1887
image of A multimodal approach to grammatical aspect

Abstract

Abstract

This paper offers a multimodal approach to grammatical aspect, traditionally seen in linguistics as a verbal-morphological category. Using conversation analysis and interactional linguistics, we take as our object of study turn completions done with bodily movements and non-lexical vocalizations, focusing on the aspectual information they construct, and how this information is oriented to as relevant to the trajectory of action underway. We argue that the aspectual information constructed through the practice of completing a turn with bodily movements and non-lexical vocalizations is part of demonstrating the speaker’s experiential knowledge relevant to the epistemic claims being made, in the service of securing some form of affiliative uptake from the recipient regarding those claims. Pursuits designed in this way provide the recipient access to the speaker’s “way of viewing the internal temporal constituency of [the] situation” (Comrie 1976: 3). Furthermore, we show that the aspectual information conveyed (i) by bodily movements, and (ii) co-occurring non-lexical vocalizations, are somewhat distinct from each other. Our study is the first that we are aware of to examine the category of grammatical aspect in turn completions and in this embodied and social-interactional way. Data are in American English.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/il.23010.ney
2024-12-06
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/il.23010.ney/il.23010.ney.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/il.23010.ney&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andersen, R. W.
    (1990) Verbal virtuosity and speakers’ purposes. InH. Burmeister & P. L. Rounds (Eds.), Variability in Second Language Acquisition: Proceedings of the tenth meeting of the second language research forum, Vol. 2 (pp.–). University of Oregon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Axelrod, M.
    (1993) The semantics of time: Aspectual categorization in Koyukon Athabaskan. University of Nebraska Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
    (2023) Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.3.20. www.praat.org/
  4. Bolden, G. B., & Mandelbaum, J.
    (2017) The use of conversational co-remembering to corroborate contentious claims. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/1461445616683593
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445616683593 [Google Scholar]
  5. Clark, H. H.
    (2016) Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review(), –. 10.1037/rev0000026
    https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000026 [Google Scholar]
  6. (2019) Depicting in communication. InP. Hagoort (Ed.), Human Language: From Genes and Brains to Behaviour (pp.–). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/10841.003.0021
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10841.003.0021 [Google Scholar]
  7. Clayman, S. E., & Raymond, C. W.
    (2021) ‘You know’ as invoking alignment: A generic resource for emerging problems of understanding and affiliation. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.011 [Google Scholar]
  8. Clift, R.
    (2016) Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Comrie, B.
    (1976) Aspect. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Couper-Kuhlen, E., Fox, B. A., Raymond, C. W., Sorjonen, M.-L., & Thompson, S. A.
    (2024) Analyzing grammar in social interaction. InJ. D. Robinson, R. Clift, K. H. Kendrick, & C. W. Raymond (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Methods in Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M.
    (2018) Interactional Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Croft, W.
    (2022) Morphosyntax: Constructions of the World’s Languages. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316145289
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316145289 [Google Scholar]
  13. Curl, T. S.
    (2006) Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.09.004 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dahl, Ö., & Velupillai, V.
    (2013) Perfective/Imperfective Aspect. InM. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), WALS Online (v2020.3). 10.5281/zenodo.7385533
    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7385533 [Google Scholar]
  15. Drew, P.
    (1997) “Open” class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of trouble in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(97)89759‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7 [Google Scholar]
  16. (1998) Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language & Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595 [Google Scholar]
  17. Drew, P., Walker, T., & Ogden, R.
    (2013) Self-repair and action construction. InM. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Duncan, S. D.
    (2002) Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture, (), –. 10.1075/gest.2.2.04dun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.2.2.04dun [Google Scholar]
  19. Ehmer, O., & Brône, G.
    (2021) Instructing embodied knowledge: Multimodal approaches to interactive practices for knowledge constitution. Linguistics Vanguard, (). 10.1515/lingvan‑2021‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0012 [Google Scholar]
  20. Emerson, K., Williamson, V., & Wilkinson, R.
    (2017) Seeing the music in their hands: How conductors’ depictions shape the music. InE. Van Dyck (Ed.), ESCOM 2017 Proceedings. Presented at the 25th Anniversary Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM) (pp.–). Ghent University.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Evans, B., & Lindwall, O.
    (2020) Show Them or Involve Them? Two Organizations of Embodied Instruction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1741290
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1741290 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ford, C. E., & Fox, B. A.
    (2010) Multiple practices for constructing laughables. InD. Barth-Weingarten, M. Selting, & E. Reber (Eds.), Prosody in Interaction (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.23.27for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.23.27for [Google Scholar]
  23. Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A.
    (2002) Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. InC. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0002
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0002 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fortescue, M.
    (1992) Aspect and superaspect in Koyukon: An application of the Functional Grammar model to a polysynthetic language. InMichael Fortescue, Peter Harder & Lars Kristoffersen (Eds.), Layered Structure and Reference in a Functional Perspective (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.23.07for
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.23.07for [Google Scholar]
  25. Fox, B., Hayashi, M., & Jasperson, R.
    (1996) Resources and Repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. InE. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.004 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fox, B. A., & Heinemann, T.
    (2015) The alignment of manual and verbal displays in requests for the repair of an object. Research on Language and Social Interaction(): –. 10.1080/08351813.2015.1058608
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1058608 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2017) “Issues in action formation: Requests and the problem with x.” Open Linguistics: –. 10.1515/opli‑2017‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2017-0003 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gardner, R.
    (2001) When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. John Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.92
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.92 [Google Scholar]
  29. Glenn, P.
    (2003) Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511519888
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519888 [Google Scholar]
  30. Goffman, E.
    (1978) Response cries. Language, , –. 10.2307/413235
    https://doi.org/10.2307/413235 [Google Scholar]
  31. Goodwin, C.
    (1979) The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp.–). Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. (2018) Co-Operative Action. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H., & Olsher, D.
    (2002) Producing Sense with Nonsense Syllables: Turn and Sequence in Conversations with a Man with Severe Aphasia. InC. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0004
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195124897.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  34. Haakana, M.
    (2001) Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction. Text, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hayashi, M.
    (2003) Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: A study of word searches in Japanese conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_2 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2005) Referential problems and turn construction: An exploration of an intersection between grammar and interaction. Text, (), –. 10.1515/text.2005.25.4.437
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.4.437 [Google Scholar]
  37. Heritage, J.
    (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. InJ. M. Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2011) Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction. InT. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.008
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.008 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2012) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2015) Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.08.008 [Google Scholar]
  41. Heritage, J., & Raymond, C. W.
    (2021) Preference and Polarity: Epistemic Stance in Question Design. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1864155
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1864155 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hinton, L., Nichols, J. & Ohala, J.
    (1995) Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. InL. Hinton, J. Nichols & J. J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound Symbolism (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511751806.001
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511751806.001 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hoey, E.
    (2014) Sighing in interaction: Somatic, semiotic, and social. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2014.900229
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.900229 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hoey, E. M.
    (2020) Waiting to Inhale: On Sniffing in Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712962
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712962 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hoey, E. M., & Raymond, C. W.
    (2022) Managing conversation analysis data. InAndrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Brad McDonnell, Eve Koller, & Lauren B. Collister (Eds.), The Open Handbook of Linguistic Data Management (pp.–). MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/12200.003.0025
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12200.003.0025 [Google Scholar]
  46. Holt, E.
    (1996) Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_2 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2016) Laughter at last: playfulness and laughter in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.012 [Google Scholar]
  48. Jefferson, G.
    (1978) Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. InStudies in the organization of conversational interaction (pp.–). New York: Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  49. (1979) A Technique for Inviting Laughter and Its Subsequent Acceptance/Declination. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp.–). New York: Irvington.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. (1984a) On the Organization of Laughter in Talk About Troubles. InJ. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. (1984b) Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens “Yeah” and “Mm Hm”. Papers in Linguistics, (), –. 10.1080/08351818409389201
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389201 [Google Scholar]
  52. Jefferson, G., Sacks, H. & Schegloff, E. A.
    (1987) Notes on Laughter in the Pursuit of Intimacy. InG. Button & John R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and Social Organisation (pp.–). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781800418226‑008
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800418226-008 [Google Scholar]
  53. Keevallik, L.
    (2013) The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2013.753710
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753710 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2014) Turn organization and bodily-vocal demonstrations. Journal of Pragmatics, –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2018) What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar?Research on Language and Social Interaction, , –. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2020) Multimodal noun phrases. InT. Ono & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages: An Emergent Unit in Interaction (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.128.07kee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.128.07kee [Google Scholar]
  57. (2021) Vocalizations in dance classes teach body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard, (), 20200098. 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0098
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0098 [Google Scholar]
  58. Keevallik, L. & Ogden, R.
    (2020) Sounds on the Margins of Language at the Heart of Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, ():–. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961 [Google Scholar]
  59. Kendon, A.
    (2004) Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kendrick, K. H.
    (2015) The intersection of turn-taking and repair: The timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, . 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250 [Google Scholar]
  61. (2021) The ‘Other’ side of recruitment: methods of assistance in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.015 [Google Scholar]
  62. Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P.
    (2016) Recruitment: Offers, requests, and the organization of assistance in interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kendrick, K. H., & Holler, J.
    (2017) Gaze Direction Signals Response Preference in Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1262120
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1262120 [Google Scholar]
  64. Koshik, I.
    (2003) Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/14614456030050010301
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030050010301 [Google Scholar]
  65. Lerner, G.
    (1996) On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn-space of another speaker. InE. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.005 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lerner, G. H.
    (2013) On the place of hesitating in delicate formulations: A turn-constructional infrastructure for collaborative indiscretion. InM. Hayashi, G. Raymond, & J. Sidnell (Eds.), Conversational Repair and Human Understanding (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Li, X.
    (2013) Language and the body in the construction of units in Mandarin face-to-face interaction. InBeatrice Szczepek Reed & Geoffrey Raymond (Eds.), Units of talk–Units of action (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.25.11li
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.25.11li [Google Scholar]
  68. Li, C., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1981) Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520352858
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352858 [Google Scholar]
  69. Lindwall, O., & Ekström, A.
    (2012) Instruction-in-Interaction: The Teaching and Learning of a Manual Skill. Human Studies, (), –. 10.1007/s10746‑012‑9213‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-012-9213-5 [Google Scholar]
  70. Local, J., & Walker, G.
    (2012) How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, (), –. 10.1017/S0025100312000187
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100312000187 [Google Scholar]
  71. Löfgren, A., and Hofstetter, E.
    (2021) Introversive semiosis in action: depictions in opera rehearsals. Social Semiotics(), –. 10.1080/10350330.2021.1907180
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1907180 [Google Scholar]
  72. Majlesi, A. R., & Ekström, A.
    (2016) Baking together — The coordination of actions in activities involving people with dementia. Journal of Aging Studies, , –. 10.1016/j.jaging.2016.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2016.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  73. Manrique, E.
    (2016) Other-initiated repair in Argentine Sign Language. Open Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/opli‑2016‑0001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0001 [Google Scholar]
  74. Marrese, O. H., Raymond, C. W., Fox, B. A., Ford, C. E. & Pielke, M.
    (2021) The Grammar of Obviousness: Gesture in Argument Sequences. Frontiers in Communication:663067. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.663067
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.663067 [Google Scholar]
  75. McNeill, D.
    (2003) Aspects of aspect. Gesture, (), –. 10.1075/gest.3.1.02mcn
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.3.1.02mcn [Google Scholar]
  76. Mondada, L.
    (2006) Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/1461445606059561
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059561 [Google Scholar]
  77. (2012) Deixis: an integrated interactional multimodal analysis. InPia Bergmann, Jana Brenning, Martin Pfeiffer and Elisabeth Reber (Eds.), Prosody and embodiment in interactional grammar (pp.–). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110295108.173
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110295108.173 [Google Scholar]
  78. (2015) Multimodal completions. InA. Deppermann and S. Günthner (Eds.), Temporality in Interaction (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.27.09mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.27.09mon [Google Scholar]
  79. (2019) Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016 [Google Scholar]
  80. (2021) Sensing in social interaction: The taste for cheese in gourmet shops. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108650090
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108650090 [Google Scholar]
  81. (2024a) Multimodal transcription conventions. InJ. D. Robinson, R. Clift, K. H. Kendrick, & C. W. Raymond (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Methods in Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. (2024b) Multimodality in conversation analysis. InJ. D. Robinson, R. Clift, K. H. Kendrick, & C. W. Raymond (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Methods in Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Nevile, M., Haddington, P., Heinemann, T., & Rauniomaa, M.
    (Eds.) (2014) Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.186
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186 [Google Scholar]
  84. Ogden, R.
    (2004) Non-modal voice quality and turntaking in Finnish. InE. Couper-Kuhlen & C. A. Ford (Eds.), Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation (pp.–). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tsl.62.05ogd
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.62.05ogd [Google Scholar]
  85. (2020) Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction(), –. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1712960
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712960 [Google Scholar]
  86. (2021) Swallowing in conversation. Frontiers in Communication. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.657190. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.657190
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.657190 [Google Scholar]
  87. (2024) Listening to talk-in-interaction: Ways of observing speech. InJ. D. Robinson, R. Clift, K. H. Kendrick, & C. W. Raymond (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Methods in Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Okada, M.
    (2018) Imperative Actions in Boxing Sparring Sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798 [Google Scholar]
  89. (2023) Lexical repetitions during time critical moments in boxing. Language & Communication, , –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2023.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2023.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  90. Olsher, D.
    (2004) Talk and gesture: The embodies completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. InR. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second Language Conversations (pp.–).
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Parrill, F.
    (2010) The hands are part of the package: Gesture, common ground, and information packaging. InSally Rice and John Newman (eds.), Empirical and experimental methods in cognitive/functional research (pp.–). CSLI Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Parrill, F., Bergen, B. K., & Lichtenstein, P. V.
    (2013) Grammatical aspect, gesture, and conceptualization: Using co-speech gesture to reveal event representations. Cognitive Linguistics, (), –. 10.1515/cog‑2013‑0005
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0005 [Google Scholar]
  93. Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2019) At the Interface of Grammar and the Body: Chais pas (“dunno”) as a Resource for Dealing with Lack of Recipient Response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2019.1657276
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1657276 [Google Scholar]
  94. Pekarek Doehler, S., Polak-Yitzhaki, H., Li, X., Stoenica, I. M., Havlík, M., & Keevallik, L.
    (2021) Multimodal Assemblies for Prefacing a Dispreferred Response: A Cross-Linguistic Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, . https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689275. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689275
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689275 [Google Scholar]
  95. Pomerantz, A.
    (1980) Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a fishing device. Sociological Inquiry, (), –. 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00020.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00020.x [Google Scholar]
  96. Pomerantz, A. M.
    (1984) Pursuing a Response. InJ. M. Atkinson & John Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action (pp.–). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Raymond, G.
    (2000) The structure of responding: Type-conforming and nonconforming responses to yes/no type interrogatives. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
  98. Raymond, C. W., Robinson, J. D., Fox, B. A., Thompson, S. A., & Montiegl, K.
    (2021) Modulating action through minimization: Syntax in the service of offering and requesting. Language in Society, , –. 10.1017/S004740452000069X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740452000069X [Google Scholar]
  99. Raymond, C. W., & Stivers, T.
    (2016) The omnirelevance of accountability: Off-record account solicitations. InJ. D. Robinson (Ed.), Accountability in Social Interaction (pp.–). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210557.003.0011
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210557.003.0011 [Google Scholar]
  100. Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff, & G. Jefferson
    (1974) A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, , –. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  101. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1979) The Relevance of Repair for Syntax-for-Conversation. InT. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and Semantics 12: Discourse and Syntax (pp.–). Academic Press. 10.1163/9789004368897_012
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368897_012 [Google Scholar]
  102. (1996) Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction. InElinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
  103. (2005) On complainability. Social Problems, , –. 10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449
    https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.449 [Google Scholar]
  104. Schmidt, A., & Deppermann, A.
    (2023) Showing and telling — How directors combine embodied demonstrations and verbal descriptions to instruct in theater rehearsals. Frontiers in Communication:. 10.3389/fcomm.2022.955583
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.955583 [Google Scholar]
  105. Stevanovic, M.
    (2013) Constructing a proposal as a thought: A way to manage problems in the initiation of joint decision-making in Finnish workplace interaction. Pragmatics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A.
    (2012) Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2012.699260
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.699260 [Google Scholar]
  107. Stukenbrock, A.
    (2014) Take the words out of my mouth: Verbal instructions as embodied practices. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.017
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.017 [Google Scholar]
  108. Skogmyr Marian, K.
    (2021) ‘Assessing Without Words: Verbally Incomplete Utterances in Complaints’. Frontiers in Psychology, . 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689443
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689443 [Google Scholar]
  109. Szczepek Reed, B.
    (2021) Singing and the body: body-focused and concept-focused vocal instruction. Linguistics Vanguard, 20200071. 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0071
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0071 [Google Scholar]
  110. Thompson, S. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (2005) The Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction. Language and Linguistics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Thompson, S. A., Fox, B. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (2015) Grammar in Everyday Talk: Building Responsive Actions. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139381154
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381154 [Google Scholar]
  112. Thompson, S. A., Fox, B. A., & Raymond, C. W.
    (2021) The Grammar of Proposals for Joint Activities. Interactional Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/il.20011.tho
    https://doi.org/10.1075/il.20011.tho [Google Scholar]
  113. Tolins, J.
    (2013) Assessment and direction through nonlexical vocalizations in music instruction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2013.753721
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753721 [Google Scholar]
  114. Vandelanotte, L.
    (2012) Quotative go and be like: Grammar and grammaticalization. InBarbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (Eds.), Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1075/celcr.15.11van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.15.11van [Google Scholar]
  115. Velupillai, V.
    (2012) An Introduction of Linguistic Typology. John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.176
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.176 [Google Scholar]
  116. Walker, G.
    (2013) Phonetics and Prosody in Conversation. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Weeks, P.
    (1996) A rehearsal of a Beethoven passage: An analysis of correction talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_3 [Google Scholar]
  118. (2002) Performative error-correction in music: A problem for ethnomethodological description. Human Studies(), –. 10.1023/A:1020182018989
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020182018989 [Google Scholar]
  119. Yagi, J.
    (2022) Achieving (a)synchrony through choral chanting: Co-operative corrections in taiko ensemble rehearsals. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  120. Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T.
    (2014) ‘Put your fingers right in here’: Learnability and instructed experience. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/1461445613515359
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613515359 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/il.23010.ney
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: multimodality ; aspect ; grammar ; epistemics ; turn-taking ; morphology ; embodiment
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error