1887
image of Linguistic and other vocal resources of instructing bodies

Abstract

Abstract

This special issue targets the relationship between language and the body, in cases where the local emergence of grammar and lexicon is embedded in trajectories of instruction. The contributions document how the body comes into use in sequences of verbal interaction, as well as how the language system systematically embraces the body. The natural habitat for grammar lies within a multimodal ecology of speakers engaging not only with each others’ mental spheres but also with each others’ bodies.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/il.24020.kee
2025-06-05
2025-06-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/il.24020.kee/il.24020.kee.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/il.24020.kee&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andersson, J., Öhman, M., & Garrison, J.
    (2016) Physical education teaching as a caring act — techniques of bodily touch and the paradox of caring. Sport, Education and Society:, –. 10.1080/13573322.2016.1244765
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2016.1244765 [Google Scholar]
  2. Auer, P.
    (2005) Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar. Text — Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, (), –. 10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2009) On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences, (), –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergnehr, D. & Cekaite, A.
    (2018) Adult-initiated touch and its functions at a Swedish preschool: Controlling, affectionate, assisting and educative haptic conduct. International Journal of Early Years Education, –. 10.1080/09669760.2017.1414690
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2017.1414690 [Google Scholar]
  5. Broth, M., Cromdal, J., & Levin, L.
    (2017) Starting out as a driver: Progression in instructed pedal work. InÅ. Mäkitalo, P. Linell, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Memory practices and learning: Interactional, institutional and sociocultural perspectives (pp.–). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-134150
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cekaite, A.
    (2010) Shepherding the child: Embodied directive sequences in parent–child interactions. Text & Talk, (), –. 10.1515/text.2010.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (2014) What does grammar tell us about action?Pragmatics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M.
    (1996) Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. InE. Couper-Kuhlen & M. Selting (Eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511597862.003
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597862.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2018) Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Stefani, E., & Gazin, A.-D.
    (2014) Instructional sequences in driving lessons: Mobile participants and the temporal and sequential organization of actions. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.020
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.020 [Google Scholar]
  11. Deppermann, A.
    (2013) Multimodal interaction from a conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.014 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2018) Instruction practices in German driving lessons: Differential uses of declaratives and imperatives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1111/ijal.12198
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12198 [Google Scholar]
  13. Deppermann, A., & Günthner, S.
    (Eds.) (2015) Temporality in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.27
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.27 [Google Scholar]
  14. Drew, P., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (Eds.) (2014) Requesting in social interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.26
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.26 [Google Scholar]
  15. Ehmer, O.
    (this issue). Marking action accomplishment with non-lexical vocalizations. Interactional Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2021) Synchronization in demonstrations. Multimodal practices for instructing body knowledge. Linguistics Vanguard, (). 10.1515/lingvan‑2020‑0038
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2020-0038 [Google Scholar]
  17. Ehmer, O., & Brône, G.
    (2021) Instructing embodied knowledge: Multimodal approaches to interactive practices for knowledge constitution. Linguistics Vanguard, (). 10.1515/lingvan‑2021‑0012
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0012 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ekström, A., & Lindwall, O.
    (2014) To follow the materials: The detection, diagnosis and correction of mistakes in craft education. InM. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, & M. Rauniomaa (Eds.), Interacting with objects: Language, materiality, and social activity (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.186.10eks
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.186.10eks [Google Scholar]
  19. Garfinkel, H.
    (2002) Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkeim’s aphorism (A. W. Rawls, Ed.). Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Goodwin, C.
    (1979) The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. InG. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp.–). Irvington: Irvington Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. (2004) A Competent Speaker Who Can’t Speak: The Social Life of Aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, (), –. 10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.151
    https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.151 [Google Scholar]
  22. (2013) The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  23. (2018) Co-operative action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. H.
    (1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPrA Papers in Pragmatics, (), –.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. (1992) Context, activity and participation. InA. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1075/pbns.22.07goo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.22.07goo [Google Scholar]
  26. Goodwin, M. H., & Cekaite, A.
    (2018) Embodied Family Choreography: Practices of Control, Care, and Mundane Creativity. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315207773
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315207773 [Google Scholar]
  27. Goodwin, M. H., Goodwin, C., & Yaeger-Dror, M.
    (2002) Multi-modality in girls’ game disputes. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00078‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00078-4 [Google Scholar]
  28. Günthner, S., Imo, W., & Bücker, J.
    (Eds.) (2014) Grammar and Dialogism: Sequential, Syntactic, and Prosodic Patterns between Emergence and Sedimentation. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. 10.1515/9783110358612
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110358612 [Google Scholar]
  29. Heritage, J.
    (1984) A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. InJ. M. Atkinson (Ed.), Structures of Social Action (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868.020 [Google Scholar]
  30. Heritage, J., & Sorjonen, M.-L.
    (2018) Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial particles across languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.31
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.31 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C., Benford, S., & Greenhalgh, C.
    (2000) Object-focused interaction in collaborative virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, (), –. 10.1145/365058.365088
    https://doi.org/10.1145/365058.365088 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hofstetter, E., & Keevallik, L.
    (2023) Prosody is used for real-time exercising of other bodies. Language & Communication, , –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hofstetter, E., Keevallik, L., & Löfgren, A.
    (2021) Suspending Syntax: Bodily Strain and Progressivity in Talk. Frontiers in Communication, . 10.3389/fcomm.2021.663307
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.663307 [Google Scholar]
  34. Horlacher, A-S.
    (2022) Negative requests within hair salons: Grammar and embodiment in action formation. Frontiers in Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689563
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689563 [Google Scholar]
  35. Iwasaki, S.
    (2011) The multimodal mechanics of collaborative unit construction in Japanese conversation. InJ. Streeck, C. Goodwin, & C. LeBaron (Eds.), Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kärkkäinen, E., & Keisanen, T.
    (2012) Linguistic and embodied formats for making (concrete) offers. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/1461445612454069
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612454069 [Google Scholar]
  37. Karvonen, U., Tainio, L., & Heinonen, P.
    (2023) Kosketustutkimus koulun kontekstissa. [The Study of Touch in School Context.] InL. Tainio, U. Karvonen, & P. Heinonen (Eds.), Koskettava koulu: Koskettaminen vuorovaikutuksessa ja pedagogisessa toiminnassa (pp.–). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Keevallik, L.
    (2010a) Bodily Quoting in Dance Correction. Research on Language & Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2010.518065
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2010.518065 [Google Scholar]
  39. (2010b) Marking Boundaries Between Activities: The Particle nii in Estonian. Research on Language & Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351811003737697
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351811003737697 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2013) The Interdependence of Bodily Demonstrations and Clausal Syntax. Research on Language & Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2013.753710
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753710 [Google Scholar]
  41. (2018) What Does Embodied Interaction Tell Us About Grammar?Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887 [Google Scholar]
  42. (2020) Linguistic structures emerging in the synchronization of a Pilates class. InC. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, & P. Golato (Eds.), Mobilizing others: Grammar and lexi within larger activities (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.33.06kee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.33.06kee [Google Scholar]
  43. Keisanen, T., & Kärkkäinen, E.
    (2014) A multimodal analysis of compliment sequences in everyday English interactions. Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1075/prag.24.3.09kei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.24.3.09kei [Google Scholar]
  44. Kendon, A.
    (2004) Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511807572
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kendrick, K. H., & Drew, P.
    (2016) Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lindström, A., & Mondada, L.
    (2009) Assessments in Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351810903296457
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903296457 [Google Scholar]
  47. Lindström, J., Lindholm, C., Grahn, I.-L., & Huhtamäki, M.
    (2020) Consecutive clause combinations in instructing activities: Directives and accounts in the context of physical training. InY. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindström, & L. Keevallik (Eds.), Emergent syntax for conversation: Clausal patterns and the organization of action (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.32.09lin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.32.09lin [Google Scholar]
  48. Linell, P.
    (2009) Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. (2013) Distributed language theory, with or without dialogue. Language Sciences, , –. 10.1016/j.langsci.2013.04.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.04.001 [Google Scholar]
  50. Mondada, L.
    (2013) Coordinating mobile action in real time: The timely organisation of directives in video games. InP. Haddington, L. Mondada, & M. Nevile (Eds.), Interaction and mobility: Language and the body in motion (pp.–). Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110291278.300
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110291278.300 [Google Scholar]
  51. (2014) The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  52. (2017) Precision timing and timed embeddedness of imperatives in embodied courses of action: Examples from French. InM.-L. Sorjonen, L. Raevaara, & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Imperative Turns at Talk (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027265524-slsi.30.03mon. 10.1075/slsi.30.03mon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.03mon [Google Scholar]
  53. (2018a) Driving instruction at high speed on a race circuit: Issues in action formation and sequence organization. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, (), –. 10.1111/ijal.12202
    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12202 [Google Scholar]
  54. (2018b) The multimodal interactional organization of tasting: Practices of tasting cheese in gourmet shops. Discourse Studies, (), –. 10.1177/1461445618793439
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618793439 [Google Scholar]
  55. (2019) Contemporary issues in conversation analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016 [Google Scholar]
  56. (2021) Language and the Sensing Body: How Sensoriality Permeates Syntax in Interaction. Frontiers in Communication, . https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.664430. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.664430
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.664430 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mushin, I., & Doehler, S. P.
    (2021) Linguistic structures in social interaction: Moving temporality to the forefront of a science of language. Interactional Linguistics, (), –. 10.1075/il.21008.mus
    https://doi.org/10.1075/il.21008.mus [Google Scholar]
  58. Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A.
    (Eds.) (1996) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620874
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874 [Google Scholar]
  59. Okada, M.
    (this issue). Japanese turn-initial particle hai in instruction-compliance sequences in boxing. Interactional Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. (2018) Imperative Actions in Boxing Sparring Sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1375798 [Google Scholar]
  61. (2023) Lexical repetitions during time critical moments in boxing. Language & Communication, , –. 10.1016/j.langcom.2023.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2023.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  62. Pehkonen, S., Kannisto, A., & Frick, M.
    (this issue). Ole hyvä (’please’) + imperative. A multimodal analysis of Finnish police directive turns. Interactional Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Råman, J.
    (2019) Budo demonstrations as shared accomplishments: The modalities of guiding in the joint teaching of physical skills. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.06.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.06.014 [Google Scholar]
  64. Rauniomaa, M., & Keisanen, T.
    (2012) Two multimodal formats for responding to requests. Journal of Pragmatics, (), –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.03.003 [Google Scholar]
  65. Rossi, G.
    (2020) The prosody of other-repetition in Italian: A system of tunes. Language in Society, (), –. 10.1017/S0047404520000627
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000627 [Google Scholar]
  66. Ruusuvuori, J., & Peräkylä, A.
    (2009) Facial and Verbal Expressions in Assessing Stories and Topics. Research on Language & Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351810903296499
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903296499 [Google Scholar]
  67. Schegloff, E. A.
    (1984) On some gestures’ relation to talk. InJ. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp.–). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511665868
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511665868 [Google Scholar]
  68. Selting, M., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (Eds.) (2001) Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/sidag.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sidag.10 [Google Scholar]
  69. Simone, M., & Galatolo, R.
    (2020) Climbing as a pair: Instructions and instructed body movements in indoor climbing with visually impaired athletes. Journal of Pragmatics, , –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.09.008 [Google Scholar]
  70. (2021) Timing and Prosody of Lexical Repetition: How Repeated Instructions Assist Visually Impaired Athletes’ Navigation in Sport Climbing. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2021.1974742
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1974742 [Google Scholar]
  71. Sorjonen, M.-L., Raevaara, L. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
    (2017) Imperative turns at talk: An introduction. InM.-L. Sorjonen, L. Raevaara, & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Imperative Turns at Talk (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.30.01sor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.01sor [Google Scholar]
  72. Steensig, J., Jørgensen, M., Mikkelsen, N., Suomalainen, K., & Sørensen, S. S.
    (2023) Toward a Grammar of Danish Talk-in-Interaction: From Action Formation to Grammatical Description. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1080/08351813.2023.2205304
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2023.2205304 [Google Scholar]
  73. Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J.
    (2005) Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica, (), –. 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1 [Google Scholar]
  74. Stoenica, I. M., & Pekarek Doehler, S.
    (2020) Relative-clause increments and the management of reference: A multimodal analysis of French talk-in-interaction. InY. Maschler, S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Lindström, & L. Keevallik (Eds.), Emergent syntax for conversation: Clausal patterns and the organization of action (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.32.11sto
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.32.11sto [Google Scholar]
  75. Streeck, J.
    (2009) Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/gs.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/gs.2 [Google Scholar]
  76. Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & LeBaron, C.
    (Eds.) (2011) Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Stukenbrock, A.
    (2021) Multimodal Gestalts and Their Change Over Time: Is Routinization Also Grammaticalization?Frontiers in Communication, . https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.662240. 10.3389/fcomm.2021.662240
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.662240 [Google Scholar]
  78. Tekin, B.
    (this issue). Instructions in the photography studio: How photographers treat and organize the bodies of the clients. Interactional Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Weatherall, A. & Doehring, A.
    (this issue). Accomplishing choral and collectively performed multi-modal self-defence actions. Interactional Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Weeks, P.
    (1996) A Rehearsal of a Beethoven Passage: An Analysis of Correction Talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, (), –. 10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_3
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2903_3 [Google Scholar]
  81. Włodarczak, M., Heldner, M., & Edlund, J.
    (2015) Breathing in Conversation: An Unwritten History, –. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-125382
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Yasui, E.
    (this issue). Vocal resource of effort and force in interaction: Japanese yoisho/iyoisho in dance instructions. Interactional Linguistics.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Zinken, J., & Deppermann, A.
    (2017) A cline of visible commitment in the situated design of imperative turns. Evidence from German and Polish. InM.-L. Sorjonen, L. Raevaara, & E. Couper-Kuhlen (Eds.), Imperative Turns at Talk (pp.–). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.30.02zin
    https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.30.02zin [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/il.24020.kee
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/il.24020.kee
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error