1887
Volume 5, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN 2666-4224
  • E-ISSN: 2666-4232
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This paper examines the instructions produced by photographers in photography studios. Drawing on ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, this study elucidates the instructive practices deployed by photographers in their work of designing photographable poses. This paper concentrates on the interactional aspects of how photographers arrange their clients’ bodies for individual portraits and group photographs. While organizing the individual portraits, the photographers instruct their clients by dealing with different bodily aspects, such as postures, head orientations and facial expressions, in a successive fashion, treating their bodies as disarticulated. When arranging group photographs, the photographers orchestrate intercorporeal contact between the bodies, often engaging in tactile instructions in which they use instructive utterances together with tactile practices such as touching and moving. The photographers’ instructive utterances notify and inform the clients about their projected touch and imply the relevance for them to adopt docile bodies. By way of producing tactile instructions, the photographers not only formulate the instructions but also perform the relevant instructed actions by manipulating the clients’ bodies. In this way, the photographers exhibit their entitlement to touch their clients’ bodies as part of their professional service and exercise a specific form of embodied agency. Participants in the data speak Turkish.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/il.24018.tek
2025-07-17
2026-04-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahearn, L. M.
    (2001) Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 301, 109–137. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bergnehr, D., & Cekaite, A.
    (2018) Adult-initiated touch and its functions at a Swedish preschool: controlling, affectionate, assisting and educative haptic conduct. International Journal of Early Years Education, 261, 312–331. 10.1080/09669760.2017.1414690
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2017.1414690 [Google Scholar]
  3. Broth, M., & Keevallik, L.
    (2014) Getting ready to move as a couple. Accomplishing mobile formations in a dance class. Space & Culture, 171, 107–121. 10.1177/1206331213508483
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331213508483 [Google Scholar]
  4. Cekaite, A.
    (2010) Shepherding the child: embodied directive sequences in parent-child interactions. Text & Talk, 301, 1–25. 10.1515/text.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. (2015) The coordination of talk and touch in adults’ directives to children: Touch and social control. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 481, 152–175. 10.1080/08351813.2015.1025501
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2015.1025501 [Google Scholar]
  6. Deppermann, A.
    (2018) Instruction practices in German driving lessons: Differential uses of declaratives and imperatives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 281, 265–282. 10.1111/ijal.12198
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12198 [Google Scholar]
  7. Deppermann, A., & Gubina, A.
    (2021) When the body belies the words: Embodied agency with darf/kann ich? (“may/can I?”) in German. Frontiers in Communication, 61, 661800. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.661800
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.661800 [Google Scholar]
  8. Deppermann, A., & Schmidt, A.
    (2021) Micro-sequential coordination in early responses. Discourse Processes, 581, 372–396. 10.1080/0163853X.2020.1842630
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1842630 [Google Scholar]
  9. De Stefani, E.
    (2018) Formulating direction: Navigational instructions in driving lessons. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 281, 283–303. 10.1111/ijal.12197
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12197 [Google Scholar]
  10. De Stefani, E., & Gazin, A-D.
    (2014) Instructional sequences in driving lessons: Mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions. Journal of Pragmatics, 651, 63–79. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.020 [Google Scholar]
  11. Duranti, A.
    (2004) Agency in language. InA. Duranti (Ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology (pp.449–473). Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Evans, B., & Lindwall, O.
    (2020) Show them or involve them? Two organizations of embodied instruction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 531, 223–246. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1741290
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1741290 [Google Scholar]
  13. Evans, B., & Reynolds, E.
    (2016) The organization of corrective demonstrations using embodied action in sports coaching feedback. Symbolic Interaction, 391, 525–556. 10.1002/symb.255
    https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.255 [Google Scholar]
  14. Garfinkel, H.
    (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodwin, C.
    (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 961, 606–633. 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
    https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 [Google Scholar]
  16. (2000) Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 321, 1489–1522. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00096‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodwin, M. H.
    (2006) Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text & Talk, 261, 513–542. 10.1515/TEXT.2006.021
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.021 [Google Scholar]
  18. (2017) Haptic sociality: The embodied interactive constitution of intimacy through touch. InC. Meyer, J. Streeck & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality (pp.73–102). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Goodwin, M. H., & Cekaite, A.
    (2013) Calibration in directive/response sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 461, 122–138. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.008 [Google Scholar]
  20. Harjunpää, K., Deppermann, A., & Sorjonen, M-L.
    (2021) Constructing the Chekhovian inner body in instructions: An interactional history of factuality and agentivity. Journal of Pragmatics, 1711, 158–174. 10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.034
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.034 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hofstetter, E., & Keevallik, L.
    (2023) Prosody is used for real-time exercising of other bodies. Language & Communication, 881, 52–72. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  22. Horlacher, A-S.
    (2022) Negative requests within hair salons: Grammar and embodiment in action formation. Frontiers in Psychology, 121, 689563. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689563
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689563 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hydén, L-C., Majlesi, A. R., & Ekström, A.
    (2022) Assisted eating in late-stage dementia: Intercorporeal interaction. Journal of Aging Studies. 611, 101000. 10.1016/j.jaging.2022.101000
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2022.101000 [Google Scholar]
  24. Keevallik, L.
    (2010) Bodily quoting in dance correction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 431, 401–426. 10.1080/08351813.2010.518065
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2010.518065 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2021) Vocalizations in dance classes teach body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard, 71, 20200098. 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0098
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0098 [Google Scholar]
  26. Keevallik, L., Hofstetter, E., Löfgren, A., & Wiggins, S.
    (2024) Repetition for real-time coordination of action: Lexical and non-lexical vocalizations in collaborative time management. Discourse Studies, 261, 334–357. 10.1177/14614456231224079
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231224079 [Google Scholar]
  27. Koschmann, T., LeBaron, C., Goodwin, C., & Feltovich, P.
    (2011) “Can you see the cystic artery yet?” A simple matter of trust. Journal of Pragmatics, 431, 521–541. 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.09.009 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lindström, J., Lindholm, C., Grahn, I-L., & Huhtamäki, M.
    (2020) Consecutive clause combinations in instructing activities: Directives and accounts in the context of physical training. InY. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindström & L. Keevallik (Eds.), Emergent Syntax for Conversation (pp.245–274). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.32.09lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.32.09lin [Google Scholar]
  29. Lindwall, O., & Ekström, A.
    (2012) Instruction-in-interaction: The teaching and learning of a manual skill. Human Studies, 351, 27–49. 10.1007/s10746‑012‑9213‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-012-9213-5 [Google Scholar]
  30. Llewellyn, N., Hindmarsh, J., & Burrow, R.
    (2022) Coalitions of touch: Balancing restraint and haptic soothing in veterinary clinic. Sociology of Health & Illness, 441, 725–744. 10.1111/1467‑9566.13458
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13458 [Google Scholar]
  31. Merlino, S.
    (2020) Professional touch in speech and language therapy for the treatment of post-stroke aphasia. InA. Cekaite & L. Mondada (Eds.), Touch in Social Interaction (pp.197–223). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003026631‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003026631-9 [Google Scholar]
  32. Mondada, L.
    (2014) Instructions in the operating room: How the surgeon directs their assistant’s hands. Discourse Studies, 161, 131–161. 10.1177/1461445613515325
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613515325 [Google Scholar]
  33. (2017) Precision timing and timed embeddedness of imperatives in embodied courses of action: Examples from French. InM-L. Sorjonen, L. Raevaara & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Imperative Turns at Talk (pp.65–101). John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.30.03mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.03mon [Google Scholar]
  34. (2018) Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 511, 85–106. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mondada, L., Monteiro, D., & Tekin, B. S.
    (2020) The tactility and visibility of kissing: Intercorporeal configurations of kissing bodies in family photography sessions. InA. Cekaite & L. Mondada (Eds.), Touch in Social Interaction (pp.54–80). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003026631‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003026631-3 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mondada, L., & Tekin, B. S.
    (2020) Arranging bodies for photographs: Professional touch in the photography studio. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 3(1). 10.7146/si.v3i1.120254
    https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v3i1.120254 [Google Scholar]
  37. Mondada, L., Tekin, B. S., & Monteiro, D.
    (2024) Instructing hugs for the photograph: The local achievement of haptic compositions and their public visibility. Discourse Processes, 611, 117–141. 10.1080/0163853X.2023.2293445
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2023.2293445 [Google Scholar]
  38. Nishizaka, A.
    (2020) Appearance and action: The sequential organization of instructions in Japanese calligraphy lessons. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 531, 295–323. 10.1080/08351813.2020.1739428
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1739428 [Google Scholar]
  39. Okada, M.
    (2018) Imperative actions in boxing sparring sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 511, 67–84. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798 [Google Scholar]
  40. Oshima, S., & Streeck, J.
    (2015) Coordinating talk and practical action: The case of hair salon service assessments. Pragmatics and Society, 61, 538–564. 10.1075/ps.6.4.04osh
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.6.4.04osh [Google Scholar]
  41. Sacks, H.
    (1992) Lectures on Conversation. Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Schmidt, A., & Deppermann, A.
    (2023) Showing and telling — How directors combine embodied demonstrations and verbal descriptions to instruct in theater rehearsals. Frontiers in Communication, 71, 955583. 10.3389/fcomm.2022.955583
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.955583 [Google Scholar]
  43. Sczcepek Reed, B.
    (2023) ‘Go on keep going’: The instruction of sustained embodied activities. Discourse Studies, 251, 692–717. 10.1177/14614456231153578
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231153578 [Google Scholar]
  44. Simone, M., & Galatolo, R.
    (2021) Climbing as a pair: Instructions and instructed body movements in indoor climbing with visually impaired athletes. Journal of Pragmatics, 1551, 286–302. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.008 [Google Scholar]
  45. Steensig, J.
    (2001) Notes on turn construction methods in Danish and Turkish conversation. InM. Selting & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics (pp.259–286). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.10.13ste
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10.13ste [Google Scholar]
  46. Svensson, H.
    (2024) Requesting another to taste: Passing food and the distribution of agency in the organization of bodily trajectories. Discourse Studies, 61, 822–847. 10.1177/14614456241242945
    https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456241242945 [Google Scholar]
  47. Tekin, B. S.
    (2017) Negotiation of poses in photo-making practices: Shifting asymmetries in distinct participation frameworks. InL. Mondada & S. Keel (Eds.), Participation et asymétries dans l’interaction institutionnelle (pp.285–313). L’Harmattan.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. (2021) Quasi-instructions: Orienting to the projectable trajectories of imminent bodily movements with instruction-like utterances. Journal of Pragmatics, 1861, 341–357. 10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.018
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.018 [Google Scholar]
  49. (2024) Disciplined body: How players design their game movements for the machine. Discourse, Context & Media, 571, 100754. 10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100754
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100754 [Google Scholar]
  50. Toerien, M., & Kitzinger, C.
    (2007) Emotional labour in action: Navigating multiple involvements in the beauty salon. Sociology, 411, 645–662. 10.1177/0038038507078918
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507078918 [Google Scholar]
  51. Webb, H., Heath, C., vom Lehn, D., & Gibson, W.
    (2013) Engendering response: Professional gesture and the assessment of eyesight in optometry consultations. Symbolic Interaction, 361, 137–158. 10.1002/symb.55
    https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.55 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/il.24018.tek
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): agency; body; instructions; intercorporeality; photography; touch
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error