1887
image of Japanese turn-initial particle hai in instruction-compliance sequences in boxing
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper analyzes how language and body interact in boxing sparring sessions by focusing on the Japanese particle (lit. ‘yes’) as it occurs turn-initially in the first part of instruction-compliance sequences. Based on sequential and embodied analysis of 11 boxing sparring sessions, this paper examines: (1) in what sequential and embodied environments is used; (2) if responds to a focal moment, what constitutes that moment; (3) what actions do -prefaced instructions indicate? How do language and body interact when these actions emerge? This paper identifies three environments: (1) while a boxer is being attacked, the particle prefaces instruction to evade the attack; (2) after a first phase of combined boxing movements, it precedes instruction pursuing the second phase; (3) after a change of distance, the particle introduces instructions for punches which are suitable at that distance. In each environment, is used to identify the exact moment at which targeted shifts from a current body alignment to a different one should be implemented. Depending on the temporal order of language and body, -prefaced instructions express different actions, e.g., ‘late’ instruction can “acknowledge” (Mondada 2021) boxer’s independent initiations of the targeted action and, simultaneously, make their completions relevant.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/il.24011.oka
2025-06-12
2025-07-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Austin, J. L.
    (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Beach, W. A.
    (1993) Transition regularities for ‘casual’ “Okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/0378‑2166(93)90092‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90092-4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bolden, G. B.
    (2009) Implementing incipient actions: the discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Boersma, P. & Weenink, D.
    (2024) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.4.23, retrieved27 October 2024fromwww.praat.org/
  5. Cameron, D., McAlinden, F. & O’Leary, K.
    (1989) Lakoff in context: the social and linguistic functions of tag questions. InJ. Coates & D. Cameron (Eds.), Women in their speech communities: new perspectives on language and sex (pp.–) New York: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M.
    (2018) Interactional Linguistics: studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Deppermann, A.
    (2018) Instruction practices in German driving lessons: differential uses of declaratives and imperatives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, , –. 10.1111/ijal.12198
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12198 [Google Scholar]
  8. Deppermann, A. & Günthner, S.
    (2015) Introduction: temporality in interaction. InA. Deppermann & S. Günthner, (Eds.), Temporality in interaction. (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.27.001int
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.27.001int [Google Scholar]
  9. Deppermann, A., Mondada, L. & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2021) Early responses: an introduction, Discourse Processes, (), –, 10.1080/0163853X.2021.1877516
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1877516 [Google Scholar]
  10. Deppermann, A. & Schmidt, A.
    (2021) Micro-sequential coordination in early responses, Discourse Processes, (), –, 10.1080/0163853X.2020.1842630
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1842630 [Google Scholar]
  11. ELAN (Version 6.8) [Computer software]
    ELAN (Version 6.8) [Computer software] (2024) Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. Retrieved fromhttps://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan
  12. Fox, B. A., Thompson, S. A., Ford, C. E. & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (2013) Conversation Analysis and Linguistics. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers, (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Malden, MA.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Goodwin, C. & Goodwin, M. H.
    (1987) Concurrent operation on talk: notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA papers in Pragmatics(), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Heritage, J.
    (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. (1995) Conversation Analysis: methodological aspects. InU. M. Quasthoff (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication (pp.–). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110879032.391
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110879032.391 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2013) Turn-initial position and some of its occupants. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.025
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.025 [Google Scholar]
  17. Heritage, J. & Atkinson, J. M.
    (1984) Introduction. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: studies in Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Heritage, J. & Sorjonen, M.
    (1994) Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: and-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, –. 10.1017/S0047404500017656
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500017656 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacobsen, W. M.
    (1999) Aspects of hypothetical meaning in Japanese conditionals. InA. Kamio & K. Takami, (Eds.), Function and structure: in honor of Susumu Kuno (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jefferson, G.
    (1984) Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. Tilburg papers in language and literature, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Keevallik, L.
    (2010) Marking boundaries between activities: The particle nii in Estonian, Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –, 10.1080/08351811003737697
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351811003737697 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2018) What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar?Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –, 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2020) Grammatical coordination of embodied action: the Estonian ja ‘and’ as a temporal organizer of Pilates moves. InY. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindström & L. Keevallik (Eds.), Emergent syntax for conversation: clausal pattens and organization of action (pp.–) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.32.08kee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.32.08kee [Google Scholar]
  24. Keevallik, L., Hofstetter, E., & Lindström, J.
    (2025) Linguistic and other vocal resources of instructing bodies, Interactional Linguistics, this issue.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuroshima, S.
    (2023) When a request turn is segmented: managing the deontic authority via early compliance. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/14614456221136975
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456221136975 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kuroshima, S., Kim, S. H., Hayano, K., Kim, M. S., & Lee, S.
    (2021) When OKAY is repeated: closing the talk so far in Korean and Japanese conversations. InE. Betz, A. Deppermann, L. Mondada & M. Sorjonen (Eds.), OKAY across languages: toward a comparative approach to its use in talk-in-interaction (pp–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.34.08kur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.34.08kur [Google Scholar]
  27. Levinson, S. C.
    (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge. 10.1017/CBO9780511813313
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2013) Action formation and ascription. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers, (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Malden, MA.: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mondada, L.
    (2014a) Instructions in the operating room: How the surgeon directs their assistant’s hands. Discourse Studies(), –. 10.1177/1461445613515325
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613515325 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2014b) Requesting immediate action in the surgical operating room: time, embodied resources and praxeological embeddedness. InP. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Requesting in social interaction (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.26.11mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26.11mon [Google Scholar]
  31. (2017) Precision timing and timed embeddedness of imperatives in embodied courses of action: examples from French. InM. Sorjonen, L. Raevaara, & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Imperative turns at talk: the design of directives in action (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.30.03mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.03mon [Google Scholar]
  32. (2021) How early can embodied responses be? Issues in time and sequentiality, Discourse Processes, (), –, 10.1080/0163853X.2020.1871561
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1871561 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mondada, L. & Sorjonen, M.
    (2021) OKAY in closings and transitions. InE. Betz, A. Deppermann, L. Mondada & M. Sorjonen (Eds.), OKAY across languages: toward a comparative approach to its use in talk-in-interaction (pp–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.34.04mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.34.04mon [Google Scholar]
  34. Morita, Y.
    (1989) A dictionary of basic Japanese. Tokyo: Kadokawa.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Nishizaka, A. & Sunaga, M.
    (2015) Conversing while massaging: multidimensional asymmetries of multiple activities in interaction, Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –, 10.1080/08351813.2015.1025506
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1025506 [Google Scholar]
  36. Okada, M.
    (2008) When the coach is a woman: the situational meanings of so-called masculine directives in a Japanese boxing gym. InJ. Mori and A. Snyder-Ohta (Eds.), Japanese Applied Linguistics: discourse and social perspectives (pp.–). London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. (2009) Some analyses of the Japanese interjection hai embedded in activities: a linguistic form within a combination of resources. InM. Kobayashi and J. Hibiya (Eds.), Past, present, and future of Japanese language education, vol. (pp.–). Tokyo: Bonjinsha.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. (2018) Imperative actions in boxing sparring sessions, Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2023) Lexical repetitions during time critical moments in boxing. Language & Communication, –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2023.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2023.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  40. Okada, M. & Yanagimachi, T.
    (2008) How do coparticipants organize instructions?: analyses based on multimodality and joint attention. The Japanese Journal of Language in Society, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Rossi, G.
    (2014) When do people not use language to make requests?InP. Drew & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.). Requesting in social interaction (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.26.12ros
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26.12ros [Google Scholar]
  42. Simone, M. & Galatolo, R.
    (2021) Timing and prosody of lexical repetition: how repeated instructions assist visually impaired athletes’ navigation in sport climbing, Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –, 10.1080/08351813.2021.1974742
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1974742 [Google Scholar]
  43. Takagi, T.
    (2008) The recipient’s response as a method for ordering interaction: cases of hai used in a therapy session’. The Japanese Journal of Language in Society, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Togashi, J.
    (2002) Regarding relationships between hai and un. InT. Sadanobu (Ed.), Linguistic studies about un and soo. (pp.–). Tokyo: Hitsuji shoboo
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/il.24011.oka
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/il.24011.oka
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error