1887
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2666-4224
  • E-ISSN: 2666-4232

Abstract

Abstract

Interactional linguists are interested in ways in which communicative resources emerge from interactional practice. This paper defines a place for the study of gesture within interactional linguistics, conceived as ‘linguistics of time’ (Hopper, 2015). It shows how hand gestures of a certain kind – conceptual gestures – emerge from ‘hands-on’ instrumental actions, are repeated and habitualized, and are taken to other communicative contexts where they enable displaced reference and conceptual representation of experiences.

The data for this study is a video-recording of one work-day of an auto-shop owner (Streeck, 2017). The corpus includes auto-repair sequences in which he spontaneously improvises new gestures in response to situated communication needs, and subsequent narrative sequences during which he re-enacts them as he explains his prior actions. He also makes numerous ‘pre-fabricated’ gestures, gestures that circulate in the society at large and that are acquired by copying other conversationalists. They are ready-made manual concepts. The paper explains the life-cycle of conceptual gestures from spontaneous invention to social sedimentation and thereby sheds light on the ongoing emergence of symbolic forms in corporeal practice and intercorporeal communication.

This work was made publicly available by the publisher.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/il.20013.str
2021-05-06
2021-09-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/il.20013.str.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/il.20013.str&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andrén, M.
    (2017) Children’s expressive handling of objects in a shared world. InC. Meyer, J. Streeck & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction (pp.105–142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bakhtin, M. M.
    (1986 [1952–3]) The problem of speech genres. InC. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barsalou, L. W., Kyle Simmons, W., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D.
    (2003) Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(2), 84–91. 10.1016/S1364‑6613(02)00029‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00029-3 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bavelas, J., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A.
    (1992) Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15, 469–489. 10.1080/01638539209544823
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539209544823 [Google Scholar]
  5. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T.
    (1967) The social construction of reality. Garden City: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Birdwhistell, R.
    (1970) Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bressem, J., & Mueller, C.
    (2014) A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. InC. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body language communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. Volume2, pp.1575–1591). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110302028.1575
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110302028.1575 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brookes, H. J.
    (2004) A repertoire of South African quotable gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 186–224. 10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.186
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.186 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bybee, J. L.
    (1998) Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. InM. Tomasello (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language (Vol.2, pp.145–168). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Calbris, G.
    (1990) The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (2003) From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis: Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture, 3(1), 19–46. 10.1075/gest.3.1.03cal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.3.1.03cal [Google Scholar]
  12. (2011) Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins B.V.. 10.1075/gs.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.5 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cienki, A., & Müller, C.
    (Eds.) (2008) Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cuffari, E., & Streeck, J.
    (2017) Taking the world by hand: How (some) hand gestures mean. InC. Meyer, J. Streeck & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction (pp.173–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. De Jorio, A.
    (2000 [1832]) Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity (A. Kendon, Trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Donald, M.
    (1991) Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Dreyfus, H. L.
    (1991) Being-in-the-world. A commentary on Heidegger’s “Being and time”. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Efron, D.
    (1972 [1941]) Gesture, race and culture. The Hague: Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V.
    (1969) The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98. 10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49 [Google Scholar]
  20. Galantucci, B.
    (2005) An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 29, 737–767. 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_34
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_34 [Google Scholar]
  21. Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G.
    (2005) The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 455–479. 10.1080/02643290442000310
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310 [Google Scholar]
  22. Givon, T., & Malle, B. F.
    (2002) The evolution of language out of pre-Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.53
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.53 [Google Scholar]
  23. Goodman, N.
    (1976 (1968)) Languages of art (2 ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Goodwin, C.
    (2007) Environmentally coupled gestures. InS. D. Duncan, J. Cassell & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language: Essays in honor of David McNeill (pp.195–212). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.1.18goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.1.18goo [Google Scholar]
  25. (2018) Co-operative action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Haiman, J.
    (1994) Ritualization and the development of language. InW. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization (pp.3–28). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.109.07hai
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.109.07hai [Google Scholar]
  27. Haviland, J. B.
    (2013) The emerging grammar of nouns in a first generation sign language: Specification, iconicity, and syntax. Gesture, 13(3), 309–353. 10.1075/gest.13.3.04hav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.04hav [Google Scholar]
  28. Heine, B., & Kuteva, T.
    (2011) Grammaticalization theory as a tool for reconstructing language evolution. InK. R. Gibson & M. Tallermann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hopper, P. J.
    (1994) Phonogenesis. InW. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization (pp.29–45). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.109.09hop
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.109.09hop [Google Scholar]
  30. (2011) Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. InP. Auer & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions. Emerging and emergent (pp.22–44). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110229080.22
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110229080.22 [Google Scholar]
  31. (2015) Hermann Paul’s emergent grammar. InP. Auer & R. W. Murray (Eds.), Hermann Paul’s Principles of language history revisited (pp.237–256). Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110348842‑012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110348842-012 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C.
    (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hutchins, E., & Johnson, C. M.
    (2009) Modeling the emergence of language as an embodied collective cognitive activity. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 523–546. 10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2009.01033.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01033.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Ingold, T.
    (2011) Being alive. Essays on movement, knowledge, and description. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203818336
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818336 [Google Scholar]
  35. Keller, R.
    (1994) On language change: the invisible hand in language. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kendon, A.
    (1988) How gestures can become like words. InF. Poyatos (Ed.), Crosscultural perspectives on nonverbal communication (pp.131–141). Toronto: C. J. Hogrefe.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (1995) Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(3), 247–279. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00037‑F
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-F [Google Scholar]
  38. (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2009) Manual actions, speech and the nature of languageInD. Gambarara & A. Givigliano (Eds.), Origine e sviluppo del linguaggio, fra teoria e storia. Società di Filosofia del Linguaggio, atti del XV congresso nazionale. Arcavata di Rende (CS), 15-17settembre 2008 (pp.19–33). Rome: Aracne editrice s.r.l.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lakoff, G.
    (1982) Categories: An essay in cognitive linguistics. InT. L. S. O. Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp.139–193). Seoul: Hanshin.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
    (1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Laland, K. N.
    (2017) Darwin’s unfinished symphony: How culture made the human mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400884872
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884872 [Google Scholar]
  43. Langacker, R. W.
    (1998) Conceptualization, symbolization, and grammar. InM. Tomasello (Ed.), The New psychology of language (Vol.1, pp.1–40). Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. LeBaron, C. D.
    (1998) Building communication: Architectural gestures and the embodiment of new ideas. Ph.D. Dissertation: The University of Texas at Austin.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. LeBaron, C. D., & Streeck, J.
    (2000) Gestures, knowledge, and the world. InD. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp.118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620850.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620850.008 [Google Scholar]
  46. Leroi-Gourhan, A.
    (1993) Gesture and speech. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Luria, A.
    (1973) The working brain. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Mauss, M.
    (1973 (1935)) The techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2(1), 70–88. 10.1080/03085147300000003
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147300000003 [Google Scholar]
  49. McNeill, D.
    (1992) Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Merleau-Ponty, M.
    (1962) Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Müller, C.
    (2003) Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. InC. Müller & R. Posner (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures. The Berlin Conference (pp.234–256). Berlin: Weidler.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. (2017) How recurrent gestures mean: Conventionalized contexts-of-use and embodied motivation. Gesture, 16(2), 276–303. 10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.05mul [Google Scholar]
  53. Nuñez, R.
    (2008) A fresh look at the foundations of mathematics: Gesture and the psychological reality of conceptual metaphor. InA. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp.55–93). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.3.07nun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.3.07nun [Google Scholar]
  54. Olson, D.
    (1994) The world on paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Padden, C., Hwang, S.-O., Lepic, R., & Seegers, S.
    (2014) Tools for language: Patterned iconicity in sign languages nouns and verbs. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7, 81–94. 10.1111/tops.12121
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12121 [Google Scholar]
  56. Peirce, C. S.
    (1995 [1940]) Philosophical writings. New York: Dover.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Perniss, P., & Vigliocco, G.
    (2014) The bridge of iconicity: from a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Reddy, M.
    (1979) The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language. InA. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp.284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Ryle, G.
    (1949) The concept of mind. London.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Schütz, A.
    (1945) On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5(4), 533–576. 10.2307/2102818
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2102818 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sheets-Johnstone, M.
    (2010) Thinking in movement: Further analyses and validations. InJ. Stewart, O. Gapenne & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction. Toward a new paradigm for Cognitive Science (pp.165–181). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. 10.7551/mitpress/9780262014601.003.0007
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014601.003.0007 [Google Scholar]
  62. (2012) Kinesthetic memory. Further critical reflections and constructive analysesInT. F. Sabine, C. Koch, M. Summa and C. Müller (Eds.), Body memory, metaphor and movement (pp.43–72). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/aicr.84.05she
    https://doi.org/10.1075/aicr.84.05she [Google Scholar]
  63. Slobin, D. I.
    (1996) From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. InJ. J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp.97–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Sowa, T.
    (2006) Understanding coverbal iconic gestures in shape descriptions. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Streeck, J.
    (1993) Gesture as communication I: Its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs, 60(December 1993), 275–299. 10.1080/03637759309376314
    https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376314 [Google Scholar]
  66. (2002) Grammars, words, and embodied meanings. On the evolution and uses of so and like. Journal of Communication, 52(3), 581–596. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2002.tb02563.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02563.x [Google Scholar]
  67. (2007) Geste und verstreichende Zeit. Innehalten und Bedeutungswandel der “bietenden Hand”. InH. Hausendorf (Ed.), Gespraech als Prozess (pp.157–180). Tuebingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. (2008) Depicting by gestures. Gesture, 8(3), 285–301. 10.1075/gest.8.3.02str
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.02str [Google Scholar]
  69. (2009) Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  70. (2013) Interaction and the living body. Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 69–90. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.010 [Google Scholar]
  71. (2017) Self-making man. A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139149341
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139149341 [Google Scholar]
  72. Tomasello, M.
    (2008) Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  73. Tomlinson, G.
    (2015) A million years of music. The emergence of human modernity. New York: Zone Books. 10.2307/j.ctt17kk95h
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt17kk95h [Google Scholar]
  74. Wehling, E.
    (2017) Discourse management gestures. Gesture, 16(2), 245–275. 10.1075/gest.16.2.04weh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.16.2.04weh [Google Scholar]
  75. Wittgenstein, L.
    (1953) Philosophical investigations. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/il.20013.str
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/il.20013.str
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conceptualization; evolution; gesture; grammaticalization; interaction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error