1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Interactional Linguistics
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Multimodally aligning with projected continuation in Peninsular Spanish
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This article explores resources for multimodally aligning with projected continuation in data from Peninsular Spanish, engaging with method-ological-theoretical frameworks from Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics. The article presents a pattern largely representative of a collection of fifteen storytellings: When tellers project continuation (pragmatically, semantically, prosodically, syntactically, gesturally), recipients are silent and embodiedly still, steadily gazing at teller, rarely producing vocal continuers. The Aforementioned recipient behavior appears throughout the data as structurally aligning with the turn-taking system being adjusted to one speaker doing a lengthy turn-at-talk. As pertaining to vocal continuers, the pattern is also representative of a pool of >364 big packages from which the storytellings are collected. One of the rare occasions when vocal continuers employed in the data from Peninsular Spanish, is in a multimodally restricted participation framework. This study thus invites a multimodal reinterrogation of the roles and frequencies of vocal continuers in the interactional achievement of multi-unit-turns. Alongside work on other languages, however, it also suggests that structural alignment, as a likely universal relational principle, can be language-/culture-specifically routinized.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/il.24017.sbe
2025-05-23
2025-06-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/il.24017.sbe
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auer, P.
    (2005) Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar. Text — Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, (). 10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergmann, J. R.
    (1987) Klatsch: Zur Sozialform der diskreten Indiskretion. De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110875195
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110875195 [Google Scholar]
  3. Briz, A., Hidalgo, A., Padilla, X., Pons, S., Ruiz Gurillo, L., Sanmartín, J., Benavent, E., Albelda, M., Fernández, M. J., & Pérez, M.
    (2003) Un sistema de unidades para el estudio del lenguaje coloquial. Oralia: análisis del discurso oral, , –. 10.25115/oralia.v1i6.8406
     https://doi.org/10.25115/oralia.v1i6.8406 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cabanes Pérez, S.
    (2023) Análisis multimodal en la distinción entre intervención y turno: Efectos en la segmentación de la conversación desde el modelo Val.Es.Co. [PhD, Universitat de Valencia]. https://roderic.uv.es/handle/10550/90785
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Cladera, N. B.
    (2010) Backchannels as a realization of interaction: Some uses of mm and mhm in Spanish. InDialogue in Spanish (pp.–). John Benjamins. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027288103-ds.7.08bra. 10.1075/ds.7.08bra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.7.08bra [Google Scholar]
  6. Clift, R., & Raymond, C. W.
    (2018) Actions in practice: On details in collections. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/1461445617734344
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445617734344 [Google Scholar]
  7. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M.
    (2018) Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Del Río Villanueva, C. A.
    (2024) La construcción interaccional de la (des)información: De la entrevista política de televisión en vivo a las notas periodísticas. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, (), Article 3.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Deppermann, A.
    (2011) The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics. Human Studies, (), –. 10.1007/s10746‑011‑9187‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9187-8 [Google Scholar]
  10. Dingemanse, M.
    (2024) Interjections at the Heart of Language. Annual Review of Linguistics, (), –. 10.1146/annurev‑linguistics‑031422‑124743
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031422-124743 [Google Scholar]
  11. Dingemanse, M., Liesenfeld, A., & Woensdregt, M.
    (2022) Convergent Cultural Evolution of Continuers (mmhm) [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. 10.31234/osf.io/65c79
     https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/65c79 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dingemanse, M., Rossi, G., & Floyd, S.
    (2017) Place reference in story beginnings: A cross-linguistic study of narrative and interactional affordances. Language in Society, (), –. 10.1017/S0047404516001019
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404516001019 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dingemanse, M., Torreira, F., & Enfield, N. J.
    (2013) Is “Huh?” a Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent Evolution of Linguistic Items. PLoS ONE, (), . 10.1371/journal.pone.0078273
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078273 [Google Scholar]
  14. Drew, P.
    (1998) Complaints About Transgressions and Misconduct. Research on Language & Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595 [Google Scholar]
  15. Duncan, S., & Fiske, D. W.
    (1977) Face-to-Face Interaction: Research, Methods, and Theory. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Enfield, N. J.
    (2013) Relationship Thinking. Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199338733.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199338733.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  17. Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C.
    (2006) Roots of human sociality. Berg.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Enfield, N. J., Stivers, T., Brown, P., Englert, C., Harjunpää, K., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Keisanen, T., Rauniomaa, M., Raymond, C. W., Rossano, F., Yoon, K.-E., Zwitserlood, I., & Levinson, S. C.
    (2018) Polar answers. Journal of Linguistics, (), –. 10.1017/S0022226718000336
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226718000336 [Google Scholar]
  19. Estebas-Vilaplana, E., & Prieto, P.
    (2010) Castilian spanish intonation. InP. Prieto & P. Rosseano (Eds.), Transcription of intonation of the Spanish language (pp.–). LINCOM Studies in Phonetics.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Etelämäki, M., Heinemann, T., & Vatanen, A.
    (2021) On affiliation and alignment: Non-cooperative uses of anticipatory completions in the context of tellings. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/14614456211017407
     https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456211017407 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fant, L.
    (1989) Cultural mismatch in conversation: Spanish and Scandinavian communicative behaviour in negotiation settings. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. (2006) National cultural norms or activity type conventions?: Negotiation talk and informal conversation among Swedes and Spaniards. Synaps, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Floyd, S.
    (2005) The poetics of evidentiality in South American storytelling. Eighth Workshop on American Indian Languages (WAIL), –. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_468575/component/file_468573/content
     [Google Scholar]
  24. (2021) Conversation and Culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, (Volume 2021), –. 10.1146/annurev‑anthro‑101819‑110158
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110158 [Google Scholar]
  25. Floyd, S., Rossi, G., & Enfield, N. J.
    (2020) Getting others to do things. Studies in Diversity Linguistics 31, Language Science Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A.
    (1996) Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. InE. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (Vol., pp.–). 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.003 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ford, C. E., Thompson, S. A., & Drake, V.
    (2012) Bodily-Visual Practices and Turn Continuation. Discourse Processes, (), –. 10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gardner, R.
    (2001) When Listeners Talk: Response tokens and listener stance (Vol.). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.92
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.92 [Google Scholar]
  29. Garfinkel, H.
    (1964) Studies of the Routine Grounds of Everyday Activities. Social Problems, (), –. 10.2307/798722
     https://doi.org/10.2307/798722 [Google Scholar]
  30. Goodwin, C.
    (1984) Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. InJ. M. Atkinson (Ed.), Structures of Social Action (1st ed., pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511665868.016
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.016 [Google Scholar]
  31. (1986) Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, (), –. 10.1007/BF00148127
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148127 [Google Scholar]
  32. Graziano, M., & Gullberg, M.
    (2024) Providing evidence for a well-worn stereotype: Italians and Swedes do gesture differently. Frontiers in Communication, . 10.3389/fcomm.2024.1314120
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1314120 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hayashi, M., & Yoon, K.
    (2009) Negotiating boundaries in talk. InJ. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511635670.009
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670.009 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B.
    (2012) The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp.–). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch4
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch4 [Google Scholar]
  35. Heritage, J.
    (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. InJ. M. Atkinson (Ed.), Structures of Social Action (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020 [Google Scholar]
  36. (2012a) Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2012b) The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2012.646685
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646685 [Google Scholar]
  38. Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. E.
    (2024) Making Arrangements: A Sketch of a ‘Big Package.’Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2024.2369483
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2024.2369483 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hidalgo, A.
    (1998) Alternancia de turnos y conversación: Sobre el papel regulador de los suprasegmentos en el habla simultánea. LEA: Lingüística Española Actual, (), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Hidalgo, A., & Briz Gómez, A.
    (2023) Partículas discursivas y prosodia: Los marcadores de control de contacto ¿sabes? y ¿entiendes?Spanish in Context. 10.1075/sic.21027.hid
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.21027.hid [Google Scholar]
  41. Hidalgo, A., & Ruano Piqueras, N.
    (2022) Prosodia de los actos interrogativos en la conversación coloquial española: Aproximación interactivo-funcional. Estudios Filológicos, , –. 10.4067/S0071‑17132022000100103
     https://doi.org/10.4067/S0071-17132022000100103 [Google Scholar]
  42. Jefferson, G.
    (1978) Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation. InJ. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp.–). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50016‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50016-1 [Google Scholar]
  43. (1985) Notes on a Systematic Deployment of the Ackowledgement Tokens Yeah and Mm hm. Papers in Linguistics, , –. 10.1080/08351818409389201
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389201 [Google Scholar]
  44. (1988) On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, (), –. 10.2307/800595
     https://doi.org/10.2307/800595 [Google Scholar]
  45. (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. InConversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, ed. Gene Lerner (pp.–). Benjamins. 10.1075/pbns.125.05jef
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.05jef [Google Scholar]
  46. Keevallik, L.
    (2013) The Interdependence of Bodily Demonstrations and Clausal Syntax. Research on Language & Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2013.753710
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753710 [Google Scholar]
  47. (2018) What Does Embodied Interaction Tell Us About Grammar?Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kendrick, K. H., Brown, P., Dingemanse, M., Floyd, S., Gipper, S., Hayano, K., Hoey, E., Hoymann, G., Manrique, E., Rossi, G., & Levinson, S. C.
    (2020) Sequence organization: A universal infrastructure for social action. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.06.009 [Google Scholar]
  49. Küttner, U. A. & Ehmer, O.
    (2023) Affordances and Actions: Requests for Confirmation as Devices for Implementing Challenging and Other Disagreement-Implicative Actions. InContrastive Pragmatics, Vol. 5 (). Brill. 10.1163/26660393‑bja10089
     https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10089 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lindström, A., & Sorjonen, M.-L.
    (2012) Affiliation in Conversation. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp.–). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch17
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch17 [Google Scholar]
  51. Mandelbaum, J.
    (1989) Interpersonal activities in conversational storytelling. Western Journal of Speech Communication, (), –. 10.1080/10570318909374295
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318909374295 [Google Scholar]
  52. (2012) Storytelling in conversation. InT. Stivers & J. Sidnell (Eds.), The handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch24
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch24 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mondada, L.
    (2012) The Conversation Analytic Approach to Data Collection. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp.–). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch3
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch3 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2014) The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2024) Multimodal transcription conventions. InJ. D. Robinson, R. Clift, K. H. Kendrick, & C. W. Raymond (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Methods in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Padilla, X. A.
    (2004) Del oyente receptor al oyente combatiente. ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística. Universidad de Alicante, , –. 10.14198/ELUA2004.18.11
     https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA2004.18.11 [Google Scholar]
  57. Pavlidou, T.-S., Gialabouki, L., Alvanoudi, A., & Ananiadis, C.
    (2022) On the recipients’ part: Responding with m/mm (and nods) in Greek conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.07.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.07.007 [Google Scholar]
  58. Pons Bordería, S.
    (dir.) (2022) Corpus Val.Es.Co. 3.0 [Dataset]. www.valesco.es
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Raymond, C. W.
    (2015) Questions and responses in Spanish monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual conversation. Language & Communication, , –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2015.02.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  60. (2018a) Bueno-, pues-, and bueno-pues-prefacing in Spanish conversation. InJ. Heritage & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Studies in Language and Social Interaction (Vol., pp.–). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/slsi.31.03ray
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31.03ray [Google Scholar]
  61. (2018b) On the relevance and accountability of dialect: Conversation analysis and dialect contact. Journal of Sociolinguistics, (), –. 10.1111/josl.12277
     https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12277 [Google Scholar]
  62. (2022) Suffixation and sequentiality: Notes on the study of morphology in interaction. Interactional Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/il.21012.ray
     https://doi.org/10.1075/il.21012.ray [Google Scholar]
  63. Raymond, C. W., Clift, R., Kendrick, K. H., & Robinson, J. D.
    (2024) Methods in Conversation Analysis. InJ. D. Robinson, R. Clift, K. H. Kendrick, & C. W. Raymond (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Methods in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Raymond, C. W., & Olguín, L. M.
    (2022) Análisis de la conversación: Fundamentos, metodología y alcances. Routledge. 10.4324/9780429507274
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429507274 [Google Scholar]
  65. Robinson, J. D., Rühlemann, C., & Rodriguez, D. T.
    (2022) The Bias Toward Single-Unit Turns in Conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2022.2067436
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2022.2067436 [Google Scholar]
  66. Rossano, F.
    (2009) Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction [PhD, Radboud University]. 10/component/file_2272985/Rossano_2012_Gaze_behavior_in_face‑to‑face_interaction.pdf
     https://doi.org/10/component/file_2272985/Rossano_2012_Gaze_behavior_in_face-to-face_interaction.pdf [Google Scholar]
  67. (2012) Gaze in Conversation. InJ. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (1st ed., pp.–). Wiley. 10.1002/9781118325001.ch15
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001.ch15 [Google Scholar]
  68. Rossano, F., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
    (2009) Gaze, questioning, and culture. InJ. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation Analysis (1st ed., pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511635670.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670.008 [Google Scholar]
  69. Ruiz Fajardo, G.
    (2016) Columbia Corpus of Spanish Conversations (Corpus de conversaciones para E/LE) [Dataset]. Columbia University. https://edblogs.columbia.edu/corpusdeconversaciones/
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Sacks, H.
    (1978) Some Technical Considerations of a Dirty Joke. InJ. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp.–). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑623550‑0.50017‑3
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-623550-0.50017-3 [Google Scholar]
  71. (1986) Some considerations of a story told in ordinary conversations. Poetics, (), –. 10.1016/0304‑422X(86)90036‑7
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(86)90036-7 [Google Scholar]
  72. (1989) An Analysis of the Course of a Joke’s Telling in Conversation. InR. Bauman & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking (2nd ed., pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511611810.022
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611810.022 [Google Scholar]
  73. Sacks, H. (with Jefferson, G., & Schegloff, E. A.
    ) (1992b) Lectures on conversation: 2 (Vol.). Blackwell.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.
    (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language, , –. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  75. Satti, I.
    (2023a) Requests for Verification across Varieties of Spanish: A Comparative Approach to Gaze Behaviour. Contrastive Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1163/26660393‑bja10092
     https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10092 [Google Scholar]
  76. (2023b) When it’s “now or never”: Multimodal practices for managing opportunities to initiate other-repair in collaborative storytelling. Narrative Inquiry, (), –. 10.1075/ni.21005.sat
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.21005.sat [Google Scholar]
  77. Sbertoli-Nielsen, P.
    (2019) Estilos conversacionales noruegos y españoles: La retrocanalización mediante nasalizaciones y habla simultánea en Oslo y Valencia. [Master’s thesis] University of Oslo. Permanent link: urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-72511
     [Google Scholar]
  78. (2023) Teasing Out 2mm: Bilabial-Nasal Response Particles in Norwegian. InJ. Svennevig (Ed.) Special Issue on Conversation Analysis for Norwegian Journal of Linguistics(), pp.–. Novus forlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1980) Preliminaries to Preliminaries: “Can I Ask You a Question?”Sociological Inquiry, (), –. 10.1111/j.1475‑682X.1980.tb00018.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00018.x [Google Scholar]
  80. (1982) Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’and other things that come between sentences. Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, , –.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. (1984) On some gestures’ relation to talk. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp.–). Cambridge University Press. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1572543024617726336
     [Google Scholar]
  82. (1986) The routine as achievement. Human Studies, (), –. 10.1007/BF00148124
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148124 [Google Scholar]
  83. Schegloff, E.A.
    (1987) Recycled Turn Beginnings: A Precise Repair Mechanism in Conversation's Turn-taking Organisation. InG. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.) Talk and Social Interaction (<-kursive), Clevedon, England, Multilingual Matters, pp.–.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Streeck, J.
    (1995) Ch. 4: On projection. InE. N. Goody (Ed.) Social Intelligence and Interaction. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1996) Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. InE. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (1st ed., pp.–). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002 [Google Scholar]
  86. (2006) Interaction: The Infrastructure for Social Institutions, the Natural Ecological Niche for Language, and the Arena in which Culture is Enacted. InS. C. Levinson & N. J. Enfield (Eds.), Roots of Human Sociality. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. (2007) Sequence organization in interaction (Vol.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511791208
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791208 [Google Scholar]
  88. Schmidt, A., & Deppermann, A.
    (2023) On the Emergence of Routines: An Interactional Micro-history of Rehearsing a Scene. Human Studies, (), –. 10.1007/s10746‑022‑09655‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09655-1 [Google Scholar]
  89. Selting, M.
    (2000) The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society, (), –. 10.1017/S0047404500004012
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500004012 [Google Scholar]
  90. (2010) Affectivity in conversational storytelling: An analysis of displays of anger or indignation in complaint stories. Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/prag.20.2.06sel
     https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20.2.06sel [Google Scholar]
  91. (2012) Complaint stories and subsequent complaint stories with affect displays. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.005
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  92. Sidnell, J., & Stivers, T.
    (Eds.) (2012) The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 10.1002/9781118325001
     https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118325001 [Google Scholar]
  93. Sorjonen, M.-L.
    (2001) Responding in conversation: A study of response particles in Finnish (Vol.). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/pbns.70
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.70 [Google Scholar]
  94. Stivers, T.
    (2008) Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351810701691123
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123 [Google Scholar]
  95. (2022) Introduction. InT. Stivers, The Book of Answers (1st ed., pp.–). Oxford University PressNew York. 10.1093/oso/9780197563892.003.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197563892.003.0001 [Google Scholar]
  96. Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., Englert, C., Hayashi, M., Heinemann, T., Hoymann, G., Rossano, F., de Ruiter, J. P., Yoon, K.-E., & Levinson, S. C.
    (2009) Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (), –. 10.1073/pnas.0903616106
     https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903616106 [Google Scholar]
  97. Stivers, T., & Rossano, F.
    (2010) Mobilizing Response. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351810903471258
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258 [Google Scholar]
  98. Streeck, J.
    (2009) Forward-Gesturing. Discourse Processes, (), –. 10.1080/01638530902728793
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728793 [Google Scholar]
  99. Tao, H.
    (2019) List gestures in Mandarin conversation and their implications for understanding multimodal interaction. InX. Li & T. Ono (Eds.), Multimodality in Chinese Interaction (pp.–). De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110462395‑004
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110462395-004 [Google Scholar]
  100. Temer, V. G.
    (2017) A multimodal analysis of assessment sequences in Chilean Spanish interaction [PhD, University of York]. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/20579/
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Terasaki, A. K.
    (1976) Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. InG. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp.–). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/pbns.125.11ter (first appeared as Social Science Working Paper 99, School of Social Sciences, Irvine, CA 1976.)
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.125.11ter [Google Scholar]
  102. Torreira, F., & Ernestus, M.
    (2010) The Nijmegen Corpus of Casual Spanish. Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), –.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. (2012) Weakening of Intervocalic /s/ in the Nijmegen Corpus of Casual Spanish. Phonetica, (), –. 10.1159/000343635
     https://doi.org/10.1159/000343635 [Google Scholar]
  104. Vázquez Carranza, A.
    (2012) O sea in Talk: A study of Mexican Spanish interactions. Department of Language and Linguistics, .
     [Google Scholar]
  105. (2016) Remembering and noticing: A conversation-analytic study of ‘ah’ in Mexican Spanish talk. Spanish in Context, (), –. 10.1075/sic.13.2.03vaz
     https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.13.2.03vaz [Google Scholar]
  106. (2019) Análisis Conversacional: Estudio de la acción social. Universidad de Guadalajara.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Voutilainen, L., Henttonen, P., Stevanovic, M., Kahri, M., & Peräkylä, A.
    (2019) Nods, vocal continuers, and the perception of empathy in storytelling. Discourse Processes, (), –. 10.1080/0163853X.2018.1498670
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1498670 [Google Scholar]
  108. Whitehead, K. A.
    (2011) Some uses of head nods in “third position” in talk-in-interaction. Gesture, (), –. 10.1075/gest.11.2.01whi
     https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.11.2.01whi [Google Scholar]
  109. Williams, N., Stenzel, K., & Fox, B.
    (2020) Parsing particles in Wa’ikhana. Revista Linguíʃtica, (), –. 10.31513/linguistica.2020.v16nEsp.a43715
     https://doi.org/10.31513/linguistica.2020.v16nEsp.a43715 [Google Scholar]
  110. Zama, A., & Robinson, J. D.
    (2016) A Relevance Rule Organizing Responsive Behavior During One Type of Institutional Extended Telling. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1196551
     https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1196551 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/il.24017.sbe
Loading
Multimodally aligning with projected continuation in Peninsular Spanish
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/il.24017.sbe
/content/journals/10.1075/il.24017.sbe
/content/journals/10.1075/il.24017.sbe
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: gaze ; alignment ; Spanish ; projected continuation ; continuers

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error