Displaying a negative stance by questioning meaning

References

1. Bilmes, J.
   (2011) Occasioned semantics: A systematic approach to meaning in talk. Human Studies, 34(2), 129–154. 10.1007/s10746‑011‑9183‑z
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9183-z [Google Scholar]
2. Calabria, V., & De Stefani, E.
   (2020) Per una grammatica situata: aspetti temporali e multimodali dell’incrementazione sintattica. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, 49(3), 571–601.
   [Google Scholar]
3. De Jorio, A.
   (1832) La mimica degli antichi investigata nel gestire napoletano. Napoli: Fibreno.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Deppermann, A.
   (2023) An exercise in Interactional Semantics: Definitions and specifications provided in response to was heißt x? (‘what does X mean?’). Interactional Linguistics3 (1/2), 13–39.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Deppermann, A., & De Stefani, E.
   (2019) Defining in talk-in-interaction: Recipient-design through negative definitional components. Journal of Pragmatics, 1401, 140–155. 10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.004 [Google Scholar]
6. Deppermann, A., & Spranz-Fogasy, T.
   Eds. be-deuten: Wie Bedeutung im Gespräch entsteht. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
   [Google Scholar]
7. De Stefani, E.
   (2020) ‘Nel senso (che)’ in Italian conversation: Turn-taking, turn-maintaining and turn-yielding. InY. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindström, & L. Keevallik (Eds.), Emergent syntax for conversation. Clausal patterns and the organization of action (pp.25–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.32.02ste
   https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.32.02ste [Google Scholar]
8. De Stefani, E.
   (2022) On Gestalts and their analytical corollaries: A commentary to the Special Issue. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 5(1). 10.7146/si.v5i2.130875
   https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v5i2.130875 [Google Scholar]
9. De Stefani, E., & Gazin, A.-D.
   (2014) Instructional sequences in driving lessons: Mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 651, 63–79. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.020
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.020 [Google Scholar]
10. De Stefani, E., & Horlacher, A.-S.
    (2008) Topical and sequential backlinking in a French radio phone-in program: Turn shapes and sequential placements. Pragmatics, 18(3), 381–406.
    [Google Scholar]
11. De Stefani, E., & Horlacher, A.-S.
    (2018) Mundane talk at work: Multiactivity in interactions between professionals and their clientele. Discourse Studies, 20(2), 221–245. 10.1177/1461445617734935
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734935 [Google Scholar]
12. Dingemanse, M., Blythe, J., & Dirksmeyer, T.
    (2014) Formats for other-initiation of repair across languages. An exercise in pragmatic typology. Studies in Language, 38(1), 5–43. 10.1075/sl.38.1.01din
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.38.1.01din [Google Scholar]
13. Drew, P.
    (1997) ‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 281, 69–101. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)89759‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7 [Google Scholar]
14. Dubois, J. W.
    (2007) The stance triangle. InR. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse (pp.139–182). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.164.07du
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du [Google Scholar]
15. Glenn, Ph.
    (2019) Conflict interaction. Insights from conversation analysis. InM. Evans, L. Jeffries, & J. O’Driscoll (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language in conflict (pp.215–245). London, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429058011‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429058011-13 [Google Scholar]
16. Günthner, S.
    (2015) Grammatische Konstruktionen im Kontext sequenzieller Praktiken – was heißt x-Konstruktionen im gesprochenen Deutsch. InJ. Bücker, S. Günthner, & W. Imo (Eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik V: Konstruktionen im Spannungsfeld von sequenziellen Mustern, kommunikativen Gattungen und Textsorten (pp.187–218). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Helmer, H.
    (2020) How do speakers define the meaning of expressions? The case of German x heißt y (‘x means y’). Discourse Processes, 57(3), 278–299. 10.1080/0163853X.2019.1646567
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2019.1646567 [Google Scholar]
18. Heritage, J.
    (2012) The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
19. Jefferson, G.
    (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InG. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis. Studies from the first generation (pp.13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.02jef [Google Scholar]
20. Kendon, A.
    (1995) Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 231, 247–279. 10.1016/0378‑2166(94)00037‑F
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00037-F [Google Scholar]
21. Kendon, A.
    (2004) Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
22. Lakoff, G.
    (1973) Hedges: A study in meaning criteria and the logic of fuzzy concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 21, 458–508. 10.1007/BF00262952
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262952 [Google Scholar]
23. Mehan, H.
    (1979) ‘What time is it, Denise?’: asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 28(4), 285–294. 10.1080/00405847909542846
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846 [Google Scholar]
24. Mondada, L.
    (2014) The local constitution of multiple resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 651, 137–156. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 [Google Scholar]
25. Mondada, L.
    (2018) Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
26. Nencioni, G.
    (1987) Costanza dell’antico nel parlato moderno. InAccademia della Crusca (Ed.), Gli italiani parlati. Sondaggi sopra la lingua di oggi (pp.7–25). Firenze: Accademia della Crusca.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Patota, G.
    (2006) Grammatica di riferimento dell’italiano contemporaneo. Novara: Garzanti Linguistica.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Poggi, I.
    (1983) La mano a borsa: analisi semantica di un gesto emblematico olofrastico. InG. Attili, & P. E. Ricci-Bitti (Eds.), Comunicare senza parole: la comunicazione non-verbale nel bambino e nell’interazione sociale tra adulti (pp.219–238), Roma: Bulzoni.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Raymond, G., & Sidnell, J.
    (2019) Interaction at the boundaries of a world known in common: Initiating repair with ‘What do you mean?’. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(2), 177–192. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1608100
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1608100 [Google Scholar]
30. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
31. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
32. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H.
    (1977) The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), 361–382. 10.1353/lan.1977.0041
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041 [Google Scholar]
33. Sinclair, J. McH., & Coulthard, R. M.
    (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse. The English used by teachers and pupils. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]