1887
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2666-4224
  • E-ISSN: 2666-4232
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper shows how horse-riding instructors vocally depict, and thereby co-design and mobilize the unfolding progression of horses’ and riders’ actions through gradually escalating prosody. Escalating prosody involves the stepwise raising of a speaker’s overall pitch across a series of turn components, often accompanied by increases in overall loudness and occasionally by changes in voice quality. Escalating prosody can accompany instructed activities from beginning to end or only during certain phases of the activity. The prosodic delivery mirrors the building and subsequent sustaining of physical effort expected of the horse-rider pair. It can occur with lexical instructions to perform series of actions or with repeated directives to sustain the current activity. It can also occur with repeated praise as a successful performance unfolds, and with repeated corrections, which temporally frame moments of trouble. Prosody is shown to be a resource for co-designing the actions of others, specifically, their mobility, physical effort, and sequential progression. The data are horse-riding lessons recorded in the UK and in Germany.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/il.23009.szc
2024-04-23
2024-12-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ashmore, M., & Reed, D.
    (2000) Innocence and nostalgia in conversation analysis: The dynamic relations of tape and transcript. Forum: Qualitative Research, 1(3). www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1020 (last accessed06/03/2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Banse, R., & Scherer, K. R.
    (1996) Acoustic profiles in vocal emotion expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 614–636. 10.1037/0022‑3514.70.3.614
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.614 [Google Scholar]
  3. Berg, M., Fuchs, M., Wirkner, K., Loeffler, M. W., Engel, C., & Berger, T.
    (2017) The speaking voice in the general population: normative data and associations to sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. Journal of Voice, 31(2), 257.e13-e24. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.001 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
    (2022) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.2.07, retrieved fromhttps://www.praat.org (last accessed06/03/2024).
  5. Brandenberger, C., & Hottiger, C.
    (2018) Sharing perception when using hands-on exhibits in science centres: the case of vocal depiction. Travaux neuchâtelois De Linguistique, 681, 59–68. 10.26034/tranel.2018.2868
    https://doi.org/10.26034/tranel.2018.2868 [Google Scholar]
  6. Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (1986) An introduction to English prosody. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M.
    (2018) Interactional Linguistics: studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. De Stefani, E., & Gazin, A.-D.
    (2014) Instructional sequences in driving lessons: mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 651, 63–79. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.020 [Google Scholar]
  9. Deppermann, A.
    (2018a) Instruction practices in German driving lessons: differential uses of declaratives and imperatives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 265–282. 10.1111/ijal.12198
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12198 [Google Scholar]
  10. (2018b) Changes in turn-design over interactional histories: the case of instructions in driving school lessons. InA. Deppermann & J. Streeck (Eds.), Time in embodied interaction: synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources (pp.293–324). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.293.09dep
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.293.09dep [Google Scholar]
  11. (2012) Deontische Infinitivkonstruktionen: Syntax, Semantik, Pragmatik und interaktionale Verwendung. InS. Günthner & W. Imo (Eds.), Konstruktionen in der Interaktion (pp.239–262). Berlin: De Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ehmer, O.
    (2021) Synchronization in demonstrations. Multimodal practices for instructing body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(s4). 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0038
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0038 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2023) Recycling turns in multimodal dance instructions. Paper presented at the18th International Pragmatics Conference, Brussels, 9–14.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ehmer, O., & Brône, G.
    (2021) Instructing embodied knowledge: multimodal approaches to interactive practices for knowledge constitution. Special Issue. Linguistics Vanguard7(s4). 10.1515/lingvan‑2021‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0012 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hofstetter, E., & Keevallik, L.
    (2023) Prosody is used for real-time exercising of other bodies. Language and Communication881, 52–72. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R.
    (2008) Conversation Analysis. 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Keevallik, L.
    (2014) Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of Pragmatics, 651, 103–120. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2020) Linguistic structures emerging in the synchronization of a Pilates class. InC. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, & P. Golato (Eds.), Mobilizing others. Grammar and lexis within larger activities (pp.147–173). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.33.06kee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.33.06kee [Google Scholar]
  19. (2021) Vocalizations in dance classes teach body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(s4), 20200098. 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0098
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0098 [Google Scholar]
  20. Keevallik, L., Hofstetter, E., Weatherall, A., & Wiggins, S.
    (2023) Sounding others’ sensations in interaction. Discourse Processes, 60(1), 73–91. 10.1080/0163853X.2023.2165027
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2023.2165027 [Google Scholar]
  21. Keevallik, L., & Ogden, R.
    (2020) Sounds on the margins of language at the heart of interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 53(1), 1–18. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961 [Google Scholar]
  22. Kern, F.
    (2010) Speaking dramatically. The prosody of live radio commentary of football matches. InD. Barth-Weingarten, E. Reber, & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in Conversation (pp.217–237). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.23.18ker
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.18ker [Google Scholar]
  23. Lundesjö Kvart, S.
    (2020) Instructions in horseback riding – the collaborative achievement of an instructional space. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 251, 100253. 10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.10.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.10.002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lundesjö Kvart, S., & Melander Bowden, H.
    (2022) Instructing equestrian feel: on the art of teaching embodied knowledge. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(2), 290–305. 10.1080/00313831.2020.1869076
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1869076 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lundgren, C.
    (2017) Ridtränares kommunikation under privatlektioner i dressyr: en samtalsanalytisk studie [The communication of trainers in equestrian dressage: a multimodal interaction analysis]. Scandinavian Sport Studies Forum, 81, 67–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. McIlvenny, P., Broth, M., & Haddington, P.
    (2014) Moving together: mobile formations in interaction. Editorial to the Special Issue. Space and Culture, 17(2), 104–106. 10.1177/1206331213508679
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508679 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mondada, L.
    (2019) Conventions for multimodal transcriptions. Version 5.0.1. https://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcriptionLast accessed06/03/2024.
  28. (2018a) Driving instruction at high speed on a race circuit: issues in action formation and sequence organization. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 281, 304–325. 10.1111/ijal.12202
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12202 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2018b) Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2017) Precision timing and timed embeddedness of imperatives in embodied courses of action. InL. Raevaara, M.-L. Sorjonen, & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Imperative turns at talk: the design of directives in action (pp.65–101). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.30.03mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.03mon [Google Scholar]
  31. Müller, T.
    (2007) Football, language and linguistics. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Murray, I. R., & Arnott, J. L.
    (1993) Toward the simulation of emotion in synthetic speech: a review of the literature on human vocal emotion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(2), 1097–1108. 10.1121/1.405558
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.405558 [Google Scholar]
  33. Norris, S.
    (2012) Teaching touch/response-feel. A first step to an analysis of touch from an (inter)active perspective. InS. Norris (Ed.), Multimodality in practice: investigating theory-in-practice-through-methodology (pp.7–19). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203801246‑8
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203801246-8 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ogden, R.
    (2020) Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), 66–89. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712960
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712960 [Google Scholar]
  35. (2012) Making sense of outliers. Phonetica, (69)1–21, 48–67. 10.1159/000343197
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000343197 [Google Scholar]
  36. Okada, M.
    (2023) Lexical repetitions during time critical moments in boxing. Language & Communication, 901, 95–113. 10.1016/j.langcom.2023.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2023.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2018) Imperative actions in boxing sparring sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 67–84. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798 [Google Scholar]
  38. Reed, D. J.
    (forthcoming). Ethnomethodology of dance: the achievement of rhythm in the Waltz and Vals. InP. Tolmie, A. Crabtree, D. Randall, & M. Rouncefield Eds. Ethnomethodological studies of music. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Schegloff, E. A.
    (2007) Sequence organization in interaction: a primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  40. Schmidt, T.
    (2014) The Research and Teaching Corpus of Spoke German – FOLK. InProceedings of the Ninth Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 383–387.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Selting, M.
    (2007) Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics391, 483–526. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  42. Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., Bergmann, J., Bergmann, P., Birkner, K., Couper-Kuhlen, E., Deppermann, A., Gilles, P., Günthner, S., Hartung, M., Kern, F., Mertzlufft, C., Meyer, C., Morek, M., Oberzaucher, F., Peters, J., Quasthoff, U., Schütte, W., Stukenbrock, A., & Uhmann, S.
    (2009) Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2), Gesprächsforschung, 101, 353–402. Translated and adapted for English byCouper-Kuhlen, E., & Barth-Weingarten, D. (2011) Gesprächsforschung, 121, 1–51.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Simone, M., & Galatolo, R.
    (2020) Climbing as a pair: instructions and instructed body movements in indoor climbing with visually impaired athletes. Journal of Pragmatics, 1551, 286–302. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.008 [Google Scholar]
  44. (2021) Timing and prosody of lexical repetition: how repeated instructions assist visually impaired athletes’ navigation in sport climbing. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(4), 397–419. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1974742
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1974742 [Google Scholar]
  45. Stivers, T.
    (2004) “No no no” and other types of multiple sayings in social interaction. Human Communication Research, 30(2), 260–293. 10.1111/j.1468‑2958.2004.tb00733.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00733.x [Google Scholar]
  46. Szczepek Reed, B.
    (in press). “You don’t need me shouting here”: When instructors observe learners in silence. Research on Language and Social Interaction.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. (2023a) Designing talk for humans and horses: prosody as a resource for parallel recipient design. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 56(2), 89–115. 10.1080/08351813.2023.2170638
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2023.2170638 [Google Scholar]
  48. (2023b) ‘Go on keep going’: the instruction of sustained embodied activities. Discourse Studies, 25(5), 692–717. 10.1177/14614456231153578
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231153578 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2021) Singing and the body: body-focused and concept-focused vocal instruction. Linguistics Vanguard, 7(s4), 20200071. 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0071
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0071 [Google Scholar]
  50. (2010) Analysing conversation. An introduction to prosody. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Szczepek Reed, B., Reed, D. J., & Haddon, E.
    (2013) NOW or NOT NOW: coordinating restarts in the pursuit of learnables in musical masterclasses. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 46(1), 22–46. 10.1080/08351813.2013.753714
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753714 [Google Scholar]
  52. Ten Have, P.
    (1997) In the presence of data: Conversation Analysis as ‘empirical philosophy’. Paper presented atEthnomethodology, an Improbable Sociology?, Cerisy-la-Salles, France, June 1997. www.paultenhave.nl/presence.htm (last accessed06/03/2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Trouvain, J.
    (2015) Notes on the development of speaking styles over decades: the case of live football commentaries. First International Workshop on the History of Speech Communication Research (HSCR 2015) Dresden, GermanySeptember 4–5, 2015. ISCA Archivehttps://www.isca-archive.org/hscr_2015/trouvain15_hscr.pdf (last accessed06/03/2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Trouvain, J., & Barry, W. J.
    (2000) The prosody of excitement in horse race commentaries. ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Speech Emotion, September 5–7, 2000. Newcastle, Northern Ireland, UK. 86–91. ISCA Archivehttps://www.isca-archive.org/speechemotion_2000/trouvain00_speechemotion.pdf (last accessed06/03/2024).
    [Google Scholar]
  55. van Beezooyen, R.
    (1984) Characteristics and recognizability of vocal expressions of emotion. (Netherlands Phonetics Archives 5). Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Vine, B.
    (2004) Getting things done at work: the discourse of power in workplace interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.124
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.124 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/il.23009.szc
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/il.23009.szc
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): horse-riding; instruction; intonation; pitch
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error