1887
image of Grounding lists
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Drawing on findings from three distinct corpora encompassing interactions in Spanish, Portuguese, and German, this study investigates the role of lists as strategic devices employed by interlocutors in everyday storytellings and positioning activities to establish common ground (CG). Termed ‘grounding lists’, our research identifies them as a distinct communicative practice for dynamically co-building CG. We found three domains to be most relevant in our data: (a) Personal CG emerging from biographically shared experiences, (b) Communal CG emerging from shared cultural knowledge, and (c) Communal CG emerging from shared everyday knowledge. Our findings reveal the primary characteristics of grounding lists being stylized prosody, reduced itemization, general extenders, lexical elements or quotatives in the onset projecting generalizability, early affiliation, reported speech, as well as gestural depiction. Through empirical analysis, we demonstrate the extent to which each type of CG aligns with these identified features of grounding lists and highlight that it is particularly the dominant use of the list as an abstract gestalt, less as a sedimented practice in itself, that defines grounding lists. This kind of list is strongly marked by its gestalt projection, enabling intersubjectivity and co-building of CG through animated speech and gestural enactment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/il.24002.dan
2024-12-20
2025-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A.
    (2008) Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, (), –. 10.1515/TEXT.2008.018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2008.018 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barotto, A., & Mauri, C.
    (2018) Constructing lists to construct categories. Italian Journal of Linguistics, (), –. 10.26346/1120‑2726‑117
    https://doi.org/10.26346/1120-2726-117 [Google Scholar]
  3. Borreguero Zuloaga, M.
    (2022) General extenders in spanish interactions: frequent forms, pragmatic functions y todo eso. Anuari De Filologia. Estudis De Lingüística, (), –. 10.1344/AFEL2022.12.8
    https://doi.org/10.1344/AFEL2022.12.8 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bücker, J.
    (2009) Quotativ-Konstruktionen mit ‘Motto’ als Ressourcen für Selbst- und Fremdpositionierungen. InS. Günthner & J. Bücker (Eds.), Grammatik im Gespräch: Konstruktionen der Selbst- und Fremdpositionierung (pp.–). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110213638.213
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213638.213 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carneiro Mendes, M.
    (2019) As expressões “tipo”, “assim”, “tipo assim” e “assim tipo” e suas funções nas falas de uma interação em grupo. InU. Schröder & M. Carneiro Mendes. (Eds.). Comunicação (Inter)Cultural em Interação (Vol.) (pp.–). Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG. 10.7476/9786558580102
    https://doi.org/10.7476/9786558580102 [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, H. H.
    (2008 [1996]) Using language (8th printing ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/S0022226798217361
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226798217361 [Google Scholar]
  7. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Barth-Weingarten, D.
    (2011) A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. English translation and adaptation of Selting, Margret et al. 2009: Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2. Gesprächsforschung — Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, , –.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M.
    (2018) Interactional Linguistics — Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139507318
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139507318 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dankel, P., & Satti, I.
    (2019) Multimodale Listen. Form und Funktion körperlicher Ressourcen in Aufzählungen in französischen, spanischen und italienischen Interaktionen. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, (), –. 10.1515/roja‑2019‑0003
    https://doi.org/10.1515/roja-2019-0003 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dankel, P., & Soto, R. M.
    (2018) Patrones prosódicos en construcciones enumerativas — una visión desde la perspectiva del contacto Español — Quechua. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana. Vervuert, (), –. 10.31819/rili‑2018‑163205
    https://doi.org/10.31819/rili-2018-163205 [Google Scholar]
  11. Deppermann, A., & Schmitt, R.
    (2008) Verstehensdokumentationen: Zur Phänomenologie von Verstehen in der Interaktion. Deutsche Sprache, (), –. 10.37307/j.1868‑775X.2008.03.03
    https://doi.org/10.37307/j.1868-775X.2008.03.03 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dressel, D., Dankel, P., & Teixeira Kalkhoff, A. M.
    (2023) What can collaboratively produced lists tell us about constructions? A multimodal analysis of co-constructed enumeration practices in spoken Spanish. InI. Hennecke & E. Wiesinger (Eds.), Constructions in Spanish (pp.–). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/cal.34.13dre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.34.13dre [Google Scholar]
  13. Duranti, A.
    (1997) Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511810190
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810190 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ehmer, O.
    (2011) Imagination und Animation: Die Herstellung mentaler Räume durch animierte Rede. (linguae & litterae 7). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110237801
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110237801 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fernández, J.
    (2015) General extenders use in spoken Peninsular Spanish: Metapragmatics awareness and pedagogical implications. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, (), –. 10.1080/23247797.2015.1010846
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2015.1010846 [Google Scholar]
  16. Grutschus, A.
    (2021) Y yo en plan: ‘¿Qué es esto?’: Los marcadores de cita en el español coloquial. Spanish in Context, (), –. 10.1075/sic.19016.gru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.19016.gru [Google Scholar]
  17. Gudmundsen, J., & Svennevig, J.
    (2020) Multimodal displays of understanding in vocabulary-oriented sequences. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, (). 10.7146/si.v3i2.114992
    https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i2.114992 [Google Scholar]
  18. Günthner, S.
    (1999) Polyphony and the ‘layering of voices’ in reported dialogues. An analysis of the use of prosodic devices in everyday reported speech. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(98)00093‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00093-9 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hinnell, J., & Rice, S.
    (2023) The Semantics and Pragmatics of Gestured Listing Constructions in English. Conference paper at the 16th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference (ICLC), HHU Düsseldorf.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hodges, A.
    (2015) Intertextuality. InD. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Volume (pp.–). Chichester: Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118584194.ch2
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584194.ch2 [Google Scholar]
  21. Inbar, A.
    (2020) List Constructions. InR. Berman (Ed.), Usage-Based Studies in Modern Hebrew: Background, Morpho-lexicon, and Syntax (pp.–). Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/slcs.210.18inb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.210.18inb [Google Scholar]
  22. Jefferson, G.
    (1990) List-Construction as a Task and Resource. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Interaction Competence (pp.–). Lanham: University Press of America.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kecskes, I., & Zhang, F.
    (2009) Activating, seeking, and creating common ground: a socio-cognitive approach. Pragmatics and Cognition, (), –. 10.1075/pc.17.2.06kec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.2.06kec [Google Scholar]
  24. Kendon, A.
    (2004) Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  25. Knerich, H.
    (2013) Listenkonstruktionen als vorgeformte Strukturen -vorgeformte Ausdrücke innerhalb von Listenkonstruktionen. Linguistik Online, (), –. 10.13092/lo.62.1307
    https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.62.1307 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lerner, G. H.
    (1994) Responsive List Construction. A Conversational Resource for Accomplishing Multifaceted Social Action. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, (), –. 10.1177/0261927X94131002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X94131002 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mondada, L.
    (2013) Embodied and spatial resources for turn-taking in institutional multi-party interactions: Participatory democracy debates. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.010 [Google Scholar]
  28. Overstreet, M.
    (1999) Whales, Candlelight, and Stuff Like That: General extenders in English Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780195125740.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195125740.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sánchez-Ayala, I.
    (2003) Constructions as resources for interaction: lists in English and Spanish conversation. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/14614456030053003
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456030053003 [Google Scholar]
  30. Schiffrin, D.
    (1994) Making a List. Discourse Processes, , –. 10.1080/01638539409544875
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539409544875 [Google Scholar]
  31. Schladebeck, A.
    (2015) Rhythm as a resource to generate prosodic coherence in lists. InR. Vogel & R. v. d. Vijver (Eds.), Rhythm in Cognition and Grammar. A Germanic Perspective (pp.–). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110378092.277
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378092.277 [Google Scholar]
  32. Schröder, U.
    (2015) The interplay of verbal, vocal, and visual cues in the co-construction of the experience of alterity in exchange students’ talk. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.010 [Google Scholar]
  33. Schwitalla, J.
    (2012) Gesprochenes Deutsch. Eine Einführung (Vol.). Berlin: Schmidt.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Selting, M.
    (2007) Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  35. Traugott, E. C.
    (2010) Revisiting subjectification and intersubjectification. InK. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization (pp.–). Berlin, De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/il.24002.dan
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/il.24002.dan
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: gesture ; stylized prosody ; common ground ; list constructions ; multimodal interaction
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error