Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2214-3157
  • E-ISSN: 2214-3165
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The rich variety of emotion descriptions in terms of motion verbs found in standard Estonian was studied in respect of their general motivation and some specific motivating factors, such as conceptual structures and cognitive mechanisms. The possibilities of being a relatively late cultural loan and a direct influence of the humoral theory were both rejected, because of the discovered abundance of semi-schematic patterns and the lack of prominence of patterns related to the specific motion of body fluids. The universalistic account of bodily experience was considered to be the most powerful available explanation. The generalised embodied understanding of emotion in terms of motion was revealed by (a) the rich variety of conceptual metaphors and metonymies that were used (often simultaneously), and (b) how well they fit into the three-stage cognitive model of a typical emotion scenario. Gradual deliteralization of the verbs’ meanings is also a plausible mechanism at work because the semantic abstractness of a motion verb was found to be a function of the nature of the entities filling the slots in the semi-schematic patterns.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Bamberg, M.
    (1997) Emotion talk(s). The role of perspective in the construction of emotions. In S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (Eds.), The Language of emotions. Conceptualisation, expression and theoretical foundation (pp.209–225). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:  10.1075/z.85.15bam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.85.15bam [Google Scholar]
  2. Bloem, A.
    (2012) (E)motion in the XVIIth century. A closer look at the changing semantics of the French verbs émouvoir and mouvoir . In A. Foolen , U. M. Lüdtke , T. P. Racine & J. Zlatev (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others. Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (pp.407–422). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:  10.1075/ceb.6.16blo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.6.16blo [Google Scholar]
  3. Cameron, L.
    (2008) Metaphor and talk. In Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.197–211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511816802.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.013 [Google Scholar]
  4. EED
    EED= (2009)  Langemets, M. , Tiits, M. , Valdre, T. , Veskis, L. , Viks, Ü. , & Voll, P. (Eds.). Eesti keele seletav sõnaraamat [The explanatory dictionary of Estonian] (Vol.I–VI1). Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Evans, V. , & Green, M.
    (2006) Cognitive linguistics. An introduction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Geeraerts, D.
    (2009) Deliteralization and the birth of emotion. A presentation held at Workshop of the FOCUS Foundation. Serock, Poland. Slides retrieved fromwwwling.arts.kuleuven.be/qlvl/PDFPresentations/2009_Serock.pdf.
  7. Geeraerts, D. , & Grondelaers, S.
    (1995) Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns. In J. Taylor and R. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp.153–179). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. doi:  10.1515/9783110809305.153
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110809305.153 [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibbs, R. W. Jr.
    (2006) Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson, M.
    (1987) The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  10. Kövecses, Z.
    (2000) Metaphor and emotion. Language, culture and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2005) Metaphor in culture. Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2006) Embodiment, experiential focus, and diachronic change in metaphor. In R. W. McConchie et al. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on new approaches in English historical lexis (pp.1–7). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2008) Metaphor and emotion. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.380–395). Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511816802.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.023 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lakoff, G. , & Kövecses, Z.
    (1987) The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp.195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511607660.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607660.009 [Google Scholar]
  17. Langacker, R. W.
    (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar I. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Maalej, Z.
    (2004) Figurative language in anger expressions in Tunisian Arabic: An extended view of embodiment. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(1), 51–75. doi:  10.1207/S15327868MS1901_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1901_3 [Google Scholar]
  19. Metsmägi, I. , Sedrik, M. , & Soosaar, S.-E.
    (2012) Eesti etümoloogiasõnaraamat [The etymological dictionary of Estonian]. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ross, K.
    (2011) Historical aspects of Estonian Bible translation and the formation of biblical terminology from the Middle Ages up to the 18th century. Magyar Terminológia, 11, 19–27. doi:  10.1556/MaTerm.4.2011.1.4
    https://doi.org/10.1556/MaTerm.4.2011.1.4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Talmy, L.
    (1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 121, 49–100. doi:  10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2 [Google Scholar]
  22. Vainik, E.
    (2002) Emotions, emotion terms and emotion concepts in an Estonian folk model. TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences, 6(4), 322–341.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. (2011) The dynamic body parts in the Estonian figurative descriptions of emotions. In Z. Maalej & N. Yu (Eds.), Embodiment via body parts: Studies from various languages and cultures (pp.41–70). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:  10.1075/hcp.31.06vai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.31.06vai [Google Scholar]
  24. Yu, N.
    (1995) Metaphorical expressions of anger and happiness in English and Chinese. Metaphor and symbolic activity, 10(2), 59–92. doi:  10.1207/s15327868ms1002_1
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1002_1 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2008) Metaphor from body and culture. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.247–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511816802.016
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.016 [Google Scholar]
  26. Zlatev, J. , Blomberg, M. , & Magnusson, U.
    (2012) Metaphor and subjective experience: A study of motion-emotion metaphors in English, Swedish, Bulgarian, and Thai. In A. Foolen et al. (Eds.), Moving ourselves, moving others. Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (pp.423–450). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:  10.1075/ceb.6.17zla
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.6.17zla [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conceptual metaphors; embodiment; emotion; Estonian; metonymy; motion verbs; motivation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error