1887
Volume 3, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2214-3157
  • E-ISSN: 2214-3165
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Many languages of the world have genders, that is, grammatical agreement classes, based on such core semantic properties as animacy, sex and humanness, and also shape. In Manambu, a language of New Guinea, nouns are assigned genders according to the sex of a human referent, and to shape and size of any other referent. Men are assigned to the masculine, and women to the feminine gender. A long tube and a large house are masculine, and a round plate and a small house are feminine. Switching gender for humans has pejorative overtones: an unusually boisterous or bossy woman can be treated as masculine, and a squat fattish man who does not display fully masculine behaviour as feminine. Classifying humans by their shape and size implies downgrading them to the level of inanimates. Gender switch also reflects social stereotypes. Feminine gender is functionally unmarked for non-humans, but not for humans. The noun , “man” can be used as a generic term for “human being.” Linguistic Gender of humans in Manambu unequivocally reflects Social Gender relations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.3.1.04aik
2016-07-22
2018-12-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aikhenvald, A.Y
    (2000) Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. (2004) Gender. Article 98. In G.E. Booij , C. Lehmann , J. Mugdan , & S. Skopeteas (Eds.), Morfologie/Morphology. Ein Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung/A handbook on inflection and word formation, 2 Halbband (pp.1031–1045). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. (2008) The Manambu language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. (2012) Round women and long men: Shape and size in gender choice in Papua New Guinea and beyond. Anthropological Linguistics, 54(1), 33–86. doi: 10.1353/anl.2012.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1353/anl.2012.0005 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2013) The language of value and the value of language. Hau: A Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3(2), 55–73.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. (2014) Double talk: Parallel structures in Manambu songs. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia, 32(2), 86–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. (2015a) Classifiers: A bibliography. Oxford Bibliography Online. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (2015b) Body, mind and spirit: Body parts in Manambu and their meanings. Studies in Language, 39, 85–117. doi: 10.1075/sl.39.1.04aik
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.39.1.04aik [Google Scholar]
  9. (2016) How gender shapes the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Aikhenvald, A.Y. , & Green, D
    (1998) Palikur and the typology of classifiers. Anthropological Linguistics, 40, 429–480.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Alpher, B
    (1987) Feminine as the unmarked gender: Buffalo girls are no fools. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 7, 169–187. doi: 10.1080/07268608708599380
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07268608708599380 [Google Scholar]
  12. Alvanoudi, Angeliki
    2015Grammatical gender in interaction: Cultural and cognitive aspects. Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Baron, D
    (1986) Language and gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Beauvoir, S. de
    (1949) Le deuxième sexe. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Braun, F
    (1997) Making men out of people: The MAN principle in translating genderless forms. In H. Kotthof & R. Wodak (Eds.), Communicating gender in context (pp.3–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/pbns.42.03bra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.42.03bra [Google Scholar]
  16. Chafe, W
    (2004) Masculine and feminine in the Northern Iroquioan languages. In N.J. Enfield (Ed.), Ethnosyntax. Explorations in grammar and culture (pp.99–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199266500.003.0005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199266500.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
  17. Coates, J
    (1993) Women, men and language. London and New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Corbett, G
    (1991) Gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139166119
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166119 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2014) Gender typology. In G. Corbett (Ed.), The expression of gender (pp.87–130). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Dixon, R.M.W
    (1972) The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139084987
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084987 [Google Scholar]
  21. (1982) Where have all the adjectives gone? and other essays in semantics and syntax. Berlin: Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110822939
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110822939 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2004) The Jarawara language of Southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (2010) Basic linguistic theory, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. (2015) Edible gender, mother-in-law style, and other grammatical wonders: Studies in Dyirbal, Yidiñ, and Warrgamay. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702900.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198702900.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Eckert, P. , & McConnell-Ginet, S
    (2003) Language and gender. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791147
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791147 [Google Scholar]
  26. Georg, S
    (2007) A descriptive grammar of Ket. Folkestone: Global Oriental Ltd. doi: 10.1163/ej.9781901903584.i‑328
    https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9781901903584.i-328 [Google Scholar]
  27. Harrison, S.J
    (1990) Stealing people’s names: History and politics in a Sepik river cosmology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511521096
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521096 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hellinger, M. , & Pauwels, A
    (2007) Language and sexism. In M. Hellinger & A. Pauwels (Eds.), Handbook of language and communication: Diversity and change (pp.651–681). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110198539
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110198539 [Google Scholar]
  29. Joseph, B.D. , & Philippaki-Warburton, I
    (1987) Modern Greek. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kilian-Hatz, C
    (2008) A grammar of Modern Khwe (Central Khoisan). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. McConnell-Ginet, S
    (1979) Prototypes, pronouns and persons. In M. Mathiot (Ed.), Ethnology: Boas, Sapir and Whorf revisited (pp.63–83). The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mills, S
    (2008) Language and sexism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511755033
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755033 [Google Scholar]
  33. Payne, J.K
    (1989) Lecciones para el aprendizaje del idioma Ashéninca. Série Lingüística Peruana No. 28. Yarinacocha: Instituto Lingüístico del Verano.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rapold, C.J
    (2006) Towards a grammar of Benchnon. PhD thesis, University of Leiden.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Romani Miranda, M.M
    (2004) Toponimia en el Gran Pajonal con especial atención a los Topónimos de Afiliación Ashaninka. PhD dissertation. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Roscoe, P.B
    (2001) ‘Strength’ and ‘sexuality’: Sexual avoidance and masculinity in New Guinea and Amazonia. In T.A. Gregor & D. Tuzin (Eds.), Gender in Amazonia and Melanesia: An exploration of the comparative method (pp.279–308). Berkeley: University of California Press. doi: 10.1525/california/9780520228511.003.0012
    https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520228511.003.0012 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sasse, H.-J
    (1974) Notes on the structure of Galab. BSOAS, 37, 407–438. doi: 10.1017/S0041977X00136316
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0041977X00136316 [Google Scholar]
  38. Shepard, Jr., G
    (1997) Noun classification and ethnozoological classification in Machiguenga, an Arawakan language of the Peruvian Amazon. Journal of Amazonian Languages, 1, 29–57.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Speece, R
    . (n.d.). Angave grammar. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ijolc.3.1.04aik
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error