non-verbal cues used. According to the results, YouTubers’ affective narratives are characterized by emphasis on explicitly named feelings and by non-verbal cues that reinforce the transmission of mediated emotion, as well as functioning to boost self-disclosure. The narratives reveal a kind of stance-continuum that underlines the dynamic nature of phenomena, where YouTubers gradually construct, in conjunction with self-disclosure, the act of stance-taking, starting from self-oriented positioning, then moving toward a more instructive and self-to-others perspective, and finally acting as stance-influencers of the community in which they are involved.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.22050.pel
2023-06-15
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, S.
    (2004) The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Archer, R., & Earle, W. B.
    (1983) The interpersonal orientations of disclosure. InP. B. Paulus (Ed.), Basic group processes (pp.289–314). New York: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978‑1‑4612‑5578‑9_12
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5578-9_12 [Google Scholar]
  3. Argyle, M.
    (2013) Bodily communication. 2nd edition. London/New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203753835
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203753835 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barrett, L. F.
    (2006) Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10 (1), 20–46. 10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1001_2 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2012) Emotions are real. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 12.31, 413–429. 10.1037/a0027555
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027555 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barton, D., & Lee, C.
    (2013) Stance-taking through language and image. InD. Barton & C. Lee (Eds.), Language online (pp.96–116). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203552308
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203552308 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bazarova, N. N., & Hyung Choi, Y.
    (2014) Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network Sites. Journal of Communication, 64.41, 635–657. 10.1111/jcom.12106
    https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12106 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bednarek, M.
    (2009) Emotion talk and emotional talk: Cognitive and discursive perspectives. InH. Pishwa (Ed.), Language and social cognition: Expression of the social mind (pp.395–432). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110216080.3.395
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216080.3.395 [Google Scholar]
  9. Beers Fägersten, K.
    (2017) The role of swearing in creating an online persona: The case of YouTuber PewDiePie. Discourse, Context & Media, 181, 1–10. 10.1016/j.dcm.2017.04.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  10. Beers Fägersten, K., & Stapleton, K.
    (Eds.) (2017) Advances in swearing research: New languages and new contexts. Vol.2821. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.282
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.282 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bou-Franch, P., & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P.
    (2014) Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube. Journal of Pragmatics, 731, 19–36. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  12. Caffi, C., & Janney, R. W.
    (1994) Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 22 (3), 325–373. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)90115‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90115-5 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chun, E.
    (2013) Ironic blackness as masculine cool: Asian American language and authenticity on YouTube. Applied Linguistics, 34 (5): 592–612. 10.1093/applin/amt023
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt023 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chun, E., & Walters, K.
    (2011) Orienting to Arab orientalisms: Language, race, and humor in a YouTube video. InCrispin & K. Mroczek (Eds.), Digital discourse: Language in the new media (pp.1–22). New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199795437.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  15. Crilley, R., & Chatterje-Doody, P. N.
    (2020) Emotions and war on YouTube: Affective investments in RT’s visual narratives of the conflict in Syria. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 1–21. 10.1080/09557571.2020.1719038
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1719038 [Google Scholar]
  16. De Fina, A.
    (2016) Storytelling and audience reactions in social media. Language in Society, 45.41, 473–498. 10.1017/S0047404516000051
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516000051 [Google Scholar]
  17. De Fina, A., & Perrino, S.
    (2019) Storytelling in the digital world. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/bct.104
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.104 [Google Scholar]
  18. Du Bois, J. W.
    (2007) The stance triangle. InR. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp.139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
  19. DuBois, J. W., & Kärkkäinen, E.
    (2012) Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk, 32 (4), 433–451. 10.1515/text‑2012‑0021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0021 [Google Scholar]
  20. Duprez, C., Christophe, V., Rimé, B., Congard, A., & Antoine, P.
    (2015) Motives for the social sharing of an emotional experience. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32.61, 757–787. 10.1177/0265407514548393
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514548393 [Google Scholar]
  21. Frobenius, M.
    (2011) Beginning a monologue: The opening sequence of video blogs. Journal of Pragmatics, 43.31, 814–827. 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.018 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2014) Audience design in monologues: How vloggers involve their viewers. Journal of Pragmatics, 721 (Oct), 59–72. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  23. Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2007) Small stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sin.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.8 [Google Scholar]
  24. (2013) Small stories research and social media practices: Narrative stancetaking and circulation in a Greek news story. Sociolinguistica, 27(1), 19–36. 10.1515/soci.2013.27.1.19
    https://doi.org/10.1515/soci.2013.27.1.19 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2017a) Small stories research: A narrative paradigm for the analysis of social media. InA. Quan-Haase & L. Sloan (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social media research methods (pp.266–281). London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. (2017b) Life/narrative of the moment: From telling a story to taking a narrative stance. InB. Schiff, A. E. McKim & S. Patron (Eds.), Life and narrative: The risks and responsibilities of storying experience (pp.29–54). OUP: Oxford. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256654.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190256654.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gesteland, R. R.
    (2002) Cross-cultural business behavior. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Giaxoglou, K., Döveling, K., & Pitsillides, S.
    (2017) Networked emotions: Interdisciplinary perspectives on sharing loss online, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61:1, 1–10. 10.1080/08838151.2016.1273927
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1273927 [Google Scholar]
  29. Goffman, E.
    (1959) Presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Goldin-Meadow, S.
    (2003) Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge (Mass.): Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Goodwin, C.
    (1981) Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2000) Action and embodiment with situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00096‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X [Google Scholar]
  33. (2007) Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society, 18(1), 53–73. 10.1177/0957926507069457
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457 [Google Scholar]
  34. Green, M., Bobrowicz, A., & Siang Ang, C.
    (2015) The lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community online: Discussions of bullying and self-disclosure in YouTube videos. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34:7, 704–712. 10.1080/0144929X.2015.1012649
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2015.1012649 [Google Scholar]
  35. Griffith, M., & Papacharissi, Z.
    (2010) Looking for You: An analysis of video blogs. First Monday, 151, 1–4. (Retrieved fromhttps://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2769/2430).
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Izard, C. E.
    (1990) Facial expressions and the regulation of emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol.58 (3), 487–498. 10.1037/0022‑3514.58.3.487
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.3.487 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jandl, S.
    (2018) The intermediality of emotion representations of emotionality and fear in YouTube vlogs and beyond. InS. Jandl, I. Jandl, G. Tockner, S. Schönfellner & S. Knaller (Eds.), Writing emotions (pp.175–194). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Jenvdhanaken, B., & Rangponsumrit, N.
    (2020) Intercultural communication in the Spanish-language classroom in Thailand: Differences in power distance, individualism, and expressiveness.” Journal of Intercultural Communication, 541, 17–30.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Keltner, D.
    (1995) Signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68.31, 441–454. 10.1037/0022‑3514.68.3.441
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.441 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kendon, A.
    (1967) Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 261, 22–63. 10.1016/0001‑6918(67)90005‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(67)90005-4 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2017) Pragmatic functions of gestures: Some observations on the history of their study and their nature. Gesture, 16.21, 157–175. 10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.01ken [Google Scholar]
  43. Kiesling, S.
    (2018) YouTube Yinzers: Stancetaking and the performance of ‘Pittsburghese. Identity and Dialect Performance, 1st ed, 245–264. 10.4324/9781315279732‑15
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315279732-15 [Google Scholar]
  44. Kim, J., & Dindia, K.
    (2011) Online self-disclosure: A review of research. InK. B. Wright & L. M. Webb (Eds.), Computer-mediated Communication in Personal Relationships (pp.156–180). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Labov, W.
    (1972) The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. InW. Labov, Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular (pp.354–396). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Lange, P. G.
    (2014) Commenting on YouTube rants: Perceptions of inappropriateness or civic engagement?Journal of Pragmatics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language Studies, 731, 53–65. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  47. Marwick, A. E.
    (2013) Status update: Celebrity, publicity, and branding in the social media age. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Mickles, M. S., & Weare, A. M.
    (2020) Trying to save the game(r): Understanding the self-disclosure of YouTube subscribers surrounding mental health in video-game vlog comments. The Southern Communication Journal, 85.41, 231–243. 10.1080/1041794X.2020.1798494
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2020.1798494 [Google Scholar]
  49. Mingione, D.
    (2014) Hello Internet! An analysis of Youtubers greetings. Explorations in Linguistics: An Online Journal of Undergraduate Research, 19–34. Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia University.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Misoch, S.
    (2014) Card stories on YouTube: A new frame for online self- disclosure. Media and Communication, 2(1), 2–12. 10.17645/mac.v2i1.16
    https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v2i1.16 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2015) Stranger on the Internet: Online self-disclosure and the role of visual anonymity. Computers in Human Behavior, 481, 535–541. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.027
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.027 [Google Scholar]
  52. Mondada, L.
    (2014) The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 651, 137–156. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  53. (2018) Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51:1, 85–106. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2019) Conventions for multimodal transcriptions. (Retrieved fromhttps://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcription).
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Müller, C.
    (2013) Gesture as a window onto mind and brain. InE. Fricke, S. Ladewig, J. Bressem, C. Müller, D. McNeill & A. J. Cienki (Eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp.28–53). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ochs, E., & Schieffelin, B.
    (1989) Language has a heart. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 9 (1), 7–25. 10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1989.9.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  57. Page, R.
    (2018) Narratives online: Shared stories in social media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316492390
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316492390 [Google Scholar]
  58. Parini, A., & Fetzer, A.
    (2019) Evidentiality and stance in YouTube comments on smartphone reviews. Internet Pragmatics, 2:1, 112–135. 10.1075/ip.00025.par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00025.par [Google Scholar]
  59. Pearce, W. B., & Sharp, S. M.
    (1973) Self-disclosing communication. Journal of Communication, 23(4), 409–425. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1973.tb00958.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1973.tb00958.x [Google Scholar]
  60. Pelttari, S.
    (2020) ¡Hola, amores! Los saludos, las despedidas y las formas nominales de tratamiento de los Youtubers Españoles [Hello, my loves! The opening and closing greetings, and the nominal forms of address used by Spanish YouTubers].” Neuephilogische Mitteilungen, 121(1), 45–77. 10.51814/nm.99997
    https://doi.org/10.51814/nm.99997 [Google Scholar]
  61. (2023) YouTube: Audience emotional reactions and convergent alignment. Internet Pragmatics, 6:1, 42–66. 10.1075/ip.00085.pel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00085.pel [Google Scholar]
  62. Posey, C., Lowry, P., Roberts, T. & Selwyn, E. T.
    (2010) Proposing the online community self-disclosure model: The case of working professionals in France and the U.K. who use online communities. European Journal of Information Systems, 191, 181–195. 10.1057/ejis.2010.15
    https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.15 [Google Scholar]
  63. Rimé, B., Mesquita, B., Philippot, P., & Boca, S.
    (1991) Beyond the emotional event: Six studies on the social sharing of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 51, 435–465. 10.1080/02699939108411052
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939108411052 [Google Scholar]
  64. Sabich, M. A., & Steinberg, L.
    (2017) Discursividad YouTuber: Afecto, narrativas y estrategias de socialización en comunidades de internet. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 8(2), 171–188. 10.14198/MEDCOM2017.8.2.12
    https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2017.8.2.12 [Google Scholar]
  65. Scolari, C. A., & Fraticelli, D.
    (2019) The case of the top Spanish YouTubers: Emerging media subjects and discourse practices in the new media ecology. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 25.3, 496–515. 10.1177/1354856517721807
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517721807 [Google Scholar]
  66. Sokolova, K., & Perez, C.
    (2021) You follow fitness influencers on YouTube. But do you actually exercise? How parasocial relationships, and watching fitness influencers, relate to intentions to exercise. Journal of retailing and consumer services581: 102276. 10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102276
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102276 [Google Scholar]
  67. Tamir, D. I., & Mitchell, J. P.
    (2012) Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109 (21), 8038–8043. 10.1073/pnas.1202129109
    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202129109 [Google Scholar]
  68. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C.
    (1998) Riding the waves of culture, 2nd Edition. London: Nicholas Brealey.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Wagner, P., Malisz, Z., & Kopp, S.
    (2014) Gesture and speech in interaction: An overview. Speech Communication, 571, 209–232. 10.1016/j.specom.2013.09.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2013.09.008 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.22050.pel
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.22050.pel
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): affective narratives; multimodal analysis; self-disclosure; stance-taking; YouTube
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error